Abstract
Studies of putatively adaptive plasticity, such as inducible defenses, frequently explore the fitness consequences of expressing alternative phenotypes in alternative environments, but few studies examine how and why the pattern of selection changes in relation to trait induction. We induced snails in the presence/absence of nonlethal predatory crayfish, exposed both phenotypes (alone and combined) to selection by lethal crayfish, and quantified linear and nonlinear selection differentials. Crayfish induced an increase in mass, shell thickness, and absolute (but not relative) shell dimensions. Crayfish predation on uninduced snails was rapid, accomplished via shell-crushing and revealed strong selection for increased size (i.e., mass and shell dimensions). Conversely, crayfish predation on predator-induced snails was slower, often accomplished using an alternative mode of predation (shell-crushing 70% of the time, but shell-extraction 30% of the time), and revealed selection for wide apertures and thick shells. Crayfish selection on uninduced snails in the presence of predator-induced snails was stronger than predation on uninduced snails alone demonstrating that selection can be frequency dependent. Therefore, predator-induced changes in size and shell thickness appear to be adaptive and, along with reciprocal adjustments in the mode of predation, result in altered patterns of selection.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ågren J, Schemske DW (1993) The cost of defense against herbivores: an experimental study of trichome production in Brassica rapa. Am Nat 141:338–350
Auld JR, Relyea RA (2008) Interacting effects of mate availability and predation risk on life history and defense in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. J Evol Biol 21:1371–1378
Baldridge AK, Smith LD (2008) Temperature constraints on phenotypic plasticity explain biogeographic patterns in predator trophic morphology. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 365:25–34
Berrigan D, Scheiner SM (2004) Modeling the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. In: DeWitt TJ, Scheiner SM (eds) Phenotypic plasticity: functional and conceptual approaches. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 82–97
Brodie ED III, Moore AJ, Janzen FJ (1995) Visualizing and quantifying natural selection. Trends Ecol Evol 10:313–318
Covich AP, Crowl TA, Alexander JE, Vaughn CC (1994) Predator-avoidance responses in freshwater decapod-gastropod interactions mediated by chemical stimuli. J North Am Benthol Soc 13:283–290
Crowl TA (1990) Life-history strategies of a freshwater snail in response to stream permanence and predation: balancing conflicting demands. Oecologia 84:238–243
Crowl TA, Covich AP (1990) Predator-induced life-history shifts in a freshwater snail. Science 247:949–950
DeWitt TJ (1998) Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity: tests with predator-induced morphology and life history in a freshwater snail. J Evol Biol 11:465–480
DeWitt TJ, Langerhans RB (2003) Multiple prey traits, multiple predators: keys to understanding complex community dynamics. J Sea Res 49:143–155
DeWitt TJ, Sih A, Hucko JA (1999) Trait compensation and cospecialization in a freshwater snail: size, shape and antipredator behaviour. Anim Behav 58:397–407
DeWitt TJ, Robinson BW, Wilson DS (2000) Functional diversity among predators of a freshwater snail imposes an adaptive trade-off for shell morphology. Evol Ecol Res 2:129–148
Doughty P, Reznick DN (2004) Patterns and analysis of adaptive phenotypic plasticity in animals. In: DeWitt TJ, Scheiner SM (eds) Phenotypic plasticity: functional and conceptual approaches. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 126–150
Edgell TC, Rochette R (2007) Geographic correlation between reciprocally adaptive traits of an exotic decapod predator and native gastropod prey: evidence of an arms race? Evol Ecol Res 9:579–597
Edgell TC, Brazeau C, Grahame JW, Rochette R (2008) Simultaneous defense against shell entry and shell crushing in a snail faced with the predatory shore crab Carcinus maenas. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 371:191–198
Gotthard K, Nylin S (1995) Adaptive plasticity and plasticity as an adaptation: a selective review of plasticity in animal morphology and life history. Oikos 74:3–17
Harvell CD, Tollrian R (1999) Why inducible defenses? In: Tollrian R, Harvell CD (eds) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 3–19
Henry P-Y, Jarne P (2007) Marking hard-shelled gastropods: tag loss, impact on life-history traits, and perspectives in biology. Invert Biol 126:138–153
Hoverman JT, Auld JR, Relyea RA (2005) Putting prey back together again: integrating predator-induced behavior, morphology, and life history. Oecologia 144:481–491
Juanes F (1992) Why do decapod crustaceans prefer small-sized molluscan prey? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 87:239–249
Karban R, Baldwin IT (1997) Induced responses to herbivory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Kishida O, Mizuta Y, Nishimura K (2006) Reciprocal phenotypic plasticity in a predator-prey interaction between larval amphibians. Ecology 87:1599–1604
Kopp M, Tollrian R (2003) Reciprocal phenotypic plasticity in a predator-prey system: inducible offences against inducible defenses? Ecol Lett 6:742–748
Lande R, Arnold SJ (1983) The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210–1226
Lima SL (2002) Putting predators back into behavioral predator-prey interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 17:70–75
McCoy MW, Bolker BM, Osenberg CW, Miner BG, Vonesh JR (2006) Size correction: comparing morphological traits among populations and environments. Oecologia 148:547–554
Musser RO, Cipollini DF, Hum-Musser SM, Williams SA, Brown JK, Felton GW (2005) Evidence that the caterpillar salivary enzyme glucose oxidase provides herbivore offense in Solanaceous plants. Archiv Insect Biochem Physiol 58:128–137
Osenberg CW, Mittelbach GG (1989) Effects of body size on the predator-prey interaction between pumpkinseed sunfish and gastropods. Ecol Monogr 59:405–432
Phillips PC, Arnold SJ (1999) Hierarchical comparison of genetic variance-covariance matrices. I. Using the Flury hierarchy. Evolution 53:1506–1515
Relyea RA (2003) How prey respond to combined predators: a review and an empirical test. Ecology 84:1827–1839
Relyea RA (2004) Integrating phenotypic plasticity when death is on the line: insights from predator-prey systems. In: Pigliucci M, Preston K (eds) The evolutionary biology of complex phenotypes. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 176–194
Riessen HP (1999) Predator-induced life history shifts in Daphnia: a synthesis of studies using meta-analysis. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56:2487–2494
Rochette R, Doyle SP, Edgell TC (2007) Interaction between an invasive decapod and a native gastropod: predator foraging tactics and prey architectural defenses. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 330:179–188
Smith LD, Jennings JA (2000) Induced defensive responses by the bivalve Mytilus edulis to predators with different attack modes. Mar Biol 136:461–469
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman & Company, New York
Tollrian R, Harvell CD (eds) (1999) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Trussell GC (2000a) Phenotypic clines, plasticity, and morphological trade-offs in an intertidal snail. Evolution 54:151–166
Trussell GC (2000b) Predator-induced plasticity and morphological trade-offs in latitudinally separated populations of Littorina obtusata. Evol Ecol Res 2:803–822
Turner AM (2008) Predator diet and prey behaviour: freshwater snails discriminate among closely related prey in a predator’s diet. Anim Behav 76:1211–1217
Turner AM, Bernot RJ, Boes CM (2000) Chemical cues modify species interactions: the ecological consequences of predator avoidance by freshwater snails. Oikos 88:148–158
Van Buskirk J, Relyea RA (1998) Selection for phenotypic plasticity in Rana sylvatica tadpoles. Biol J Linn Soc 65:301–328
Van Buskirk J, McCollum SA, Werner EE (1997) Natural selection for environmentally induced phenotypes in tadpoles. Evolution 51:1983–1992
Vermeij GJ, Covich AP (1978) Coevolution of freshwater Gastropods and their predators. Am Nat 112:833–843
Wade MJ, Kalisz S (1990) The causes of natural selection. Evolution 44:1947–1955
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge funding from the Pymatuning Laboratory of Ecology’s McKinley Research Grant (JRA) and the National Science Foundation (RAR). JRA was supported by fellowships from the A.W. Mellon Foundation, a post-doc from the French C.N.R.S. (awarded to P. David and A. Charmantier), and the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NESCent), NSF #EF-0905606. We thank A. Stoler for help with the experiment and especially D. Jones for assistance with the experiment and for measuring the snails. T.-L. Ashman, A. Biere, M. Groner, J. Hammond, J. Hoverman, P. Jarne, S. Kalisz, A. Stoler, S. Tonsor, J. Wolf, and several anonymous reviewers provided comments that improved this work. This is a contribution from the Pymatuning Laboratory of Ecology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Auld, J.R., Relyea, R.A. Adaptive plasticity in predator-induced defenses in a common freshwater snail: altered selection and mode of predation due to prey phenotype. Evol Ecol 25, 189–202 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-010-9394-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-010-9394-1