Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Introduced and native ground beetle assemblages (Coleoptera: Carabidae) along a successional gradient in an urban landscape

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to the intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH), species diversity should be higher at sites with intermediate levels of disturbance. We tested this hypothesis using ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) collected in pitfall traps from sites that varied in time since last disturbance. This successional gradient was embedded in an urban landscape near Montreal, Quebec. We predicted that diversity in young forests and old fields would be higher than in agricultural fields and old forests. Fifty-five species (2932 individuals) were found in 2003 and 46 species (2207 individuals) in 2004. In both years, species richness was highest from traps placed in agricultural fields. We collected nine introduced species; these had higher catch rates than the native species in both years (64.8% of total catch). When introduced species were removed from the Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling ordination analysis, the assemblages from agricultural fields were less distinct compared to those of the other habitats, suggesting the introduced fauna is important in structuring carabid assemblages from the agricultural fields. Introduced species may play a significant role in the community composition of ground beetles in urban landscapes, and their influence may be the cause of the lack of support found for the IDH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bousquet Y (1992) Bembidion femoratum Sturm and Amara communis (Panzer) (Coleoptera: Carabidae) new to North America. J New York Entomol S 100:503–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Bousquet Y, Larochelle A (1993) Catalogue of the Geadephaga (Coleoptera: Trahypachidae, Rhysodidae. Carabidae including Cicindelini) of America north of Mexico. Mem Entomol Soc Can 167:397

    Google Scholar 

  • Buddle CM, Beguin J, Bolduc E, Mercado A, Sackett TE, Selby RD, Varady-Szabo H, Zeran RM (2005) The importance and use of taxon sampling curves for comparative biodiversity research with forest arthropod assemblages. Can Entomol 137:120–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell RK (1994–2004) EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 7. User’s guide and application. Persistent URL: <http://www.purl.oclc.org/estimates>

  • Colwell RK, Coddington JA (1994) Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philos T Roy Soc B 345:101–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rain forest and coral reefs. Science 199:1302–1310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Downie NM, Arnett RH (1996) The beetles of northeastern North America, vol 1 and 2. Sandhill Crane Press, Gainesville

    Google Scholar 

  • du Bus de Warnaffe G, Lebrun P (2003) Effects of forest management on carabid beetles in Belgium: implications for biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv 118:219–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray JS (1989) Effects of environmental stress on species rich assemblages. Biol J Linn Soc 37:19–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1973) Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature 242:344–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston MA (1994) Biological diversity the coexistence of species on changing landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GE (1959) Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kinds of animals? Am Nat 93:145–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johst K, Huth A (2005) Testing the intermediate disturbance hypothesis: when will there be two peaks of diversity? Divers Distrib 11:111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koivula M, Niemelä J (2003) Gap felling as a forest harvesting method in boreal forests: responses of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Ecography 26:179–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koivula M, Punttila P, Haila Y, Niemelä J (1999) Leaf litter and the small-scale distribution of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in boreal forest. Ecography 22:424–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koivula M, Kukkonen J, Niemelä J (2002) Boreal carabid-beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) assemblages along the clear-cut originated succession gradient. Biodivers Conserv 11:1269–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kujuwa K, Sobczyk D, Kajak A (2006) Dispersal of Harpalus rufipes (Degeer) (Carabidae) between shelterbelt and cereal field. Pol J Ecol 54:243–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Langor DW, Spence JR (2006) Arthropods as ecological indicators of sustainability in Canadian forests. Forest Chron 82(3):344–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Larochelle A (1976) Manuel d’identification des carabidae du Québec. Cordulia, Supplement 1. Rigaud, Québec. 127 pp

  • Larochelle A (1990) The food of Carabid Beetles. Fabreries, Supplement 5. 132 pp

  • Larochelle A, Larivière MC (2003) A natural history of the ground-beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of America north of Mexico. Pensoft, Sofia

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA, Paine RT (1974) Disturbance, patch formation and community structure. Proc Nat Acad Sci 71:2744–2747

