Abstract
A CuSiC MMC heatspreader will offer high thermal conductivity between 250 and 325 W/mK and corresponding adjustable thermal expansion coefficient between 8.0 and 12.5 ppm/°C. The primary challenge of CuSiC manufacture was to prevent reaction between copper and silicon carbide during high temperature densification, which dramatically degraded the thermal conductivity. In this study, the key issue addressed was the Si attack of Cu at the temperatures necessary for CuSiC fabrication (850 to 1200°C). Decomposition of SiC in contact with copper will dissolve Si in Cu causing a dramatic decrease of Cu thermal conductivity. This diffusion of Si into Cu can be prevented by the application of reliable barrier layers to diminish mass transport through the diffusion path and thereby minimizing the chemical interaction. A reliable barrier coating was identified and used to fabricate the CuSiC composites. The CuSiC composites were then characterized by SEM, TEM, XRD and XPS. Chemical analysis and thermal conductivity by laser flash diffusivity measurement illustrated the effectiveness of the barriers. A CuSiC composite having thermal conductivity of 322.9 W/m-K was successfully fabricated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
G. J. SUNDBERG et al., Proceedings of PCIM 2001 Power Electronics Conference, Rosemont September (2001) p. 172.
N. J. GERNERT et al., Thermacore International, https://doi.org/www.thermacore.com/pdfs/kilowatt.pdf, p. 1.
C. RADO, B. DREVET and N. EUSTATHOPOULOS, Acta Materialia 48 (2000) 4483.
E. KOLAWA, J. S. CHEN, J. S. REID, P. J. POKELA and M. A. NICOLET, J. Appl. Phys. 70 (1991) 1369.
C. RADO, S. KALOGEROPOULOU and N. EUSTATHOPOULOS, Scripta. Mater. 42 (2000) 203.
D. TYLER and W. BLACK, https://doi.org/www.asminternational.org/hbo/do/highlight/content/V02/D01/A09
J. J. LEWANDOWSKI, C. LIU and W. H. HUNT, Mater. Sci. Eng. A107 (1989) 241.
L. C. STONE and P. TSAKIROPOULOS, Mater. Sci. Technol. 11 (1995) 213.
W. A. SPITZIG, J. F. KELLY and O. RICHMOND, Metallography 18 (1985) 235.
H. SCHWARZ and H. E. EXNER, J. Microsc. 129 (1983) 155.
K. H. HANISCH and D. STOYAN, ibid. 122 (1981) 131.
A. OLSZOWKA-MYALSKA, J. SZALA and J. CWAJNA, Mater. Characterization 46 (2001) 189.
P. A. KARNEZIS, G. DURRANT and B. CANTOR, ibid. 40 (1998) 97.
R. T. DEHOFF and F. N. RHINES, “Quantitative Microscopy” (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968).
E. E. UNDERWOOD, “Quantitative Stereology” (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1970).
I. SAXL, Distance methods in metallurgy. Proc IV Int Conf STERMAT'94, WislCa (October 3–6). Fotobit Design, Krakow, Poland, p. 65.
L. M. KARLSSON, Proc IV Int. Conf STERMAT'94, WislCa (October 3–6). Fotobit Design, Krakow, Poland, p. 249.
J. CWAJNA, A. OLSZOWKA-MYALSKA, J. SZALA, Acta Stereol. 11 (1992) 431.
A. ROGERS, “Statistical Analysis of Spatial Dispersions” (The Quadrat Method. Pion, London, 1974).
K. J. KURZYDLOWSKI and B. RALPH, “The Quantitative Description of the Micro Structure of Materials” (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1995).
P. GREIG-SMITH, Ann. Bot. 16 (1952) 293.
J. T. CURTIS and R. P. MCLNTOSH, Ecology 31 (1950) 434.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sundberg, G., Paul, P., Sung, C. et al. Fabrication of CuSiC metal matrix composites. J Mater Sci 41, 485–504 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-2622-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-2622-3