Skip to main content
Log in

Phylogenetic analysis of Indian Dioscorea and comparison of secondary metabolite content with sampling across the tree

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dioscorea (Dioscoreaceae) is a large monocot genus of species with either underground tubers or rhizomes. Many species of Dioscorea are used for food or medicine. Dioscorea is as an emerging model organism that is important in understanding plant biology and evolution. Dioscorea is rich in secondary metabolite content (e.g., diosgenin). The first objective of this study was phylogenetic analysis of Indian Dioscorea. Sampling included 16 Indian species representing approximately 50% of total Indian species. In molecular phylogenetic analyses, using plastid markers (matK, rbcL, atpB-rbcL and ndhF), the tuberous and rhizomatous species formed separate clades with strong support and members of each section formed distinct clade supporting the traditional morphology based sectional classification of Dioscorea. Results of phylogenetic analyses of Indian Dioscorea formed the basis for sampling of species for the second objective of this study, which was to compare the secondary metabolite (phenolics and flavonoid) content in representatives from different sections of Indian Dioscorea. The phenolic content and associated antioxidant activity were studied using methanolic extracts of underground parts. Six species from different sections were used in this study, which are Dioscorea alata L. (six cultivars; Enantiophyllum), D. pentaphylla L. (sect. Botryosicyos), D. esculenta (Lour.) Burkill (sect. Combilium), D. bulbifera L. (sect.  Opsophyton), D. deltoidea Wall. ex Griseb. and D. prazeri Prain et Burkill (sect. Stenophora). The rhizomatous species D. prazeri and D. deltoidea showed higher phenolic and flavonoid contents than the tuberous species. Significant differences were also observed in the phenolic content and antioxidant activities among different cultivars of D. alata.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asiedu R, Sartie A (2010) Crops that feed the World 1 Yams. Food Secur 2:305–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barman P (2015) Phylogenetic Biology of Dioscorea: Transcriptome, Biochemical Activities and Storage Protein Dioscorin. Thesis, University of Delhi

  • Bhandari RM, Kawabata J (2004) Organic acid, phenolic content and antioxidant activity of wild yam (Dioscorea spp.) tubers of Nepal. Food Chem 88:163–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burkill IH (1935) A dictionary of the economic products of Malayasia. Ministry of Agriculture of Malaysia, pp 813–825

  • Burkill IH (1960) The organography and the evolution of the Dioscoreaceae, the family of the yams. Bot J Linn Soc 56:319–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diop A (1998) Storage and processing of roots and tubers in the tropics. In: Calverley DJB (eds) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, pp 1–14

  • DNA Baser Sequence Assembler v4 (2013), Heracle BioSoft, www.DnaBaser.com

  • Govaerts R, Wilkin P, Raz L (2011) World checklist of Dioscoreaceae. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Published on the internet; http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/ Retrieved 2011-10-22

  • Harborne JB (1973) Phytochemical methods. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 49–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges SA, Arnold ML (1994) Columbines: a geographically widespread species flock. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:5129–5132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu KM, Tsai JL, Chen MY, Ku HM, Liu SC (2013) Molecular phylogeny of Dioscorea (Dioscoreaceae) in East and Southeast Asia. Blumea 58:21–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber H (1998) Dioscoreaceae. In: Kubitzki K (ed) The families and genera of vascular plants, vol 3. Springer, Berlin, pp 216–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Hue SM, Boyce AN, Somasundram C (2012) Antioxidant activity, phenolic and flavonoid contents in the leaves of different varieties of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas). Aust J Crop Sci 6:375–380

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754–755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hugo JC, Remarchuk K, Ubayasena K (2006) Ready-to-use DNA extracted with a CTAB method adapted for herbarium specimens and mucilaginous plant tissue. Plant Mol Biol Rep 24:161–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knuth R (1924) Dioscoreaceae. In: Engler HGA, Leipzig HY (eds) Das Pflanzenreich. J Cramer. pp 1–387

  • Lebot V (1999) Biomolecular evidence for crop domestication on Sahul. Genet Resour Crop Evol 46:619–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin FW (1969) The species of Dioscorea containing sapogenins. Econ Bot 23:373–379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meda A, Lamien CE, Romito M, Millogo J, Nacoulma OG (2005) Determination of the total phenolic, flavonoid and proline contents in Burkina Fasan honey, as well as their radical scavenging activity. Food Chem 91:571–577

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mignouna H, Abang MM, Asiedu R, Geeta R (2009) Dioscorea, true yams—A biological and evolutionary link between eudicots and grasses. In: Emerging Model Organisms. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, pp 73–79

  • Miller MA, Pfeiffer W Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: Proceedings of the gateway computing environments workshop (GCE), 14 Nov. 2010, New Orleans, LA, pp 1–8

  • Mukherjee P, Bhat KV (2013) Phylogenetic relationship of wild and cultivated yam species (Dioscorea spp.) of India inferred from PCR–RFLP analysis of two cpDNA loci. Plant Syst Evol 299:1587–1597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murugan M, Mohan VR (2012) In vitro antioxidant studies of Dioscorea esculenta (Lour). Burkill. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 2:S1620–S1624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okwu DE, Ndu CU (2006) Evaluation of phytonutrients, mineral and vitamin contents of some varieties of Yam (Dioscorea species). Int J Mol Med Adv Sci 2:199–203

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead RG, Sweere JA (1994) Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: an empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Syst Biol 43:467–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullaiah T (2002) Medicinal plants in India. Regency Publications, New Delhi, pp 220–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Vander Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Hohna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol 61:539–542

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert BG, Shehbaz IA (1989) The Dioscoreaceae in the Southeastern United States. J Arnold Arbor 70:57–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shewry P (2003) Tuber storage proteins. Ann Bot Lond 91:755–769

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Standley K (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30:772–780

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DL (2003) PAUP. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts

  • Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA 5, molecular evolutionary genetic analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Velioglu YS, Mazza G, Gao L, Oomah BD (1998) Antioxidant activity and total phenolics in selected fruits, vegetables, and grain products. J Agric Food Chem 46:4113–4117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Viruel J et al (2016) Late Cretaceous—Early Eocene origin of yams (Dioscorea, Dioscoreaceae) in the Laurasian Palaearctic and their subsequent Oligocene—Miocene diversification. J Biogeogr 43:750–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanasundera JPD, Ravindran G (1994) Nutritional assessment of Yam (D. alata) tubers. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 46:33–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkin P, Schols P, Chase MW, Chayamarit K, Furness CA, Huysmans S, Rakotonasolo F, Smets E, Thapyai C (2005) A plastid gene phylogeny of the yam genus, Dioscorea: roots, fruits and Madagascar. Syst Bot 30:736–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf PG, Soltis PS, Soltis DE (1994) Phylogenetic relationships of dennstaedtioid ferns: evidence from rbcL sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 3:383–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research work described here was a part of Ph.D. research work of Paramananda Barman. We thank the UGC, DST- PURSE and the R&D Grant of University of Delhi, New Delhi, for financial and infrastructural support. We are grateful to NBPGR, New Delhi and CTCRI, Thiruvananthapuram for providing some accessions of Dioscorea for this study. We are grateful to Drs. P. L. Uniyal, N. K. Dhal and Sudam Sahu for their support in sample collection and Suraj Umdale and Renu Puri for their help in amplifying few accessions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paramananda Barman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in the publication.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 46 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barman, P., Bhat, K.V. & Geeta, R. Phylogenetic analysis of Indian Dioscorea and comparison of secondary metabolite content with sampling across the tree. Genet Resour Crop Evol 65, 1003–1012 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-017-0591-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-017-0591-4

Keyword

Navigation