Abstract
Protective coloration is a well-known predator avoidance strategy in prey species. Aposematic species often display a contrasting color pattern consisting of dark spots of different shapes and sizes on a bright background coloration. Both elements, background color and spots are expected to serve different purposes. While the ecological function of the bright coloration has been addressed in many studies, the question of whether the interaction with differently sized spots influences predator behavior has received less attention by researchers. In a lowland rain forest in Costa Rica we used 2700 clay models that imitated the polytypic strawberry poison frog (Oophaga pumilio) as a proxy for an aposematic prey species. We manipulated the dorsal color pattern by using a local and a non-local aposematic and a non-local cryptic background color and combined them with black spots increasing in size (none, small, medium, large). The major objective was to test if spot size alters the survival rate of differently colored models. Background coloration and spot size were significant predictors of being attacked. However, the interaction between both effects was not. During five trials predators avoided the non-local aposematic color morph and did not discriminate between local aposematic and non-local cryptic models. Spot size and attack rate were negatively linear correlated which suggests that predator selection promotes the evolution of dark spots. We further conclude that spot size matters in a contrasting color pattern and plays an important role in predator avoidance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abràmoff MD, Magalhães PJ, Ram SJ (2004) Image processing with image. J Biophotonics Int 11:36–41. doi:10.1117/1.3589100
Aksoy V, Camlitepe Y (2012) Behavioural analysis of chromatic and achromatic vision in the ant Formica cunicularia (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Vis Res 67:28–36. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2012.06.013
Ali MA (ed) (1984) Photoreception and vision in invertebrates. NATO ASI series A, life sciences, 74th edn. Plenum Press, New York
Alvarado JB, Alvarez A, Saporito RA (2013) Oophaga pumilio (strawberry poison frog). Predation. Herpetol Rev 44:298
Amézquita A, Castro L, Arias M et al (2013) Field but not lab paradigms support generalisation by predators of aposematic polymorphic prey: the Oophaga histrionica complex. Evol Ecol 27:769–782. doi:10.1007/s10682-013-9635-1
Andersson M (2015) Aposematism and crypsis in a rodent: antipredator defence of the Norwegian lemming. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:571–581. doi:10.1007/s00265-014-1868-7
Arenas LM, Troscianko J, Stevens M (2014) Color contrast and stability as key elements for effective warning signals. Front Ecol Evol 2:1–12. doi:10.3389/fevo.2014.00025
Aronsson M, Gamberale-Stille G (2008) Domestic chicks primarily attend to colour, not pattern, when learning an aposematic coloration. Anim Behav 75:417–423. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.05.006
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1(7). http://CRAN.R-Project.org/package=lme4. Accessed Feb 2016
Bohlin T, Gamberale-Stille G, Merilaita S et al (2012) The detectability of the colour pattern in the aposematic firebug, Pyrrhocoris apterus: An image-based experiment with human “predators”. Biol J Linn Soc 105:806–816. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01834.x
Bowdish TI, Bultman TL (1993) Visual cues used by mantids in learning aversion to aposematically colored prey. Am Midl Nat 129:215. doi:10.2307/2426501
Bretz F, Hothorn T, Westfall PH (2011) Multiple comparisons using R. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Brodie ED (1993) Differential avoidance of coral snake banded patterns by free-ranging avian predators in Costa Rica. Soc Study Evol 47:227–235
Chouteau M, Angers B (2011) The role of predators in maintaining the geographic organization of aposematic signals. Am Nat 178:810–817. doi:10.1086/662667
Crothers L, Saporito RA, Yeager J et al (2016) Warning signal properties covary with toxicity but not testosterone or aggregate carotenoids in a poison frog. Evol Ecol 30:601–621. doi:10.1007/s10682-016-9830-y
Cuthill IC, Stevens M, Sheppard J et al (2005) Disruptive coloration and background pattern matching. Nature 434:72–74. doi:10.1038/nature03312
Dreher CE, Cummings ME, Pröhl H (2015) An analysis of predator selection to affect aposematic coloration in a poison frog species. PLoS ONE 10:1–18. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130571
Dunn ER (1941) Notes on Dendrobates auratus. Copeia 1941:88. doi:10.2307/1437437
Endler JA (1980) Natural selection on color patterns in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution (N Y) 34:76–91. doi:10.2307/2408316
Forsman A, Merilaita S (1999) Fearful symmetry: Pattern size and asymmetry affects aposematic signal efficacy. Evol Ecol 13:131–140. doi:10.1023/A:1006630911975
Fritz G, Rand AS, DePamphilis CW (1981) The aposematically colored frog, Dendrobates pumilio, is distasteful to the large, predatory ant, Paraponera clavata. Biotropica 13:158–159
Gamberale-Stille G (2001) Benefit by contrast: an experiment with live aposematic prey. Behav Ecol 12:768–772. doi:10.1093/beheco/12.6.768
