Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Item Response Theory Analyses of the Parent and Teacher Ratings of the DSM-IV ADHD Rating Scale

  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The graded response model (GRM), which is based on item response theory (IRT), was used to evaluate the psychometric properties of the inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms in an ADHD rating scale. To accomplish this, parents and teachers completed the DSM-IV ADHD Rating Scale (DARS; Gomez et al., Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 265–274, 1999) for a group of 1,475 primary school-aged children. The results for the discrimination parameters showed that all symptoms for both groups of respondents were generally good for discriminating their respective latent traits. For virtually all symptoms, their threshold values showed moderate to large increases in the level of the latent trait at each subsequent response dichotomy, with the symptoms being especially good at representing the appropriate traits from mean to moderately high trait levels. The item information function values for most symptoms indicated reasonable reliability from, approximately, the mean trait levels to moderately high trait levels. These findings indicate good psychometric properties for the parent and teacher ratings of the DARS. The implications of the findings for the use of the DARS and other similar scales are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders III. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders IV. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders—IV text revised. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anastopoulos, A. D., & Shelton, T. L. (2001). Assessing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. New York: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (1993). Estimated resident population by age and sex (Catalogue No. 3201.2). Canberra: Author.

  • Barkley, R. A. (2006). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkley, R. A., & Murphy, K. R. (1998). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A clinical workbook (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. In F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick (Eds.), Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, G. L., Boe, B., Walsh, J. A., Sommers-Flanagan, R., & Teegarden, L. A. (2001). A confirmatory factor analysis on the DSM-IV ADHD and ODD symptoms: What is the best model for the organization of these symptoms? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 339–349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, G. L., Walsh, J. A., & Gomez, R. (2003). Convergent and discriminant validity of trait and source effects in ADHD-inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity measures across a 3-month interval. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31, 529–541.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DuPaul, G. J., Anastopoulos, A. D., Power, T. J., Reid, R., McGoey, K. E., & Ikeda, M. J. (1998). Parent ratings of ADHD symptoms: Factor structure, normative data, and psychometric properties. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 20, 83–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DuPaul, G. J., Power, T. J., Anastopoulos, A. D., Reid, R., McGoey, K. E., & Ikeda, M. J. (1997). Teacher ratings of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms: Factor structure and normative data. Psychological Assessment, 9, 436–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frick, P. J., Lahey, B. B., Applegate, B., et al. (1994). DSM-IV field trials for the disruptive behaviour disorders: Symptom utility estimates. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 33, 529–539.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaub, M., & Carlson, C. L. (1997). Behavioral characteristics of DSM-IV ADHD subtypes in a school-based population. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 25, 103–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, R. (2007). Australian parent and teacher ratings of the DSM-IV ADHD symptoms: Differential symptom functioning and parent–teacher agreement and differences. Journal of Attention Disorders, 11, 17–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, R., Burns, G. L., Walsh, J. A., & Hafetz, N. (2005). A multitrait–multisource confirmatory factor analytic approach to the construct validity of ADHD and ODD rating scales with Malaysian children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 241–254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, R., Burns, G. L., Walsh, J. A., & Moura, M. A. (2003). A multitrait–multisource confirmatory factor analytic approach to the construct validity of the ADHD rating scales. Psychological Assessment, 15, 3–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, R., Harvey, J., Quick, C., Scharer, I., & Harris, G. (1999). DSM-IV AD/HD: Confirmatory factor models, prevalence, and gender and age differences based on parent and teacher ratings of Australian primary school children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 265–274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goyette, C. H., Conners, C. K., & Ulrich, R. F. (1978). Normative data on revised Conners parent and teacher rating scales. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 221–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. N., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2006). Mplus user’s guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillow, D. R., Pelham, W. E., Jr., Hoza, B., Molina, B. S. G., & Stutz, C. H. (1998). Confirmatory factor analyses examining attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms and other childhood disruptive behaviors. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26, 293–309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Power, T. J., Andrews, T. J., Eiraldi, R. B., Doherty, B. J., Ikeda, B., & DuPaul, G. J. (1998). Evaluating attention deficit hyperactivity disorder using multiple informants: The incremental utility of combining teacher with parent reports. Psychological Assessment, 10, 250–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., et al. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related Quality of Life item banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information systems (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(Suppl 1), S22–S31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, R., DuPaul, G. J., Power, T. J., Anastopoulos, A. D., Rogers-Ackinson, D., Noll, M. B., et al. (1998). Assessing culturally different students for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder using behavioural rating scales. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26, 187–198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent trait ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement, no. 17.

  • Sprafkin, J., Gadow, K. D., & Nolan, E. E. (2001). The utility of the DSM-IV-Referenced Screening Instrument for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 9, 182–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, S., Chemyshenko, S., Chua, W. L., & Wadlington, P. (2001). Computing chi-square statistics and fit-plots using the MODFIT program. http://work.psych.uiuc.edu/irt/mdf_modfit.asp, downloaded on 6 October 2003.

  • Steinberg, L., & Thissen, D. (1995). Item response theory in personality research. In P. E. Shrout & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Personality research, methods, and theory: A festschrift honoring Donald W. Fiske. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thissen, D. (1991). MULTILOG: Multiple category item analysis and test scoring using item response theory. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thissen, D., & Steinberg, L. (1988). Data analysis using item response theory. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 385–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wender, E. (2004). ADHD symptoms and parent–teacher agreement. (Commentary). Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 25, 48–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolraich, M. L., Lambert, E. W., Bickman, L., Simmons, T., Doffing, M. A., & Woricy, K. A. (2004). Assessing the impact of parent and teacher agreement on diagnosing attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 25, 41–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rapson Gomez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gomez, R. Item Response Theory Analyses of the Parent and Teacher Ratings of the DSM-IV ADHD Rating Scale. J Abnorm Child Psychol 36, 865–885 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-008-9218-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-008-9218-8

Keywords

Navigation