Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Re-empowering academics in a corporate culture: an exploration of workload and performativity in a university

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neo-liberal reforms in higher education have resulted in corporate managerial practices in universities and a drive for efficiency and productivity in teaching and research. As a result, there has been an intensification of academic work, increased stress for academics and an emphasis on accountability and performativity in universities. The paper proposes that while managerialism in modern universities is now the norm, corporate approaches have disempowered academics in their institutions and reduced productivity because they ignore the nature of academic work. Using Foucault’s conception of power relations in institutions, policies that directly affect academic work such as workload allocation and performance management are identified as key ways in which power is exercised in universities. The paper reports on a case study in one university which explored the relationship between the academic workload allocation and performance management policies and concludes that a more balanced power relationship is needed in which academics can have more influence over these key processes which control their work so they preserve the self-managed aspects of academic work and the intrinsic motivations driving their careers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altbach, P.G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L.E. (2009). Trends in global higher education: tracking an academic revolution. A report prepared for the UNESCO 2009 world conference on higher education.

  • Anderson, G. (2006). Carving out time and space in the managerial university, Journal of Organisational Change Management, 19(5), 578-592. DOI 110.1108/09534810610696698.

  • ARC. (2015). Australian Research Council. In Discovery projects: Selection report for funding commencing in 2015. Australian Government: Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R., & Middlehurst, R. (1993). The lost profession. Higher Education in Europe, 18(2), 110–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolden, R., Gosling, J., O’Brien, A., Peters, K., Ryan, M., & Haslam, A. (2012). Academic leadership: changing conceptions, identities and experiences in UK higher education. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, T. F., Lewis, H. A., & Mobbs, T. (2003). Academic workload planning revisited. Higher Education, 46(2), 215–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannizzo, F., & Osbaldiston, N. (2015). Academic work/life balance: a brief quantitative analysis of the Australian experience. Journal of Sociology, 1–17.

  • Chatelet, F. (1979). In M. Morris & P. Patton (Eds.), Michel Foucault: power, truth and strategy. Sydney: Feral Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, H., & Goedegebuure, L. (2010). The real academic revolution. Melbourne: LH Martin Institute for Higher Education Leadership and Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research; planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, J., & Eveline, J. (2011). E-technology and work/life balance for academics with young children. Higher Education, 62(4), 533–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1983). The subject and power. In H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (2nd ed., pp. 208–226). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredman, N., & Doughney, J. (2012). Academic dissatisfaction, managerial change and neo-liberalism. Higher Education, 64, 41–58. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9479-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furlong, J. (2013). Globalisation, neo-liberalism and the reform of teacher education in England. The Educational Forum, 77(1), 28–50. doi:10.1080/00131725.2013.739017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gane, N. (2014). The emergence of neoliberalism: thinking through and beyond Michel Foucault’s lectures on Biopolitics, theory. Culture & Society, 31(4), 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (2002). Neoliberalism, corporate culture, and the promise of higher education: the university as a democratic public sphere. Harvard Educational Review, 72(2), 425–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, M. (2007). Academic identities and policy change in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, D., Meyer, L. H., & Paewai, S. (2006). Academic staff workloads and job satisfaction: expectations and values in academe. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(1), 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, J. (2008). Efficiency and effectiveness in higher education: who is accountable for what? Australian Universities’ Review, 50(1), 11–19. ISSN 0818–8068. Accessed online from http://www.aur.org.au/archive.

  • Kenny, J., & Fluck, A. E. (2014). The effectiveness of academic workload models in an institution: a staff perspective. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(6), 585–602. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2014.957889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, J., Fluck, A., & Jetson, T. (2012). Placing a value on academic work: the development of a time-based academic workload model. Australian Universities Review, 54(2), 50–60 Accessed online from http://www.aur.org.au/archive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langford, P. H. (2010). Benchmarking work practices and outcomes in Australian universities using an employee survey. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(1), 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, M., & Ingersoll, L. (2010). Regulated autonomy or autonomous regulation? Collective bargaining and academic workloads in Australian universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(2), 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J-F. (1979). The Postmodern Condition. Manchester University Press, 1984. Accessed online from: http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/fr/lyotard.htm.

  • Mennicken, A., & Miller, P. (2012). Accounting. Territorialization and Power, Foucault Studies, 13, 4–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall International.

  • Mitchell, M. (2015). The university model is a victim of its own success. Australian Universities’ Review, 57(2), 87–90 Accessed online from http://www.nteu.org.au/article/The-university-model-is-a-victim-of-its-own-success-%28AUR-57-02%29-17935.

    Google Scholar 

  • NTEU (2013). The UTAS Academic- Serving the interests of the university? A report prepared by Tasmanian Division of the Nation Tertiary Education Union. Available online from http://www.nteu.org.au/tas/academic_matters.

  • Roberts, P. (2013). Academic dystopia: knowledge, performativity, and tertiary education. Review of Education, Pedagogy and Cultural Studies, 35(1), 27–43. doi:10.1080/10714413.2013.753757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, M., & Germov, J. (2015). Bringing the budget back into academic work allocation models: a management perspective. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(5), 507–518. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2015.1079398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, S. (2012). Academic zombies: a failure of resistance or a means of survival. Australian Universities’ Review, 54(2), 3–11 Accessed online from http://www.aur.org.au/archive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, G., and Brass, K. (2014). Mapping the Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences in Australia. Australian Academy of the Humanities, Canberra. Accessed online from: http://www.humanities.org.au/Portals/0/documents/Policy/Research/MappingProject/txt/Mapping_HASS_Aust_FinalReport_All_Oct2014.pdf.

  • Vardi, I. (2009). The impacts of different types of workload allocation models on academic satisfaction and working life. Accessed online from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10734-008-9159-8.

  • Winefield, A., Gillespie, N., Stough, C., Dus, J., & Hapuararchchi, J. (2002). Occupational stress in Australian universities: a national survey 2002. Canberra: National Tertiary Education Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yielder, J., & Codling, A. (2004). Management and leadership in the contemporary university. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26(3), 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeichner, K., & Noffke, S. (2001). Practitioner research. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 298–330). AERA: Washington.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Kenny.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kenny, J. Re-empowering academics in a corporate culture: an exploration of workload and performativity in a university. High Educ 75, 365–380 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0143-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0143-z

Keywords

Navigation