Skip to main content
Log in

Image Denoising by Statistical Area Thresholding

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Area openings and closings are morphological filters which efficiently suppress impulse noise from an image, by removing small connected components of level sets. The problem of an objective choice of threshold for the area remains open. Here, a mathematical model for random images will be considered. Under this model, a Poisson approximation for the probability of appearance of any local pattern can be computed. In particular, the probability of observing a component with size larger than k in pure impulse noise has an explicit form. This permits the definition of a statistical test on the significance of connected components, thus providing an explicit formula for the area threshold of the denoising filter, as a function of the impulse noise probability parameter. Finally, using threshold decomposition, a denoising algorithm for grey level images is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. Bollobás,Random Graphs, Academic Press: London, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A.R. Conway and A.J. Guttmann, “On two-dimensional percolation”J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., Vol. 28, pp. 891–904, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Coupier, A. Desolneux, and B. Ycart, A zero-one law for first-order logic on random images, inProceedings Math-Info’04, Drmota et al. (Ed.), to appear 2004.

  4. A. Desolneux, L. Moisan, and J.-M. Morel, “Meaningful alignments”Int. J. Computer Vision, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 7–23, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Desolneux, L. Moisan, and J.-M. Morel, “Edge detection by Helmholtz principle”Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 271–284, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D.L. Donoho and I.M. Johnstone, “Adapting to unknown smoothness via wavelet shrinkage”Journal of Amer. Stat. Assoc., Vol. 90, pp. 1200–1224, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H.J.A.M. Heijmans, “Self-dual morphological operators and filters”Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 15–36, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H.J.A.M. Heijmans, “Connected morphological operators for binary images”Computer Vision and Image Understanding, Vol. 73, No. 1, pp. 99–120, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. I. Jensen and A.J. Guttmann, “Statistics of lattice animals (polyominoes) and polygons”J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., Vol. 33, pp. L257–L263, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D.A. Klarner, “Cell growth problems”Canad. J. Math., Vol. 19, pp. 851–863, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D.A. Klarner and R.L. Rivest, “A procedure for improving the upper bound for the number ofn-ominoes”Canad. J. Math., Vol. 25, pp. 585–602, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Masnou and J.-M. Morel, “Image restoration involving connectedness” inProc. DIP’97, Vienna, Austria, Vol. 3346. SPIE, 1998.

  13. P. Monasse, “Contrast invariant representation of digital images and application to registration” PhD thesis, University Paris 9, 2000.

  14. P. Monasse and F. Guichard, “Fast computation of a contrast invariant image representation”IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 860–872, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. Sapoval and M. Rosso, “Gradient percolation and fractal frontiers in image processing”Fractals, Vol. 3, pp. 23–31, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Serra,Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology, Part. I, Academic Press: New York, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Serra,Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology, Part. II: Theoretical Advances, Academic Press: London, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Serra and L. Vincent, “An overview of morphological filtering”Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 47–108, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Spencer, “Nine lectures on random graphs” inEcole d’été de probabilité de Saint-Flour XXI, P. Bernard (Ed.), Vol. 1541 ofL.N. in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991, pp. 293–343.

    Google Scholar 

  20. L. Vincent, “Morphological area opening and closing for grayscale images” inProc. NATO Shape in Picture Workshop, Driebergen, Springer-Verlag: The Netherlands, 1992, pp. 197–208.

    Google Scholar 

  21. L. Vincent, “Grayscale area openings and closings: Their applications and efficient implementation” inProc. EURASIP Workshop on Mathematical Morphology and its Applications to Signal Processing, Barcelona, Spain, 1993, pp. 22–27.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Desolneux.

Additional information

David Coupier is 25 years old, he is PhD student at the MAP5. He has studied mathematics at the University of Orsay—Paris XI. He is working on zero-one laws and Poisson approximations for random images. Web page: http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~coupier/

Agnés Desolneux is 30 years old, she is CNRS researcher at the MAP5. She defended her PhD thesis in applied mathematics in 2000 under the direction of Jean-Michel Morel at the ENS Cachan. She is working on statistical methods in image analysis. Web page: http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~desolneux/

Bernard Ycart is 45 years old, he is Professor of mathematics at the University Paris 5 and director of the MAP5 (FRE CNRS 2428). He is specialist of applied probabilities (Markov processes, stochastic algorithms). Web page: http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~ycart/

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coupier, D., Desolneux, A. & Ycart, B. Image Denoising by Statistical Area Thresholding. J Math Imaging Vis 22, 183–197 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10851-005-4889-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10851-005-4889-z

Keywords

Navigation