Abstract
The construction of highway embankments in urban areas often interferes with existing underground facilities such as sewer lines and other buried conduits. In many instances, the extra loads imposed by embankment construction on buried conduits would be unacceptably high. Severe consequences of overstressing an underground utility conduit include damage and interruption of services for both the utility and highway. Typical alternatives considered to address this problem include: relocation of utility lines; embankment load reduction using lightweight fill; at-grade pile cap bridging; at-grade geogrids-reinforced bridging; and induced (imperfect) trenches. The relocation, lightweight fill and pile cap alternatives are usually cost prohibitive. A full-scale instrumented test embankment is constructed by Ontario Ministry of Transportation to study the effects of embankment construction on the underground utilities. The test embankment comprised four sections, which facilitated the evaluation of four configurations including the conventional backfill, induced trenching and two at-grade geogrid-reinforcing bridging with different spans. Each configuration consisted of a 3 m deep trench overlain by a 10 m wide, 10 m long and 6 m high embankment section. Earth load cells were installed to monitor stresses at the fill/ground interface and at depths of 1.5 and 3 m. The numerical models of the test embankment are generated using the finite difference program FLAC. This paper presents the results of stress measurements in the 3 m wide trench under embankment loads and the results of numerical varification analyses. The results showed that the use of induced trench method (ITM) resulted in substantial reduction in vertical stresses relative to positive projection method case. It was also observed that horizontal stresses increased when ITM is employed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AASHTO (2007) LRFD bridge design specifications, 4th edn. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC
ACPA (1980) ACPA concrete pipe handbook. American Concrete Pipe Association, Vienna, VA
ACPA (1998) ACPA concrete pipe handbook. American Concrete Pipe Association, Irving, TX
ACPA (2001) ACPA concrete pipe handbook. American Concrete Pipe Association, Vienna, VA
ACPA (2004) ACPA concrete pipe handbook. American Concrete Pipe Association, Vienna, VA
Bourque S (2002) Centrifuge and numerical modeling of induced trench twin conduits. M.Sc.E. thesis, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB
Brown CB (1967) Forces on rigid culverts under high fills. J Struct Div ASCE 93(5):195–215
Canadian Standards Association (2006) Canadian highway bridge design code. CSA-S6-06
Duncan JM, Chang CY (1970) Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain on soils. J Soil Mech Found Div 96(5):1629–1653
Floyd KJ, Clark RE (1979) Construction and instrumentation of induced experiment under high fill. State of Illinois Department of Transportation, Springfield, Il. Interim report IHD-19
Handy RL (2004) Anatomy of an error. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng (ASCE) 130(7):768–771
Hansen P, Miller L, Valsangkar AJ, Bourque S, MacLeod T (2007) Performance of induced trench culverts in New Brunswick. In: Proceedings of the annual conference of the Transportation Association of Canada, Saskatoon, Sask., 14–17 Oct 2007. Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, Ont
Hardin BO (1971) Characterization and use of shear stress-strain relations for airfield subgrade and base course material. AFN-TR-71-60, Air Force Weapons Laboratory, Kirkland AFB, NM
Itasca Consulting Group (2005) FLAC, Fast Lagrangian analysis of continua, Version 5.0, Itasca Consulting Group, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Kang J (2007) Soil-structure-interaction and imperfect trench installation applied to deeply buried conduits. PhD thesis, Auburn University, Auburn AL, USA
Kang J, Parker F, Yoo C (2007a) Soil-structure interaction and imperfect trench installations for deeply buried concrete pipes.”. J Geotech Geo-environ Eng ASCE 133(3):277–285
Kang J, Parker F, Yoo C (2007b) Soil-structure interaction and imperfect trench installations for deeply buried corrugated PVC pipes. Transp Res Rec TRB 2028:192–202
Katona MG, Smith JM, Odello RS, Allgood JR (1976) CANDE—a modern approach for the structural design and analysis of buried culverts. FHWA-RD-77-5, Federal Highway Administration, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, McLean, Va
Kim K, Yoo CH (2005) Design loading on deeply buried box culverts. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131:20
Kondner RL (1963) Hyperbolic stress–strain response: cohesive soils. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 98(1):115–143
MacLeod T (2003) Earth pressures on induced trench conduits. M.Sc.E. thesis, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB
Marston A (1922) Second progress report to the joint concrete culvert pipe committee. Iowa Engineering Experimental Station, Ames, IA
Marston A (1930) The theory of external loads on closed conduits in the light of the latest experiments. Bulletin 96. Iowa Engineering Experiment Station, Ames, IA
Marston A, Anderson AO (1913) The theory of loads on pipes in ditches and tests of cement and clay drain tile and sewer pipe. Bulletin 31. Iowa Engineering Experiment Station, Iowa State College, Ames, IA
McAffee RP (2005) Soil-structure interaction in rigid culverts installed in induced trenches. Ph.D. thesis, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB
McAffee RP, Valsangkar AJ (2005) Performance of an induced trench installation. Transp Res Rec 1936(1):230–237
McAffee RP, Valsangkar AJ (2008) Field performance, centrifuge testing, and numerical modelling of an induced trench installation. Can Geotech J 45:85–101
McGuigan BL, Valsangkar AJ (2010) Centrifuge testing and numerical analysis of box culverts installed in induced trenches. Can Geotech J 47(2):147–163
McGuigan BL, Valsangkar AJ (2011) Earth pressures on twin positive projecting and induced trench box culverts under high embankments. Can Geotech J 48(2):173–185
Okabayashi K, Ohtani W, Akiyama K, Kawamura M (1994) Centrifugal model test for reducing the earth pressure on the culvert by using the flexible material. In: Proceedings of the 4th international offshore and polar engineering conference, Osaka, Japan, 10–15 April 1994. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, Cupertino, Calif. pp 620–624
Parker BA, McAffee RP, Valsangkar AJ (2008) Field performance and analysis of 3-m-diameter induced trench culvert under a 19.4-m soil cover. Transp Res Rec 2045(08):68–76
Scario JH (2003) Reappraisal of Marton’s formula. J Transp Eng (ASCE) 129(6):703–712
Sladen JA, Oswell JM (1988) The induced trench method—a critical review and case history. Can Geotech J 25:541–549
Spangler MG (1950a) A theory of loads on negative projecting conduits. Proceedings of the Highway Research Board, 30, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp 153–161
Spangler MG (1950b) Field measurements of the settlement ratios of various highway culverts, Bulletin 171. Iowa Engineering Experiment Station, Ames, IA
Spangler MG, Handy RL (1973) Loads on underground conduits, soil engineering, 3rd edn. Harper Collins, New York, pp 658–686
Spangler MG, Handy RL (1982) Soil engineering, 4th edn. Harper and Row, New York
Sven N, Liedberg D (1997) Load reduction on a rigid pipe pilot study of a soft cushion. Transp Res Rec 1594:217–223
Vaslestad J (1990) Soil structure interaction of buried culverts. PhD thesis, The Norwegian Institute of Technology, Norway
Vaslestad J, Johansen TH, Holm W (1993) Load reduction on rigid culverts beneath high fills: long-term behavior. Transportation Research Record, 1415, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp 58–68
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the valuable contributions by the reviewers and the support provided by the Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Material Engineering and Research Office.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Turan, A., El Naggar, M.H. & Dundas, D. Investigation of Induced Trench Method Using a Full Scale Test Embankment. Geotech Geol Eng 31, 557–568 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-012-9608-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-012-9608-0