Abstract
In 2004, the U.K. parliament passed the Civil Partnership Act which provides a scheme to enable same-sex couples to obtain formal recognition of their relationships through the registration of a civil partnership. When the Civil Partnership Bill was making its way through parliament, attempts were made in the House of Lords to derail the Bill through amendments seeking to extend the Bill to certain familial relationships of care and support. In order to counter these attempts and to facilitate the removal of the amendments, the government gave the assurance that the matter of the economically vulnerable cohabitant would be referred back to the Law Commission for England and Wales for review. Consequently, in July 2005, the Law Commission commenced its project on cohabitation. This paper seeks to examine models of reform (such as the one proposed by the Law Society of England and Wales in its 2002 Cohabitation report) as well as those introduced in other Commonwealth countries. The aim is to identify some of the crucial questions that the Law Commission will need to give careful consideration to if they are to make recommendations that will provide a more radical approach to this area of the law, rather than adopt the more conservative approach of including cohabitation in ‘piggy back’ mode on the marriage model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bailey-Harris R. (1998). Dividing the Assets on Family Breakdown. Jordan Publishing Ltd., Bristol
Bottomley, A. & Wong, S., “Shared Households: A New Paradigm for Thinking about the Reform of Domestic Property Relations”, in Feminist Perspectives on Family Law, eds. A. Diduck & K. O’Donovan (London: Glasshouse Press, 2006), forthcoming
Clarke P. (1992). The Family Home: Intention and Agreement. Fam. Law 22:72–76
Dewar J. (1998). Land, Law and the Family Home. In: Bright S., Dewar J. (eds). Land Law: Themes and Perspectives. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 327–355
Diduck A. (2001). Fairness and Justice for All? The House of Lords in White v. White [2000] 2 FLR 981. Feminist Legal Studies 9/2:173–183
Flynn L., Lawson A. (1995). Gender, Sexuality and the Doctrine of Detrimental Reliance. Legal Studies 3(1):105–121
Gardner S. (1993). Rethinking Family Property. Law Quarterly Review 109:263–300
Glover N., Todd P. (1996). The Myth of Common Intention. Legal Studies 16(3):325–347
Law Commission, Sharing Homes: A Discussion Paper Law Com. No. 278 (London: Law Commission, 2002).
Law Society, Cohabitation: The Case for Clear Law (London: Law Society, 2002).
Lawson A. (1996). The Things we do for Love: Detrimental Reliance in the Family Home. Legal Studies 16:218–231
Mee J. (2004). Property Rights and Personal Relationships: Reflections on Reform. Legal Studies 24(3):414–450
Miles J. (2003). Property Law v. Family Law: Resolving the Problems of Family Property. Legal Studies 23(4):624–648
Millbank J., Morgan W. (2001). Let Them Eat Cake and Ice Cream: Wanting Something ‘More’ from the Relationship Recognition Menu. In: Wintemute R., Andenæs M. (eds). Legal Recognition of Same-sex Partnerships: A Study of National, European and International Law. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp. 295–316
Millbank J., Sant K. (2000). A Bride in Her Everyday Clothes: Same Sex Relationship Recognition in N.S.W. Sydney Law Review 22:181–219
Neave M. (1991). Living Together – The Legal Effects of the Sexual Division of Labour in Four Common Law Countries. Monash University Law Review 17:14–63
O’Donovan K. (1985). Sexual Divisions in Law. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London
Wong S. (1998). Constructive Trusts over the Family Home: Lessons to be Learned From Other Commonwealth Jurisdictions?. Legal Studies 18(3):369–390
Wong S. (1999). When Trust(s) is Not Enough: An Argument for the use of Unjust Enrichment for Home-sharers. Feminist Legal Studies 7(1):47–62
Wong S. (2003). Trusting in Trust(s): The Family Home and Human Rights. Feminist Legal Studies 11(2):119–137
Wong, S., “The Shared Home: A Rational Solution Through Statutory Reform?” in Feminist Perspectives on Land Law, eds. H. Lim & A. Bottomley (London: Glasshouse Press, 2006a), forthcoming
Wong S. (2006b). The Human Rights Act 1998 and the Shared Home: Issues for Cohabitants. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 27(3–4):265–279
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wong, S. Cohabitation and the Law Commission’s Project. Feminist Legal Stud 14, 145–166 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-006-9025-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-006-9025-y