Skip to main content
Log in

Coastal dunes as important strongholds for the survival of the rare Niobe fritillary (Argynnis niobe)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied the oviposition and larval habitat preferences of the Niobe fritillary (Argynnis niobe) in the dunes of the east Frisian Island Langeoog (German North Sea). By ascertaining habitat quality we are able to assess the minimum habitat size for populations of A. niobe in dune islands. The preferred oviposition and larval habitats were best characterised by a combination of (1) host-plant abundance, (2) host-plant quality and (3) vegetation structure. The oviposition and larval habitats of A. niobe were characterised by low-growing vegetation with bare ground and a warm microclimate. In contrast to the also common V. tricolor ssp. curtisii, the leaves of the host plant V. canina showed a lower C/N ratio, suggesting that differences in plant quality may account for host-plant use. A. niobe seems to depend on very large areas of potential larval habitat, thus explaining its ongoing decline in the increasingly fragmented Central European landscape. Our data indicate that grass encroachment is a major threat for A. niobe in coastal dunes due to its negative impact on microclimate and violet germination. Mosaic top-soil removal and low-intensity grazing should be suitable tools to promote rejuvenation of V. canina.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anthes N, Fartmann T, Hermann G (2003a) Wie lässt sich der Rückgang des Goldenen Scheckenfalters (Euphydryas aurinia) in Mitteleuropa stoppen? Erkenntnisse aus populationsökologischen Studien in voralpinen Niedermoorgebieten und der Arealentwicklung in Deutschland. Naturschutz Landschaftspl 35:279–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthes N, Fartmann T, Hermann G, Kaule G (2003b) Combining larval habitat quality and metapopulation structure—the key for successful management of prealpine Euphydryas aurinia colonies. J Insect Conserv 7:175–185. doi:10.1023/A:1027330422958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthes N, Fartmann T, Hermann G (2008) The Duke of Burgundy butterfly and its dukedom: larval niche variation in Hamearis lucina across Central Europe. J Insect Conserv 12:3–14. doi:10.1007/s10841-007-9084-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquazoo-Löbbecke Museum (2007) Landessammlung Großschmetterlinge. Available via DIALOG. http://www.duesseldorf.de/cgi-bin/aquazoo/insekten.pl?insekt_typ=1. Accessed 26 Oct 2008

  • Bayerisches Landesamt für Umwelt (ed) (2007) Artenschutzkartierung Bayern. Argynnis niobe (Linnaeus, 1758). Datenbankauszug. Received 03 April 2007

  • Beattie AJ, Lyons N (1975) Seed dispersal in Viola (Violaceae): adaptations and strategies. Am J Bot 62:714–722. doi:10.2307/2442060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beneš J, Kepka P, Konvička M (2002) Limestone quarries as refuges for European xerophilous butterflies. Conserv Biol 17:1058–1069. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02092.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernays EA, Chapman RF (1994) Host-plant selection by phytophagous insects. Chapman & Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bink FA (1986) Acid stress in Rumex hydrolapathum (Polygonaceae) and its influence on the phytophage Lycaena dispar (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Oecologia 70:447–451. doi:10.1007/BF00379510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bink FA (1992) Ecologische Atlas van de Dagvlinders van Noordwest-Europa. Schyt, Haarlem

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos FG, Bosveld MA, Groenendijk DG, van Swaay CAM, Wynhoff I (2006) De dagvlinders van Nederland. Verspreiding en bescherming. Nederlandse Fauna 7. KNNV Uitgeverij, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourn NAD, Thomas JA (1993) The ecology and conservation of the brown argus butterfly Aricia agestis in Britain. Biol Conserv 63:67–74. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(93)90075-C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockmann E (1989) Schutzprogramm für Tagfalter in Hessen (Papilionoidea und Hesperioidea). Stiftung Hessischer Naturschutz, Reiskirchen

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulman CR, Wilson RJ, Holt AR, Gálvez Bravo L, Early RI, Warren MS, Thomas CD (2007) Minimum viable metapopulation size, extinction debt, and the conservation of a declining species. Ecol Appl 17:1460–1473. doi:10.1890/06-1032.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cain ML, Eccleston J, Kareiva PM (1985) The influence of food plant dispersion on caterpillar searching success. Ecol Entomol 10:1–7. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.1985.tb00529.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, van Dyck H (2006) Habitats and resources: the need for a resource-based definition to conserve butterflies. Biodivers Conserv 15:1943–1966. doi:10.1007/s10531-005-4314-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DWD (2007) Mittelwerte der Periode 1961–1990. Available via DIALOG. http://www.dwd.de/bvbw/appmanager/bvbw/dwdwwwDesktop?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=_dwdwww_menu2_leistungen_a-z_freiemetinfos&T115202758871200642573928gsbDocumentPath=Navigation%2FOeffentlichkeit%2FKlima__Umwelt%2FKlimadatenzentren%2FNKDZ%2Fkldaten__akt%2Fausgabe__mittelwerte__node.html__nnn%3Dtrue. Accessed 26 Oct 2008

  • Ebert G, Rennwald E (1991) Die Schmetterlinge Baden-Württembergs. Band 1, Tagfalter I. Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichel S, Fartmann T (2008) Management of calcareous grasslands for Nickerl’s fritillary (Melitaea aurelia) has to consider habitat requirements of the immature stages, isolation and patch area. J Insect Conserv 12:677–688. doi:10.1007/s10841-007-9110-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H, Weber HE, Düll R, Wirth V, Werner W (2001) Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. 3. Aufl. Scr Geobot 18:1–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Fartmann T (2004) Die Schmetterlingsgemeinschaften der Halbtrockenrasen-Komplexe des Diemeltales. Abh Westf Mus Naturkde 66:1–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Fartmann T (2006a) Oviposition preferences, adjacency of old woodland and isolation explain the distribution of the Duke of Burgundy butterfly (Hamearis lucina) in calcareous grasslands in central Germany. Ann Zool Fenn 43:335–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Fartmann T (2006b) Welche Rolle spielen Störungen für Tagfalter und Widderchen? In: Fartmann T, Hermann G (eds) Larvalökologie von Tagfaltern und Widderchen in Mitteleuropa. Abh Westf Mus Naturkde 68 (3/4):259–270

  • Fartmann T, Hermann G (2006) Larvalökologie von Tagfaltern und Widderchen in Mitteleuropa von den Anfängen bis heute. In: Fartmann T, Hermann G (eds) Larvalökologie von Tagfaltern und Widderchen in Mitteleuropa, vol 68 (3/4). Abh Westf Mus Naturkde, Münster, pp 11–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer K, Fiedler K (2000) Response of the copper butterfly Lycaena tityrus to increased leaf nitrogen in natural food plants: evidence against the nitrogen limitation hypothesis. Oecologia 124:235–241. doi:10.1007/s004420000365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Föhst P, Broszkus W (1992) Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Schmetterlingsfauna (Insecta: Lepidoptera) des Hunsrück-Nahe-Gebiets (BRD, Rheinland-Pfalz. Fauna Flora Rheinland-Pfalz Beiheft 3:5–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Fric Z, Konvička M (2002) Perleťovec maceškový. Argynnis niobe (Linnaeus, 1758). In: Beneš J, Konvička M, Dvořak J, Fric Z, Havelda Z, Pavlíčko A, Vrabec V, Weidenhoffer Z (eds) Motýli České republiky: Rozšiření a ochrana I. Butterflies of the Czech Republic: Distribution and conservation I. SOM, Prag, pp 409–411

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Barros E, Fartmann T (2009) Oviposition sites. In: Settele J, Shreeve TG, M. Konvička, Van Dyck H (eds) Ecology of butterflies in Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 105–118 (in press)

  • Haeupler H, Schönfelder P (1989) Atlas der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafner S (2005) Neue Beobachtungen zum Vorkommen von Fabriciana niobe im Schwarzwald und auf der Schwäbischen Alb. In: Ebert G (ed) Die Schmetterlinge Baden-Württembergs. Band 10. Ergänzungsband. Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, pp 46–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordano D, Gomariz G (1994) Variation in phenology and nutritional quality between host plants and its effect on larval performance in a specialist butterfly, Zerynthia rumina. Entomol Exp Appl 71:271–277. doi:10.1007/BF02426411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konvička M, Hula V, Fric Z (2003) Habitat of pre-hibernating larvae of the endangered butterfly Euphydryas aurinia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): What can be learned from vegetation composition and architecture? Eur J Entomol 100:313–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooijman AM, Dopheide JCR, Sevink J, Takken I, Verstraten JM (1998) Nutrient limitations and their implications on the effects of atmospheric deposition in coastal dunes; lime-poor and lime-rich sites in the Netherlands. J Ecol 86:511–526. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00273.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopper BJ, Charlton RE, Margolies DC (2000) Oviposition site selection by the regal fritillary, Speyeria idalia, as affected by proximity of violet host plants. J Insect Behav 13:651–665. doi:10.1023/A:1007887809621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus W (1993) Verzeichnis der Großschmetterlinge (Insecta: Lepidoptera) der Pfalz. Selbstverlag, Bad Dürkheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederer G, Künnert R (1963) Beiträge zur Insektenfauna des Mittelrheins und der angrenzenden Gebiete. Entomol Zeitschr 73:237–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobenstein U (2003) Die Schmetterlingsfauna des mittleren Niedersachsens. Bestand, Ökologie und Schutz der Großschmetterlinge in der Region Hannover, der Südheide und im unteren Weser-Leine-Bergland. NABU, Hannover

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes D, Ghesquiere A, Logie M, Bonte D (2006) Habitat use and mobility of two threatened coastal dune insects: implications for conservation. J Ins Cons 10:105–115. doi:10.1007/s10841-006-6287-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möllenbeck V, Hermann G, Fartmann T (2008) Does prescribed burning mean a threat to the rare satyrine butterfly Hipparchia fagi? Larval-habitat preferences give the answer. J Insect Conserv 13:77–87. doi:10.1007/s10841-007-9128-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munguira ML, García-Barros E, Martin J (2009) Herbivory. In: Settele J, Shreeve TG, Konvička M, van Dyck H (eds) Ecology of butterflies in Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (in press)

  • Nationalpark Niedersächsisches Wattenmeer (2007) Habitate. Habitate. Available via DIALOG. http://www.nationalpark-wattenmeer.niedersachsen.de/master/C28089931_N28551166_L20_D0_I5912119.html. Accessed 26 Oct 2008

  • NLWKN (Niedersächsischer Landesbetrieb für Wasserwirtschaft Küsten- und Naturschutz) (ed) (2006) Argynnis niobe. Auszug aus den Funddaten des Tierarten-Erfassungsprogramms der Fachbehörde für Naturschutz. Received 13 Mar 2006

  • Oberdorfer E (2001) Pflanzensoziologische Exkursionsflora. 8. Aufl. Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen J, Lammerts EJ (2005) Dunes. In: Essink K, Dettmann C, Farke H, Laursen G, Marencic H, Wiersinga W (eds) Wadden Sea Quality Status Report 2004. Wadden Sea Ecosyst 19:249–266

  • Petersen J, Pott R (2005) Ostfriesische Inseln. Landschaft und Vegetation im Wandel. Schriften zur Heimatpflege. Veroffentl Niedersachs Heimatbundes 15:1–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter K (1982) Basking behaviour in the larvae of the butterfly Euphydryas aurinia. Oikos 38:308–312. doi:10.2307/3544670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter K (1992) Eggs and egg-laying. In: Dennis RLH (ed) The ecology of butterflies in Britain. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 46–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretscher P (1998) Rote Liste der Großschmetterlinge (Macrolepidotera). Schriftenr Landschaftspfl Naturschutz 55:87–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullin AS (1986) Influence of the food plant, Urtica dioica, on larvae development, feeding efficiency, and voltinism of a specialist insect, Inachis io. Holarct Ecol 9:72–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Randle Z, Simcox DJ, Schönrogge K, Wardlaw JC, Thomas JA (2005) Myrmica ants as keystone species and Maculinea arion as an indicator of rare niches in UK grasslands. In: Settele J, Kühn E, Thomas JA (eds) Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe. Vol 2: species ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a model. Pensoft, Sofia, pp 26–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Rausher MD (1979) Egg recognition: its advantage to a butterfly. Anim Behav 27:1034–1040. doi:10.1016/0003-3472(79)90050-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt R (1983) Beiträge zur Insektenfauna der DDR. Lepidoptera—Rhopalocera et Hesperiidae. Entomol Nachr Ber 26, Beih Nr. 2:1–79

  • Reinhardt R (2005) Beiträge zur Tagfalterfauna Sachsens. Teil 2: Familie Nymphalidae (Edelfalter)—Unterfamilien Heliconiinae und Nymphalinae. Mitt Sachsischer Entomol Suppl 3:1–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennwald E (2002) (ed) Verzeichnis und Rote Liste der Pflanzengesellschaften Deutschlands mit Datenservice auf CD-Rom. Schriftenr Vegetationsk 35:1–800

  • SBN (Schweizerischer Bund für Naturschutz Lepidopteren-Arbeitsgruppe) (ed) (1987) Tagfalter und ihre Lebensräume. Arten, Gefährdung, Schutz. Fotorar AG, Egg/ZH

  • Stamm K (1981) Prodomus der Lepidopteren-Fauna der Rheinlande und Westfalens. Selbstverlag, Solingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoutjesdijk P, Barkman JJ (1992) Microclimate vegetation and fauna. Opulus Press, Uppsala

    Google Scholar 

  • Streif H (1990) Das ostfriesische Küstengebiet. 2nd edn. Sammlung geologischer Führer 59:1–376

    Google Scholar 

  • ten Harkel MJ, van der Meulen F (1995) Impact of grazing and atmospheric nitrogen deposition on the vegetation of dry coastal dune grasslands. J Veg Sci 6:445–452. doi:10.2307/3236245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA (1991) Rare species conservation: case studies of European butterflies. In: Spellerberg IF, Goldsmith FB, Morris MG (eds) The scientific management of temperate communities for conservation. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 149–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA, Bourn NAD, Clarke RT, Stewart KE, Simcox DJ, Pearman GS, Curtis R, Goodger B (2001) The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268:1791–1796. doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1693

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tonne F (1954) Besser Bauen mit Besonnungs- und Tageslichtplanung. Hofmann, Schondorf

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Meijden R, Plate CL, Weeda EJ (1989) Atlas van de Nederlandse flora, deel 3: minder zeldzame en algemene soorten. Onderzoeksinstituut Rijksherbarium/Hortus Botanicus, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • van Swaay CAM, Warren MS, Lois G (2006) Biotope use and trends of European butterflies. J Insect Conserv 10:189–209. doi:10.1007/s10841-006-6293-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WallisDeVries MF (2004) A quantitative conservation approach for the endangered butterfly Maculinea alcon. Conserv Biol 18:488–499

    Google Scholar 

  • WallisDeVries MF, Raemakers I (2001) Does extensive grazing benefit butterflies in coastal dunes? Restor Ecol 9:179–188. doi:10.1046/j.1526-100x.2001.009002179.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WallisDeVries MF, van Swaay CAM (2006) Global warming and excess nitrogen may induce butterfly decline by microclimatic cooling. Glob Change Biol 12:1620–1626. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01202.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren MS (1992) Butterfly populations. In: Dennis RLH (ed) The ecology of butterflies in Britain. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 73–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren MS (1993) A review of butterfly conservation in central southern Britain: II. Site management and habitat selection of key species. Biol Conserv 64:37–49. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(93)90381-A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren MS (1995) Managing local microclimates for the high brown fritillary, Argynnis adippe. In: Pullin AS (ed) Ecology and conservation of butterflies. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 198–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidemann HJ (1995) Tagfalter: beobachten, bestimmen, 2nd edn. Naturbuch-Verlag, Augsburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund C (1984) Egg-laying patterns in butterflies in relation to their phenology and the visual apparency and abundance of their host plants. Oecologia 67:23–29. doi:10.1007/BF00379780

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank N. Anthes, G. Hermann, M. WallisDeVries and an anonymous reviewer for valuable comments on the manuscript. We are grateful to the administration of the Wadden Sea National Park of Lower Saxony for providing permission of access and vegetation maps. Thanks for providing distribution data of Argynnis niobe and helpful information to R. Altmüller, H. Andretzke, R. Bolz, M. Bräu, S. Buchholz, S. Caspari, J. Gelbrecht, F. Goosmann, S. Hafner, H. G. Joger, J. Kleinekuhle, D. Koelman, D. Kolligs, A. C. Lange, D. Lück, P. Mansfeld, B. Nannen, R. Ohle, R. Reinhardt, F. Röbbelen, A. Schmidt, P. Schmidt, M. Sommerfeld, M. Stoltze, R. Trusch, J. Voith, H. Wegner.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Fartmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salz, A., Fartmann, T. Coastal dunes as important strongholds for the survival of the rare Niobe fritillary (Argynnis niobe). J Insect Conserv 13, 643–654 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-009-9214-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-009-9214-5

Keywords

Navigation