Skip to main content
Log in

Morphokinetics of vitrified and warmed blastocysts predicts implantation potential

  • Embryo Biology
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

It was studied whether morphokinetics of blastocoele re-expansion and hatching in vitrified-warmed blastocysts is predictive of implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth.

Methods

In 144 patients aiming for single warmed blastocyst transfer, blastocysts were cultured in a new time-lapse system (Miri® TL) immediately after warming. Video sequences with an image interval of 5 min were annotated and the corresponding morphokinetic variables were correlated with pregnancy outcome. In detail, tRE (start of re-expansion), tCRE (completion of re-expansion), tAH (hatching from the manipulated zona pellucida), and presence of collapses were recorded.

Results

In the pregnant group, tRE and tCRE were significantly lower (0.69 ± 0.45 h and 2.16 ± 0.94 h) as compared to the non-pregnant group (1.23 ± 1.08 h and 2.70 ± 1.20 h). Both variables and the duration of re-expansion (tCRE-tRE) allowed for distinction between “non-pregnant,” “loss of pregnancy,” and live birth/ongoing pregnancy. Presence and number of collapses showed no correlation with outcome.

Conclusions

Time-lapse imaging of vitrified-warmed blastocysts offers additional selection criteria allowing for prediction of implantation potential. As a consequence, cumulative pregnancy rate could be increased and time-to-pregnancy reduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liebermann J, Tucker MJ. Comparison of vitrification and conventional cryopreservation of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts during clinical application. Fertil Steril. 2005;86:20–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vanderzwalmen P, Bertin G, Debauche C, Standaert V, van Roosendaal E, Vandervorst M, et al. Births after vitrification at morula and blastula stages: effect of artificial reduction of the blastocoelic cavity before vitrification. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:744–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vanderzwalmen P, Bertin G, Debauche C, Standaert V, Bollen N, van Roosendaal E, et al. Vitrification of human blastocysts with the Hemi-straw carrier: application of assisted hatching after thawing. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1504–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ortega-Hrepich C, Stoop D, Guzmán L, Van Landuyt L, Tournaye H, Smitz J, et al. A “freeze-all” embryo strategy after in vitro maturation: a novel approach in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:1002–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C. Freeze-all at the blastocyst or bipronuclear stage: a randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:1138–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stoop D, Van Landuyt L, Van den Abbeel E, Camus M, Verheyen G, Devroey P. Should a single blastocyst transfer policy be a clinical decision or should it depend on the embryological evaluation on day 3? Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2011;9:60. doi:10.1186/1477-7827-9-60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zander-Fox DL, Tremellen K, Lane M. Single blastocyst embryo transfer maintains comparable pregnancy rates to double cleavage-stage embryo transfer but results in healthier pregnancy outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;51:406–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ebner T, Vanderzwalmen P, Shebl O, Urdl W, Moser M, Zech NH, et al. Morphology of vitrified/warmed day-5 embryos predicts rates of implantation, pregnancy and live birth. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19:72–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ebner T, Vanderzwalmen P, Wirleitner B. Atlas of vitrified blastocysts in human assisted reproduction. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Shu Y, Watt J, Gebhardt J, Dasig J, Appling J, Behr B. The value of fast blastocyst re-expansion in the election of a viable thawed blastocyst for transfer. Fertil Steril. 2008;91:401–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Van den Abbeel E, Camus M, Verheyen G, Van Waesberghe L, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. Slow controlled-rate freezing of sequentially cultured human blastocysts: an evaluation of two freezing strategies. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:2929–45.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maezawa T, Yamanaka M, Hashimoto S, Amo A, Ohgaki A, Nakaoka Y, et al. Possible selection of viable human blastocysts after vitrification by monitoring morphological changes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31:1099–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. ALPHA Scientists in Reproductive Medicine, ESHRE Special Interest Group Embryology. Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;22:632–46.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ebner T, Moser M, Tews G. Possible applications of a non-contact 1.48 microm wavelength diode laser in assisted reproduction technologies. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11:425–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Biggers JD, Bell JE, Benos DJ. Mammalian blastocyst: transport functions in a developing epithelium. Am J Physiol. 1988;255:C419–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Veeck LL, Zaninovic N. An atlas of human blastocysts. 1st ed. Boca Raton, London, New York, Washington: Parthenon Publishing; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marcos J, Pérez-Albalá S, Mifsud A, Molla M, Landeras J, Meseguer M. Collapse of blastocysts is strongly related to lower implantation success: a time-lapse study. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:2501–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bodri D, Sugimoto T, Yao Serna J, Kawachiya S, Kato R, Matsumoto T. Blastocyst collapse is not an independent predictor of reduced live birth: a time-lapse study. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:1476–83.e3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shimoda Y, Kumagai J, Anzai M, Kabashima K, Togashi K, Miura Y, et al. Time-lapse monitoring reveals that vitrification increases the frequency of contraction during the pre-hatching stage in mouse embryos. J Reprod Dev. 2016;62:187–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Mirzazadeh F, Cater E, Nice L, Campbell A. Data analysis study on the rate of blastocyst re-expansion after warming and its significance to outcome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016;32(1):9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Galán Rivas A, Coello A, Cobo A, Nohales M, Alegre L, Meseguer M. Morphology dynamics of warmed blastocysts are strong predictors of clinical outcome. Hum Reprod. 2016, in press.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank G. Schappacher-Tilp for statistical expertise.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Ebner.

Additional information

Capsule Time-lapse imaging of vitrified-warmed blastocysts, particularly the start of re-expansion, offers additional selection criteria allowing for prediction of implantation potential which may result in reduced time-to-pregnancy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ebner, T., Oppelt, P., Radler, E. et al. Morphokinetics of vitrified and warmed blastocysts predicts implantation potential. J Assist Reprod Genet 34, 239–244 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0855-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0855-5

Keywords

Navigation