Skip to main content
Log in

Mutational analysis of IZUMO1R in women with fertilization failure and polyspermy after in vitro fertilization

  • Genetics
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The etiology of fertilization failure and polyspermy during assisted reproductive technology (ART) remains elusive. The aim of this study was to determine whether mutations in the IZUMO1 receptor (IZUMO1R) gene, which is essential for mammalian fertilization, contribute to the pathogenesis of fertilization failure or polyspermy in humans.

Methods

We recruited 215 female subjects with fertilization failure/poor fertilization, 330 females with polyspermy, and 300 matched controls. All subjects underwent IVF treatment. Peripheral blood DNA of cases was extracted and screened for mutations in IZUMO1R gene.

Results

Four rare single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the IZUMO1R were identified among specimens from patients with fertilization failure and polyspermy but were absent in the 300 control subjects. These included a missense SNP (rs76779571 in exon 4), which was found in two fertilization failure patients, and a nonsynonymous SNP (rs61742524 in exon 1) and two synonymous SNPs (rs76781645 in exon 1 and rs377369966 in intron 2), which were found among three polyspermy cases.

Conclusions

The variations in IZUMO1R might play a role in the pathogenesis of fertilization failure and polyspermy, and the putative functions and effects of these rare variants require further studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Swain JE, Pool TB. ART failure: oocyte contributions to unsuccessful fertilization. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14:431–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beck-Fruchter R, Lavee M, Weiss A, Geslevich Y, Shalev E. Rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:690–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Neuber E, Powers RD. Is the mouse a clinically relevant model for human fertilization failures? Hum Reprod. 2000;15:171–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rawe VY, Olmedo SB, Nodar FN, Doncel GD, Acosta AA, Vitullo AD. Cytoskeletal organization defects and abortive activation in human oocytes after IVF and ICSI failure. Mol Hum Reprod. 2000;6:510–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kunathikom S, Makemaharn O, Suksompong S, Laokirkkiat P. Chromosomal analysis of “failed-fertilized” human oocytes resulting from in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Med Assoc Thail. 2001;84:532–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ikawa M, Inoue N, Benham AM, Okabe M. Fertilization: a sperm’s journey to and interaction with the oocyte. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:984–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Mahutte NG, Arici A. Failed fertilization: is it predictable? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2003;15:211–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jacobs PA, Angell RR, Buchanan IM, Hassold TJ, Matsuyama AM, Manuel B. The origin of human triploids. Ann Hum Genet. 1978;42:49–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zaragoza MV, Surti U, Redline RW, Millie E, Chakravarti A, Hassold TJ. Parental origin and phenotype of triploidy in spontaneous abortions: predominance of diandry and association with the partial hydatidiform mole. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66:1807–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Trounson A, Bongso A. Fertilization and development in humans. Curr Top Dev Biol. 1996;32:59–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ho PC, Yeung WS, Chan YF, So WW, Chan ST. Factors affecting the incidence of polyploidy in a human in vitro fertilization program. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. 1994;39:14–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gardner AJ, Evans JP. Mammalian membrane block to polyspermy: new insights into how mammalian eggs prevent fertilisation by multiple sperm. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2006;18:53–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ducibella T. The cortical reaction and development of activation competence in mammalian oocytes. Hum Reprod Update. 1996;2:29–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Niwa K, Park CK, Okuda K. Penetration in vitro of bovine oocytes during maturation by frozen-thawed spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil. 1991;91:329–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bauskin AR, Franken DR, Eberspaecher U, Donner P. Characterization of human zona pellucida glycoproteins. Mol Hum Reprod. 1999;5:534–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tatone C, Van Eekelen CG, Colonna R. Plasma membrane block to sperm entry occurs in mouse eggs upon parthenogenetic activation. Mol Reprod Dev. 1994;38:200–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Swann K. Different triggers for calcium oscillations in mouse eggs involve a ryanodine-sensitive calcium store. Biochem J. 1992;287(Pt 1):79–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Bianchi E, Doe B, Goulding D, Wright GJ. Juno is the egg Izumo receptor and is essential for mammalian fertilization. Nature. 2014;508:483–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Coonrod SA, Naaby-Hansen S, Shetty J, Shibahara H, Chen M, White JM, et al. Treatment of mouse oocytes with PI-PLC releases 70-kDa (pI 5) and 35- to 45-kDa (pI 5.5) protein clusters from the egg surface and inhibits sperm-oolemma binding and fusion. Dev Biol. 1999;207:334–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Goldstein DB, Allen A, Keebler J, Margulies EH, Petrou S, Petrovski S, et al. Sequencing studies in human genetics: design and interpretation. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14:460–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Panoutsopoulou K, Tachmazidou I, Zeggini E. In search of low-frequency and rare variants affecting complex traits. Hum Mol Genet. 2013;22:R16–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Plotkin JB, Kudla G. Synonymous but not the same: the causes and consequences of codon bias. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12:32–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all participants in this study.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (2016YFC1000600), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81622021, 31371453, 31571548, 81430029, 81490743, 81300461), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-13-0355), and the Young Scholars Program of Shandong University (2015WLJH54).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongbin Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Informed consents were obtained from all subjects. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Reproductive Medicine of Shandong University, China.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 12.7 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 14.7 kb)

ESM 3

(DOCX 68.6 kb)

ESM 4

(DOCX 44.9 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, M., Zhao, H., Chen, T. et al. Mutational analysis of IZUMO1R in women with fertilization failure and polyspermy after in vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet 35, 539–544 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-1101-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-1101-5

Keywords

Navigation