Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Investigation of Pre-service Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Ability to Conduct Valid Proofs, Methods Used, and Reasons for Invalid Arguments

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purposes of this study are to investigate Turkish pre-service middle school mathematics teachers’ ability in conducting valid proofs for statements regarding numbers and algebra in terms of their year of enrollment in a teacher education program, to determine the proof methods used in their valid proofs, and to examine the reasons for their invalid arguments. A proof questionnaire containing three proof statements was administered to 115 pre-service middle school mathematics teachers in a large state university in Ankara, Turkey. The results showed that more than half of the pre-service teachers were able to conduct valid proofs for the given statements. In terms of year levels, it was seen that the seniors were the least successful group in conducting valid proofs for each statement. When pre-service teachers’ valid proofs were analyzed, it was concluded that mathematical induction and direct proof were the mostly used methods for the given statements. When pre-service teachers’ invalid arguments were analyzed, it was seen that “inserting numbers to verify the given statement” and “rewriting the givens in the statement” were the common reasons for stating invalid arguments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcock, L. J. & Weber, K. (2010). Undergraduates’ example use in proof construction: Purposes and effectiveness. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 3, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, D. (2000). A survey of mathematics undergraduates’ interaction with proof: Some implications for mathematics education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31(6), 869–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, D. (2001). Pupils’ proof potential. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 32(1), 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altıparmak, K. & Öziş, T. (2005). An investigation upon mathematical proof and development of mathematical reasoning. Ege Education Journal, 6(1), 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonini, S. & Mariotti, A. M. (2008). Indirect proof: What is specific to this way of proving? ZDM-The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 40, 401–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwood, P.R. (2001). Learning to construct proofs in a first course on mathematical proof (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Western Michigan University, Traverse City, MI.

  • Baylis, J. (1983). Proof—the essence of mathematics, part 1. International Journal of Mathematics Education and Science Technology, 14, 409–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. W. (1976). A study of pupils’ proof-explanations in mathematical situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 7, 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieda, K. (2010). Enacting proof in middle school mathematics: Challenges and opportunities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41, 351–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanton, M., Stylianou, D.A., & David, M. (2003). The nature of scaffolding in undergraduate students’ transition to mathematical proof. In N.A. Pateman, B.J. Dougherty & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th PME International Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 113–120). Honalulu, Hawaii: ERIC.

  • Bleiler, S. K., Thompson, D. R. & Krajčevski, M. (2014). Providing written feedback on students’ mathematical arguments: Proof validations of prospective secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(2), 105–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. A. (2014). On skepticism and its role in the development of proof in the classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(3), 311–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P. J. & Hersh, R. (1981). The mathematical experience. Boston, MA.

  • Dickerson, D.S. (2008). High school mathematics teachers’ understandings of the purposes of mathematical proof (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.

  • Fitzgerald, J. F. (1996). Proof in mathematics education. Journal of Education, 178(1), 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2005). How to design and evaluate research in education (6th ed.). Boston, MA.

  • Gibson, D. (1998). Students’ use of diagrams to develop proofs in an introductory analysis course. Students’ proof schemes. In E. Dubinsky, A. Schoenfeld, & J. Kaput (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education, III (pp.284–307). New York, NY: AMS.

  • Goetting, M. (1995). The college students’ understanding of mathematical proof (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park, MD.

  • Hanna, G. (2000). Proof, explanation and exploration: An overview. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44, 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, G. & de Villiers, M. (2008). ICMI study 19: Proof and proving in mathematics education. ZDM-The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 40(2), 1–8.

  • Harel, G. & Sowder, L. (1998). Students’ proof schemes: Results from exploratory studies. CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, 7, 234–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harel, G. & Sowder, L. (2007). Toward a comprehensive perspective on proof. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 435–458). Reston, VA.

  • Healy, L. & Hoyles, C. (2000). A study of proof conceptions in algebra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 396–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, A. & Reiss, K. (2003). Reasoning and proof: Methodological knowledge as a component of proof competence. In M.A. Mariotti (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp.1--10). Bellaria, Italy: ERME.

  • Iannone, P. & Inglis, M. (2010) Self efficacy and mathematical proof: Are undergraduate students good at assessing their own proof production ability? In S. Brown, S. Larsen, K. Keene, & K. Marrongelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. North Carolina: Raleigh.

