Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pore network modeling of phase change in PEM fuel cell fibrous cathode

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Applied Electrochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A pore network model has been applied to the cathode side of a fuel cell membrane electrode assembly to investigate the mechanisms leading to liquid water formation in the cell. This model includes mass diffusion, liquid water percolation, thermal and electrical conduction to model phase change which is highly dependent on the local morphology of the cathode side. An iterative algorithm was developed to simulate transport processes within the cathode side of PEMFC applying a pseudo-transient pore network model at constant voltage boundary condition. This algorithm represents a significant improvement over previous pore network models that only considered capillary invasion of water from the catalyst layer and provides useful insights into the mechanism of water transport in the electrodes, especially condensation and evaporation. The electrochemical performance of PEMFCs was simulated under different relative humidity conditions to study the effect of water phase change on the cell performance. This model highlights the ability of pore network models to resolve the discrete water clusters in the electrodes which is essential to the two-phase transport behavior especially the transport of water vapor to and from condensed water clusters.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gostick JT et al (2009) On the role of the microporous layer in PEMFC operation. Electrochem Commun 11(3):576–579

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ramasamy RP et al (2008) Investigation of macro-and micro-porous layer interaction in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Int J Hydrog Energy 33(13):3351–3367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Owejan JP et al (2009) Water management studies in PEM fuel cells, Part I: fuel cell design and in situ water distributions. Int J Hydrog Energy 34(8):3436–3444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Secanell M, Wishart J, Dobson P (2011) Computational design and optimization of fuel cells and fuel cell systems: a review. J Power Sources 196(8):3690–3704

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Weber AZ et al (2014) A critical review of modeling transport phenomena in polymer-electrolyte fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc 161(12):F1254–F1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gostick JT et al (2010) Impact of liquid water on reactant mass transfer in PEM fuel cell electrodes. J Electrochem Soc 157(4):B563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lu Z et al (2010) Water management studies in PEM fuel cells, part III: dynamic breakthrough and intermittent drainage characteristics from GDLs with and without MPLs. Int J Hydrog Energy 35(9):4222–4233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cindrella L et al (2009) Gas diffusion layer for proton exchange membrane fuel cells—a review. J Power Sources 194(1):146–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Djilali N (2007) Computational modelling of polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cells: challenges and opportunities. Energy 32(4):269–280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bachmat Y, Bear J (1987) On the concept and size of a representative elementary volume (REV). In: Advances in transport phenomena in porous media. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Garcia-Salaberri PA et al (2015) Effective diffusivity in partially-saturated carbon-fiber gas diffusion layers: effect of local saturation and application to macroscopic continuum models. J Power Sources 296:440–453

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rebai M, Prat M (2009) Scale effect and two-phase flow in a thin hydrophobic porous layer. Application to water transport in gas diffusion layers of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J Power Sources 192(2):534–543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Aghighi M et al (2016) Simulation of a full fuel cell membrane electrode assembly using pore network modeling. J Electrochem Soc 163(5):F384–F392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Blunt MJ (2001) Flow in porous medi—pore-network models and multiphase flow. Curr Opin Coll Interface Sci 6(3):197–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Blunt MJ et al (2013) Pore-scale imaging and modelling. Adv Water Resour 51:197–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sahimi M (2011) Flow and transport in porous media and fractured rock: from classical methods to modern approaches. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Chatzis I, Dullien F (1977) Modelling pore structure by 2-D And 3-D networks with application to sandstones. J Can Pet Technol 16(01):33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Celia MA, Reeves PC, Ferrand LA (1995) Recent advances in pore scale models for multiphase flow in porous media. Rev Geophys 33(S2):1049–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Blunt MJ (1998) Physically-based network modeling of multiphase flow in intermediate-wet porous media. J Petrol Sci Eng 20(3):117–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gostick JT (2008) Multiphase mass transfer and capillary properties of gas diffusion layers for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. University of Waterloo, Waterloo

