Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Corneal densitometry in bilateral keratoconus patients with unilateral corneal Vogt’s striae: a contralateral eye study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate corneal densitometry and correlations with corneal morphological parameters in patients with bilateral keratoconus (KC) with unilateral Vogt’s striae.

Methods

This prospective contralateral study enrolled 112 patients (224 eyes) with evident KC characteristics (corneal topography with asymmetric bow-tie pattern, inferior steepening), and at least one KC sign (conical protrusion of the cornea at the apex, corneal stromal thinning, Fleischer ring, Vogt’s striae) on slit-lamp examination. Corneal densitometry and morphological parameters were measured using Pentacam HR.

Results

The mean age was 23.93 ± 6.81 years. Fifty-two (23.22%), 111 (49.55%), and 61 (27.23%) eyes were in mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. Corneal densitometry values of the anterior 0–2 mm and 2–6 mm, intermediate 0–2 mm and 2–6 mm, posterior 2–6 mm, and total cornea 2–6 mm were significantly higher in eyes with Vogt’s striae (P < 0.05), whereas those of the anterior 6–10 mm, posterior 0–2 mm, and total cornea 6–10 mm were significantly lower in eyes with Vogt’s striae (P < 0.05). Anterior 0–2 mm and total cornea 2–6 mm corneal densitometry values were positively correlated with anterior K1 (A-K1), K2 (A-K2), Km (A-Km), Kmax (A-Kmax), anterior corneal elevation, and posterior corneal elevation (P < 0.05), and negatively correlated with central corneal thickness and thinnest corneal thickness in eyes with Vogt’s striae (P < 0.05). A-K2, A-Km, and A-Kmax were significantly correlated with the densitometry values of the anterior 0–2 mm and intermediate 0–2 mm in eyes without Vogt’s striae (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Vogt’s striae mainly occur on the anterior and intermediate layers during KC progression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Blackburn BJ, Jenkins MW, Rollins AM, Dupps WJ (2019) A review of structural and biomechanical changes in the cornea in aging, disease, and photochemical crosslinking. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 7:66. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00066

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Romero-Jiménez M, Santodomingo-Rubido J, Wolffsohn JS (2010) Keratoconus: a review. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 33:157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2010.04.006 (quiz 205)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Millodot M, Ortenberg I, Lahav-Yacouel K, Behrman S (2016) Effect of ageing on keratoconic corneas. J Optom 9:72–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2015.05.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hashemi H, Beiranvand A, Khabazkhoob M, Asgari S, Emamian MH, Shariati M, Fotouhi A (2013) Prevalence of keratoconus in a population-based study in Shahroud. Cornea 32:1441–1445. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182a0d014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zadnik K, Barr JT, Edrington TB, Everett DF et al (1998) Baseline findings in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39:2537–2546

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hollingsworth JG, Efron N (2005) Observations of banding patterns (Vogt striae) in keratoconus: a confocal microscopy study. Cornea 24:162–166. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ico.0000141231.03225.d8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Güngör IU, Beden U, Sönmez B (2008) Bilateral horizontal Vogt’s striae in keratoconus. Clin Ophthalmol 2:653–655. https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s2573

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Rabinowitz YS (1998) Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol 42:297–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6257(97)00119-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mas Tur V, MacGregor C, Jayaswal R, O’Brart D, Maycock N (2017) A review of keratoconus: diagnosis, pathophysiology, and genetics. Surv Ophthalmol 62:770–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.06.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kennedy RH, Bourne WM, Dyer JA (1986) A 48-year clinical and epidemiologic study of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 101:267–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(86)90817-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gokhale NS (2013) Epidemiology of keratoconus. Indian J Ophthalmol 61:382–383. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.116054

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Grieve K, Ghoubay D, Georgeon C et al (2017) Stromal striae: a new insight into corneal physiology and mechanics. Sci Rep 7:13584

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wisse RPL, Simons RWP, van der Vossen MJB, Muijzer MB, Soeters N, Nuijts RMMA, Godefrooij DA (2019) Clinical evaluation and validation of the Dutch crosslinking for keratoconus score. JAMA Ophthalmol 137:610–616. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.0415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mocan MC, Yilmaz PT, Irkec M, Orhan M (2008) The significance of Vogt’s striae in keratoconus as evaluated by in vivo confocal microscopy. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 36:329–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01737.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kreps EO, Jimenez-Garcia M, Issarti I, Claerhout I, Koppen C, Rozema JJ (2020) Repeatability of the Pentacam HR in various grades of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 219:154–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2020.06.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lopes B, Ramos I, Ambrósio R Jr (2014) Corneal densitometry in keratoconus. Cornea 33:1282–1286. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000000266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ní Dhubhghaill S, Rozema JJ, Jongenelen S, Ruiz Hidalgo I, Zakaria N, Tassignon MJ (2014) Normative values for corneal densitometry analysis by Scheimpflug optical assessment. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55:162–168. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-13236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shen Y, Jian W, Sun L, Li M, Han T, Son J, Zhou X (2016) One-year follow-up of changes in corneal densitometry after accelerated (45 mW/cm2) transepithelial corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus: a retrospective study. Cornea 35:1434–1440. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000000934

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Bitirgen G, Ozkagnici A, Bozkurt B, Malik RA (2015) In vivo corneal confocal microscopic analysis in patients with keratoconus. Int J Ophthalmol 8:534–539. https://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.03.17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ozgurhan EB, Kara N, Yildirim A, Bozkurt E, Uslu H, Demirok A (2013) Evaluation of corneal microstructure in keratoconus: a confocal microscopy study. Am J Ophthalmol 156:885-893.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2013.05.043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Anayol MA, Sekeroglu MA, Ceran BB, Dogan M, Gunaydin S, Yilmazbas P (2016) Quantitative assessment of corneal clarity in keratoconus: a case control study of corneal densitometry. Eur J Ophthalmol 26:18–23. https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Goebels S, Eppig T, Seitz B, Szentmàry N, Cayless A, Langenbucher A (2018) Endothelial alterations in 712 keratoconus patients. Acta Ophthalmol 96:134–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. El-Agha MS, El Sayed YM, Harhara RM, Essam HM (2014) Correlation of corneal endothelial changes with different stages of keratoconus. Cornea 33:707–711. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000000134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Askarizadeh F, Sedaghat MR, Ostadi-Moghaddam H, Narooie-Noori F, Rakhshandadi T, Rajabi S (2017) A contralateral eye study comparing corneal biomechanics in subjects with bilateral keratoconus with unilateral Vogt’s striae. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol 6:49–55

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Sedaghat MR, Askarizadeh F, Narooie-Noori F, Rakhshandadi T, Ostadi-Moghadam H, Rajabi S (2018) Comparative evaluation of tomographic and biometric characteristics in bilateral keratoconus patients with unilateral corneal Vogt’s striae: a contralateral eye study. Clin Ophthalmol 12:1383–1390. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S169266

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Mukhtar S, Ambati BK (2018) Pediatric keratoconus: a review of the literature. Int Ophthalmol 38:2257–2266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0699-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Steinberg J, Siebert M, Katz T et al (2018) Tomographic and biomechanical Scheimpflug imaging for keratoconus characterization: a validation of current indices. J Refract Surg 34:840–847. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20181012-01

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rakhshandadi T, Sedaghat MR, Askarizadeh F, Momeni-Moghaddam H, Khabazkhoob M, Yekta A, Narooie-Noori F (2021) Refractive characteristics of keratoconus eyes with corneal Vogt’s striae: a contralateral eye study. J Optom 14:183–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2020.04.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Freegard TJ (1997) The physical basis of transparency of the normal cornea. Eye (Lond) 11:465–471. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1997.127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rozema JJ, Koppen C, Bral N, Tassignon MJ (2013) Changes in forward and backward light scatter in keratoconus resulting from corneal cross-linking. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2:15–19. https://doi.org/10.1097/APO.0b013e3182729df0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Alnawaiseh M, Rosentreter A, Eveslage M, Eter N, Zumhagen L (2015) Changes in corneal transparency after cross-linking for progressive keratoconus: long-term follow-up. J Refract Surg 31:614–618. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20150820-07

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Shen Y, Han T, Jhanji V, Shang J, Zhao J, Li M, Zhou X (2019) Correlation between corneal topographic, densitometry, and biomechanical parameters in keratoconus eyes. Transl Vis Sci Technol 8:12. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.8.3.12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Chung SH, Kim EK (2005) Keratoconus with unilateral horizontal stress lines. Cornea 24:890. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ico.0000157405.22635.ca

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Uçakhan OO, Kanpolat A, Ylmaz N, Ozkan M (2006) In vivo confocal microscopy findings in keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens 32:183–191. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.icl.0000189038.74139.4a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ghosh S, Mutalib HA, Kaur S, Ghoshal R, Retnasabapathy S (2017) Corneal cell morphology in keratoconus: a confocal microscopic observation. Malays J Med Sci 24:44–54. https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2017.24.2.6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Erie JC, Patel SV, McLaren JW, Nau CB, Hodge DO, Bourne WM (2002) Keratocyte density in keratoconus. A confocal microscopy study(a). Am J Ophthalmol 134:689–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01698-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Krachmer JH, Feder RS, Belin MW (1984) Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disorders. Surv Ophthalmol 28:293–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6257(84)90094-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Huseynli S, Salgado-Borges J, Alio JL (2018) Comparative evaluation of Scheimpflug tomography parameters between thin non-keratoconic, subclinical keratoconic, and mild keratoconic corneas. Eur J Ophthalmol 28:521–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672118760146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ostadi-Moghaddam H, Sedaghat MR, Rakhshandadi T, Rajabi S, Narooie-Noori F, Askarizadeh F (2018) A contralateral eye study comparing characteristics of corneal endothelial cells in bilateral keratoconus patients with unilateral corneal Vogt’s striae. J Curr Ophthalmol 30:228–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2018.01.005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Bühren J (2014) Hornhauttopografie und Keratokonusdiagnostik mittels Scheimpflug-Fotografie [Corneal topography and keratoconus diagnostics with Scheimpflug photography]. Ophthalmologe 111:920–926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-013-2962-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Böhm M, Shajari M, Remy M, Kohnen T (2019) Corneal densitometry after accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking in progressive keratoconus. Int Ophthalmol 39:765–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-018-0876-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the technical support of Tianjin Eye Hospital and Eye Institute (the Tianjin Key Lab of Ophthalmology and Visual Science).

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81873684).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SW, JL, YW were involved in concept and design. SW, YC, JD contributed to data collection. SW, YL, JL were involved in analysis and interpretation. The first draft of the manuscript was written by SW, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from at least one parent or legal guardian of each subject.

Ethical approval

This study protocol adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and received approval from the institutional review board and Ethics Committee of Xi'an People's Hospital (Xi'an Fourth Hospital) (Ethical Approval Number: 20180157).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, S., Li, J., Li, Y. et al. Corneal densitometry in bilateral keratoconus patients with unilateral corneal Vogt’s striae: a contralateral eye study. Int Ophthalmol 43, 885–897 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02491-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02491-3

Keywords

Navigation