Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the Relationship between Scent-Marking and Territoriality in Callitrichid Primates

  • Published:
International Journal of Primatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Across a diverse range of animal groups, scent-marking is integrally related to the defense of territories and maintenance of social status. However, using data from a field study of wild saddleback tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis), the authors of a recent paper claimed to find no evidence to support a relationship between scent-marking and territorial defense. Here I review the same evidence and argue that the data are consistent with the idea that scent-marking plays a critical role in territorial defense. This argument includes an attempt to clarify some misconceptions about the scent-marking mechanism that exist in the literature. I then reexamine the evidence in light of a proposed alternative function for scent-marking (that scent marks are used to explore reproductive opportunity and achieve extragroup copulations), and highlight some critical tests that could serve to distinguish between the two functional interpretations. Scent-marking could serve both in territorial signaling and in signaling to mates, but current evidence suggests that territorial defense is more, or at least equally, likely to be the primary function of scent-marking in callitrichids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brashares, J., & Arcese, P. (1999). Scent marking in a territorial antelope: I. The maintenance of borders between male oribi. Animal Behaviour, 57, 1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brotherton, P., & Manser, M. (1997). Female dispersion and the evolution of monogamy in the dik-dik. Animal Behaviour, 54, 1413–1424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. E., & Macdonald, D. W. (1985). Social odours in mammals. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charpentier, M. J. E., Crawford, J. C., Boulet, M., & Drea, C. M. (2010). Message 'scent': Lemurs detect the genetic relatedness and quality of conspecifics via olfactory cues. Animal Behaviour, 80, 101–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delbarco-Trillo, J., Burkert, B. A., Goodwin, T. E., & Drea, C. M. (2011). Night and day: The comparative study of strepsirrhine primates reveals socioecological and phylogenetic patterns in olfactory signals. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 24, 82–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Desjardins, J. K., Stiver, K. A., Fitzpatrick, J. L., & Balshine, S. (2008). Differential responses to territory intrusions in cooperatively breeding fish. Animal Behaviour, 75, 595–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, S. T., & Oring, L. W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197, 215–223.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, L. M. (1981). Demarkation in a gerenuk territory: An economic approach. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 56, 305–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, L. M. (1982). A reassessment of the function of scent marking in territories. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 60, 89–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, L. M. (1990). Scent marking by resource holders: Alternative mechanisms for advertising the costs of competition. In D. W. Macdonald, S. Natynczuk, & D. Müller-Schwarze (Eds.), Chemical signals in vertebrates, vol. 5 (pp. 315–328). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, L. M., & McKay, H. V. (1990). Competitor assessment by scent matching: An experimental test. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 26, 415–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, L. M., & Roberts, S. C. (2001a). Scent-marking by male mammals: Cheat-proof signals to competitors and mates. Advances in the Study of Behaviour, 30, 169–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, L. M., & Roberts, S. C. (2001b). Testing ideas about the function of scent marks in territories from spatial patterns. Animal Behaviour, 62, F7–F10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, L. M., Roberts, S. C., Thornton, E. A., & Andrew, M. J. (2000). Life history costs of olfactory status signalling in mice. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 48, 328–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hediger, H. (1949). Säugetier-territorien und ihre markierung. Bijdragen Tot de Dierkunde, 28, 172–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirano, Z. M. B., Correa, I. C., & De Oliveira, D. A. G. (2008). Contexts of rubbing behavior in Alouatta guariba clamitans: A scent-marking role? American Journal of Primatology, 70, 575–583.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogland, J. L. (1981). Nepotism and cooperative breeding in the black-tailed prairie dog (Sciuridae: Cynomys ludovicianus). In R. D. Alexander & D. W. Tinkle (Eds.), Natural selection and social behavior (pp. 283–310). New York: Chiron.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavaliers, M., & Colwell, D. D. (1995). Discrimination by female mice between the odors of parasitized males and non-parasitized males. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 261, 31–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lazaro-Perea, C. (2001). Intergroup interactions in wild common marmosets, Callithrix jacchus: Territorial defence and assessment of neighbours. Animal Behaviour, 62, 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazaro-Perea, C., Snowdon, C. T., & Arruda, M. D. (1999). Scent-marking behavior in wild groups of common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 46, 313–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. J. (2005). Sex differences in scent-marking in Sifaka: Mating conflict or male services? American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 128, 389–398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lledo-Ferrer, Y., Pelaez, F., & Heymann, E. W. (2011). The equivocal relationship between territoriality and scent marking in wild saddleback tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis). International Journal of Primatology, 32, 974–991.