Skip to main content
Log in

The role of self- and social directed goals in a problem-based, collaborative learning context

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Students’ learning goals demonstrate much stronger variety than traditional goal orientation models for classroom learning assume, especially when the educational context allows so. In this empirical study we will investigate the richness of students’ goal orientation in a collaborative learning context. We do so with the help of a goal setting framework that is based on a two-facet approach distinguishing multiple contents (performance, learning, well-being) and goal directions (varying degrees of self vs social direction). To investigate the role of different goal constellations, goal setting and learning performance data of first year students (n = 2,636) in a problem-based, collaborative learning program, and evaluation data of problem-based tutorial groups (#groups = 206) are combined into a multilevel model. Each tutorial group functions in two different educational settings: one directed at open-ended, group problems, the other at closed, individual problems. Educational context appears indeed to have a crucial role in the relationship between students’ goal setting at the one side, and students’ performance and group functioning on the other side.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderman, L. H. (1999). Expanding the discussion of social perceptions and academic outcomes: Mechanisms and contextual influences. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Series Eds.) and T. Urdan (Vol. Ed.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol. 11. The role of context (pp. 303–336). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.

  • Boekaerts, M. (2002). Bringing about change in the classroom: Strength and weaknesses of the self-regulated learning approach—EARLI Presidential Address, 2001. Learning and Instruction, 12, 589–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M., de Koning, E., & Vedder, P. (2006). Goal-directed behavior and contextual factors in the classroom: An innovative approach to the study of multiple goals. Educational Psychologist, 41, 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croon, M. A., & van Veldhoven, M. J. P. M. (2007). Predicting group-level outcome variables from variables measured at the individual level: A latent variable multilevel model. Psychological Methods, 12, 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowson, M., & McInerney, D. M. (2003). What do students say about their motivational goals? Towards a more complex and dynamic perspective on student motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 91–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S., & Elliot, E. S. (1983). Achievement motivation. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 4: Socialization, personality, and social development (pp. 643–691). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M. E. (1992). Motivation humans: Goals emotions, and personal agency beliefs. London, Newbury: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M. E., & Nichols, C. W. (1991). Using goal assessment to identify motivational patterns und facilitate behavioural regulation and achievement. In M. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol. 7. Goals and self-regulatory processes (pp. 61–84). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Häkkinen, P., & Järvelä, S. (2006). Sharing and constructing perspectives in web-based conferencing. Computers & Education, 47, 433–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Predicting success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors and performance from freshman year through graduation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 562–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harackiewicz, J. M., & Linnenbrink, E. A. (2005). Multiple achievement goals and multiple pathways for learning: The agenda and impact of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40, 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hijzen, D., Boekaerts, M., & Vedder, P. (2006). The relationship between the quality of cooperative learning, students’ goal preferences, and perceptions of contextual factors in the classroom. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47, 9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hijzen, D., Boekaerts, M., & Vedder, P. (2007). Exploring the links between students’ engagement in cooperative learning, their goal preferences, and appraisals of instructional conditions in the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 17, 673–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä, S., Häkkinen, P., Arvaja, M., & Leinonen, P. (2003). Instructional support in CSCL. In P. Kirchner, J.-W. Strijbos, & R. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL in higher education (pp. 115–139). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä, S., Volet, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2010). Research on motivation in collaborative learning: Moving beyond the cognitive–situative divide and combining individual and social processes. Educational Psychologist, 45, 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. T., Johnson, D. W., & Tauer, M. (1979). The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on students’ attitudes and achievement. The Journal of Psychology, 102, 191–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemos, M. S. (1999). Students’ goals and self-regulation in the classroom. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 471–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnenbrink, E. A. (2005). The dilemma of performance-approach goals: The use of multiple goal contexts to promote students’ motivation and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 197–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnenbrink, E. A., & Hruda, L. Z. (1999). Student motivation and cooperative groups: Using achievement goal theory to investigate students’ socio-emotional and cognitive outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of AERA Montreal, April, 1999.

  • Nolen, S. B., & Ward, C. J. (2008). Sociocultural and situative research on motivation. In M. Maehr, S. Karabenick, & T. Urdan (Eds.), Social psychological perspective on motivation and achievement. Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 15, pp. 428–460). London: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, A., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1996). The effect of positive goal and resource interdependence on individual performance. Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 243–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), The handbook of self-regulation: Theory, research and applications (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & Garcia, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In M. Maehr & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Goals and self-regulatory processes: Vol. 7. Goals and self-regulatory processes (pp. 371–402). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rienties, B., Alcott, P., & Jindal-Snape, D. (submitted). To self-select or not to self-select: that is the question in (culturally diverse) groups.

  • Roeser, R. W. (2004). Competing schools of thought in achievement goal theory. In P. R. Pintrich & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol. 13. Motivating students, improving schools (pp. 265–300). Greenwich, CT: Elsevier-JAI.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vauras, M., Iiskala, T., Kajamies, A., Kinnunen, R., & Lehtinen, E. (2003). Shared-regulation and motivation of collaborating peers: A case analysis. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 46, 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volet, S. E., & Mansfield, C. (2006). Group work at university: Significance of personal goals in the regulation strategies of students with positive and negative appraisals. Higher Education, Research and Development, 25, 341–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volet, S., Vauras, M., & Salonen, P. (2009). Self- and social regulation in learning contexts: An integrative perspective. Educational psychologist, 44, 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. R. (1991). Social and academic goals at school: Motivation and achievement in context. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol. 7. Goals and self-regulatory processes (pp. 185–212). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. R. (1994). Relations of social goal pursuit to social acceptance, classroom behaviour, and perceived social support. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 4–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. R. (1996). Social and academic motivation in middle school: Concurrent and long-term relations to academic effort. Journal of Early Adolescence, 16, 390–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. R., Baker, S. A., & Russell, S. L. (2012). Young adolescents’ perceptions of teachers’ and peers’ goals as predictors of social and academic goal pursuit. Applied Psychology, 61, 605–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkerson, L., & Gijselaers, W. H. (Eds.). (1996). Bringing problem-based learning to higher education: Theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wosnitza, M., & Volet, S. E. (2009a). A framework for personal goals in social learning contexts. In M. Wosnitza, S. A. Karabenick, A. Efklides, & P. Nenniger (Eds.), Contemporary motivation research: From global to local perspectives (pp. 49–67). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

  • Wosnitza, M., & Volet, S. E. (2009b). Interface of personal goals with a social orientation and motivational patterns in collaborative learning contexts. Paper presented at the EARLI conference, Amsterdam.

  • Wosnitza, M., & Volet, S. E. (2012). Group heterogeneity and homogeneity in personal content goals for a group learning activity: Impact on individual appraisals. Applied Psychology, 61, 585–604.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dirk T. Tempelaar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tempelaar, D.T., Wosnitza, M., Volet, S. et al. The role of self- and social directed goals in a problem-based, collaborative learning context. High Educ 66, 253–267 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9602-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9602-8

Keywords

Navigation