Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Professionalizing the Practice of Public Policy in the Prevention of Violence

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The State of the Science Conference Statement on “Preventing Violence and Related Health-Risking Social Behaviors in Adolescents” accurately summarizes the state of knowledge regarding risk factors for violence and intervention efficacy. The Statement missed an opportunity, however, to move the field of prevention practice and policy forward by advocating for more systematic, central review of preventive interventions through a new federal regulatory body, such as an “FDA for Preventive Interventions.” This body would provide review of evidence-based programs and aid decision-making in funding. As a complement to this body, decision-makers also need guidelines in evidence-based practice in ambiguous circumstances, which characterize much of the reality of public policy. Therefore, this new regulatory body should be accompanied by guidelines for evidence-based practice in intervention and policy. Finally, in order to move forward both of these concepts, a National Academy of Sciences Panel should convene to deliberate how these concepts can be implemented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arum, R., & Beattie, I. (1999). High school experience and the risk of adult incarceration. Criminology, 37, 515–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy. (2003). Bringing evidence-driven progress to crime and substance-abuse policy: A recommended federal strategy. Final report available at http://coexgov.securesites.net.

  • Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy. (2005). Initiative with U.S. Public Policy Schools To Provide Students With Skills in Evidence-Based Policymaking. Report available at http://coexgov.securesites.net.

  • Cho, H., Hallfors, D., & Sanchez, V. (2005). Evaluation of a high school peer group intervention for at-risk youth. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 363–374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J., McCord, J., & Poulin F. (1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behaviors. American Psychologist, 54, 755–764.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A., Dishion, T. J., & Lansford, J. E. (2006). Deviant by design: The problem of deviant peer influences in intervention programs. In K. A. Dodge, T. J. Dishion, & J. E. Lansford (Eds.), Interventions and policies that aggregate deviant youth, and strategies to optimize outcomes. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. S., & Mihalic, S. (1997). Blueprints for violence prevention. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence, Institute of Behavioral Science. Available at http://www.colorado.edu/cspv/bluprints/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennett, S. T., Tobler, N. S., Ringwalt, C. L., & Flewelling, R. L. (1994). How effective is drug abuse resistance education? A meta-analysis of Project D.A.R.E. outcome evaluations. American Journal of Public Health, 84(9), 1394–1401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, R. A., Caplinger, T. E., & Wodarski, J. S. (1983). The Saint Louis Conundrum: The effective treatment of antisocial youth. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • James-Burdumy, S., Dynarski, M., Moore, M., Deke, J., Mansfield, W., & Pistorino, C. (2005). When schools stay open late: The national evaluation of the 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program: Final report. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. Available at http://www.ed.gov/ies/ncee.

  • Kew, O. (2005). A vaccine disaster and its fateful shadow. Science, 310, 975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingery, P. (2000). Zero tolerance: The alternative is education. Washington, DC: Hamilton Fish Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCord, J. (2003). Cures that harm: Unanticipated outcomes of crime prevention programs. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587, 16–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Offit, P.A. (2005). The Cutter Incident: How America's first polio vaccine led to the growing vaccine crisis. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L. W., & Strang, H. (2004). Verdicts or inventions?: Interpreting results from randomized controlled experiments in criminology. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 575–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skiba, R. J., & Peterson, R. L. (1999). The dark side of zero tolerance: Can punishment lead to safe schools? Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 372–376, 381–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, S. E., Richardson, W. S., Glasziou, & Haynes, R. B. (2005). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM (Third Ed). Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woody, S. R., Weis, J., & McLean, C. (2005). Empirically supported treatments: 10 years later. The Clinical Psychologist, 58, 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

    Kenneth A Dodge

Authors
  1. Kenneth A Dodge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dodge, K.A. Professionalizing the Practice of Public Policy in the Prevention of Violence. J Abnorm Child Psychol 34, 475–479 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-006-9040-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-006-9040-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation