Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of mean grain size of interstitial-free steel based on laser ultrasonic

  • Metals
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigated a novel mean grain size characterization method via laser ultrasonic. The IF steel samples with different grain sizes were conducted with different heat treatments, respectively, and each sample was observed by EBSD and tested by laser ultrasonic. The laser ultrasonic signal was decomposed by wavelet packet transform and sorted using correlation analysis. Then the optimal components were selected to reconstruct the new signal and obtain the energy attenuation coefficient. Finally, the novel mean grain size prediction model was established according to the Rayleigh scattering and absorption attenuation. These results show that the maximum prediction error could be reduced to 5.74% by our new method, which is more precise than the traditionally used methods. Our new method improves the mean grain size evaluation to a more precise level. In addition, compared with the conventional mean grain size acquisition methods, the laser ultrasonic method has the advantages of non-contact and high efficiency, and it is a nondestructive testing method which could be used in online testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shankaranarayan H, Varma SK (1995) Strain-rate and grain-size effect on substructures and mechanical properties in OFHC copper during tension. J Mater Sci 30(14):3576–3586. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00351868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bera J, Roy PK (2005) Effect of grain size on electromagnetic properties of Ni 0.7 Zn 0.3 Fe 2 O 4 ferrite. Phys B 363(1–4):128–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yin A, Wang X, Glorieux C et al (2017) Texture in steel plates revealed by laser ultrasonic surface acoustic waves velocity dispersion analysis. Ultrasonics 78:30–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. He F, Anmin Y, Quan Y (2015) Grain size measurement in steel by laser ultrasonics based on time domain energy. Mater Trans 56(6):808–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Martínez VJ, Verdeja JI, Pero-Sanz JA (2001) Interstitial free steel: influence of α-phase hot-rolling and cold-rolling reduction to obtain extra-deep drawing quality. Mater Charact 46(1):45–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kamikawa N, Sakai T, Tsuji N (2007) Effect of redundant shear strain on microstructure and texture evolution during accumulative roll-bonding in ultralow carbon IF steel. Acta Mater 55(17):5873–5888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ryde L (2013) Application of EBSD to analysis of microstructures in commercial steels. Met Sci J 22(11):1297–1306

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mingard KP, Roebuck B, Bennett EG, Gee MG, Nordenstrom H, Sweetman G, Chan P (2009) Comparison of EBSD and conventional methods of grain size measurement of hardmetals. Int J Refract Met H 27(2):213–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Humphreys FJ (2004) Characterisation of fine-scale microstructures by electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). Scr Mater 51(8):771–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Toozandehjani M, Matori KA, Ostovan F, Mustapha F, Zahari NI, Oskoueian A (2015) On the correlation between microstructural evolution and ultrasonic properties: a review. J Mater Sci 50(7):2643–2665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-8855-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar A, Sasi B, Sharma GK, Rao BP, Jayakumar T (2013) Nondestructive Evaluation of Austenitic Stainless Steel Welds. Adv Mater Res 794(1):366–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Song Y, Li X, Wu H, Si J, Han X (2016) Effects of In718 grain size on ultrasonic backscatting signals and its nondestructive evaluation method. Acta Metall Sin 52(3):378–384

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sarpün İH, Kılıçkaya MS, Tuncel S (2005) Mean grain size determination in marbles by ultrasonic velocity techniques. NDT E Int 38(1):21–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hutchinson B, Moss B, Smith A, Astill A, Scruby C, Engberg G, Björklund J (2002) Online characterisation of steel structures in hot strip mill using laser ultrasonic measurements. Ironmak Steelmak 29(1):77–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gao W, Glorieux C, Thoen J (2003) Laser ultrasonic study of Lamb waves: determination of the thickness and velocities of a thin plate. Int J Eng Sci 41(2):219–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zeng W, Wang H, Tian G, Wang W (2016) Detection of surface defects for longitudinal acoustic waves by a laser ultrasonic imaging technique. Optik 127(1):415–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhan Y, Liu C, Kong X, Lin Z (2017) Experiment and numerical simulation for laser ultrasonic measurement of residual stress. Ultrasonics 73:271–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dong F, Wang X, Yang Q, Yin A, Xu X (2017) Directional dependence of aluminum grain size measurement by laser-ultrasonic technique. Mater Charact. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2017.04.027

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yin A, Yang Q, He F (2014) Determination of grain size in deep drawing steel sheet by laser ultrasonics. Mater Trans 55(7):994–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Maalekian M, Radis R, Militzer M, Moreau A, Poole WJ (2012) In situ measurement and modelling of austenite grain growth in a Ti/Nb microalloyed steel. Acta Mater 60(3):1015–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li P, Cheng X, Li A, Tang Z (2013) Ultrasonic nondestructive characterization of average grain size in 304 stainless steel solution treatment products. J Mater Eng 3(6):77–81

    Google Scholar 

  22. Özkan V, Sarpün İH (2012) Examining with the sintered temperature of mean grain size of B4C–Al–Ni composites by ultrasonic techniques. Acta Phys Pol A 121(1):184–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Laux D, Cros B, Despaux G, Baron D (2002) Ultrasonic study of UO2: effects of porosity and grain size on ultrasonic attenuation and velocities. J Nucl Mater 300(2–3):192–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li M, Zhou T, Song Y (2016) Material grain size characterization method based on energy attenuation coefficient spectrum and support vector regression. Ultrasonics 69:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sharma GK, Kumar A, Rao CB, Jayakumar T, Raj B (2013) Short time Fourier transform analysis for understanding frequency dependent attenuation in austenitic stainless steel. NDT E Int 53(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hutchins DA, Dewhurst RJ, Palmer SB (1987) Directivity patterns of laser-generated ultrasound in aluminum. Acoust Soc Am J 70(5):1362–1369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang Y, Liu B, Ji X, Huang D (2017) Classification of EEG signals based on autoregressive model and wavelet packet decomposition. Neural Process Lett 45(2):365–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Benesty J, Chen J, Huang Y (2008) On the importance of the Pearson correlation coefficient in noise reduction. IEEE Trans Audio Speech 16(4):757–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Botvina LR, Fradkin LJ, Bridge B (2000) A new method for assessing the mean grain size of polycrystalline materials using ultrasonic NDE. J Mater Sci 35(18):4673–4683. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004890604013

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Beijing Natural Science Foundation (3182026), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51604024), the Tribology Science Fund of State Key Laboratory of Tribology (Grant No. SKLTKF16B11), the Open Research Project of the State Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology (Grant No. ICT170344) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. FRF-TP-17-002A2).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaochen Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Yang, Q. et al. Characterization of mean grain size of interstitial-free steel based on laser ultrasonic. J Mater Sci 53, 8510–8522 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2038-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2038-5

Keywords

Navigation