Skip to main content
Log in

Performance and phenology of wild black raspberry (Rubus occidentalis L.) germplasm in a common garden

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A lack of genetic diversity in cultivated black raspberry (Rubus occidentalis L.) germplasm has been widely recognized as a major factor limiting progress towards breeding improved cultivars. Despite this, little effort has been made since the early twentieth century to systematically collect and evaluate wild black raspberry for germplasm improvement. In recent years, there has been renewed interest in black raspberry breeding to replace existing cultivars that lack durability and disease resistance. We planted seedlings from 109 wild black raspberry populations, representing 24 US states and two Canadian provinces, in the field in replicated trial plots in Corvallis, Oregon (USA), to evaluate their performance. These populations showed wide variation in morphology, architecture, fruiting season, vigor, and apparent field tolerance to Verticillium wilt. For nearly every trait examined, wild black raspberry germplasm exhibited a range of variation beyond existing cultivars, and showed great potential for use in future breeding. While most populations were fairly uniform phenotypically, segregation for fruit gloss and possible tolerance to Verticillium wilt was noted in a few, indicating the possibility of simple inheritance of these traits. A few populations with unusual morphology, such as spinelessness or flower abnormalities, were identified, as were populations that flowered on first year canes and produced fall fruit. Populations from the southern edge of the range appear to be particularly well adapted to western Oregon, with vigorous upright growth, strong canes, and some with a low incidence of Verticillium wilt. This germplasm will be of great value to breeders interested in developing improved black raspberry cultivars.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Black B, Frisby J, Lewers K, Takeda F, Finn CE (2008) Heat unit model for predicting bloom dates in Rubus. HortScience 43:2000–2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Card FW (1898) Bush-Fruits. MacMillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor AM, Stephens MJ, Hall HK, Alspach PA (2005) Variation and heritabilities of antioxidant activity and total phenolic content estimated from a red raspberry factorial experiment. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 130:403–411

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daubeny HA (1996) Brambles. In: Janick J, Moore JN (eds) Fruit breeding: vine and small fruit crops, vol II. Wiley, NY, pp 109–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Dossett M (2007) Variation and heritability of vegetative, reproductive and fruit chemistry traits in black raspberry (Rubus occidentalis L.). Thesis, Oregon State University

  • Dossett M, Finn CE (2010) Identification of resistance to the large raspberry aphid in black raspberry. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 135:438–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Dossett M, Finn CE (2011) Primocane-fruiting in black raspberry (Rubus occidentalis L.). J Am Pomol Soc 65:48–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Dossett M, Lee J, Finn CE (2008) Inheritance of phenological, vegetative, and fruit chemistry traits in black raspberry. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 133:408–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Dossett M, Bassil NV, Finn CE (2010) Transferability of Rubus microsatellite markers to black raspberry. Acta Hortic 859:103–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dossett M, Bassil NV, Finn CE (2012a) SSR fingerprinting of black raspberry cultivars shows discrepancies in identification. Acta Hortic 946:49–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dossett M, Bassil NV, Lewers KS, Finn CE (2012b) Genetic diversity in wild and cultivated black raspberry evaluated by simple sequence repeat markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 59:1849–1865

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drain BD (1956) Inheritance in black raspberry species. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 68:169–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn CE, Wennstrom K, Link J, Ridout J (2003) Evaluation of Rubus leucodermis populations from the Pacific Northwest. HortScience 38:1169–1172

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiola JA, Swartz HJ (1994) Inheritance of tolerance to Verticillium albo-atrum in raspberry. HortScience 29:1071–1073

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall H, Hummer KE, Jamieson A, Jennings S, Weber C (2009) Raspberry breeding and genetics. Plant Breed Rev 32:39–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummer K, Dossett M, Finn C (2008a) Plant collecting expedition for berry crop species through Southeastern and Midwestern United States, June and July 2007 Part I. USDA ARS NCGR Station Publication, Corvallis

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummer K, Dossett M, Finn C (2008b) Plant collecting expedition for berry crop species through Southeastern and Midwestern United States, June and July 2007 Part II. USDA ARS NCGR Station Publication, Corvallis

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings DL (1966) The manifold effects of genes affecting fruit size and vegetative growth in the raspberry. I. Gene L 1 . New Phytol 65:176–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings DL (1988) Raspberries and blackberries: their breeding, diseases and growth. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings DL, McNicol RJ, Brydon E (1986) In: Fourth annual report of the Scottish crop research institute for 1985. p 84

  • Lewis D (1939) Genetical studies in cultivated raspberries. I. Inheritance and linkage. J Genet 38:367–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ourecky DK (1975) Brambles. In: Janick J, Moore JN (eds) Advances in fruit breeding. Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, pp 98–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Ourecky DK, Slate GL (1966) Hybrid vigor in Rubus occidentalis × Rubus leucodermis seedlings. In: Proceedings of the 17th international horticultural congress, vol 1. Abstract 277

  • Slate GL, Klein LG (1952) Black raspberry breeding. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 59:266–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallman PH (2007) Black raspberry plant named ‘Explorer’. US Plant Patent 17,727, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington DC

  • Tallman PH (2014) Black raspberry plant named ‘Niwot’. US Plant Patent Application 20140338078, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington DC

  • Tanksley SD, McCouch SR (1997) Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277:1063–1066

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • USDA, NRCS. 2015. The PLANTS Database. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA USA. http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=RUOC. Accessed 10 June 2015

  • Weber CA (2003) Genetic diversity in black raspberry detected by RAPD markers. HortScience 38:269–272

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm S, Thomas HE (1950) Verticillium wilt of bramble fruits with special reference to Rubus ursinus derivatives. Phytopathology 40:1103–1110

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm S, Bringhurst RS, Voth V (1965) Origin of Rubus cultivars resistant to Verticillium wilt. Phytopathology 55:731–733

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams CF (1950) Influence of parentage in species hybridization of raspberries. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 56:149–156

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the technical support of Mary Peterson, Ted Mackey, Joe Snead, and Jungmin Lee, as well as the myriad summer students that assisted in data collection and plot maintenance during the course of this project especially Sumi Maristany and Erin Ortiz from the Apprenticeships in Science and Engineering program (Portland, OR). We thank Kim Hummer for her role in organizing and participating in the collection trips. We would like to thank the following individuals for contributing seed for this project: W. Anderson (Illinois), M. Bathrick (Pennsylvania), C. Brown (New Jersey), P. Byers (Missouri), T. Cuff (Wisconsin), A. Dale (Ontario), R. Davis (New York), R. Geneve (Kentucky), J. Hancock (Michigan), D. Handley (Maine), A. Jamieson (New Brunswick), K. Kellogg (Connecticut), J. Lehman (Indiana), T. Leslie (Ohio), H. Love (Tennessee), J. Luby (Minnesota), C. Mauchline (Pennsylvania), R. Moyer (Virginia), G. Nonnecke (Iowa), M. Retter (Indiana), M. Stanton (Ohio), H. Swartz (Maryland), F. Takeda (West Virginia), E. Thompson (Arkansas), C. Weber (New York). This project was supported by grants from the USDA-ARS Northwest Center for Small Fruits Research, the USDA-ARS Plant Exchange Office, and the Oregon Raspberry and Blackberry Commission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Dossett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dossett, M., Finn, C.E. Performance and phenology of wild black raspberry (Rubus occidentalis L.) germplasm in a common garden. Genet Resour Crop Evol 63, 653–673 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-015-0274-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-015-0274-y

Keywords

Navigation