Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Targeted savings and labor supply

  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Substantial evidence suggests that savings behavior may depart from neoclassical optimization. This article examines the implications of raising the savings rate—whether through social security, retirement plans, or otherwise—for labor supply, where labor supply is determined by behavioral utility functions that reflect the non-neoclassical character of savings behavior. Under one formulation, raising the targeted savings rate increases labor supply regardless of the slope of the labor supply curve; under a second, raising the targeted savings rate has the same effect on labor supply as that of raising the labor income tax rate; and under a third, raising the targeted savings rate has no effect on labor supply. Effects on labor supply are particularly consequential because of the significant preexisting distortion due to labor income taxation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguiar, M., & Hurst, E. (2005). Consumption versus expenditure. Journal of Political Economy, CXIII, 919–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, J., Blundell, R., & Tanner, S. (1998). Is there a retirement-savings puzzle? American Economic Review, LXXXVIII, 769–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B. D. (1994). Personal saving, information, and economic literacy: new directions for public policy. In C. E. Walker, M. Bloomfield, & M. Thorning (Eds.), Tax policy for economic growth in the 1990s (pp. 53–78). Washington, D.C.: American Council for Capital Formation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B. D. (2002). Taxation and saving. In A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (Eds.), Handbook of public economics (Vol. 3, pp. 1173–1249). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B. D., & Rangel, A. (2007). Behavioral public economics: welfare and policy analysis with non-standard decision makers. In P. Diamond & H. Vartiainen (Eds.), Behavioral economics and its applications (pp. 7–77). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B. D., Skinner, J., & Weinberg, S. (2001). What accounts for the variation in retirement wealth among U.S. households? American Economic Review, XCI, 832–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beshears, J., Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., & Madrian, B. C. (2006a). The importance of default options for retirement savings outcomes: evidence from the United States. National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Papers, No. 12009.

  • Beshears, J., Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., & Madrian, B. C. (2006b). Simplification and saving. National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Papers, No. 12659.

  • Carroll, G. D., Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B. C., & Metrick, A. (2009). Optimal defaults and active decisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, CXXIV, 1639–1674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chetty, R. (2006). A new method of estimating risk aversion. American Economic Review, XCVI, 1821–1834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B. C., & Metrick, A. (2004). For better or worse: default effects and 401(k) savings behavior. In D. A. Wise (Ed.), Perspectives on the economics of aging (pp. 81–121). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P. A. (2002). Social security reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P. A. (2004). Social security. American Economic Review, XCIV, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominitz, J., Manski, C. F., & Heinz, J. (2003). ‘Will social security be there for you?’: how Americans perceive their benefits. National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Papers, No. 9798.

  • Engen, E. M., Gale, W. G., & Uccello, C. E. (1999). The adequacy of household saving. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1999(2), 65–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M., & Liebman, J. B. (2002). Social security. In A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (Eds.), Handbook of public economics (Vol. 4, pp. 2245–2324). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gokhale, J., Kotlikoff, L. J., & Warshawsky, M. J. (2001). Comparing the economic and conventional approaches to financial planning. In L. J. Kotlikoff (Ed.), Essays on saving, bequests, altruism, and life-cycle planning (pp. 489–560). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., Kotlikoff, L. J., & Samuelson, W. (2001). Can people compute? An experimental test of the life cycle consumption model. In L. J. Kotlikoff (Ed.), Essays on saving, bequests, altruism, and life-cycle planning (pp. 335–385). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplow, L. (2006). Myopia and the effects of social security and capital taxation on labor supply. National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Papers, No. 12452.

  • Kaplow, L. (2008). The theory of taxation and public economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotlikoff, L. J., Spivak, A., & Summers, L. H. (1982). The adequacy of savings. American Economic Review, LXXII, 1056–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laibson, D. (1996). Hyperbolic discount functions, undersaving, and savings policy. National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Papers, No. 5635.

  • Laibson, D. (1997). Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, CXII, 443–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebman, J. B., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2004). Schmeduling. Harvard University, Kennedy School of Government.

  • Madrian, B. C., & Shea, D. F. (2001). The power of suggestion: inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, CXVI, 1149–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J., & Mitchell, O. S. (2000). Projected retirement wealth and saving adequacy. In O. S. Mitchell, P. B. Hammond, & A. M. Rappaport (Eds.), Forecasting retirement needs and retirement wealth (pp. 68–94). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, J. K., Seshadri, A., & Khitatrakun, S. (2006). Are Americans saving ‘optimally’ for retirement? Journal of Political Economy, CXIV, 617–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. (2006). The retirement–consumption puzzle and involuntary early retirement: evidence from the British Household Panel Survey. Economic Journal, CXVI, C130–C148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. H., & Benartzi, S. (2004). Save more tomorrow: using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. Journal of Political Economy, CXII, S164–S187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Harvard University, Hauser Hall 322, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA

    Louis Kaplow

Authors
  1. Louis Kaplow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louis Kaplow.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaplow, L. Targeted savings and labor supply. Int Tax Public Finance 18, 507–518 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-010-9128-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-010-9128-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation