Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Study on hot compressive deformation behaviors and corresponding industrial extrusion of as-homogenized Al–7.82Zn–1.96Mg–2.35Cu–0.11Zr alloy

  • Metals
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hot compression tests of an as-homogenized Al–7.82Zn–1.96Mg–2.35Cu–0.11Zr alloy were carried out on a Gleeble-3500 thermo-simulation machine at temperatures varying from 300 to 460 °C and strain rates ranging from 0.001 to 10 s−1. The true stress–strain curves exhibited four cases which represented the competition between work hardening and dynamic softening under different deformation conditions. Arrhenius-type constitutive equation was established to describe flow behaviors and provide the basis for calculating the industrial extrusion parameters. In this study, microstructure evolution of the studied alloy under different deformation temperatures, strain rates, and strains was observed by optical microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and electron backscatter diffraction. Dynamic recovery, continuous dynamic recrystallization, and discontinuous dynamic recrystallization occurred at high deformation temperatures and low strain rates. Based on processing map, the optimal processing domain was in the strain rate within the limits of 0.001–0.1 s−1 and deformation temperature ranges of 400–450 °C. The industrial extrusion process of the studied alloy was carried out on an extruder with capacity of 3500T, and the results of industrial extrusion were in accordance with the conclusions of hot compression tests. After T6 heat treatment, the studied alloy shows ultimate tensile strength of 700 MPa with elongation of 8.9%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marlaud T, Deschamps A, Bley F, Lefebvre W, Baroux B (2010) Evolution of precipitate microstructures during the retrogression and re-ageing heat treatment of an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. Acta Mater 58:4814–4826

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Song RG, Dietzel W, Zhang BJ, Liu WJ, Tseng MK, Atrens A (2004) Stress corrosion cracking and hydrogen embrittlement of an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. Acta Mater 52:4727–4743

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Marlaud T, Deschamps A, Bley F, Lefebvre W, Baroux B (2010) Influence of alloy composition and heat treatment on precipitate composition in Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys. Acta Mater 58:248–260

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Deschamps A, Fribourg G, Bréchet Y, Chemin JL, Hutchinson CR (2012) In situ evaluation of dynamic precipitation during plastic straining of an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. Acta Mater 60:1905–1916

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sha G, Wang YB, Liao XZ, Duan ZC, Ringer SP, Langdon TG (2009) Influence of equal-channel angular pressing on precipitation in an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. Acta Mater 57:3123–3132

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Liao HC, Wu YN, Zhou KX, Yang J (2015) Hot deformation behavior and processing map of Al–Si–Mg alloys containing different amount of silicon based on Gleebe-3500 hot compression simulation. Mater Des 65:1091–1099

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu H, Wen SP, Huang H, Wu XL, Gao KY, Wang W, Nie ZR (2016) Hot deformation behavior and constitutive equation of a new type Al–Zn–Mg–Er–Zr alloy during isothermal compression. Mater Sci Eng A 651:415–424

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Li B, Pan QL, Yin ZM (2014) Characterization of hot deformation behavior of as-homogenized Al–Cu–Li–Sc–Zr alloy using processing maps. Mater Sci Eng A 614:199–206

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Moussa C, Bernacki M, Besnard R, Bozzolo N (2017) Statistical analysis of dislocations and dislocation boundaries from EBSD data. Ultramicroscopy 179:63–72

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Prasad YVRK, Gegel HL, Doraivelu SM, Malas JC, Morgan JT, Lark KA, Barker DR (1984) Modeling of dynamic material behavior in hot deformation: forging of Ti-6242. Metall Mater Trans A 15A:1883–1892

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu WY, Zhao H, Li D, Zhang ZQ, Huang GJ, Liu Q (2014) Hot deformation behavior of AA7085 aluminum alloy during isothermal compression at elevated temperature. Mater Sci Eng A 596:176–182

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Feng D, Zhang XM, Liu SD, Deng YL (2014) Constitutive equation and hot deformation behavior of homogenized Al–7.68Zn–2.12Mg–1.98Cu–0.12Zr alloy during compression at elevated temperature. Mater Sci Eng A 608:63–72

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin YC, Li LT, Fu YX, Jiang YQ (2011) Hot compressive deformation behavior of 7075 Al alloy under elevated temperature. J Mater Sci 47:1306–1318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-5904-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yan J, Pan QL, Li AD, Song WB (2017) Flow behavior of Al–6.2Zn–0.70Mg–0.30Mn–0.17Zr alloy during hot compressive deformation based on Arrhenius and ANN models. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 27:638–647

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jabbari Taleghani MA, Ruiz Navas EM, Salehi M, Torralba JM (2012) Hot deformation behaviour and flow stress prediction of 7075 aluminium alloy powder compacts during compression at elevated temperatures. Mater Sci Eng A 534:624–631

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin YC, Li QF, Xia YC, Li LT (2012) A phenomenological constitutive model for high temperature flow stress prediction of Al–Cu–Mg alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 534:654–662

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Li DF, Zhang DZ, Liu SD, Shan ZJ, Zhang XM, Wang Q, Han SQ (2016) Dynamic recrystallization behavior of 7085 aluminum alloy during hot deformation. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 26:1491–1497

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jiang H, Dong JX, Zhang MC, Yao ZH (2016) A study on the effect of strain rate on the dynamic recrystallization mechanism of alloy 617B. Metall Mater Trans A 47:5071–5087

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu RH, Liu Q, Li JF, Xiang S, Chen YL, Zhang XH (2015) Dynamic restoration mechanism and physically based constitutive model of 2050 Al–Li alloy during hot compression. J Alloys Compd 650:75–85

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhu FJ, Wu HY, Lee S, Lin MC, Chen D (2015) Dynamic behavior of a 6069 Al alloy under hot compression. Mater Sci Eng A 640:385–393

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gourdet S, Montheillet F (2003) A model of continuous dynamic recrystallization. Acta Mater 51:2685–2699

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee BH, Reddy NS, Yeom JT, Lee CS (2007) Flow softening behavior during high temperature deformation of AZ31Mg alloy. J Mater Process Technol 187–188:766–769

    Google Scholar 

  23. Huang K, Logé RE (2016) A review of dynamic recrystallization phenomena in metallic materials. Mater Des 111:548–574

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang QY, Deng ZH, Zhang ZQ, Liu Q, Jia ZH, Huang GJ (2016) Effects of strain rate on flow stress behavior and dynamic recrystallization mechanism of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu aluminum alloy during hot deformation. Mater Sci Eng A 662:204–213

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamagata H, Saito N, Otsuka M (2001) Nucleation of new grains during discontinuous dynamic recrystallization of 99.998 mass% Aluminum at 453 K. Scripta Mater 45:1055–1061

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. A. International (2013) ASTM E112-13, Standard test methods for determining average grain size, West Conshohocken, PA

  27. Ji GL, Li L, Qin FL, Zhu LY, Li Q (2017) Comparative study of phenomenological constitutive equations for an as-rolled M50NiL steel during hot deformation. J Alloys Compd 695:2389–2399

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang J, Zhao GQ, Chen L, Li JL (2016) A comparative study of several constitutive models for powder metallurgy tungsten at elevated temperature. Mater Des 90:91–100

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. He A, Xie GL, Zhang HL, Wang XT (2013) A comparative study on Johnson-Cook, modified Johnson-Cook and Arrhenius-type constitutive models to predict the high temperature flow stress in 20CrMo alloy steel. Mater Des 52:677–685

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen L, Zhao GQ, Yu JQ, Zhang WD (2015) Constitutive analysis of homogenized 7005 aluminum alloy at evaluated temperature for extrusion process. Mater Des 66:129–136

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Jiang FL, Zhang H, Su J, Sun YS (2015) Constitutive characteristics and microstructure evolution of 7150 aluminum alloy during isothermal and non-isothermal multistage hot compression. Mater Sci Eng A 636:459–469

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zener C, Hollomon H (1944) Effect of strain rate upon plastic flow of steel. Appl Phys 15:22–32

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shi CJ, Mao WM, Chen XG (2013) Evolution of activation energy during hot deformation of AA7150 aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 571:83–91

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Luo J, Li MQ, Ma DW (2012) The deformation behavior and processing maps in the isothermal compression of 7A09 aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 532:548–557

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Jiao L, Wang XL, Li H, Zhao YT, Yang YG, Chen JC (2016) High strain rate superplasticity of in situ Al3Zr/6063Al composites. Rare Metal Mater Eng 45:2798–2803