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J., & Harper, D. (2003). Animal signals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitani, J. C. (1987). Territoriality and monogamy among agile gibbons (Hylobates agilis). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 20, 265–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novotny, M., Harvey, S., & Jemiolo, B. (1990). Chemistry of male dominance in the house mouse, Mus domesticus. Experientia, 46, 109–113.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palagi, E., & Norscia, I. (2009). Multimodal signaling in wild Lemur catta: Economic design and territorial function of urine marking. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 139, 182–192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pochron, S. T., Morelli, T. L., Terranova, P., Scirbona, J., Cohen, J., Kunapareddy, G., Rakotonirina, G., Ratsimbazafy, R., Rakotosoa, R., & Wright, P. C. (2005). Patterns of male scent-marking in Propithecus edwardsi of Ranomnafana National Park, Madagascar. American Journal of Primatology, 65, 103–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raemaekers, J. J., & Raemaekers, P. M. (1985). Field playback of loud calls to gibbons (Hylobates lar) – territorial, sex-specific and species-specific responses. Animal Behaviour, 33, 481–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralls, K. (1971). Mammalian scent marking. Science, 171, 443–449.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, T. J., & Hurst, J. L. (1998). Scent marks as reliable signals of the competitive ability of mates. Animal Behaviour, 56, 727–735.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, T. J., & Hurst, J. L. (1999). The competing countermarks hypothesis: Reliable assessment of competitive ability by potential mates. Animal Behaviour, 58, 1027–1037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S. C. (1997). Selection of scent-marking sites by klipspringers (Oreotragus oreotragus). Journal of Zoology, 243, 555–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S. C. (1998). Behavioural responses to scent marks of increasing age in klipspringer Oreotragus oreotragus. Ethology, 104, 585–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S. C., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2000). Female territoriality and the function of scent-marking in a monogamous antelope (Oreotragus oreotragus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 47, 417–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S. C., & Gosling, L. M. (2003). Genetic similarity and quality interact in mate choice decisions by female mice. Nature Genetics, 35, 103–106.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S. C., & Gosling, L. M. (2004). Manipulation of olfactory signaling and mate choice for conservation breeding: A case study of harvest mice. Conservation Biology, 18, 548–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S. C., & Lowen, C. (1997). Optimal patterns of scent marks in klipspringer (Oreotragus oreotragus) territories. Journal of Zoology, 243, 565–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S. C., Gosling, L. M., Thornton, E. A., & McClung, J. (2001). Scent-marking by male mice under the risk of predation. Behavioral Ecology, 12, 698–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosell, F., & Thomsen, L. R. (2006). Sexual dimorphism in territorial scent marking by adult eurasian beavers (Castor fiber). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 32, 1301–1315.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosell, F., Johansen, G., & Parker, H. (2000). Eurasian beavers (Castor fiber) behavioral response to simulated territorial intruders. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 78, 931–935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwende, F. J., & Novotny, M. (1982). Volatile compounds associated with estrus in mouse urine: potential pheromones. Experientia, 40, 213–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scordato, E. S., & Drea, C. M. (2007). Scents and sensibility: Information content of olfactory signals in the ringtailed lemur, Lemur catta. Animal Behaviour, 73, 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Setchell, J. M., Vaglio, S., Moggi-Cecchi, J., Boscaro, F., Calamai, L., & Knapp, L. A. (2010). Chemical composition of scent-gland secretions in an Old World monkey (Mandrillus sphinx): Influence of sex, male status, and individual identity. Chemical Senses, 35, 205–220.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Setchell, J. M., Vaglio, S., Abbott, K. M., Moggi-Cecchi, J., Boscaro, F., Pieraccini, G., & Knapp, L. A. (2011). Odour signals major histocompatibility complex genotype in an Old World monkey. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 278, 274–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sliwa, A., & Richardson, P. R. K. (1998). Responses of aardwolves, Proteles cristatus, Sparrman 1783, to translocated scent marks. Animal Behaviour, 56, 137–146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolovich, C. K., & Evans, S. (2007). Sociosexual behavior and chemical communication of Aotus nancymaae. International Journal of Primatology, 28, 1299–1313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, T. (2003). Pheromones and animal behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK

    S. Craig Roberts

Authors
  1. S. Craig Roberts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Craig Roberts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roberts, S.C. On the Relationship between Scent-Marking and Territoriality in Callitrichid Primates. Int J Primatol 33, 749–761 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-012-9604-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-012-9604-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation