Skip to main content
Log in

Groups Formation and Operations in the Web 2.0 Environment and Social Networks

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Internet and the Web are evolving to a platform for collaboration, sharing, innovation and user-created content—the so-called Web 2.0 environment. This environment includes social and business networks, and it is influencing what people do on the Web and intranets, individually and in groups. This paper describes the Web 2.0 environment, its tools, applications, characteristics. It also describes various types of online groups, especially social networks, and how they operate in the Web 2.0 environment. Of special interest is the way organization members communicate and collaborate mainly via wikis and blogs. In addition, the paper includes a proposed triad relational model (Technology–People–Community) of social/work life on the Internet. Particularly, social/work groups are becoming sustainable because of the incentives for participants to connect and network with other users. A discussion of group dynamics that is based on the human needs for trust, support, and sharing, regardless if the setting is a physical or virtual one, follows. Finally, future research directions are outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson C (2006) The long tail: how endless choice is creating unlimited demand. Random House Business Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow H, McGrath JE, Berdahl JL (2000) Small groups as complex systems: formation, coordination, development, and adaptation. Sage Publications, Inc, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Backstrom L, Huttenlocher D, Kleinberg J, Lan X (2006) Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth and evolution. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, 20–23 August, 2006

  • Barnes JA (1954) Class and Committees in a Norwegian Island Parish. Hum Relat 7: 39–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett E (2007) Web 2.0: turning browsers into buyers. Baseline, June 14. http://www.baselinemag.com/article2/0,1540,2141586,00.asp. Cited November 2007

  • Blanchard AL, Markus ML (2004) The experienced ‘Sense’ of a virtual community: characteristics and processes. The DATA BASE for Adv Inform Syst 35(4): 64–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Borland J (2007) A smarter web. Technol Rev. March. http://www.technologyreview.com/Infotech/18306. Accessed August 2007

  • Boyd D (2006) Friends, friendsters, and mySpace Top 8: writing community into being on social network sites. First Monday 11(12), December. http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_12/boyd. Accessed August 2007

  • Chambers SA (2005) Working on the democratic imagination and the limits of deliberative democracy. Pol Res Q 58(4): 619–623

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H (2006) Open business models: how to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman J (1990) Foundations of social theory. Harvard University Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducheneaut N, Yee N, Nickell Y, Moore R (2006) "Alone together?" Exploring the social dynamics of massively multiplayer online games. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems: CHI ’06. Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 22–27 April, 2006

  • Farrell N (2007) Microsoft rambled over wikipedia edits. http://www.theinquirer.net/print.aspx?article=37170. Accessed August 2007

  • Gillmor D (2006) We the media: grassroots journalism by the people, for the people. O’ Reilly Media, Sebastopol

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilroy K, Ivas B (2006) Intranet 2.0: collaboration, self publishing and tools mash-up new driving force. Special Report, Mekrum Corp. London UK

  • Hagel J, Armstrong A (1997) Net gain. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinchcliffe D (2007) Profitably running an online business in the Web 2.0 Era. SOA Web Serv J. November. http://www.web2.wsj2.com. Accessed May 2007

  • Hoover JN (2007a) Beyond E-mail. Information Week. June 25

  • Hoover JN (2007b) Fire enterprise 2.0 start ups worth a second look. Information week June 18

  • Johnson GJ, Ambrose PJ (2006) Neo-tribes: the power and potential of online communities in health care. Commun ACM 49(1): 107–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim KH, Sia CL, Lee MKO, Benbasat I (2006) Do I trust you online, and if so, will I buy? An empirical study of two trust-Building strategies. J Manage Inform Syst 23(2): 233–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAfee A (2006) Enterprise 2.0: the dawn of emergent collaboration. Eng Manage Rev, IEEE 34(3): 38–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNichol T (2007) Wikipedia founder hunts for gold. Business 2.0, March

  • Murray-Buechner M (2006) 25 sites we can’t live without. Time, August. Accessed May 2007

  • Nerille J (2007) X-treme Web 2.0. Optimize Magazine, January

  • O’Reilly T (2005) What is Web 2.0? OReillynet.Com. September. http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html Accessed August 2007

  • Phelps JE, Lewis R, Mobilio L, Perry D, Raman N (2005) Viral marketing or electronic word-of-mouth advertising: examining consumer responses and motivations to pass along email. J Advert Res 44(04): 333–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan K (2006) Plugging in: can e-commerce leverage social networks? E-commerce times, February. http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/54035.html. Accessed August 2007

  • Rheingold H (2003) Smart mobs: the next social revolution. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenberger CR (2007) Nice to meet you. Forbes, April 23

  • Schonfield E, Yen YW (2007) It’s a Web, Web, Web 2.0 World. Business 2.0, February

  • Scott DM (2007) The new rules of marketing and PR. Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver D (2007) Smart start-ups. Hoboken, NJ

  • Stern A (2006) Social lending the next Web 2.0 phenomenon–part I. Centernetworks, November. http://www.centernetworks.com/social-lending-web-2-0. Accessed August 2007

  • Stutzman F (2006) An evaluation of identity-sharing behaviour in social network communities. Paper presented at the international digital media and arts association and the Miami University Centre for interactive media studies code conference, Oxford, Ohio, 6–8 April

  • Surowiecki J (2004) The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations. Doubleday Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Swearingen J (2007) Where are they now. Business 2.0. http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/biz2/0707/gallery.web_world_06.biz2/index.html. Accessed November 2007

  • The Economist (2007) Watching the Web grow up. Technol Quart, March. Accessed May 2007

  • Turban E, Lee JK, King D, McKay J, Marshal P (2008) Electronic commerce 2008: a managerial perspective (5th edn). Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein M (2006) On Demand is in Demand. Training, October

  • Wellman B (2005) Community: from neighborhood to network. Commun ACM 48(10): 53–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia (2008) Social Networking Websites. http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_social_networking_websites. Accessed March 2008

  • Woodcock B (2005) An analysis of MMOG subscription growth–version 18. http://www.mmogchart.com. Accessed April 2006

  • Yin RK (2003) Case study research: design and methods. Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, California

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda S. L. Lai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lai, L.S.L., Turban, E. Groups Formation and Operations in the Web 2.0 Environment and Social Networks. Group Decis Negot 17, 387–402 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-008-9113-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-008-9113-2

Keywords

Navigation