Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Communication in an academic context

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this qualitative case study is to investigate the most common communication problems from the views of faculty members at the Middle East Technical University in Ankara, Turkey. The sample of this study consists of 50 faculty members including professors, associate professors, assistant professors, and instructors from five largest departments representing five colleges at the Middle East Technical University. The data were gathered by utilizing interview method, including 19 interview questions which were developed by the researchers. The data collected through interviews were content-analyzed including the process of identifying, coding, and categorizing the primary patterns of data. The results of this study provide evidence that faculty members perceive a number of significant communication problem areas regarding work-related communication and overall departmental communication. Furthermore, although there are some similarities among the faculty members in identifying communication problems as well as the ways of solving these communication problems, some significant differences are also observed among the departments. In addition, analysis of the data revealed that there are some similarities and differences between hard science and soft science departments in defining communication problems and possible ways of solving these communication-related problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J.V. Baldridge D.V. Curtis G.P. Ecker G. L. Riley (2000) ‘Alternative models of governance in higher education’ M.C. Brown SuffixII (Eds) Organization and Governance in Higher Education Pearson Custom Publishing Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Becher (1981) ArticleTitle‘Towards a definition of disciplinary cultures’ Studies in Higher Education 6 IssueID2 109–122

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Becher (1990) ArticleTitle‘The counter-culture of specialisation’ European Journal of Education 25 IssueID3 333–346

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Becher (1994) ArticleTitle‘The significance of disciplinary differences’ Studies in Higher Education 19 IssueID2 151–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T. (2001).

  • T. Becher P.R. Trowler (2001) Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and The Culture of Disciplines EditionNumber2 The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  • R.M. Besse (1973) ‘A comparison of the university with the corporation’ J.A. Perkins (Eds) The University as an Organization McGraw Hill Book Company New York

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Birnbaum (1988) How Colleges Work: The Cybernetics of Academic Organization and Leadership Jossey-Bass Publishers San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • P.M. Blau (1973) The Organization of Academic Work John Wiley and Sons New York

    Google Scholar 

  • B.R. Clark (1983) The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-Cultural Perspective University of California Press London

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Clark (1994) ArticleTitle‘Knowledge ethics and the new academic culture’ Change 26 8–16

    Google Scholar 

  • J.A. Courtright G.T. Fairhurst L.E. Rogers (1989) ArticleTitle‘Interaction patterns in organic and mechanistic systems’ Academy of Management Journal 32 773–802

    Google Scholar 

  • R.L. Daft N.B. Machintosh (1981) ArticleTitle‘A Tentative exploration into amount and equivocality of information processing in organizational work units’ Administrative Science Quarterly 21 207–224

    Google Scholar 

  • D.D. Dill (2000) ‘The nature of administrative behavior in higher education’ M.C. Brown SuffixII (Eds) Organization and Governance in Higher Education Pearson Custom Publishing Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Fulk B. Boyd (1991) ArticleTitle‘Emerging theories of communication in organizations’ Journal of Management 17 407–446

    Google Scholar 

  • D.A. Gioia H.P. Sims (1986) ArticleTitle‘Cognition-behavior connections: attribution and verbal behavior in leader–subordinate interactions’ Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process 37 197–229 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0749-5978(86)90052-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W.B. Gundykunst (1997) ArticleTitle‘Cultural variability in communication’ Communication Research 24 327–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Gürüz K. (2001). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Yükseköğretim: Tarihçe ve Bugünkü Sevk ve İdare Sistemleri. Ankara: OSYM Yayınları 2001-4.

  • G. Huber (1982) ArticleTitle‘Organizational informational systems: Determinants of their performance and behavior’ Management Science 28 138–155

    Google Scholar 

  • K.J. Krone F.M. Jablin L.L. Putnam (1989) ‘Communication theory and organizational communication: Multiple perspectives F.M. Jablin L.L. Putnam K.H. Roberts L.W. Porter (Eds) Handbook of Organizational Communication Sage Publications New York

    Google Scholar 

  • G.D. Kuh E.J. Witt (2000) ‘Culture in american colleges and universities’ M.C. Brown SuffixII (Eds) Organization and Governance in Higher Education Pearson Custom Publishing Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Lockwood J. Davies (1985) Universities: The Management Challenge NFER-NELSON Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Marginson (2000) ArticleTitle‘Rethinking academic work in the global era’ Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management 22 IssueID(1 23–38

    Google Scholar 

  • A.T. Masland (2000) ‘Organizational culture in the study of higher education’ M.C. Brown SuffixII (Eds) Organization and Governance in Higher Education Pearson Custom Publishing Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • B.E. McCain C. O’Reilly J. Pfeffer (1983) ArticleTitle‘The effects of departmental demography on turnover: The case of a university’ Academy of Management Journal 26 626–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Middle East Technical University (1995). Strategic Plan for 1995–2000.

  • Y.T. Moses (1990) ArticleTitle‘The challenge of diversity’ Education and Urban Society 22 IssueID4 402–413

    Google Scholar 

  • M.W. Peterson M.G. Spencer (1993) ‘Qualitative and quantitative approaches to academic culture: Do they tell us the same thing?’ J.C. Smart (Eds) Higher Education Handbook of Theory and Research Agathon Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Simsek D. Aytemiz (1998) ArticleTitle‘Anomaly-based change in higher education: The case of a large, Turkish Public University’ Higher Education 36 155–179 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1003242331692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Smircich M.B. Calas (1989) ‘Organizational culture: a critical assessment’ F.M. Jablin L.L. Putnam K.H. Roberts L.W. Porter (Eds) Handbook of Organizational Communication Sage Publications New York

    Google Scholar 

  • R.A. Snyder J.H. Morris (1984) ArticleTitle‘Organizational communication and performance’ Journal of Applied Psychology 69 461–465 Occurrence Handle10.1037//0021-9010.69.3.461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.D. Toma (1997) ArticleTitle‘Alternative inquiry paradigms, faculty cultures, and the definition of academic lives’ The Journal of Higher Education 68 679–705

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Trow (1977) ‘Departments as contexts for peaching and learning’ D.E. McHenry (Eds) Academic Departments Jossey-Bass Publisher San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Trowler (1997) ArticleTitle‘Beyond the Robbins Trap: Reconceptualising academic responses to change in higher education (or ⋖ Quiet Flows the Don?)’ Studies in Higher Education 22 IssueID3 301–319

    Google Scholar 

  • J.L. Turner M. Miller C.M. Kernan (2002) ArticleTitle‘Disciplinary cultures and graduate education’ Emergences 12 IssueID1 47–70 Occurrence Handle10.1080/1045722022000003444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K.E. Weick (1976) ArticleTitle‘Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems’ Administrative Science Quarterly 21 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • T.R. Zenger B.S. Lawrance (1989) ArticleTitle‘Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication’ Academy of Management Journal 32 353–376

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, Department of Educational Science, Middle East Technical University, Inonu Bulvari, Ankara, 06531, Turkey

    Sidika Gizir & Hasan Simsek

Authors
  1. Sidika Gizir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hasan Simsek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sidika Gizir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gizir, S., Simsek, H. Communication in an academic context. High Educ 50, 197–221 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6349-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6349-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation