Skip to main content
Log in

Differences in regeneration between hurricane damaged and clear-cut mangrove stands 25 years after clearing

  • Soft-Bottom Near-Shore Ecosystems
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of human disturbance on mangrove forest may be substantially different from the effects of natural disturbances. This paper describes differences in vegetation composition and structure of five vegetation types in two mangrove areas near Darwin, Australia, 25 years after disturbance. The vegetation in clear-felled forest showed more adult Avicennia marina than in the hurricane-affected forest, and a virtual absence of A. marina juveniles and saplings. This indicates that A. marina will be replaced by other species in the canopy, showing a multi-phase vegetation development in mangrove forest after human disturbance. The mechanism of disturbance and the conditions after clearing therefore affects the vegetation composition for at least 25 years after this disturbance took place.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anon, 1999. Tide Predictions for Darwin. National Tidal Facility of Australia, Adelaide.

  • Ball, M. C., 1987. Establishment of mangrove seedlings in relation to salinity. A Workshop on Research and Management, Darwin.

  • Blanchard, J. & G. Prado, 1995. Natural regeneration of Rhizophora mangle in strip clearcuts in northwest ecuador. Biotropica 27: 160–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brocklehurst, P. & B. Edmaedes, 1995. Beagle gulf benthic survey report: Mangrove survey of Darwin Harbour Northern Nerritory (N.T.), Darwin, CCNT/NFI project 1994/1995.

  • Chapman, V. J., 1977. Ecosystems of the World; Wet Coastal Ecosystems. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, P. J., & W. G. Allaway, 1992. The regeneration niche of the grey mangrove (Avicennia marina): Effects of salinity, light and sediment factors on establishment, growth and survival in the field. Oecologia 93: 548–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, P. J. & R. A. Kerrigan, 2002. The effects of seed predators on the recruitment of mangroves. Journal of Ecology 90: 728–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough, B. F., 1984. Growth and salt balance of the mangroves Avicennia marina (forsk.) vierh. and Rhizophora stylosa griff. In relation to salinity. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 11: 419–430.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, C. M., O. Geertz-Hansen, U. Tampanya, J. Terrados, M. D. Fortes, L. Kamp-Nielsen, J. Borum & S. Boromthanarath, 1998. Relationship between sediment conditions and mangrove Rhizophora apiculata seedling growth and nutrient status. Marine Ecology Progress Series 175: 277–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, D. J., 1980. Rapid Creek recreational project. Unpublished report to Department of Lands and Housing Northern Territory of Australia, Darwin.

  • Ellison, A. M., 2000. Mangrove restoration: Do we know enough? Restoration Ecology 8: 219–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farnsworth, E. J. & A. M. Ellison, 1997. Global patterns of pre-dispersal propagule predation in mangrove forests. Biotropica 29: 318–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fasham, M. J. R., 1977. A comparison of nonmetric multidimensional scaling, principal components and reciprocal averaging for the ordination of simulated coenoclines, and coenoplanes. Ecology 58: 551–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guinea, M. L., 1987. Rapid Creek mangrove regeneration, thirteen years onward. A Workshop on Research and Management held in Darwin. Australian National University, Darwin.

  • Hutchings, P. & P. Saenger, 1987. The Ecology of Mangroves. University of Queensland Press, St. Lucia.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D. M., 1991. Costing out restoration. Restoration and Management Notes 9: 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist, E. S. & C. R. Carroll, 2004. Differential seed and seedling predation by crabs: Impacts on tropical coastal forest composition. Oecologia 141: 661–671.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness, K. A., 1992. Disturbance and the mangrove forests of Darwin harbour. In Moffatt, I. & A. Webb (eds), Conservation and Development Issues in North Australia. Australian National University Press, 55–62.

  • McGuinness, K. A., 1997a. Dispersal, establishment and survival of Ceriops tagal propagules in a North Australian mangrove forest. Oecologia 109: 80–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness, K. A., 1997b. Seed predation in a North Australian mangrove forest; a test of the dominance-predation model. Journal of Tropical Ecology 13: 293–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, K., & T. J. Smith Iii, 1990. Differential predation on mangrove propagules in open and closed canopy forest habitats. Vegetatio 89: 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrett, F. P., 1995. The role of propagule features in determining mangrove zonation. Sciences. Northern Territory University, Darwin.

  • Roth, L. C., 1992. Hurricanes and mangrove regeneration: Effects of hurricane Joan, October 1988, on the vegetation of Isla del Venado, Bluefields, Nicaragua. Biotropica 24: 375–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salgado-Kent, C. P., 2002. The significance of plant-animal interaction in tropical mangrove forests: How crabs affect structure and production. School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Northern Territory University, Darwin, 296.

  • Sengupta, R. & B. Middleton, 2005. Landscape characteristics of Rhizophora mangle forests and propagule deposition in coastal environments of Florida (USA). Landscape Ecology 20: 93–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith Iii, T. J., 1987a. Effects of seed predators and light level on the distribution of Avicennia marina (forsk.) vierh. in tropical, tidal forests. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 25: 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith Iii, T. J., 1987b. Seed predation in relation to tree dominance and distribution in mangrove forests. Ecology 68: 266–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stocker, G. C., 1976. Report on cyclone damage to natural vegetation in the Darwin area after cyclone Tracy, 25 December 1974. Forestry and Timber Bureau, Canberra.

  • Sukardjo, S., 1987. Natural regeneration status of commercial mangrove species (Rhizophora apiculata and Bruguiera gymnorrhiza) in the mangrove forest of Tanjung Bungin, Banyuasin district, South Sumatra. Forest Ecology and Management 20: 233–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wightman, G. M., 1989. Mangroves of the Northern Territory. Conservation Commission of the Northern Territory, Darwin Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, Y., N. F.-Y. Tam, C.-Y. Lu & Y.-S. Wong, 2005. Effects of salinity on germination, seedling growth and physiology of three salt-secreting mangrove species. Aquatic Botany 83: 193–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The participation of P. Ketner was financially supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO grant R 84-507). The work by J.G. Ferwerda was financially supported by the Wageningen University Fund, the “Hendrick Muller Vaderlandsch fonds” and the Fund for fundamental research for nature conservation (FONA), and an ARC grant supported K. McGuinness. Research facilities for the project were made available by Charles Darwin University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. G. Ferwerda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferwerda, J.G., Ketner, P. & McGuinness, K.A. Differences in regeneration between hurricane damaged and clear-cut mangrove stands 25 years after clearing. Hydrobiologia 591, 35–45 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-0782-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-0782-7

Keywords

Navigation