Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preferred surgical techniques for secondary intraocular lens implantation in adults with aphakia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

To identify the current surgical management of aphakia and the outcomes and complications of each technique.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included ophthalmic surgeons with at least one-year experience in surgery for aphakia. A study questionnaire was formulated to collect data in Saudi Arabia and other regional countries. The questionnaire included 22 questions on demographics, preferred surgical techniques, complications and the factors related to surgeon decision and the choice for managing aphakia.

Results

The study included 145 participants (111; 76.6% were males) with mean age of 46.7 ± 11.5 years. The mean duration of cataract surgery experience was 17.6 ± 11.1 years. Most participants (86.2%) were trained in cataract surgery. Scleral fixation of intraocular lens (SFIOL) was the most commonly preferred technique, followed by iris fixation IOL, and anterior chamber IOL (75.2%, 9%, and 15.9%, respectively). The main determinants for selection of a surgical technique were simplicity (56.6%), surgical instrument availability (48.3%), and training on the technique (47.6%). The most frequent postoperative complications were pupil distortion, high intraocular pressure (IOP), pupillary capture of the IOL, and IOL decentration.

Conclusions

SFIOL is the preferred surgical technique for managing aphakia. The decision to choose one technique over another is complex and is based on several factors, including technical difficulty, previous training, anatomical variations, ocular comorbidities, and the potential complications. The most frequent complications after surgical correction of aphakia are pupil distortion, high IOP, pupillary capture of the IOL, and decentered IOLs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yotsukur E, Ayaki M, Nezu N, Torii H, Arai H, Sakatani K, Tsubota K, Negishi K (2020) Changes in patient subjective happiness and satisfaction with cataract surgery. Sci Rep 10:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  2. Por YM, Lavin MJ (2005) Techniques of intraocular lens suspension in the absence of capsular/zonular support. Surv Ophthalmol 50:429–462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Davies EC, Pineda R 2nd (2016) Intraocular lens exchange surgery at a tertiary referral center: indications, complications, and visual outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg 42:1262–1267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Holt DG, Stagg B, Young J, Ambati BK (2012) ACIOL. Sutured PCIOL, or glued IOL: Where do we stand? Curr Opin Ophthalmol 23:62

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Jones JJ, Jones YJ, Jin GJ (2014) Indications and outcomes of intraocular lens exchange during a recent 5-year period. Am J Ophthalmol 157(154–162):e151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jehan FS, Mamalis N, Crandall AS (2001) Spontaneous late dislo- cation of intraocular lens within the capsular bag in pseudoexfoliation patients. Ophthalmology 108:1727–1731

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pueringer SL, Hodge DO, Erie JC (2011) Risk of late intraocular lens dislocation after cataract surgery, 1980–2009: a population-based study. Am J Ophthalmol 152:618–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.03.009

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Mamalis N (2015) Pseudoexfoliation in intraocular lens dislocation: underdiagnosed scourge. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:909–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.05.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu E, Cole S, Werner L, Hengerer F, Mamalis N, Kohnen T (2015) Pathologic evidence of pseudoexfoliation in cases of in-the-bag intraocular lens subluxation or dislocation. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:929–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.08.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Alwadani S (2018) Cataract surgery training using surgical simulators and wet-labs: course description and literature review. Saudi J Ophthalmol 32:324–329

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Xepoleas MD, Munabi NCO, Auslander A, Magee WP, Yao CA (2020) The experiences of female surgeons around the world: a scoping review. Hum Resour Health 18:80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-020-00526-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gong D, Winn BJ, Beal CJ, Blomquist PH, Chen RW, Culican SM et al (2019) Gender differences in case volume among ophthalmology residents. JAMA Ophthalmol 137:1015–1020. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.2427

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu RY, Nongpiur ME, He MG, Sakata LM, Friedman DS, Chan Y-H et al (2011) Association of narrow angles with anterior chamber area and volume measured with anterior-segment optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 129:569–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang D, Qi M, He M, Wu L, Lin S (2012) Ethnic difference of the anterior chamber area and volume and its association with angle width. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:3139–3144

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Khan MA, Gupta OP, Jason HSU (2022) Scleral fixation of a four-haptic intraocular lens using gore-tex suture. Four-point fixation results in stable IOL positioning and centration. In: Retina Surgery Retina Pearls. Eliott D, Scott IU (Eds). Retina Today 2015; November/December, pp 35–37. 1215RT_Pearls.pdf (bmctoday.net). Accessed 7 July 2022

  16. Sindal MD, Nakhwa CP, Sengupta S (2016) Comparison of sutured versus sutureless scleral-fixated intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 42:27–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ayres BD, Weissbart SB (2022) Scleral fixated intraocular lens. American Academy of Ophthalmology 2021. Website: Scleral Fixated Intraocular Lens: EyeWiki (aao.org). Accessed on 7 July 2022

  18. Nottage JM, Bhasin V, Nirankari VS (2009) Long-term safety and visual outcomes of transscleral sutured posterior chamber IOLs and penetrating keratoplasty combined with transscleral sutured posterior chamber IOLs. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 107:242–250

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang Y, Liang XY, Liu S, Lee JWY, Bhaskar S, Lam DSC (2016) Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas for highly myopic eyes. J Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1917268

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Schuster AK, Schlichtenbrede FC, Harder BC, Beutelspacher SC, Jonas JB (2014) Target refraction for best uncorrected distance and near vision in cataract surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol 24:509–515. https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Filipović T, Gržetić R, Merlak M, Lončarek K (2005) Complications after primary and secondary transsclerally sutured posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. Coll Antropol 29(Supplement 1 No. 1):37–40

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brunin G, Sajjad A, Kim EJ, Montes de Oca I, Weikert MP, Wang L et al (2017) Secondary intraocular lens implantation: complication rates, visual acuity, and refractive outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg 43:369–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lodhi S, Shruthi G (2018) Revised technique of four: point scleral fixated intraocular lens: visual outcomes and complications. OR 8:1–7. https://doi.org/10.9734/OR/2018/39882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Long C, Wei Y, Yuan Z, Zhang Z, Lin X, Liu B (2015) Modified technique for transscleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses. BMC Ophthalmol 15:127

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Mahapatra SK, Mannem N (2021) Anterior chamber intraocular lens: an effective alternative in traumatic and surgical aphakia in the era of scleral-fixated intraocular lens. Indian J Ophthalmol 69:1404–1408. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2192_20

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Dzhaber D, Mustafa OM, Tian J, Cox JT, Daoud YJ (2020) Outcomes and complications of iris-fixated intraocular lenses in cases with inadequate capsular support and complex ophthalmic history. Eye 34:1875–1882. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-019-0759-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Wagoner MD, Cox TA, Ariyasu RG, Jacobs DS, Karp CL (2003) Intraocular lens implantation in the absence of capsular support: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 110:840–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(02)02000-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Houser K (2022) Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lenses. Website: Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lenses - EyeWiki (aao.org). Accessed on July 23rd

  29. Kwong YYY, Yuen HKL, Lam RF, Lee VYW, Rao SK, Lam DSC (2007) Comparison of outcomes of primary scleral-fixated versus primary anterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in complicated cataract surgeries. Ophthalmology 114:80–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.11.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sedziak-Marcinek B, Wylegała A, Chełmecka E, Marcinek M, Wylegała E (2021) Iris-claw intraocular lens implantation in various clinical indications: a 4-year study. J Clin Med 10:1199. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061199

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen Y, Liu Q, Xue C, Huang Z, Chen Y (2012) Three-year follow-up of secondary anterior iris fixation of an aphakic intraocular lens to correct aphakia. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:1595–1601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Simões PS, Ferreira TB (2014) Iris-fixated intraocular lenses for ametropia and aphakia. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol 3:116–122

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support was received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception, design, material preparation, and data collection. Data analysis was performed by MA MBBS and HBH MBBS. MA MBBS, HBH MBBS, and RF MBBS wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. Finally, all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafah Fairaq.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare they have no financial interests.

Ethical approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital Institutional Review Board.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects included in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alshehri, M., Bin Helayel, H., Vargas, J.M. et al. Preferred surgical techniques for secondary intraocular lens implantation in adults with aphakia. Int Ophthalmol 43, 3539–3547 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-023-02761-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-023-02761-8

Keywords

Navigation