Skip to main content
Log in

International Comparison on Thermal-Diffusivity Measurements for Iron and Isotropic Graphite Using the Laser Flash Method in CCT-WG9

  • Published:
International Journal of Thermophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The first international pilot study of thermal-diffusivity measurements using the laser flash (LF) method was organized by the working group 9 (WG9) of the Consultative Committee for Thermometry (CCT) of the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM). Four National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) participated in this comparison. Thermal-diffusivity measurements on the Armco iron and the isotropic graphite IG-110 were carried out from room temperature to about 1200 K. The sample sets consist of five disk-shaped specimens of 10 mm in diameter and (1.0, 1.4, 2.0, 2.8, and 4.0) mm in thickness, each cut from the same block of material. These sample sets were specifically prepared for the comparison and sent to the participants. In the pilot comparison, the thermal diffusivity of each sample was estimated using the LF method with a specific extrapolating procedure. This procedure has the advantage of determining the inherent thermal diffusivity of the material. The extrapolated value in a plot of measured apparent thermal-diffusivity values versus the amplitude of the output signal corresponding to the temperature rise during each measurement is defined as the inherent thermal diffusivity. The overall results showed good agreement between independent laboratories, measurement equipment, and specimen thicknesses. The thermal diffusivities of the materials were determined using our measured results. A quantitative evaluation of the variability of the data obtained by the participants has been done, by evaluating the deviations from the reference value, the Z-value, and the En-number. Some data showed a large deviation from the reference value. It was concluded that these are caused by an insufficient time response of the measurement equipment and some difficulties with changing the pulsed heating energy. The effect of the thermal expansion on the thermal diffusivity was checked. It was found that the thermal-expansion effect was very small and negligible in this case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bureau International des poids et Mesures, The International System of Units (SI), 8th edn. http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/si_brochure_8.pdf. Accessed 16 May 2012.

  2. http://www.bipm.org/en/home/. Accessed 16 May 2012

  3. http://www.bipm.org/en/committees/cc/cct/. Accessed 16 May 2012

  4. Parker W.J., Jenkins R.J., Butler C.P., Abbott G.L.: J. Appl. Phys. 32, 1679 (1961)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Akoshima M., Baba T.: Int. J. Thermophys. 26, 151 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hay B., Filtz J.R., Hameury J., Rongione L.: Int. J. Thermophys. 26, 883 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. NMIJ Certified Reference Materials Catalog 2011–2012, http://www.nmij.jp/service/C/CRM_Catalogue20120315.pdf and http://www.nmij.jp/english/service/C/

  8. M. Akoshima, B. Hay, J. Zhang, L. Chapman, T. Baba, in Proceedings of Thermal Conductivity 30/Thermal Expansion 18, ed. by D.S. Gaal, P.S. Gaal (DEStech Publications, Lancaster, 2010), p. 367–377

  9. ISO/IEC Guide98:1995 “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement” (GUM)

  10. M. Akoshima, T. Baba, in Proceedings of Thermal Conductivity 28/Thermal Expansion 16, ed. by R.B. Dinwiddie, M.A. White, L. McElroy (DEStech Publications, Lancaster, 2006), p. 497–506

  11. A. Degiovanni, M. Laurent, Rev. Phys. Appl. 21, 229 (1986) [in French]

  12. Shinzato K., Baba T.: J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 64, 413 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cape J.A., Lehman G.W.: J. Appl. Phys. 34, 1909 (1963)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Josell D., Warren J., Cezairliyan A.: J. Appl. Phys. 78, 6867 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. http://www.nmij.jp/~mprop-stats/thermophys/homepage/research/cfp32/index.html. Accessed 16 May 2012

  16. Baba T., Ono A.: Meas. Sci. Technol. 12, 2046 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Zhang, “Uncertainty_report_NIM” (for the comparison), private comunication

  18. B. Hay, J.-R. Filtz, J.-C. Batsale, Mesure de la diffusivité thermique par la méthode flash. Techniques de l’Ingénieur, R2955 (Paris, 2004) [in French]

  19. ISO/IEC 17043:2010, “Conformity assessment—general requirements for proficiency testing”

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Akoshima.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akoshima, M., Hay, B., Zhang, J. et al. International Comparison on Thermal-Diffusivity Measurements for Iron and Isotropic Graphite Using the Laser Flash Method in CCT-WG9. Int J Thermophys 34, 763–777 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-012-1209-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-012-1209-x

Keywords

Navigation