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sinha PK, Wang C-Y (2007) Pore-network modeling of liquid water transport in gas diffusion layer of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell. Electrochim Acta 52(28):7936–7945

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang Z, Wang C, Chen K (2001) Two-phase flow and transport in the air cathode of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J power sources 94(1):40–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nam JH, Kaviany M (2003) Effective diffusivity and water-saturation distribution in single-and two-layer PEMFC diffusion medium. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 46(24):4595–4611

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gostick JT et al (2007) Pore network modeling of fibrous gas diffusion layers for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. J Power Sources 173(1):277–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gostick JT (2013) Random pore network modeling of fibrous PEMFC gas diffusion media using Voronoi and Delaunay tessellations. J Electrochem Soc 160(8):F731–F743

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hinebaugh J, Fishman Z, Bazylak A (2010) Unstructured pore network modeling with heterogeneous PEMFC GDL porosity distributions. J Electrochem Soc 157(11):B1651

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. El Hannach M, Pauchet J, Prat M (2011) Pore network modeling: application to multiphase transport inside the cathode catalyst layer of proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Electrochim Acta 56(28):10796–10808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu R et al. (2012) Pore network modeling of cathode catalyst layer of proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Int J Hydrog Energy 37(15):11255–11267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zenyuk IV et al Coupling continuum and pore-network models for polymer-electrolyte fuel cells. Int J Hydrog Energy 40(46), 16831–16845

  30. Hartnig C et al (2009) High-resolution in-plane investigation of the water evolution and transport in PEM fuel cells. J Power Sources 188(2):468–474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hartnig C et al (2008) Cross-sectional insight in the water evolution and transport in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Appl Phys Lett 92(13):134106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Caulk DA, Baker DR (2010) Heat and water transport in hydrophobic diffusion media of PEM fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc 157(8):B1237–B1244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hickner M (2008) In situ high-resolution neutron radiography of cross-sectional liquid water profiles in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc 155(4):B427–B434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Yortsos YC, Stubos AK (2001) Phase change in porous media. Curr Opin coll Interface Sci 6(3):208–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Prat M (1993) Percolation model of drying under isothermal conditions in porous media. Int J Multiphase Flow 19(4):691–704

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Prat M (2007) On the influence of pore shape, contact angle and film flows on drying of capillary porous media. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 50(7–8):1455–1468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Prat M (2011) Pore network models of drying, contact angle, and film flows. Chem Eng Technol 34(7):1029–1038

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Yiotis AG et al (2005) Pore-network modeling of isothermal drying in porous media. Transp Porous Media 58(1–2):63–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Owejan JP et al (2010) Water transport mechanisms in PEMFC gas diffusion layers. J Electrochem Soc 157(10):B1456–B1464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Louriou C, Prat M (2012) Pore network study of bubble growth by vaporisation in a porous medium heated laterally. Int J Therm Sci 52(0):8–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Medici EF, Allen JS (2011) Incorporation of evaporation and vapor transport in pore level models of fuel cell porous media. ECS Trans 41(1):141–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Fritz DL (2012) An implementation of a phenomenological evaporation model into a porous network simulation for water management in low temperature fuel cells. Michigan Technological University, Houghton

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hinebaugh J, Bazylak A (2010) Condensation in PEM fuel cell gas diffusion layers: a pore network modeling approach. J Electrochem Soc 157(10):B1382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Boillat P et al (2012) Impact of water on PEFC performance evaluated by neutron imaging combined with pulsed helox operation. J Electrochem Soc 159(7):F210–F218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Oberholzer P, Boillat P (2014) Local characterization of PEFCs by differential cells: systematic variations of current and asymmetric relative humidity. J Electrochem Soc 161(1):F139–F152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Straubhaar B, Pauchet J, Prat M (2015) Water transport in gas diffusion layer of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell in the presence of a temperature gradient. Phase change effect. Int J Hydrog Energy 40(35):11668–11675

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Straubhaar B, Pauchet J, Prat M (2016) Pore network modelling of condensation in gas diffusion layers of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 102:891–901

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Belgacem N, Prat M, Pauchet J (2017) Coupled continuum and condensation–evaporation pore network model of the cathode in polymer-electrolyte fuel cell. Int J Hydrog Energy, 42(12), 8150–8165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Schalenbach M et al (2015) Gas permeation through nafion. Part 2: resistor network model. J Phys Chem C, 119(45), 25156–25169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Gostick J et al (2016) OpenPNM: a pore network modeling package. Comput Sci Eng 18(4):60–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Putz A et al (2013) Introducing open PNM: an open source pore network modeling software package. ECS Trans 58(1):79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Bruggeman D (1935) Dielectric constant and conductivity of mixtures of isotropic materials. Ann Phys (Leipzig) 24:636–679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. O’Hayre RP et al (2006) Fuel cell fundamentals. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  54. Washburn EW (1921) Note on a method of determining the distribution of pore sizes in a porous material. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 7:115–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Barabási A-L (1996) Invasion percolation and global optimization. Phys Rev Lett 76(20):3750–3753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Glantz R, Hilpert M (2008) Invasion percolation through minimum-weight spanning trees. Phys Rev E. 77(3):031128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Wilkinson D, Willemsen JF (1983) Invasion percolation: a new form of percolation theory. J Phys A: Math Gen 16(14):3365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Quesnel C et al (2015) Dynamic Percolation and Droplet Growth Behavior in Porous Electrodes of Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells. J Phys Chem C 119(40):22934–22944

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Gostick JT et al (2009) Characterization of the capillary properties of gas diffusion media. In: Modeling and diagnostics of polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Springer, Berlin, pp 225–254

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  60. Pharoah JG, Karan K, Sun W (2006) On effective transport coefficients in PEM fuel cell electrodes: anisotropy of the porous transport layers. J Power Sources 161(1):214–224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Shi Y et al (2008) Fractal model for prediction of effective thermal conductivity of gas diffusion layer in proton exchange membrane fuel cell. J Power Sources 185(1):241–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Vielstich W, Gasteiger HA, Yokokawa H (2009) Handbook of Fuel Cells. 6 vol Set. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  63. Reiser CA et al (2005) A reverse-current decay mechanism for fuel cells. Electrochem Solid-State Lett 8(6):A273–A276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Parthasarathy A et al (1992) The platinum microelectrode/Nafion interface: an electrochemical impedance spectroscopic analysis of oxygen reduction kinetics and Nafion characteristics. J Electrochem Soc 139(6):1634–1641

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Mathias M et al (2003) Diffusion media materials and characterisation. Handbook of fuel cells. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  66. Meng H, Wang C-Y (2004) Electron transport in PEFCs. J Electrochem Soc 151(3):A358–A367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Zhang J (2008) PEM fuel cell electrocatalysts and catalyst layers: fundamentals and applications. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  68. Iranzo A, Boillat P, Rosa F (2014) Validation of a three dimensional PEM fuel cell CFD model using local liquid water distributions measured with neutron imaging. Int J Hydrog Energy 39(13):7089–7099

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Tranter T et al (2017) A method for measuring relative in-plane diffusivity of thin and partially saturated porous media: an application to fuel cell gas diffusion layers. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 110:132–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada financial support throughout the course of this project, and the Automotive Fuel Cell Cooperation for support through the Collaborative Research and Development program.

Funding

Funding was provided by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Mahmoudreza Aghighi & Jeff Gostick

Authors
  1. Mahmoudreza Aghighi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeff Gostick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeff Gostick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aghighi, M., Gostick, J. Pore network modeling of phase change in PEM fuel cell fibrous cathode. J Appl Electrochem 47, 1323–1338 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-017-1126-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-017-1126-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation