Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cohabitation and the Law Commission’s Project

  • Article
  • Published:
Feminist Legal Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 2004, the U.K. parliament passed the Civil Partnership Act which provides a scheme to enable same-sex couples to obtain formal recognition of their relationships through the registration of a civil partnership. When the Civil Partnership Bill was making its way through parliament, attempts were made in the House of Lords to derail the Bill through amendments seeking to extend the Bill to certain familial relationships of care and support. In order to counter these attempts and to facilitate the removal of the amendments, the government gave the assurance that the matter of the economically vulnerable cohabitant would be referred back to the Law Commission for England and Wales for review. Consequently, in July 2005, the Law Commission commenced its project on cohabitation. This paper seeks to examine models of reform (such as the one proposed by the Law Society of England and Wales in its 2002 Cohabitation report) as well as those introduced in other Commonwealth countries. The aim is to identify some of the crucial questions that the Law Commission will need to give careful consideration to if they are to make recommendations that will provide a more radical approach to this area of the law, rather than adopt the more conservative approach of including cohabitation in ‘piggy back’ mode on the marriage model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey-Harris R. (1998). Dividing the Assets on Family Breakdown. Jordan Publishing Ltd., Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottomley, A. & Wong, S., “Shared Households: A New Paradigm for Thinking about the Reform of Domestic Property Relations”, in Feminist Perspectives on Family Law, eds. A. Diduck & K. O’Donovan (London: Glasshouse Press, 2006), forthcoming

  • Clarke P. (1992). The Family Home: Intention and Agreement. Fam. Law 22:72–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewar J. (1998). Land, Law and the Family Home. In: Bright S., Dewar J. (eds). Land Law: Themes and Perspectives. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 327–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Diduck A. (2001). Fairness and Justice for All? The House of Lords in White v. White [2000] 2 FLR 981. Feminist Legal Studies 9/2:173–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn L., Lawson A. (1995). Gender, Sexuality and the Doctrine of Detrimental Reliance. Legal Studies 3(1):105–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner S. (1993). Rethinking Family Property. Law Quarterly Review 109:263–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover N., Todd P. (1996). The Myth of Common Intention. Legal Studies 16(3):325–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law Commission, Sharing Homes: A Discussion Paper Law Com. No. 278 (London: Law Commission, 2002).

  • Law Society, Cohabitation: The Case for Clear Law (London: Law Society, 2002).

  • Lawson A. (1996). The Things we do for Love: Detrimental Reliance in the Family Home. Legal Studies 16:218–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mee J. (2004). Property Rights and Personal Relationships: Reflections on Reform. Legal Studies 24(3):414–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles J. (2003). Property Law v. Family Law: Resolving the Problems of Family Property. Legal Studies 23(4):624–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millbank J., Morgan W. (2001). Let Them Eat Cake and Ice Cream: Wanting Something ‘More’ from the Relationship Recognition Menu. In: Wintemute R., Andenæs M. (eds). Legal Recognition of Same-sex Partnerships: A Study of National, European and International Law. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp. 295–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Millbank J., Sant K. (2000). A Bride in Her Everyday Clothes: Same Sex Relationship Recognition in N.S.W. Sydney Law Review 22:181–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave M. (1991). Living Together – The Legal Effects of the Sexual Division of Labour in Four Common Law Countries. Monash University Law Review 17:14–63

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donovan K. (1985). Sexual Divisions in Law. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong S. (1998). Constructive Trusts over the Family Home: Lessons to be Learned From Other Commonwealth Jurisdictions?. Legal Studies 18(3):369–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong S. (1999). When Trust(s) is Not Enough: An Argument for the use of Unjust Enrichment for Home-sharers. Feminist Legal Studies 7(1):47–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong S. (2003). Trusting in Trust(s): The Family Home and Human Rights. Feminist Legal Studies 11(2):119–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, S., “The Shared Home: A Rational Solution Through Statutory Reform?” in Feminist Perspectives on Land Law, eds. H. Lim & A. Bottomley (London: Glasshouse Press, 2006a), forthcoming

  • Wong S. (2006b). The Human Rights Act 1998 and the Shared Home: Issues for Cohabitants. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 27(3–4):265–279

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simone Wong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wong, S. Cohabitation and the Law Commission’s Project. Feminist Legal Stud 14, 145–166 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-006-9025-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-006-9025-y

Keywords

Navigation