  • Jahnke, H. N. (2007). Proofs and hypotheses. ZDM-The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 39(1–2), 79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. (1997). Student teachers’ conceptions of mathematical proof. Mathematics Education Review, 9, 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, J. (2005). Learning to prove in order to prove to learn. Retrieved in May 2013 from http://mathpost.asu.edu/~sjgm/issues/2005_spring/SJGM_knapp.pdf.

  • Knuth, E. (1999). The nature of secondary school mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.

  • Ko, Y. Y. (2010). Mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof: Implications for educational research. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(6), 1109–1129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ko, Y. Y. & Knuth, E. (2009). Undergraduate mathematics majors’ writing performance producing proofs and counterexamples about continuous functions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28(1), 68–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, S.G. (2007). The history and concept of mathematical proof. Retrieved in May 2013 from www.math.wustl.edu/~sk/eolss.pdf.

  • Mariotti, M.A. (2006). Proof and proving in mathematics education. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education, (pp. 173–204), Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

  • Martin, W. G. & Harel, G. (1989). Proof frames of preservice elementary teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mejia-Ramos, J.P. & Inglis, M. (2009). Argumentative and proving activities in mathematics education research. In F.-L. Lin, F.-J. Hsieh, G. Hanna & M. de Villiers (Eds.), Proceedings of the ICMI Study 19 conference: Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 88–93). [New York, NY]: Springer.

  • Moore, R. C. (1994). Making the transition to formal proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27, 249–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D.W. & Morris, J. (2009). Proofs and concepts: The fundamentals of abstract mathematics. Alberta, Canada: University of Lethbridge.

  • National Council of Teacher of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standard for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teacher of Mathematics.

  • Overton, W. F. (1990). Reasoning, necessity, and logic: Developmental perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.

  • Palla, M., Potari, D. & Spyrou, P. (2011). Secondary school students’ understanding of mathematical induction: Structural characteristics and the process of proof construction. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(5), 1023–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raman, M. (2003). What are they and how can they help us understand how people view proof? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52, 319–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recio, A. M. & Godino, J. D. (2001). Institutional and personal meanings of mathematical proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48(1), 83–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, K.J. (2003). An investigation of prospective secondary mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof and refutations (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Montana State University, Bozeman, MT.

  • Ross, K. A. (1998). Doing and proving: The place of algorithms and proof in school mathematics. American Mathematical Monthly, 3, 252–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saeed, R.M. (1996). An exploratory study of college students’ understanding of mathematical proof and the relationship of this understanding to their attitudes toward mathematics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ohio University, Athens, OH.

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1994). What do we know about mathematics curricula? Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 13(1), 55–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, J. (2000). Learning about mathematical proof: Conviction and validity. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18, 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipley, A.J. (1999). An investigation of collage students’ understanding of proof construction when doing mathematical analysis proofs (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of American, Washington, DC.

  • Stylianides, A. J. (2007). The notion of proof in the context of elementary school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stylianides, A. J. & Ball, D. L. (2008). Understanding and describing mathematical knowledge for teaching: Knowledge about proof for engaging students in the activity of proving. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 307–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stylianides, A. & Stylianides, G. (2009). Proof constructions and evaluations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72, 237–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stylianides, A. J., Stylianides, G. J. & Philippou, G. N. (2004). Undergraduate students’ understanding of the contraposition equivalence rule in symbolic and verbal contexts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55, 133–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stylianides, A.J., Stylianides, G.J. & Philippou, G.N. (2005). Prospective teachers’ understanding of proof: What if the truth set of an open sentence is broader than that covered by the proof? In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 4, pp. 241–248). Melbourne, Australia, PME.

  • Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J. & Philippou, G. N. (2007). Preservice teachers’ knowledge of proof by mathematical induction. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 145–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D. (1989). The nature of mathematical proof. Mathematics Teaching, 127, 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanSpronsen, H.D. (2008). Proof processes of novice mathematics proof writers (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). University of Montana, Missoula, MT.

  • Velleman, D.J. (2006). How to prove it. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

  • Weber, K. (2001). Student difficulty in constructing proofs. The need for strategic knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48(1), 101–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, K. (2008). How mathematicians determine if an argument is a valid proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 431–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, K. (2010). Mathematics’ majors perceptions of conviction, validity, and proof. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12, 306--336.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

    Esra Demiray

  2. Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

    Mine Işıksal Bostan

Authors
  1. Esra Demiray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mine Işıksal Bostan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esra Demiray.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Demiray, E., Işıksal Bostan, M. An Investigation of Pre-service Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Ability to Conduct Valid Proofs, Methods Used, and Reasons for Invalid Arguments. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 15, 109–130 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9664-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9664-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation