Skip to main content
Log in

Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Effectiveness of the OpenMind (OM) Program for Pre-School Children

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Preschool curricula often include social emotional learning (SEL) competencies, such as self-awareness and self-management. Emerging programs also include mindfulness-based practices that develop preschool children’s awareness of the effects of their thoughts, feelings, and perceptions on their behaviors and ways by which they can make skillful choices through discernment. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of the OpenMind (OM) program that combines mindfulness-based practices with SEL competencies for preschool children.

Methods

Preschools in a Head Start program were randomly assigned to either the OM program or a comparison group. A total of 262 children (3 to 5-year-old), 27 teachers, and 281 parents completed the study. Teachers in the OM program were provided training in the use of the program together with the existing preschool curriculum, and teachers in the Comparison group were provided an equivalent amount of training on relationship building and child bonding activities. At the end of the preschool year, the teachers in both groups responded to feasibility and acceptability questionnaires. In addition, child, teacher, and parent outcomes were assessed.

Results

The teachers reported the OM program was feasible as an adjunctive program that could be integrated with the existing preschool curriculum, but finding enough time meditate during school hours was only partially feasible. The teachers perceived benefits for the children in terms of improved self-regulation, increased body and emotional awareness, improved self-calming, and increased empathy and awareness of the feelings of others. They rated the OM program as very acceptable, and which they would recommend to other preschool teachers. The outcome data indicated positive child outcomes for both groups, with some added advantage for the children in the OM program.

Conclusions

The OM program offers a promising approach to enhancing preschool children’s social, emotional, and academic development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, J. P., Pianta, R. C., Gregory, A., Mikami, A. Y., & Lun, J. (2011). An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary school instruction and student achievement. Science, 333, 1034–1037.

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13, 27–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakosh, L. S., Snow, R. M., Tobias, J. M., Houlihan, J. L., & Barbosa-Leiker, C. (2016). Maximizing mindful learning: an innovative mindful awareness intervention improves elementary school students’ quarterly grades. Mindfulness, 7(1), 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierman, K. L., Nix, R. L., Greenberg, M. T., Blair, C., & Domitrovich, C. E. (2008). Executive functions and school readiness intervention: Impact, moderation, and mediation in the Head Start REDI program. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 821–843.

  • Bridgeland, J., Bruce, M., & Hariharan, A. (2013). The missing piece: a national survey on how social and emotional learning can empower children and transform schools. Washington, DC: Civic Enterprises.

  • Cohen, J. (2006). Social, emotional, ethical, and academic education: Creating a climate for learning, participation in democracy, and well-being. Harvard Educational Review, 76, 201–237.

  • Cohen, S., Karmarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 24, 385–396.

  • Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (2013). Effective social and emotional learning programs: preschool and elementary school edition. Chicago, IL: Author.

  • Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (2017). Core SEL competencies. http://www.casel.org/social-and-emotional-learning/core-competencies.

  • Domitrovich, C. E., Cortes, R., & Greenberg, M. T. (2007). Improving young children’s social and emotional competence: a randomized trial of the preschool PATHS curriculum. Journal of Primary Prevention, 28, 67–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dowsett, S. M., & Livesey, D. J. (2000). The development of inhibitory control in preschool children: Effects of “executive skills” training. Developmental Psychobiology, 36, 161–174.

  • Durlak, J. A., Domitrovich, C. E., Weissberg, R. P., & Gullotta, T. P. (2015). Handbook of social and emotional learning: research and practice. New York, NY: Guilford.

  • Durlak, J. A., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., Weissberg, R. P., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: a meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82, 405–432.

  • Feuerborn, L. L., & Gueldner, B. A. (2019). Mindfulness and social-emotional competencies: proposing connections through a review of research. Mindfulness. Advance of Print.

  • Flook, L., Smalley, S. L., Kitil, M. J., Galla, B. M., Kaiser-Greenland, S., Locke, J., Ishijima, E., & Kasari, C. (2010). Effects of mindful awareness practices on executive functions in elementary school children. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 26, 70–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flook, L., Goldberg, S. B., Pinger, L., & Davidson, R. J. (2015). Promoting prosocial behavior and self-regulatory skills in preschool children through a mindfulness-based kindness curriculum. Developmental Psychology, 51(1), 44–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, G. A., Espy, K. A., & Isquith, P. K. (2003). Behavior rating of executive function-preschool version (BRIEF-P): professional manual. Lutz, FL: PAR.

  • Goldin, P. R., Saltzman, A., & Gross, J. J. (2006). Mindfulness meditation based stress reduction for children and their parents. Paper presented at the Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies 40th Annual Convention. Chicago, IL.

  • Greenberg, M. T., Weissberg, R. P., O’Brien, M. U., Zins, J. E., Fredericks, L., Resnik, H., & Elias, M. J. (2003). Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning. American Psychologist, 58, 466–474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holistic Life Foundation. (2014). Mindful moment program. http://hlfinc.org/services/mindful-momentprogram.

  • Jackman, M. M. (2016a). OpenMind—a mindfulness-based social emotional learning program for pre-K children: daily practice activities. Port St. Lucie: Little Lotus Therapy and Consulting.

  • Jackman, M. M. (2016b). OpenMind—a mindfulness-based social emotional learning curriculum for pre-K children: earning activities. Port St. Lucie, FL: Little Lotus Therapy and Consulting.

  • Jackman, M. M. (2017a). OpenMind—a mindfulness-based social emotional learning program for pre-K children: daily practice activities. 2nd edn. Port St. Lucie: Little Lotus Therapy and Consulting.

  • Jackman, M. M. (2017b). OpenMind—a mindfulness-based social emotional learning curriculum for pre-K children: learning activities. 2nd edn. Port St. Lucie: Little Lotus Therapy and Consulting.

  • Jackman, M. M. (2018a). OpenMind—a mindfulness-based social emotional learning program for Pre-K children: daily practice activities. 3rd edn. Port St. Lucie: Little Lotus Therapy and Consulting.

  • Jackman, M. M. (2018b). OpenMind—a mindfulness-based social emotional learning curriculum for pre-K children: learning activities. 3rd edn. Port St. Lucie: Little Lotus Therapy and Consulting.

  • January, A. M., Casey, R. J., & Paulson, D. (2011). A meta-analysis of classroom-wide interventions to build social skills: do they work? School Psychology Review, 40(2), 242–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 144–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, E., Jackman, M. M., Jo, S.-H., Oh, J., Ko, S.-Y., McPherson, C. L., & Singh, N. N. (2019). Feasibility and acceptability of the mindfulness-based OpenMind-Korea (OM-K) preschool program. Journal of Child and Family Studies. Advance of Print.

  • Kress, J. S., & Elias, M. J. (2006). School-based social and emotional learning programs. In K. A. Renninger & I. E. Sigel (Eds), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Child psychology in practice. 6th edn (pp 592–618). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

  • MacNeil, M., Gray, A., & Quintiliani, A. R. (2011). Evaluation of the South Burlington Wellness and Resilience program, year three. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Meiklejohn, J., Soloway, G., Isberg, R., Sibinga, E., Grossman, L., & Saltzman, A., et al. (2012). Integrating mindfulness training into K-12 education: fostering the resilience of teachers and students. Mindfulness, 3, 291–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelson, T., Greenberg, M. T., Dariotis, J. K., Gould, L. F., Rhoades, B. L., & Leaf, P. J. (2010). Feasibility and preliminary outcomes of a school-based mindfulness intervention for urban youth. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 985–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mindful Schools (2017). Research. http://www.mindfulschools.org/about-mindfulness/research/#data.

  • Müller, U., Kerns, K. A., & Konkin, K. (2012). Test–retest reliability and practice effects of executive function tasks in preschool children. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 26, 271–287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, A. E., & Kupersmidt, J. B. (2016). Two universal mindfulness education programs for elementary and middle-school students: Master Mind and Moment. In K. Schonert-Reichl & R. Roeser (Eds), Handbook of mindfulness in education: Integrating theory and research into practice (pp. 335–354). New York: Springer.

  • Parker, A. E., Kupersmidt, J. B., Mathis, E. T., Scull, T. M., & Sims, C. (2014). The impact of mindfulness education on elementary school students: evaluation of the master mind program. Advances in School Mental Health Promotion, 7, 184–204.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ponitz, C. C., McClelland, M. M., Jewkes, A. M., Connor, C. M., Farris, C. L., & Morrison, F. J. (2008). Touch your toes! Developing a direct measure of behavioral regulation in early childhood. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.

  • Semple, R. J., Droutman, V., & Reid, B. A. (2017). Mindfulness goes to school: Things learned (so far) from research and real-world experiences. Psychology in the Schools, 54, 29–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semple, R. J., & Lee, J. (2011). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for anxious children: a manual for treating childhood anxiety. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.

  • Sklad, M., Diekstra, R., Ritter, M. D., Ben, J., & Gravesteijn, C. (2012). Effectiveness of school-based universal social, emotional, and behavioral programs: Do they enhance students’ development in the area of skill, behavior, and adjustment? Psychology in the Schools, 49(9), 892–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Y. Y., Yang, L., Leve, L. D., & Harold, G. T. (2012). Improving executive function and its neurobiological mechanisms through a mindfulness-based intervention: Advances within the field of developmental neuroscience. Child Development Perspectives, 6, 361–366.

  • Wiebe, S. A., Sheffield, T. D., & Espy, K. A. (2012). Separating the fish from the sharks: A longitudinal study of preschool response inhibition. Child Development, 83, 1245–1261.

  • Zins, J. E., Weissberg, R. P., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (2004). Building school success through social and emotional learning. New York: Teachers College Press.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Jefferson Franklin Community Action Corporation’s (JFCAC) 2016–2019 Head Start Program classroom staff, supervisors, and leaders who contributed to the implementation and success of this project. We are grateful to JFCAC’s Executive Team (Paulette Hensley, Diana Hayes, Stephanie Kerth, and Ben Washington) for their ongoing support of the project, and Neal Mathews from Midwest Resource Solutions, Inc. for IT consultation and assistance with data management.

Author Contributions

M.M.J. developed the OM program, and assisted with all aspects of the study; L.A.N. analyzed the data and helped with the writing of the paper; C.L.M. co-trained the teachers on the OM program to the teachers; J.D.Q. initiated the study, and enabled the implementation of the OM program; and N.N.S. collaborated in all phases of the study.

Funding

This research was supported by the Jefferson Franklin Community Action Corporation (JFCAC) 2016–2019 Community Service Block Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monica M. Jackman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

M.M.J. is the developer of the OM program and may receive royalties in the future. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The Jefferson Franklin Community Action Corporation provided approval for the research component of the OM program. All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from the three preschools, the parents, teachers, and assent from the children.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jackman, M.M., Nabors, L.A., McPherson, C.L. et al. Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Effectiveness of the OpenMind (OM) Program for Pre-School Children. J Child Fam Stud 28, 2910–2921 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01506-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01506-5

Keywords

Navigation