Abstract
Aim
To identify the current surgical management of aphakia and the outcomes and complications of each technique.
Methods
This cross-sectional study included ophthalmic surgeons with at least one-year experience in surgery for aphakia. A study questionnaire was formulated to collect data in Saudi Arabia and other regional countries. The questionnaire included 22 questions on demographics, preferred surgical techniques, complications and the factors related to surgeon decision and the choice for managing aphakia.
Results
The study included 145 participants (111; 76.6% were males) with mean age of 46.7 ± 11.5 years. The mean duration of cataract surgery experience was 17.6 ± 11.1 years. Most participants (86.2%) were trained in cataract surgery. Scleral fixation of intraocular lens (SFIOL) was the most commonly preferred technique, followed by iris fixation IOL, and anterior chamber IOL (75.2%, 9%, and 15.9%, respectively). The main determinants for selection of a surgical technique were simplicity (56.6%), surgical instrument availability (48.3%), and training on the technique (47.6%). The most frequent postoperative complications were pupil distortion, high intraocular pressure (IOP), pupillary capture of the IOL, and IOL decentration.
Conclusions
SFIOL is the preferred surgical technique for managing aphakia. The decision to choose one technique over another is complex and is based on several factors, including technical difficulty, previous training, anatomical variations, ocular comorbidities, and the potential complications. The most frequent complications after surgical correction of aphakia are pupil distortion, high IOP, pupillary capture of the IOL, and decentered IOLs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Yotsukur E, Ayaki M, Nezu N, Torii H, Arai H, Sakatani K, Tsubota K, Negishi K (2020) Changes in patient subjective happiness and satisfaction with cataract surgery. Sci Rep 10:1–8
Por YM, Lavin MJ (2005) Techniques of intraocular lens suspension in the absence of capsular/zonular support. Surv Ophthalmol 50:429–462
Davies EC, Pineda R 2nd (2016) Intraocular lens exchange surgery at a tertiary referral center: indications, complications, and visual outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg 42:1262–1267
Holt DG, Stagg B, Young J, Ambati BK (2012) ACIOL. Sutured PCIOL, or glued IOL: Where do we stand? Curr Opin Ophthalmol 23:62
Jones JJ, Jones YJ, Jin GJ (2014) Indications and outcomes of intraocular lens exchange during a recent 5-year period. Am J Ophthalmol 157(154–162):e151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.019
Jehan FS, Mamalis N, Crandall AS (2001) Spontaneous late dislo- cation of intraocular lens within the capsular bag in pseudoexfoliation patients. Ophthalmology 108:1727–1731
Pueringer SL, Hodge DO, Erie JC (2011) Risk of late intraocular lens dislocation after cataract surgery, 1980–2009: a population-based study. Am J Ophthalmol 152:618–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.03.009
Mamalis N (2015) Pseudoexfoliation in intraocular lens dislocation: underdiagnosed scourge. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:909–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.05.002
Liu E, Cole S, Werner L, Hengerer F, Mamalis N, Kohnen T (2015) Pathologic evidence of pseudoexfoliation in cases of in-the-bag intraocular lens subluxation or dislocation. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:929–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.08.037
Alwadani S (2018) Cataract surgery training using surgical simulators and wet-labs: course description and literature review. Saudi J Ophthalmol 32:324–329
Xepoleas MD, Munabi NCO, Auslander A, Magee WP, Yao CA (2020) The experiences of female surgeons around the world: a scoping review. Hum Resour Health 18:80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-020-00526-3
Gong D, Winn BJ, Beal CJ, Blomquist PH, Chen RW, Culican SM et al (2019) Gender differences in case volume among ophthalmology residents. JAMA Ophthalmol 137:1015–1020. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.2427
Wu RY, Nongpiur ME, He MG, Sakata LM, Friedman DS, Chan Y-H et al (2011) Association of narrow angles with anterior chamber area and volume measured with anterior-segment optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 129:569–574
Wang D, Qi M, He M, Wu L, Lin S (2012) Ethnic difference of the anterior chamber area and volume and its association with angle width. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:3139–3144
Khan MA, Gupta OP, Jason HSU (2022) Scleral fixation of a four-haptic intraocular lens using gore-tex suture. Four-point fixation results in stable IOL positioning and centration. In: Retina Surgery Retina Pearls. Eliott D, Scott IU (Eds). Retina Today 2015; November/December, pp 35–37. 1215RT_Pearls.pdf (bmctoday.net). Accessed 7 July 2022
Sindal MD, Nakhwa CP, Sengupta S (2016) Comparison of sutured versus sutureless scleral-fixated intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 42:27–34
Ayres BD, Weissbart SB (2022) Scleral fixated intraocular lens. American Academy of Ophthalmology 2021. Website: Scleral Fixated Intraocular Lens: EyeWiki (aao.org). Accessed on 7 July 2022
Nottage JM, Bhasin V, Nirankari VS (2009) Long-term safety and visual outcomes of transscleral sutured posterior chamber IOLs and penetrating keratoplasty combined with transscleral sutured posterior chamber IOLs. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 107:242–250
Zhang Y, Liang XY, Liu S, Lee JWY, Bhaskar S, Lam DSC (2016) Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas for highly myopic eyes. J Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1917268
Schuster AK, Schlichtenbrede FC, Harder BC, Beutelspacher SC, Jonas JB (2014) Target refraction for best uncorrected distance and near vision in cataract surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol 24:509–515. https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000414
Filipović T, Gržetić R, Merlak M, Lončarek K (2005) Complications after primary and secondary transsclerally sutured posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. Coll Antropol 29(Supplement 1 No. 1):37–40
Brunin G, Sajjad A, Kim EJ, Montes de Oca I, Weikert MP, Wang L et al (2017) Secondary intraocular lens implantation: complication rates, visual acuity, and refractive outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg 43:369–376
Lodhi S, Shruthi G (2018) Revised technique of four: point scleral fixated intraocular lens: visual outcomes and complications. OR 8:1–7. https://doi.org/10.9734/OR/2018/39882
Long C, Wei Y, Yuan Z, Zhang Z, Lin X, Liu B (2015) Modified technique for transscleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses. BMC Ophthalmol 15:127
Mahapatra SK, Mannem N (2021) Anterior chamber intraocular lens: an effective alternative in traumatic and surgical aphakia in the era of scleral-fixated intraocular lens. Indian J Ophthalmol 69:1404–1408. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2192_20
Dzhaber D, Mustafa OM, Tian J, Cox JT, Daoud YJ (2020) Outcomes and complications of iris-fixated intraocular lenses in cases with inadequate capsular support and complex ophthalmic history. Eye 34:1875–1882. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-019-0759-6
Wagoner MD, Cox TA, Ariyasu RG, Jacobs DS, Karp CL (2003) Intraocular lens implantation in the absence of capsular support: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 110:840–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(02)02000-6
Houser K (2022) Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lenses. Website: Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lenses - EyeWiki (aao.org). Accessed on July 23rd
Kwong YYY, Yuen HKL, Lam RF, Lee VYW, Rao SK, Lam DSC (2007) Comparison of outcomes of primary scleral-fixated versus primary anterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in complicated cataract surgeries. Ophthalmology 114:80–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.11.024
Sedziak-Marcinek B, Wylegała A, Chełmecka E, Marcinek M, Wylegała E (2021) Iris-claw intraocular lens implantation in various clinical indications: a 4-year study. J Clin Med 10:1199. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061199
Chen Y, Liu Q, Xue C, Huang Z, Chen Y (2012) Three-year follow-up of secondary anterior iris fixation of an aphakic intraocular lens to correct aphakia. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:1595–1601
Simões PS, Ferreira TB (2014) Iris-fixated intraocular lenses for ametropia and aphakia. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol 3:116–122
Funding
The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support was received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception, design, material preparation, and data collection. Data analysis was performed by MA MBBS and HBH MBBS. MA MBBS, HBH MBBS, and RF MBBS wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. Finally, all authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare they have no financial interests.
Ethical approval
This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital Institutional Review Board.
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects included in this study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Alshehri, M., Bin Helayel, H., Vargas, J.M. et al. Preferred surgical techniques for secondary intraocular lens implantation in adults with aphakia. Int Ophthalmol 43, 3539–3547 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-023-02761-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-023-02761-8