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindroth CH (1957) The faunal connections between Europe and North America. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindroth CH (1961–1969) The ground beetles (Carabidae, excl. Cicindelinae) of Canada and Alaska, parts 1–6. Opuscula Entomologica Supplementa 20, 24, 29, 33, 34, 35, Lund, Sweden. x1viii+1192 pp

  • Magura T, Tóthmérész B, Molnár T (2004) Changes in carabid beetle assemblages along an urbanisation gradient in the city of Debrecen, Hungary. Landscape Ecol 19:747–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough DG, Work TT, Cavey JF, Liebhold AM, Marshall D (2006) Interceptions of nonindigenous plant pests at US ports of entry and border crossings over a 17-year period. Biol Invasions 8:611–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) PC-ORD: Multivariate analysis of ecological data. Version 4.17. MjM software design, Glenden Beach Oregon

  • Mercado Cárdenas A, Buddle CM (2007) Distribution and potential range expansion of seven introduced ground beetle species (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in Québec, Canada. Coleopt Bull 61:135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J, Langor D, Spence JR (1993) Effects of clear-cut harvesting on boreal ground-beetle assemblages (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in western Canada. Conserv Biol 7:551–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J, Kotze J, Ashworth A, Brandmayr P, Desender K, New T, Penev L, Samways M, Spence J (2000) The search for common anthropogenic impacts on biodiversity: a global network. J Insect Conserv 4:3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J, Kotze DJ, Venn S, Penev L, Stoyanov I, Spence J, Hartley D, Montes de Oca E (2002) Carabid beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae) across urban-rural gradients: an international comparison. Landscape Ecol 17:387–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce JL, Venier LA (2006) The use of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and spiders (Araneae) as bioindicators of sustainable forest management: A review. Ecol Indicators 6:780–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce J, Schuurman D, Venier L, McKee J (2002) Carabid assemblage of an urban woodlot in Sault Ste Marie, Canada. Great Lakes Entomol 35:161–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainio J, Niemelä J (2003) Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as bioindicators. Biodiv Conserv 12:487–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roxburgh SH, Shea K, Wilson JB (2004) The intermediate disturbance hypothesis: patch dynamics and mechanisms of species coexistence. Ecology 85:359–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Germain M, Mauffette Y (2001) Reduced ground beetle activity following ice damage in maple stands of southwestern Quebec. Forest Chron 77:651–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Germain M, Larrivée M, Drapeau P, Fahrig L, Buddle CM (2005) Short-term response of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) to fire and logging in a spruce-dominated boreal landscape. For Ecol Manage 212:118–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea K, Roxburgh SH, Rauschert ESJ (2004) Moving from pattern to process: coexistence mechanisms under intermediate disturbance regimes. Ecol Letters 7:491–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheil D, Burslem DFRP (2002) Disturbing hypotheses in tropical forests. Trends Ecol Evol 18:18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence J (1990) Success of European Carabid Species in Western Canada: Preadaptation for Synanthropy? In: Stork NE (ed) The role of ground beetles in ecological and environmental studies. Intercept Ltd, Andover

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence JR, Spence DH (1988) Of ground-beetles and men: introduced species and the synanthropic fauna of western Canada. Mem Entomol Soc Can 144:151–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokeshi M (1999) Species coexistence. ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Blackwell, Oxford Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanbergen AJ, Woodcock BA, Watt AD, Niemelä J (2005) Effect of land-use heterogeneity on carabid communities at the landscape scale. Ecography 28:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, Dantonio CM, Loope LL, Westbrooks R (1996) Biological invasions as global environmental change. Am Sci 84:468–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson DM (1999) The disturbing history of intermediate disturbance. Oikos 84:145–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wootton JT (1998) Effects of disturbance on species diversity: a multitrophic perspective. Am Nat 152:803–825

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Saint-Germain, T. Wheeler, T. Work, R. Anderson and two anonymous reviewers for comments on early drafts of the manuscript. Dr. Yves Bousquet verified species identifications. J.P. Lessard, A. Hibbert and C. Cloutier assisted in the fieldwork. Support was provided by the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Discovery grant to C.M.B.), Department of Natural Resource Sciences at McGill University and the Ministère de l’Éducation du Québec.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher M. Buddle.

Appendix

Appendix

Summary of ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) species collected in 2003/2004 by pitfall traps placed in agricultural fields (AGF), old fields (OFI), young forests (YF) and old forests (OFO). Abbreviations for species as used in figures are given.

Species

Abbrev.

AGF

OFI

YF

OFO

Total

Status

Agonum affine Kirby

AGAF

0/0

1/0

0/0

0/2

3

Native

Agonum cupripenne (Say)

AGCU

1/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

1

Native

Agonum lutulentum (LeConte)

AGLU

0/0

0/0

1/0

0/0

1

Native

Agonum melanarium Dejean

AGME

0/0

1/0

0/0

0/0

1

Native

Agonum muelleri (Herbst)

AGMU

11/19

0/0

0/0

0/0

30

Introduced

Agonum palustre Goulet

AGPA

0/0

1/1

0/0

0/0

2

Native

Agonum placidum (Say)

AGPL

2/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

2

Native

Agonum punctiforme Say

AGPU

0/3

0/0

0/0

0/0

3

Native

Agonum trigeminum Lindroth

AGTR

0/0

0/0

1/0

0/0

1

Native

Amara carinata (LeConte)

AMCA

0/1

0/0

0/0

0/0

1

Native

Amara cupreolata Putzeys

AMCU

9/0

7/0

0/0

1/0

17

Native

Amara discors Kirby

AMDI

0/2

0/1

0/0

0/0

3

Native

Amara flebilis (Casey)

AMFL

0/0

0/1

0/0

0/0

1

Native

Amara littoralis Mannerheim

AMLI

8/6

0/3

0/0

0/0

17

Native

Amara neoscotica Casey

AMNE

0/20

0/5

0/0

0/0

25

Native

Amara otiosa Casey

AMOT

0/0

3/0

0/0

0/0

3

Native

Amara sp.

Amsp

0/1

0/2

0/0

0/0

3

 

Amphasia interstitialis (Say)

AMIN

0/0

0/0

1/1

0/0

2

Native

Anisodactylus discoideus Dejean

ANDI

0/0

2/0

0/0

0/0

2

Native

Anisodactylus harrisii LeConte

ANHA

1/0

16/0

0/0

0/0

17

Native

Anisodactylus sanctaecrucis (Fabricius)

ANSA

0/6

0/0

0/1

0/0

7

Native

Badister notatus Haldeman

BANO

0/0

0/0

0/0

1/0

1

Native

Badister obtusus LeConte

BAOB

0/0

0/0

0/1

0/0

1

Native

Bembidion frontale (LeConte)

BEFR

0/0

0/0

1/0

0/0

1

Native

Bembidion graciliforme Hayward

BEGR

0/0

0/0

0/0

1/0

1

Native

Bembidion mimus Hayward

BEMI

4/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

4

Native

Bembidion nitidum (Kirby)

BENI

1/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

1

Native

Bembidion obtusum Audinet-Serville

BEOB

0/3

4/8

51/5

26/12

109

Introduced

Bembidion quadrimaculatum Say

BEQU

41/51

1/2

0/0

0/0

95

Native

Bembidion versicolor (LeConte)

BEVE

1/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

1

Native

Brachinus ovipennis LeConte

BROV

0/0

11/0

3/0

0/0

14

Native

Bradycellus nigriceps LeConte

BRNI

0/0

0/0

0/0

1/0

1

Native

Bradycellus rupestris (Say)

BRRU

1/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

1

Native

Carabus granulatus Linnaeus

CAGR

0/0

0/0

1/0

0/0

1

Introduced

Carabus nemoralis Muller

CANE

148/1

8/19

40/66

7/4

293

Introduced

Chlaenius emarginatus Say

CHEM

0/0

1/0

0/0

0/0

1

Native

Chlaenius impunctifrons Say

CHIM

0/0

0/0

1/0

1/0

2

Native

Chlaenius tricolor Dejean

CHTR

1/0

6/0

44/0

0/0

51

Native

Cicindela punctulata Olivier

CIPU

0/1

0/0

0/0

0/0

1

Native

Cicindela repanda repanda Dejean

CIRE

0/3

0/0

0/0

0/0

3

Native

Cicindela sexguttata Fabricius

CISE

0/0

32/1

1/0

0/0

34

Native

Clivina fossor Linnaeus

CLFO

0/6

0/0

1/0

0/0

7

Introduced

Diplocheila obtusa (LeConte)

DIOB

0/0

0/4

0/1

1/0

6

Native

Dyschiriodes pilosus (LeConte)

DYPI

7/35

0/0

0/0

0/0

42

Native

Elaphropus incurvus Say

ELIN

2/5

0/0

0/0

0/0

7

Native

Geopinus incrassatus (Dejean)

GEIN

1/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

1

Native

Harpalus affinis (Schrank)

HAAF

1/7

0/0

0/0

0/0

8

Introduced

Harpalus erraticus Say

HAER

23/8

0/0

0/0

0/0

31

Native

Harpalus herbivagus Say

HAHE

3/6

1/0

0/0

0/0

10

Native

Harpalus pensylvanicus (DeGeer)

HAPE

11/329

0/0

0/0

0/0

340

Native

Harpalus plenalis Casey

HAPL

0/0

0/0

1/0

0/0

1

Native

Harpalus rufipes (DeGeer)

HARU

1333/731

6/22

17/0

1/0

2110

Introduced

Harpalus solitaris Dejean

HASO

0/0

3/0

0/0

0/0

3

Native

Notiophilus aeneus (Herbst)

NOAE

0/0

0/0

9/1

0/0

10

Native

Olisthpus parmatus (Say)

OLPA

0/0

0/0

1/0

0/0

1

Native

Oxypselaphus pusillus (LeConte)

OXPU

0/0

0/0

1/0

0/0

1

Native

Patrobus longicornis (Say)

PALO

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/1

1

Native

Platynus decentis (Say)

PLDE

0/0

0/0

5/3

1/0

9

Native

Poecilus chalcites (Say)

POCH

177/161

0/0

0/0

0/1

339

Native

Poecilus lucublandus (Say)

POLU

45/210

87/57

88/14

19/21

541

Native

Pterostichus caudicalis (Say)

PTCA

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/2

2

Native

Pterostichus corvinus (Dejean)

PTCO

0/0

1/0

0/0

0/0

1

Native

Pterostichus melanarius (Illiger)

PTME

418/152

15/17

41/39

8/81

771

Introduced

Pterostichus mutus (Say)

PTMU

0/0

0/0

15/0

10/3

28

Native

Pterostichus patruelis (Dejean)

PTPA

0/1

0/0

0/0

0/0

1

Native

Pterostichus pensylvanicus LeConte

PTPE

0/0

0/0

13/2

2/3

20

Native

Pterostichus tristis Dejean

PTTR

0/0

0/0

0/0

1/0

1

Native

Pterostichus vernalis (Panzer)

PTVE

0/1

0/0

0/0

0/0

1

Introduced

Sphaeroderus canadensis Chaudoir

SPCA

0/0

0/0

0/0

3/0

3

Native

Sphaeroderus lecontei Dejean

SPLE

0/0

0/0

1/4

18/0

23

Native

Stenolophus comma (Fabricius)

STCO

0/3

0/0

0/0

0/0

3

Native

Synuchus impunctatus (Say)

SYIM

0/5

0/1

6/6

25/2

45

Native

Tetragonoderus fasciatus (Haldeman)

TEFA

7/7

0/0

0/0

0/0

14

Native

Total collection

 

4041

351

488

259

5139

 

Number of species

 

39

27

27

22

73

 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mercado Cárdenas, A., Buddle, C.M. Introduced and native ground beetle assemblages (Coleoptera: Carabidae) along a successional gradient in an urban landscape. J Insect Conserv 13, 151–163 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-008-9137-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-008-9137-6

Keywords

Navigation