Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The influence of European and American wild germplasm in hop (Humulus lupulus L.) cultivars

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microsatellite variation at the nuclear and chloroplast genomes was evaluated for wild European and wild American hops, in order to assess the genetic diversity and origin of cultivated hops. Seven nuclear loci and 32 chloroplast loci were used in the analysis of 182 hop accessions including wild European (68), wild American (48), and cultivars (66). A total of 116 alleles were identified using 7 nuclear microsatellites showing different averages of polymorphism and distribution in the wild American and European accessions and cultivars. Two main groups were established as revealed by several statistical analyses; one including European wild accessions and cultivars and a second group consisting of American wild accessions. Three polymorphic chloroplast microsatellite loci were detected, six alleles were scored which defined a total of five haplotypes that were exclusive or presented different distribution between American and European wild accessions. A major influence of the wild European haplotypes was detected among hop cultivars. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work reporting the use of chloroplast microsatellites in hops.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arroyo-García R, Lefort F, De Andrés MT, Ibañez J, Borrego J, Jouve N, Cabello F, Martínez-Zapater JM (2002) Chloroplast microsatellite polymorphism in Vitis species. Genome 45:1142–1149. doi:10.1139/G02-087

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arroyo-García R, Ruiz-García L, Bolling L, Ocete R, López MA, Arnold C, Ergul A, Söylemezolu G, Uzun HL, Cabello F, Ibáñez J, Aradhya MK, Atanassov A, Atanassov I, Balint S, Cenis JL, Costantini L, Gorislavets S, Grando MS, Klein BY, Mcgovern PE, Merdinoglu D, Pejic I, Pelsy F, Primikirios N, Risovannaya V, Roubelakis-Angelakis KA, Snoussi H, Sotiri P, Tamhankar S, This P, Troshin L, Malpica JM, Lefort F, Martinez-Zapater JM (2006) Multiple origins of cultivated grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. ssp. sativa) based on chloroplast DNA polymorphisms. Mol Ecol 15:3707–3714. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03049.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Sykes BC, Richards MB (1995) Mitochondrial portraits of human populations. Genetics 141:743–753

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers J, Boursiquot JM, This P, Chu K, Johansson H, Meredith C (1999) Historical genetics: the parentage of Chardonnay, Gamay, and other wine grapes of Northeastern France. Science 285:1562–1565. doi:10.1126/science.285.5433.1562

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brady JL, Scott NS, Thomas MR (1996) DNA typing of hops (Humulus lupulus L.) through application of RAPD microsatellite marker sequences converted to sequence tagged sites. Euphytica 91:277–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cerenak C, Jakše J, Javornik B (2004) Identification and differentiation of hop varieties using simple sequence repeat markers. J Am Brew Chem 62:1–7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chung SM, Staub JE (2003) The development and evaluation of consensus chloroplast primer pairs that posses highly variable sequence regions in diverse array of plant taxa. Theor Appl Genet 107:757–767

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darby P (1999) New selection criteria in hop breeding. In: Seigner E (ed) International hop growers convention. Proceedings of the scientific commission. Pulawy, pp 3–6

  • Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinf Online 1:47–50

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hadonou AM, Walden R, Darby P (2004) Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellites for assessment of genetic variation in hops (Humulus lupulus L.). Mol Ecol Notes 4:280–282. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00641.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2006) PAST—PAlaeontological STatistics, ver 1.54. Distributed by the author. http://folk.uio.no/ohammer/past/download.html

  • Jakše J, Kindlhofer K, Javornik B (2001) Assessment of genetic variation and differentiation in hop (Humulus lupulus L.) genotypes by microsatellite and AFLP markers. Genome 44:773–782. doi:10.1139/gen-44-5-773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jakše J, Bandelj D, Javornik B (2002) Eleven new microsatellites for hops (Humulus lupulus L.). Mol Ecol Notes 2:544–546. doi:10.1046/j.1471-8286.2002.00309.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakše J, Satovic Z, Javornik B (2004) Microsatellite variability among wild and cultivated hops (Humulus lupulus L.). Genome 47:889–899. doi:10.1139/G04-054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jakše J, Luthar Z, Javornik J (2008) New polymorphic dinucleotide and trinucleotide microsatellite loci for hop Humulus lupulus L. Mol Ecol Res 8:769–772. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.02053.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M (2004) MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform 5:150–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson G, Gutman GA (1987) Slipped-strand mispairing: a major mechanism for DNA sequence evolution. Mol Biol Evol 4:203–221

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moir M (2000) Hop—a millennium review. J Am Soc Brew Chem 58:131–146. doi:10.1094/ASBCJ-58-0131

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murakami A, Darby P, Javornik B, Pais MSS, Seigner E, Luzt A, Svoboda P (2006a) Molecular phylogeny of wild hops, Humulus lupulus L. Heredity 97:66–74. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800839

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murakami A, Darby P, Javornik B, Pais MSS, Seigner E, Luzt A, Svoboda P (2006b) Microsatellite DNA analysis of wild hops, Humulus lupulus L. Genet Resour Crop Evol 53:1553–1562. doi:10.1007/s10722-005-7765-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neve RA (1991) Hops. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 1–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Patzak J (2002) Characterization of Czech hop (Humulus lupulus L.) genotypes by molecular methods. Plant Prod 48:343–350

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patzak J, Vrba L, Matousek J (2007) New SSR molecular markers for assessment of genetic diversity and DNA fingerprinting in hop (Humulus lupulus L.). Genome 50:15–25. doi:10.1139/G06-128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01787.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peredo EL, Arroyo-Garcia R, Martinez-Zapater JM, Revilla MA (2005) Evaluation of microsatellite detection using autoradiography and capillary electrophoresis in hops. J Am Brew Chem 63:57–62. doi:10.1094/ASBCJ-63-0057

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pillay M, Kenny ST (1994) Chloroplast DNA differences between cultivated hop, Humulus lupulus and the related species H. japonicus. Theor Appl Genet 89:373–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotypes data. Genetics 155:945–959

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Provan J, Powell W, Hollingsworth PM (2001) Chloroplast microsatellites: new tools for studies in plant ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 16:142–147. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2000.105316.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seefelder S, Ehrmaier H, Schweizer G, Seigner E (2000) Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among accessions of hop, Humulus lupulus, as determined by amplified fragment length polymorphism fingerprinting compared to pedigree data. Plant Breed 119:257–263. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0523.2000.tb01637.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siushih C (1998) Cannaboideae. In: Siushih C, Wu C (eds) Fl Republ Popularis Sin, vol 23, pp 220–224

  • Small E (1978) A numerical and nomenclatural analysis of morpho-geographic taxa of Humulus lupulus. Sys Bot 3:37–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stajner N, Jakše J, Kozjak P, Javornik B (2005) The isolation and characterization of microsatellite in hop (Humulus lupulus L.). Plant Sci 168:213–221. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.07.031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stajner N, Satovic Z, Cerenak A, Javornik B (2008) Genetic structure and differentiation in hop (Humulus lupulus L.) as inferred from microsatellite. Euphytica 161:301–311. doi:10.1007/s10681-007-9429-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tautz D (1989) Hypervariability of simple sequences as general source for polymorphic markers. Nucleic Acids Res 17:6463–6471

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend MS, Henning JA (2009) AFLP discrimination of native North American and cultivated hop. Crop Sci 42:600–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weising K, Gardner RC (1999) A set of conserved PCR primers for the analysis of simple sequence repeat polymorphism in chloroplast genomes of dicotyledonous angiosperms. Genome 42:9–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by funds from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology and FEDER (project MCT-02-AGL-02472) and the project CGL2005-06821-C02-01. E.L.P. is in receipt of an F.P.U. grant. The plant material was provided by the USDA-ARS National Clonal Germplasm Repository (Corvallis, OR, USA) supported by CRIS 5358-21000-033-00D and by Branka Javornik from the University of Ljubljana and Slovene Institute of Hop Research and Brewing (Zalec, Slovenia). Thanks are given to the people in the Departamento de Biotecnología (INIA) where part of this research was carried out. Thanks also to Leo Blanco and Fernando Rodríguez for their statistical assistance. The authors want to thank Dr. Jernej Jakse and Fernando Rodríguez for their critical pre-view and comments which helped to improve this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departmento de Biología de Organismos y Sistemas, Universidad de Oviedo, Catedrático Rodrigo Uría s/n, 33071, Oviedo, Spain

    Elena L. Peredo, M. Ángeles Revilla, Eduardo Cires & José Antonio Fernández Prieto

  2. Agricultural Research Service, National Clonal Germplasm Repository, United States Department of Agriculture, Corvallis, OR, 97333-2521, USA

    Barbara M. Reed

  3. Center for Plant Biotechnology and Breeding, Biotecnological Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    Branca Javornik

  4. Departamento de Biotecnología, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agraria y Alimentaria, Carretera de A Coruña, km 7.5, 28040, Madrid, Spain

    Rosa Arroyo-García

Authors
  1. Elena L. Peredo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Ángeles Revilla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Barbara M. Reed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Branca Javornik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Eduardo Cires
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. José Antonio Fernández Prieto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rosa Arroyo-García
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena L. Peredo.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(PDF 141 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peredo, E.L., Ángeles Revilla, M., Reed, B.M. et al. The influence of European and American wild germplasm in hop (Humulus lupulus L.) cultivars. Genet Resour Crop Evol 57, 575–586 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-009-9495-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-009-9495-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation