Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of land use patterns on the diversity and conservation status of butterflies in Kisii highlands, Kenya

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Habitat degradation poses a great threat to biodiversity conservation. Abundance and diversity of butterflies is an indicator of good environmental health. Understanding how different butterfly species respond to habitat degradation is a necessary step towards the development of effective measures to enhance environmental protection. This study investigated the impact of land use patterns on the diversity, abundance, and conservation status of butterflies in the Kisii highlands; a densely-populated region in Kenya that has received little attention in ecological studies. Sampling was done through a line transect of 300 m. A total of 2799 individual butterflies comprising 67 species were recorded across seven land cover types; secondary forest, grasslands, riverine, human settlement, mixed farmlands, monoculture, and mining areas. The secondary forest, riverine and mixed farmlands recorded more butterflies (37.0, 26.0, and 15.5 %, respectively), followed by grasslands (12.5 %), while monoculture, human settlements, and mines had the least number of butterflies (3.0 % each). Moreover, the secondary forest, riverine and mixed farmland land cover types were the most species rich. Nymphalidae were the most abundant (38 species) whereas, Papilionidae the least (3 species) in the region. Junonia sophia was the dominant species. Butterflies were most diverse in the secondary forest (Shannon–Weaver diversity index, H′ = 2.89), while the human settlement had the least (H′ = 1.25). One-way ANOVA analysis indicated a higher species similarity between secondary forest, mixed farming and riverine land cover types compared to a low species similarity between secondary forest and mining, grassland, monoculture and human settlement. Butterfly abundance and distribution was different between the dry and wet season among the land cover types. Therefore, land use patterns had effects on butterfly abundance and diversity and their conservation is threatened if proper management practices are not put in place. Planning of land use activities should thus encourage agro-forests/secondary forests interspaced with other land use activities to enhance environmental health and improve on biodiversity conservation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akite P (2008) Effects of anthropogenic disturbances on the diversity and composition of the butterfly fauna of sites in the Sango Bay and Iriiri areas, Uganda: implications for conservation. Afr J Ecol 46:3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borghesio L (2008) Effects of human subsistence activities on forest birds in Northern Kenya. Conserv Biol 22(2):384–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buschini MLT, Woiski TD (2008) Alpha-beta diversity in trap-nesting wasps (Hymenoptera: aculeata) in Southern Brazil. Acta Zool 89(4):351–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldas A, Robbins RK (2003) Modified pollard transects for assessing tropical butterfly abundance and diversity. Biol Conserv 110:211–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chazdon RL, Peres CA, Dent D, Sheil D, Lugo AE, Lamb D, Stork NE, Miller S (2009) The potential for species conservation in tropical secondary forests. Conserv Biol. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01338.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke KR, Warwick RM (2001) A further biodiversity index applicable to species lists: variation in taxonomic distinctness. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 216:265–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (2005) Eastern arc mountains and coastal forests of Tanzania and Kenya. ICIPE, Kenya

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Abrera B (2001) Butterflies of the Afrotropical region. Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale VH, Beyler SC (2001) Challenges in the development and use of ecological indicators. Ecol Indic 1:3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVries PJ (1987) Ecological aspects of ant association and host plant use in a riodinid butterfly. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, USA

  • Dunn RR (2005) Modern insect extinctions, the neglect majority. Conserv Biol 19:1030–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzherbert E, Gardner T, Davenport TRB, Caro T (2006) Butterfly species richness and abundance in the Katavi ecosystem of Western Tanzania. Afr J Ecol 44(3):353–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox R (2013) The decline of moths in Great Britain: a review of possible causes. Insect Conserv Diver 6(1):5–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzén M, Nilsson SG, Johansson V, Ranius T (2013) Population fluctuations and synchrony of grassland butterflies in relation to species traits. PLoS One 8(10):e78233. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078233

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hecq J (2002) Euriphene. In: Bauer E, Frankenbach T (eds) Butterflies of the world, Part 15, Nymphalidae VI. Goeke and Evers, Keltern, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Hole DG, Huntley B, Arinaitwe J, Butchart SHM, Collingham YC, Fishpool LDC, Pain DJ, Willis SG (2011) Toward a management framework for networks of protected areas in the face of climate change. Conserv Biol 25(2):305–315

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes JB, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR (2002) Conservation of tropical forest birds in countryside habitats. J Ecol 5:121–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (2009) Population and Housing census 2009. Nairobi, Kenya

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisii County Government (2013) The first county integrated development plan 2013–2017. Kisii, Kenya

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremen C (1992) Assessing the indicator properties of species assemblages for natural areas monitoring. Ecol Applic 2(2):203–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen TB (1996) The Butterflies of Kenya and their natural history. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen TB (2005) Butterflies of West Africa. Apollo books, Svendborg, Denmark 1–595, 1–270

  • Laurance WF, Useche DC, Rendeiro J et al (2012) Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas. Nature 489:290–294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee TM, Jetz W (2008) Future battlegrounds for conservation under global change. Proc R Soc 275:1261–1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liley D, Brereton T, Roy D (2004) The current level of butterfly monitoring in UK woodlands. Report to the forestry commission, Report No. SO4–35

  • Milder JC, Scherr SJ, Bracer C (2010) Trends and future potential of payment for ecosystem services to alleviate rural poverty in developing countries. Ecol Soc 15(2):4

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystem and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. Island press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Munyuli MBT (2012) Butterfly diversity from Farmlands of Central Uganda. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012:481509

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy DD, Freas KE, Weiss SB (1990) An environment-metapopulation approach to population viability analysis for a threatened invertebrate. Conserv Biol 4:41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Namu NF (2005) Effects of forest disturbances on butterfly diversity in Kakamega Forest National Reserve (K. F.H.R.) Western, Kenya. M. Sc. Thesis, University of Nairobi, Kenya

  • Namu FN, Githaiga JM, Kioko EN, Ndegwa PN, Hauser CL (2008) Butterfly species, composition, and abundance in an old, middle-aged, and young secondary forest. In: Kuhne L (ed) Butterflies and moth diversity of Kakamega Forest (Kenya). Brandenburgische Universitätsdruckerei und Verlagsgesellschaft, Germany, pp 47–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngongolo K, Mtoko S (2013) Using butterflies to measure biodiversity health in Wazo hill restored quarry. Entomol Zool Stud 1(4):81–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyamweya NH, Gichuki NN (2010) Effects of plant structure on butterfly diversity in Mt. Marsabit forest—Northern Kenya. Afric J Ecol 48:304–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer AR (1994) Fluctuating asymmetry analyses: a primer. In: Markow TA (ed) Developmental instability: its origins and evolutionary implications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 335–364

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL, Raven P (2000) Biodiversity: extinction by numbers. Nature 403:843–845

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard E, Yates TG (1993) Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation, vol 1. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Raina SK, Kioko E, Zethner O, Wren S (2011) Forest habitat conservation in Africa using commercially important insects. Annu Rev Entomol 56:465–485

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh T, Hussain JK, Selvanayagam M, Satpathy KK, Prasad MVR (2010) Patterns of diversity, abundance and habitat associations of butterfly communities in heterogeneous landscapes of the department of atomic energy (DAE) campus at Kalpakkam South India. Int J Biodiver Conserv 2(4):75–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez JP, Rodríguez-Clark KM, Baille JEM et al (2010) Establishing IUCN red list criteria for threatened ecosystems. Conserv Biol 25(1):21–29

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sala OE, Chapin FS III, Armesto JJ et al (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scherr SJ, McNeely JA (2008) Biodiversity conservation and agricultural sustainability: towards a new paradigm of ‘ecoagriculture’ landscapes. Phil Trans R Soc B 363:477–494

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CF, Weaver W (1949) The Mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer K, Joras J, Havelka J (1997) Effects of Small-scale disturbance on butterfly communities of an Indochinese montane rainforest. Biol Conserv 80:9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiple AD, Khurad AM, Dennis RLH (2007) Butterfly diversity in relation to a human-impact gradient on an Indian university campus. Nota Lepidopteral 30(1):179–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltert M, Mardiastuti A, Muhlenberg M (2004) Effects of land use on bird species richness in Sulawesi, Indonesia. Conserv Biol 18:1339–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltert M, Bobo KS, Sainge MN, Fermon H, Muhlenberg M (2005) From forest to farmland: habitat effects on Afrotropical forest bird diversity. Ecol Appl 15:1351–1366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Western D, Russell S, Cuthill I (2009) The status of wildlife in protected areas compared to non-protected areas of Kenya. PLoS One 4(7):e6140

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Esther Kioko and Mr. Mugambi of the National Museums of Kenya for their assistance in the identification of butterflies and for their helpful discussions and comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, P.O. Box 62000, Nairobi, 00200, Kenya

    Rose Nyakemiso Sagwe & Shadrack Muvui Muya

  2. Adminstration, Multimedia University, P.O. Box 30305, Nairobi, Kenya

    Rosebella Maranga

Authors
  1. Rose Nyakemiso Sagwe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shadrack Muvui Muya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rosebella Maranga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rose Nyakemiso Sagwe.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 29 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sagwe, R.N., Muya, S.M. & Maranga, R. Effects of land use patterns on the diversity and conservation status of butterflies in Kisii highlands, Kenya. J Insect Conserv 19, 1119–1127 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-015-9826-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-015-9826-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation