Skip to main content
Log in

Wind pollination, clonality, and the evolutionary maintenance of spatial segregation of the sexes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spatial segregation of the sexes (SSS) has been reported in >30 dioecious species from 24 plant families. Such convergent evolution can arise via shared constraints and/or shared selective pressures but the extent to which SSS is adaptive is unresolved. In particular, because mating in plants occurs primarily among near neighbors, any fitness benefits of SSS should usually be offset by the separation of mating partners during reproduction. It has been argued that the problem of mating in plants with SSS should be alleviated in plants with more reliable modes of pollination, such as wind pollination. Accordingly, we evaluated the association between SSS and pollination mode using phylogenetically controlled comparative analyses. Moreover, because outcrossing plants produce many more pollen grains than ovules, females should compete less intensely for mating partners than males. We therefore predicted that any fitness costs arising from segregation should be greater for males than females. We evaluated this prediction using spatially explicit stochastic simulations. The comparative analyses indicated that there is indeed a positive association between wind pollination and SSS, but also that SSS might be associated with clonal growth. Because methods used for detecting SSS can be biased by clonality, this raises the possibility that some cases of SSS are ‘false positives’. The simulation results supported the prediction that male fitness is more strongly affected by segregation than female fitness. Contrary to arguments based on anecdotal evidence, increasing the effectiveness of pollen dispersal had little effect on the fitness of segregated males. Instead, our results indicated that the evolutionary maintenance of SSS requires substantial performance advantages to segregated males. However, there is little empirical evidence that such performance advantages exist. Future efforts to understand the evolution of SSS should focus on the detection of performance differences between segregated and unsegregated plants, particularly males.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albaladejo RG, Gonzalez-Martinez SC, Heuertz M, Vendramin GG, Aparicio AB (2009) Spatiotemporal mating pattern variation in a wind-pollinated Mediterranean shrub. Mol Ecol 18:5195–5206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle K, Brockhurst M, Speed MP (2013) Does chemical defence increase niche space? A phylogenetic comparative analysis of the Musteloidea. Evol Ecol 27:863–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austerlitz F, Dick CW, Dutech C, Klein EK, Oddou-Muratorio S, Smouse PE, Sork VL (2004) Using genetic markers to estimate the pollen dispersal curve. Mol Ecol 13:937–954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett SCH, Hough J (2013) Sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. J Exp Bot 64:67–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett SCH, Thomson JD (1982) Spatial pattern, floral sex ratios, and fecundity in dioecious Aralia nudicaulis (Araliaceae). Can J Bot 60:1662–1670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman AJ (1948) Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349–368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bierzychudek P, Eckhart V (1988) Spatial segregation of the sexes of dioecious plants. Am Nat 132:34–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond WJ, Midgley J (1988) Allometry and sexual differences in leaf size. Am Nat 131:901–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burczyk JL, Prat D (1997) Male reproductive success in Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco: the effects of spatial structure and flowering characteristics. Heredity 79:638–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth D (2002) Plant sex determination and sex chromosomes. Heredity 88:94–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson TE, Bliss L (1989) Patterns of water use and the tissue water relations in the dioecious shrub, Salix arctica: the physiological basis for habitat partitioning between the sexes. Oecologia 79:332–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson TE, Ehleringer JR (1993) Gender-specific physiology, carbon isotope discrimination, and habitat distribution in Boxelder, Acer negundo. Ecology 74:789–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson TE, Geber MA (1999) Sexual dimorphism in physiology and morphology. In: Geber MA, Dawson TE, Delph LF (eds) Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer, Berlin, pp 175–215

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • de Lucas A, Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Hidalgo E, González-Martínez SC (2008) Mating system and pollen gene flow in Mediterranean maritime pine. Heredity 100:390–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delph LF (1999) Sexual dimorphism in life history. In: Geber MA, Dawson TE, Delph LF (eds) Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer, Berlin, pp 149–173

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Delph LF, Gehring JL, Arntz AM, Frey FM (2005) Genetic correlations with floral display lead to sexual dimorphism in the cost of reproduction. Am Nat 166:S31–S41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley LS (2006) Ecological correlates of secondary sexual dimorphism in Salix glauca (Salicaceae). Am J Bot 93:1775–1783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eppley SM (2001) Gender-specific selection during early life history stages in the dioecious grass Distichlis spicata. Ecology 82:2022–2031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eppley SM (2005) Spatial segregation of the sexes and nutrients affect reproductive success in a dioecious wind-pollinated grass. Plant Ecol 181:179–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eppley SM, Pannell JR (2007) Density-dependent self-fertilization and male versus hermaphrodite siring success in an androdioecious plant. Evolution 61:2349–2359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eppley SM, Stanton ML, Grosberg RK (1998) Intrapopulation sex ratio variation in the salt grass Distichlis spicata. Am Nat 152:659–670

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freckleton RP (2009) The seven deadly sins of comparative analysis. J Evol Biol 22:1367–1375

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freckleton RP, Harvey PH, Pagel M (2002) Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am Nat 160:712–726

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman DC, Kilkoff LG, Harper KT (1976) Differential resource utilization by the sexes of dioecious plants. Science 193:597–599

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman DC, Harper KT, Charnov EL (1980) Sex change in plants: old and new observations and new hypotheses. Oecologia 47:222–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman DC, Lovett-Doust J, El-Keblawy A, Miglia KJ, Durant-McArthur E (1997) Sexual specialization and inbreeding avoidance in the evolution of dioecy. Bot Rev 63:65–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman J, Barrett SCH (2009) Winds of change: new insights on the ecology and evolution of pollination and mating in wind-pollinated plants. Ann Bot 103:1515–1527

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156:477–488

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris MS, Pannell JR (2008) Roots, shoots and reproduction: sexual dimorphism in size and costs of reproductive allocation in an annual herb. Proc R Soc B 275:2595–2602

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Harris MS, Pannell JR (2010) Canopy seed storage is associated with sexual dimorphism in the woody dioecious genus Leucadendron. J Ecol 98:509–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilbuth JC, Ilves KL, Otto SP (2001) The consequences of dioecy for seed dispersal: modeling the seed-shadow handicap. Evolution 55:880–888

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse E, Pannell JR (2011) Density-dependent pollen limitation and reproductive assurance in a wind-pollinated herb with contrasting sexual systems. J Ecol 99:1531–1539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korpelainen H (1991) Sex ratio variation and spatial segregation of the sexes in populations of Rumex acetosa and R. acetosella (Polygonaceae). Plant Syst Evol 174:183–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh A, Cosgrove MJ, Nicotra AB (2006) Reproductive allocation in a gender dimorphic shrub: anomalous female investment in Gynatrix pulchella? J Ecol 94:1261–1271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA, Kerster HW (1974) Gene flow in seed plants. Evol Biol 7:139–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd DG (1974) Theoretical sex ratios of dioecious and gynodioecious angiosperms. Heredity 32:11–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd DG (1984) Gender allocations in outcrossing cosexual plants. In: Dirzo R, Sarukhan J (eds) Perspectives on plant population ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp 277–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd DG, Bawa KS (1984) Modification of the gender of seed plants in varying conditions. Evol Biol 17:255–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddison WP, Maddison DR (2011) Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.75. http://mesquiteproject.org

  • Melampy MN (1981) Sex-linked niche differentiation in two species of Thalictrum. Am Midl Nat 106:325–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer CA, Eppley SM (2010) Inter-sexual competition in a dioecious grass. Oecologia 164:657–664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Obeso JR (2002) The costs of reproduction in plants. New Phytol 155:321–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagel M (1994) Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc R Soc B 255:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagel M (1999) Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401:877–884

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pagel M, Meade A (2006) Bayesian analysis of correlated evolution of discrete characters by Reversible-Jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Am Nat 167:808–825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/

  • Rogers SR, Eppley SM (2012) Testing the interaction between inter-sexual competition and phosphorus availability in a dioecious grass. Botany 90:704–710

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rognli OA, Nilsson NO, Nurminiemi M (2000) Effects of distance and pollen competition on gene flow in the wind-pollinated grass Festuca pratensis Huds. Heredity 85:550–560

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sakai AK, Weller SG (1999) Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants: a review of terminology, biogeographic patterns, ecological correlates, and phylogenetic approaches. In: Geber MA, Dawson TE, Delph LF (eds) Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Vilas J, Bermúdez R, Retuerto R (2012) Soil water content and patterns of allocation to below- and above-ground biomass in the sexes of the subdioecious plant Honckenya peploides. Ann Bot 110:839–848

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shea MM, Dixon PM, Sharitz RR (1993) Size differences, sex ratio, and spatial distribution of male and female water tupelo, Nyssa aquatic (Nyssaceae). Am J Bot 80:26–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SA, Beaulieu JM (2009) Life history influences rates of climatic niche evolution in flowering plants. Proc R Soc B 276:4345–4352

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sork VL, Davis FW, Smouse PE, Apsit VJ, Dye RJ, Fernandez-M JF, Kuhn B (2002) Pollen movement in declining populations of California Valley oak, Quercus lobata: where have all the fathers gone? Mol Ecol 11:1657–1668

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steven JC, Waller DM (2007) Isolation affects reproductive success in low-density but not high-density populations of two wind-pollinated Thalictrum species. Plant Ecol 190:131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens PF (2001) Angiosperm phylogeny website. Version 12, July 2012

  • Van Drunen WE, Dorken ME (2012a) Trade-offs between clonal and sexual reproduction in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae) scale up to affect the fitness of entire clones. New Phytol 196:606–616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Drunen WE, Dorken ME (2012b) Sex-ratio variation verses interplant distances in the regulation of pollen deposition and seed production in dioecious Cirsium arvense (Asteraceae). Botany 90:565–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vekemans X, Hardy OJ (2004) New insights from fine-scale spatial genetic structure analyses in plant populations. Mol Ecol 13:921–935

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Webb CO, Donoghue MJ (2005) Phylomatic: tree assembly for applied phylogenetics. Mol Ecol Notes 5:181–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb CO, Ackerly DD, Kembel SW (2008) Phylocom: software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and trait evolution. Bioinform Appl Note 24:2098–2100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wikström N, Savolainen V, Chase MW (2001) Evolution of the angiosperms, calibrating the family tree. Proc R Soc B 268:2211–2220

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wright VL, Dorken ME (2014) Sexual dimorphism in leaf nitrogen content but not photosynthetic rates in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae). Botany 92:109–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Maurine Neiman (via Axios Review), Mario Vallejo-Marín and four anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. We also thank the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for supporting this work via a Canada Graduate Scholarship to W.E.V.D. and a Discovery Grant to M.E.D., and a Humboldt Research Fellowship for Experienced Researchers to M.E.D. for supporting a research leave at the University of Konstanz.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcel E. Dorken.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 225 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (TXT 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Van Drunen, W.E., Dorken, M.E. Wind pollination, clonality, and the evolutionary maintenance of spatial segregation of the sexes. Evol Ecol 28, 1121–1138 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-014-9733-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-014-9733-8

Keywords

Navigation