Abstract
Students’ learning goals demonstrate much stronger variety than traditional goal orientation models for classroom learning assume, especially when the educational context allows so. In this empirical study we will investigate the richness of students’ goal orientation in a collaborative learning context. We do so with the help of a goal setting framework that is based on a two-facet approach distinguishing multiple contents (performance, learning, well-being) and goal directions (varying degrees of self vs social direction). To investigate the role of different goal constellations, goal setting and learning performance data of first year students (n = 2,636) in a problem-based, collaborative learning program, and evaluation data of problem-based tutorial groups (#groups = 206) are combined into a multilevel model. Each tutorial group functions in two different educational settings: one directed at open-ended, group problems, the other at closed, individual problems. Educational context appears indeed to have a crucial role in the relationship between students’ goal setting at the one side, and students’ performance and group functioning on the other side.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.
Anderman, L. H. (1999). Expanding the discussion of social perceptions and academic outcomes: Mechanisms and contextual influences. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Series Eds.) and T. Urdan (Vol. Ed.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol. 11. The role of context (pp. 303–336). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
Boekaerts, M. (2002). Bringing about change in the classroom: Strength and weaknesses of the self-regulated learning approach—EARLI Presidential Address, 2001. Learning and Instruction, 12, 589–604.
Boekaerts, M., de Koning, E., & Vedder, P. (2006). Goal-directed behavior and contextual factors in the classroom: An innovative approach to the study of multiple goals. Educational Psychologist, 41, 33–51.
Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Croon, M. A., & van Veldhoven, M. J. P. M. (2007). Predicting group-level outcome variables from variables measured at the individual level: A latent variable multilevel model. Psychological Methods, 12, 45–57.
Dowson, M., & McInerney, D. M. (2003). What do students say about their motivational goals? Towards a more complex and dynamic perspective on student motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 91–113.
Dweck, C. S., & Elliot, E. S. (1983). Achievement motivation. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 4: Socialization, personality, and social development (pp. 643–691). New York: Wiley.
Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169–189.
Ford, M. E. (1992). Motivation humans: Goals emotions, and personal agency beliefs. London, Newbury: Sage Publications.
Ford, M. E., & Nichols, C. W. (1991). Using goal assessment to identify motivational patterns und facilitate behavioural regulation and achievement. In M. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol. 7. Goals and self-regulatory processes (pp. 61–84). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Häkkinen, P., & Järvelä, S. (2006). Sharing and constructing perspectives in web-based conferencing. Computers & Education, 47, 433–447.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Predicting success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors and performance from freshman year through graduation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 562–575.
Harackiewicz, J. M., & Linnenbrink, E. A. (2005). Multiple achievement goals and multiple pathways for learning: The agenda and impact of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40, 75–84.
Hijzen, D., Boekaerts, M., & Vedder, P. (2006). The relationship between the quality of cooperative learning, students’ goal preferences, and perceptions of contextual factors in the classroom. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47, 9–21.
Hijzen, D., Boekaerts, M., & Vedder, P. (2007). Exploring the links between students’ engagement in cooperative learning, their goal preferences, and appraisals of instructional conditions in the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 17, 673–687.
Järvelä, S., Häkkinen, P., Arvaja, M., & Leinonen, P. (2003). Instructional support in CSCL. In P. Kirchner, J.-W. Strijbos, & R. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL in higher education (pp. 115–139). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Järvelä, S., Volet, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2010). Research on motivation in collaborative learning: Moving beyond the cognitive–situative divide and combining individual and social processes. Educational Psychologist, 45, 15–27.
Johnson, R. T., Johnson, D. W., & Tauer, M. (1979). The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on students’ attitudes and achievement. The Journal of Psychology, 102, 191–198.
Lemos, M. S. (1999). Students’ goals and self-regulation in the classroom. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 471–485.
Linnenbrink, E. A. (2005). The dilemma of performance-approach goals: The use of multiple goal contexts to promote students’ motivation and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 197–213.
Linnenbrink, E. A., & Hruda, L. Z. (1999). Student motivation and cooperative groups: Using achievement goal theory to investigate students’ socio-emotional and cognitive outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of AERA Montreal, April, 1999.
Nolen, S. B., & Ward, C. J. (2008). Sociocultural and situative research on motivation. In M. Maehr, S. Karabenick, & T. Urdan (Eds.), Social psychological perspective on motivation and achievement. Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 15, pp. 428–460). London: Emerald.
Ortiz, A., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1996). The effect of positive goal and resource interdependence on individual performance. Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 243–249.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92–104.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), The handbook of self-regulation: Theory, research and applications (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Pintrich, P. R., & Garcia, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In M. Maehr & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Goals and self-regulatory processes: Vol. 7. Goals and self-regulatory processes (pp. 371–402). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Rienties, B., Alcott, P., & Jindal-Snape, D. (submitted). To self-select or not to self-select: that is the question in (culturally diverse) groups.
Roeser, R. W. (2004). Competing schools of thought in achievement goal theory. In P. R. Pintrich & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol. 13. Motivating students, improving schools (pp. 265–300). Greenwich, CT: Elsevier-JAI.
Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis. London: Sage.
Vauras, M., Iiskala, T., Kajamies, A., Kinnunen, R., & Lehtinen, E. (2003). Shared-regulation and motivation of collaborating peers: A case analysis. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 46, 19–37.
Volet, S. E., & Mansfield, C. (2006). Group work at university: Significance of personal goals in the regulation strategies of students with positive and negative appraisals. Higher Education, Research and Development, 25, 341–356.
Volet, S., Vauras, M., & Salonen, P. (2009). Self- and social regulation in learning contexts: An integrative perspective. Educational psychologist, 44, 215–226.
Wentzel, K. R. (1991). Social and academic goals at school: Motivation and achievement in context. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol. 7. Goals and self-regulatory processes (pp. 185–212). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Wentzel, K. R. (1994). Relations of social goal pursuit to social acceptance, classroom behaviour, and perceived social support. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 4–20.
Wentzel, K. R. (1996). Social and academic motivation in middle school: Concurrent and long-term relations to academic effort. Journal of Early Adolescence, 16, 390–406.
Wentzel, K. R., Baker, S. A., & Russell, S. L. (2012). Young adolescents’ perceptions of teachers’ and peers’ goals as predictors of social and academic goal pursuit. Applied Psychology, 61, 605–633.
Wilkerson, L., & Gijselaers, W. H. (Eds.). (1996). Bringing problem-based learning to higher education: Theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Wosnitza, M., & Volet, S. E. (2009a). A framework for personal goals in social learning contexts. In M. Wosnitza, S. A. Karabenick, A. Efklides, & P. Nenniger (Eds.), Contemporary motivation research: From global to local perspectives (pp. 49–67). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Wosnitza, M., & Volet, S. E. (2009b). Interface of personal goals with a social orientation and motivational patterns in collaborative learning contexts. Paper presented at the EARLI conference, Amsterdam.
Wosnitza, M., & Volet, S. E. (2012). Group heterogeneity and homogeneity in personal content goals for a group learning activity: Impact on individual appraisals. Applied Psychology, 61, 585–604.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tempelaar, D.T., Wosnitza, M., Volet, S. et al. The role of self- and social directed goals in a problem-based, collaborative learning context. High Educ 66, 253–267 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9602-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9602-8