Abstract
We report the observation of interference between an implanted loop recorder and a cellular telephone when the latter was placed over the subcutaneous pocket. The artifact produced during the ringing of the telephone was automatically recorded and stored in the device memory. A similar interference was documented during ex vivo testing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Naegeli B, Osswald S, Deola M, Burkart F. Intermittent pacemaker dysfunction caused by digital mobile telephones. Journal of Amer Coll Cardiol 1996;27;6:1471–1477.
Hayes DL, Wang PJ, Reynolds DW, Estes M, Griffith JL, Steffens RA, Carlo GL, Findlay GK, Johnson CM. Interference with cardiac pacemakers by cellular telephones. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1473–1479.
Irnich W, Batz L, Muller R, Tobisch R. Electromagnetic interference of pacemakers by mobile phones. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1996;19:1431–1446.
De Cock C, Spruijt H, Van Campen L, Plu A, Visser C. Electromagnetic interference of an implantable loop recorder by commonly encountered electronic devices. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000;23:1516–1518.
Ng E, Stafford P, Ng G. Arrhythmia detection by patient and auto-activation in implantable loop recorders. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2004,10;2:147–152.
Technical manual: Reveal ® Plus 9526, insertable loop recorder system, model 9809 software series 2.0, 2001, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Gimbel J, Wilkoff B. Artefact mimicking tachycardia during magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with an implantable loop recorder. Heart Online Mar 2003,89:10e.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Trigano, A., Blandeau, O. & Levy, S. Interference by Cellular Telephone with an Implantable Loop Recorder. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 12, 237–240 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-005-0303-4
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-005-0303-4