Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

ENHANCING STUDENTS’ COMMUNICATION SKILLS IN THE SCIENCE CLASSROOM THROUGH SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUES

International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Communication skills are one of the most important competencies for 21st century global citizens. Our guiding presupposition was that socioscientific issues (SSIs) could be used as an effective pedagogical tool for promoting students’ communication skills by increasing peer interactions, stimulating students’ reasoning, and in constructing shared social knowledge. We implemented a SSI program on gene modification (GM) technology to 132 9th graders in South Korea and investigated to what extent this SSI instruction contributed to enhancing students’ communication skills. Data sources included pre- and post-scores on the Communication Skills Questionnaire (CSQ), semi-structured interviews with the students and instructor, and classroom observations. The results demonstrated that SSI instruction could bring about a moderately large impact on students’ ability to understand the key ideas of others and to value others’ perspectives, as well as a marginal positive effect on developing active assertions. However, SSI instruction appeared to have a lesser impact on students’ ability to develop shared understanding. Overall, this research indicates the potential that even a limited SSI classroom could have in terms of promoting students’ communication skills in the context of their regular science class.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acar, O., Turkmen, L. & Roychoudhury, A. (2010). Student difficulties in socio-scientific argumentation and decision-making research findings: Crossing the borders of two research lines. International Journal of Science Education, 32(9), 1191–1206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (2007). Atlas of science literacy. Washington, DC: AAAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, P. A. & Guerrero, L. K. (1997). Handbook of communication and emotion: Research, theory, applications, and contexts. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beebe, S. A., Beebe, S. J. & Redmond, M. V. (2002). Interpersonal communication: Relating to others. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bencze, L. & Cater, L. (2011). Globalizing students acting for the common good. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 648–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, R. (1979). People skills: How to assert yourself, listen to other, and resolve conflict. New York: A Touchstone Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burleson, B. R. (2010). The nature of interpersonal communication: A message-centered approach. In C. R. Berger, M. E. Roloff & D. R. Ewoldsen (Eds.), The handbook of communication science (pp. 145–163). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, K. & Jonassen, D. H. (2002). The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem-solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, W. J. (1999). Practical nonparametric statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Council [Australia]. (1998). The curriculum framework for kindergarten to year 12 education in Western Australia. Western Australia: Curriculum Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Development Council (1998). Science syllabus for secondary schools 1-3. Hong Kong: The Curriculum Development Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curse, A. (2004). Meaning in language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Oxford: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. New York: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Newton, P. & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S. & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2008). Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (Vol. 35). The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, S. R., Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2009). Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(2), 279–296.

  • Furberg, A. & Ludvigsen, S. (2008). Students’ meaning-making of socio-scientific issues in computer mediated settings: Exploring learning through interaction trajectories. International Journal of Science Education, 30(13), 1775–1799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, T. F. (1999). Voices: The educational formation of conscience. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, L. K., Andersen, P. A. & Afifi, W. A. (2007). Close encounters: Communication in relationships. Thousand Oaks: CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2010). Science education as a call to action. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 10(3), 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. (2003). Using cognitive tools to represent problems. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35, 362–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolstø, S. D. (2000). Consensus projects: Teaching science for citizenship. International Journal of Science Education, 22(6), 645–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korean Educational Development Institute [KEDI]. (2003). A study on the development of life-skills: Communication, problem solving, and self-directed learning. Seoul: KEDI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., Fredricks, J. & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3–4), 313–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D., Black, J., Keselman, A. & Kaplan, D. (2000). The development of cognitive skills to support inquiry learning. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 495–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyza, E. & Edelson, D. (2005). Scaffolding middle school students’ coordination of theory and evidence. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11(6), 545–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., Chang, H., Choi, K., Kim, S.-W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2012). Developing character and values for global citizens: Analysis of pre-service science teachers’ moral reasoning on socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 925-953.

  • Lee, H., Yoo, J., Choi, K., Kim, S., Krajcik, J., Herman, B., & Zeidler, D. L. (2013). Socioscientific issues as a vehicle for promoting character and values for global citizens. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2079–2113.

  • Levinson, R. (2013). Practice and theory of socio-scientific issues: An authentic model? Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune, J. C. (1998). The ins and outs of extranets. Management Review, 87, 23–25.

  • McKay, M., Davis, M. & Fanning, P. (1995). Messages: The communication skills book. CA: New Harbinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (2001). Science curriculum standard. Beijing: MOE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [MEST]. (2011). National science curriculum. Seoul: MEST.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molinatti, G., Girault, Y. & Hammond, C. (2010). High school students debate the use of embryonic stem cells: The influence of context on decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 32(16), 2235–2251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murnane, R. J. & Levy, F. (1996). Teaching the new basic skills. Principles for educating children to thrive in a changing economy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council [NRC]. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council [NRC]. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education. Washington, DC: The National Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1975). Empathetic: An unappreciated way of being. Counseling Psychologist, 33, 307–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, R. B. & Martin, M. M. (1994). Development of a measure of interpersonal communication competence. Communication Research Reports, 11(1), 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, P. O. & Vallejos, R. M. (1999). The role of compassion in moral education. Journal of Moral Education, 28(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A. & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherborne, T. (2004). Immediate inspiration: Ready-made resources for teaching ethics: Ethics in science education. School Science Review, 86, 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C., Dietz, T. & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25(5), 322–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trilling, B. & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  • Wilkins, K. G., Bernstein, B. L., Bekki, J. M., Harrison, C. J., & Atkinson, R. K. (2012, October). Development of the science technology engineering and mathematics: Active listening skills assessment (STEM-ALSA). Paper presented at the 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference, Seattle, Washington.

  • Wilson, J. C. (2011). Service-learning and the development of empathy in US college students. Education & Training, 53(2/3), 207–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research‐based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377.

  • Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Applebaum, S., & Callahan, B. E. (2009). Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 74–101.

  • Zeidler, D. L., Applebaum, S. M., & Sadler, T. D. (2011). Enacting a socioscientific issues classroom: Transformative transformations. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socioscientific issues in the classroom (pp. 277-306). The Netherlands: Springer.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyunju Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chung, Y., Yoo, J., Kim, SW. et al. ENHANCING STUDENTS’ COMMUNICATION SKILLS IN THE SCIENCE CLASSROOM THROUGH SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUES. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 14, 1–27 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9557-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9557-6

Key words

Navigation