Abstract
To report a case of archipelago keratitis and its improvement as evaluated by corneal densitometry. A review of the patient’s record and relevant literature. A 57-year-old man presented with blurred vision associated with photophobia and halos around lights. Slit-lamp examination revealed multiple confluent, nummular subepithelial infiltrates. The infiltrates were unresponsive to topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drops. The treatment was changed to topical steroids and oral acyclovir and a diagnosis of archipelago keratitis was made. The patient showed quick response to the treatment and the infiltrates disappeared within 5 weeks. However, no clear changes were observed initially by slit-lamp but corneal densitometry allowed us to evaluate improvement as the density value decreased from 96.5 to 38.6. After 10 days of treatment all the symptoms were resolved. Archipelago keratitis responded well to topical steroids and oral acyclovir. We describe the use of corneal densitometry complementary to slit-lamp examination in the clinical observation of archipelago keratitis.
References
Whitcher JP, Srinivasan M, Upadhayay MP (2001) Corneal blindness; a global perspective. Bull World Health Org 79:214–221
Liesegang TJ (2001) Herpes simplex virus epidemiology and ocular importance. Cornea 20:1–13
Norn MS (1970) Dendritic (herpetic) keratitis. IV. Follow-up examination of corneal sensitivity. Acta Ophthalmol (Cph) 48(3):383–395
Gabison EE, Alfonsi N, Doan S, Racine L, Sultan G, Baudouin C, Hoang-Xuan T (2007) Archipelago keratitis: a clinical variant of recurrent herpetic keratitis? Ophthalmology 114(11):2000–2005
Beyer CF, Hill JM, Reidy JJ, Beuerman RW (1990) Corneal nerve disruption reactivates virus in rabbits latently infected with HSV-1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 31(5):925–932
Oliveira-Soto L, Efron N (2001) Morphology of corneal nerves using confocal microscopy. Cornea 20:374–384
Hillenaar T, van Cleynenbreugel H, Verjans GM, Wubbels RJ, Remeijer L (2012) Monitoring the inflammatory process in herpetic stromal keratitis: the role of in vivo confocal microscopy. Ophthalmology 119(6):1102–1110
Hamrah P, Cruzat A, Dastjerdi MH, Zheng L, Shahatit BM, Bayhan HA, Dana R, Pavan-Langston D (2010) Corneal sensation and subbasal nerve alterations in patients with herpes simplex keratitis: an in vivo confocal microscopy study. Ophthalmology 117(10):1930–1936
Vivino MA, Chintalagiri S, Trus B, Datiles M (1993) Development of a Scheimpflug slit lamp camera system for quantitative densitometric analysis. Eye (Lond) 7(Pt 6):791–798.
Bosem ME, Sample PA, Martinez GA, Lusky M, Weinreb RN (1994) Age-related changes in the human lens: a comparison of Scheimpflug photography and lens density index. J Cataract Refract Surg 20(1):70–73
Greenstein SA, Fry KL, Bhatt J, Hersh PS (2010) Natural history of corneal haze after collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: scheimpflug and biomicroscopic analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 36(12):2105–2114
Takacs AI, Mihaltz K, Nagy ZZ (2011) Corneal density with the Pentacam after photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg 27(4):269–277
Cennamo G, Forte R, Aufiero B, La Rana A (2011) Computerized scheimpflug densitometry as a measure of corneal optical density after excimer laser refractive surgery in myopic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 37(8):1502–1506
Fares U, Otri AM, Al-Aqaba MA, Faraj L, Dua HS (2012) Wavefront-optimized excimer laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and myopic astigmatism: refractive outcomes and corneal densitometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 38(12):2131–2138
Otri AM, Fares U, Al-Aqaba MA, Dua HS (2012) Corneal densitometry as an indicator of corneal health. Ophthalmology 119(3):501–508
Conflict of interest
The authors do not have any proprietary interest in the products and drugs mentioned in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Orucoglu, F., Talaz, S., Aksu, A. et al. Corneal densitometry evaluation in archipelago keratitis. Int Ophthalmol 34, 99–102 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-013-9736-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-013-9736-4