Gray HM, Kaiser H, Green DM (2010) Does alkaloid sequestration protect the green poison frog, Dendrobates auratus, from predator attacks? Salamandra 46:235–238
Halpin CG, Skelhorn J, Rowe C (2008) Naïve predators and selection for rare conspicuous defended prey: the initial evolution of aposematism revisited. Anim Behav 75:771–781. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.06.009
Hart NS, Partridge JC, Cuthill IC, Bennett AT (2000) Visual pigments, oil droplets, ocular media and cone photoreceptor distribution in two species of passerine bird: the blue tit (Parus caeruleus L.) and the blackbird (Turdus merula L.). J Comp Physiol A 186:375–387. doi:10.1007/s003590050437
Hegna RH, Saporito RA, Gerow KG, Donnelly MA (2011) Contrasting colors of an aposematic poison frog do not affect predation. Ann Zool Fennici 48:29–38. doi:10.5735/086.048.0103
Hegna RH, Saporito RA, Donnelly MA (2013) Not all colors are equal: Predation and color polytypism in the aposematic poison frog Oophaga pumilio. Evol Ecol 27:831–845. doi:10.1007/s10682-012-9605-z
Honma A, Mappes J, Valkonen JK (2015) Warning coloration can be disruptive: aposematic marginal wing patterning in the wood tiger moth. Ecol Evol 5:4863–4874. doi:10.1002/ece3.1736
Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical J 50:346–363. doi:10.1002/bimj.200810425
Husak JF, Macedonia JM, Fox SF, Sauceda RC (2006) Predation cost of conspicuous male coloration in collared lizards (Crotaphytus collaris): an experimental test using clay-covered model lizards. Ethology 112:572–580. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2005.01189.x
Jacobs GH (1981) Comparative color vision. Academic Press, New York
Jacobs GH (2009) Evolution of colour vision in mammals. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364:2957–2967. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0039
Jones CD, Osorio D (2004) Discrimination of oriented visual textures by poultry chicks. Vis Res 44:83–89. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2003.08.014
Kauppinen J, Mappes J (2003) Why are wasps so intimidating: field experiments on hunting dragonflies (Odonata: Aeshna grandis). Anim Behav 66:505–511. doi:10.1006/anbe.2003.2225
Kuchta SR (2005) Experimental support for aposematic coloration in the salamander Ensatina eschscholtzii xanthoptica: implications for mimicry of Pacific newts. Copeia 2005:265–271
Lenger DR, Berkey JK, Dugas MB (2014) Predation on the toxic Oophaga pumilio (Anura: Dendrobatidae) by Rhadinaea decorata (Squamata: Collubridae). Herpetol Notes 7:83–84
Lindstedt C, Lindström L, Mappes J (2008) Hairiness and warning colours as components of antipredator defence: additive or interactive benefits? Anim Behav 75:1703–1713. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.10.024
Lindström L, Alatalo RV, Mappes J et al (1999) Can aposematic signals evolve by gradual change? Nature 397:249–251. doi:10.1038/16692
Loew ER, Fleishman LJ, Foster RG, Provencio I (2002) Visual pigments and oil droplets in diurnal lizards. J Exp Biol 205:927–938
Maan ME, Cummings ME (2012) Poison frog colors are honest signals of toxicity, particularly for bird predators. Am Nat 179:E1–E14. doi:10.1086/663197
Mappes J, Marples N, Endler JA (2005) The complex business of survival by aposematism. Trends Ecol Evol 20:598–603. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.07.011
Mappes J, Kokko H, Ojala K et al (2014) Seasonal changes in predator community switch the direction of selection for prey defences. Nat Commun 5:5016. doi:10.1038/ncomms6016
Marek P, Papaj D, Yeager J et al (2011) Bioluminescent aposematism in millipedes. Curr Biol 21:R680–R681
Marples NM, Roper TJ, Harper DGC (1998) Responses of wild birds to novel prey: evidence of dietary conservatism. Oikos 83:161–165. doi:10.2307/3546557
Mcelroy MT (2016) Teasing apart crypsis and aposematism—evidence that disruptive coloration reduces predation on a noxious toad. Biol J Linn Soc 117:285–294. doi:10.1111/bij.12669
Murray EM, Bolton SK, Berg T, Saporito RA (2016) Arthropod predation in a dendrobatid poison frog: Does frog life stage matter? Zoology. doi:10.1016/j.zool.2016.01.002
Nokelainen O, Hegna RH, Reudler JH et al (2012) Trade-off between warning signal efficacy and mating success in the wood tiger moth. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 279:257–265. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0880
Noonan BP, Comeault A (2009) The role of predator selection on polymorphic aposematic poison frogs. Biol Lett 5:51–54. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2008.0586
Osorio D, Vorobyev M, Jones CD (1999) Colour vision of domestic chicks. J Exp Biol 202:2951–2959
Ozel LD, Stynoski JL (2011) Differences in escape behavior between a cryptic and an aposematic litter frog. J Herpetol 45:395–398. doi:10.1670/10-249.1
Pröhl H, Hödl W (1999) Parental investment, potential reproductive rates, and mating system in the strawberry dart-poison frog, Dendrobates pumilio. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:215–220. doi:10.1007/s002650050612
Pröhl H, Ostrowski T (2011) Behavioural elements reflect phenotypic colour divergence in a poison frog. Evol Ecol 25:993–1015. doi:10.1007/s10682-010-9455-5
Prudic KL, Skemp AK, Papaj DR (2006) Aposematic coloration, luminance contrast, and the benefits of conspicuousness. Behav Ecol 18:41–46. doi:10.1093/beheco/arl046
Qvarnström A, Rudh A, Edström T et al (2014) Coarse dark patterning functionally constrains adaptive shifts from aposematism to crypsis in strawberry poison frogs. Evolution (N Y) 68:2793–2803. doi:10.1111/evo.12487
R Core Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed Jan 2016
Ruxton GD, Sherratt TN, Speed MP (2004) Avoiding attack: the evolutionary ecology of crypsis, warning signals and mimicry. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Saporito RA, Zuercher R, Roberts M et al (2007) Experimental evidence for aposematism in the dendrobatid poison frog Oophaga pumilio. Copeia 2007:1006–1011. doi:10.1643/0045-8511(2007)7[1006:EEFAIT]2.0.CO;2
Savage JM (2002) The amphibians and reptiles of Costa Rica : a herpetofauna between two continents, between two seas. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Siddiqi A, Cronin TW, Loew ER et al (2004) Interspecific and intraspecific views of color signals in the strawberry poison frog Dendrobates pumilio. J Exp Biol 207:2471–2485. doi:10.1242/jeb.01047
Stevens M, Ruxton GD (2012) Linking the evolution and form of warning coloration in nature. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1932
Stuart YE, Dappen N, Losin N (2012) Inferring predator behavior from attack rates on prey-replicas that differ in conspicuousness. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048497
Summers K, Bermingham E, Weigt L, McCafferty S (1997) Phenotypic and genetic divergence in three species of dart- poison frogs with contrasting parental behavior. J Hered 88:8–13. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a023065
Summers K, Cronin TW, Kennedy T (2003) Variation in spectral reflectance among populations of Dendrobates pumilio, the strawberry poison frog, in the Bocas del Toro Archipelago, Panama. J Biogeogr 30:35–53. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00795.x
Szelistowski WA (1985) Unpalatability of the poison arrow frog Dendrobates pumilio to the ctenid spider Cupiennius coccineus. Biotropica 17:345–346
Tan EJ, Reid CAM, Elgar MA (2016) Colour pattern variation affects predation in chrysomeline larvae. Anim Behav 118:3–10. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.05.019
Troscianko J, Lown AE, Hughes AE, Stevens M (2013) Defeating crypsis: detection and learning of camouflage strategies. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073733
Tsurui K, Honma A, Nishida T (2013) Size-dependent predation risk partly explains the sex-related marking polymorphism in the sexually size-dimorphic pygmy grasshopper Tetrix japonica. Entomol Sci 16:136–144. doi:10.1111/j.1479-8298.2012.00543.x
Tullberg BS, Merilaita S, Wiklund C et al (2005) Aposematism and crypsis combined as a result of distance dependence: functional versatility of the colour pattern in the swallowtail butterfly larva. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 272:159–214. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3079
Valkonen J, Niskanen M, Björklund M, Mappes J (2011) Disruption or aposematism? Significance of dorsal zigzag pattern of European vipers. Evol Ecol 25:1047–1063. doi:10.1007/s10682-011-9463-0
Vorobyev M, Osorio D, Bennett ATD et al (1998) Tetrachromacy, oil droplets and bird plumage colours. J Comp Physiol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 183:621–633. doi:10.1007/s003590050286
Wang IJ, Shaffer HB (2008) Rapid color evolution in an aposematic species: a phylogenetic analysis of color variation in the strikingly polymorphic strawberry poison-dart frog. Evolution (N Y) 62:2742–2759. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00507.x
Watson CM, Roelke CE, Pasichnyk PN, Cox CL (2012) The fitness consequences of the autotomous blue tail in lizards: an empirical test of predator response using clay models. Zoology 115:339–344. doi:10.1016/j.zool.2012.04.001
Webster RJ, Hassall C, Herdman CM, et al (2013) Disruptive camouflage impairs object recognition. Biol Lett. 9:20130501. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2013.0501
Willink B, García-Rodríguez A, Bolaños F, Pröhl H (2014) The interplay between multiple predators and prey color divergence. Biol J Linn Soc 113:580–589
Zopf LM, Schmid A, Fredman D, Eriksson BJ (2013) Spectral sensitivity of the ctenid spider Cupiennius salei. J Exp Biol 216:4103–4108. doi:10.1242/jeb.086256
Acknowledgements
We thank Corinna Dreher and Beatriz Willink for helping with spectrometry and the manufacture of models. Nicolas Mundy kindly corrected the language. Furthermore, we express our gratitude to the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) for providing the financial background (PROMOS) and the local authorities (MINAE) in Costa Rica for granting the research permit (35-2015-SINAC).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Preißler, K., Pröhl, H. The effects of background coloration and dark spots on the risk of predation in poison frog models. Evol Ecol 31, 683–694 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-017-9903-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-017-9903-6