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hu H, Wu XZ, Jia ZH, Wang R, Li WG, Liu Q (2016) The structural stability, mechanical properties and stacking fault energy of Al3Zr precipitates in Al–Cu–Zr alloys: HRTEM observations and first-principles calculations. J Alloys Compd 681:96–108

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lv XZ, Zhang JX (2016) Three-dimensional geometry of “square-like” dislocation network in nickel-base single crystal superalloy. J Alloys Compd 688:449–455

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Pantleon W, Hansen N (2001) Dislocation boundaries—the distribution function of disorientation angles. Acta Mater 49:1479–1493

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Hughes DA, Hansen N, Bammann DJ (2003) Geometrically necessary boundaries, incidental dislocation boundaries and geometrically necessary dislocations. Scripta Mater 48:147–153

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Liu Y, Geng C, Lin QQ, Xiao YF, Xu JR, Kang W (2017) Study on hot deformation behavior and intrinsic workability of 6063 aluminum alloys using 3D processing map. J Alloys Compd 713:212–221

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Wu H, Wen SP, Huang H, Gao KY, Wu XL, Wang W, Nie ZR (2016) Hot deformation behavior and processing map of a new type Al–Zn–Mg–Er–Zr alloy. J Alloys Compd 685:869–880

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Li Y, Liu Z, Lin L, Peng J, Ning A (2010) Deformation behavior of an Al–Cu–Mg–Mn–Zr alloy during hot compression. J Mater Sci 46:3708–3715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-5143-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Bhimavarapu SB, Maheshwari AK, Bhargava D, Narayan SP (2010) Compressive deformation behavior of Al 2024 alloy using 2D and 4D processing maps. J Mater Sci 46:3191–3199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-5203-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Lin YC, Li LT, Xia YC, Jiang YQ (2013) Hot deformation and processing map of a typical Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. J Alloys Compd 550:438–445

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Anitha Lakshmi A, SrinivasaRao Ch, Gangadhar J, Srinivasu C, Singh SK (2017) Review of processing maps and development of qualitative processing maps. Mater Today Proc 4:946–956

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sheppard T (1999) Extrusion of aluminium alloys. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  47. Slooff FA, Zhou J, Duszczyk J, Katgerman L (2011) Prediction of pressure required to extrude a wrought magnesium alloy using optimized strain-dependent constitutive parameters. J Mater Process Technol 211:1241–1246

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Stuwe HP (1998) Examples of strain localisation. Springer, Vienna, pp 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  49. Lange G (1971) Der Wärmehaushalt beim Strangpressen. Z Metallkd 62:571–579

    Google Scholar 

  50. Liu LL, Pan QL, Wang XD, Xiong SW (2018) The effects of aging treatments on mechanical property and corrosion behavior of spray formed 7055 aluminium alloy. J Alloys Compd 735:261–276

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. A. International (2013) ASTM B221M-13, Standard specification for aluminum and aluminum-alloy extruded bars. Rods, Wire, Profiles, and Tubes (Metric), West Conshohocken, PA

  52. Liu B, Lei Q, Xie LQ, Wang MP, Li Z (2016) Microstructure and mechanical properties of high product of strength and elongation Al–Zn–Mg–Cu–Zr alloys fabricated by spray deposition. Mater Des 96:217–223

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Wen K, Fan YQ, Wang GJ, Jin LB, Li XW, Li ZH, Zhang YA, Xiong BQ (2016) Aging behavior and precipitate characterization of a high Zn-containing Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy with various tempers. Mater Des 101:16–23

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Mazzer EM, Afonso CRM, Galano M, Kiminami CS, Bolfarini C (2013) Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy reprocessed by spray-forming and heat treated at peak aged condition. J Alloys Compd 579:169–173

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Teng GB, Liu CY, Ma ZY, Zhou WB, Wei LL, Chen Y, Li J, Mo YF (2018) Effects of minor Sc addition on the microstructure and mechanical properties of 7055 Al alloy during aging. Mater Sci Eng A 713:61–66

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Science and Technology Major Project of Hunan Province (No. 2016GK1004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qinglin Pan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, W., Pan, Q., Sun, Y. et al. Study on hot compressive deformation behaviors and corresponding industrial extrusion of as-homogenized Al–7.82Zn–1.96Mg–2.35Cu–0.11Zr alloy. J Mater Sci 53, 11728–11748 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2388-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2388-z

Keywords

Navigation