Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evolution of complex life cycles of amphibians: bridging the gap between metapopulation dynamics and life history evolution

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current evolutionary models for amphibian life cycles reflect tradeoffs in size-specific growth and mortality rates between the aquatic and terrestrial stages. A limitation of these models is that they do not incorporate evolutionary phenomena that are associated with metapopulation structure. In this work I address components of the evolution of complex life cycles (CLCs) that are tied to the metapopulation dynamics of amphibians that use seasonal wetlands that vary in hydroperiod. In particular, I describe how selection for the minimum length of the larval period affects metapopulation viability and the selection/migration equilibrium. Selection to increase the minimum length of the larval period functionally reduces the number of viable breeding sites on the landscape, increases the average distance between neighboring sites, and increases the risk of metapopulation extinction. Within a metapopulation, asymmetric gene flow between populations that are adapted to different hydroperiods tends to swamp local selection for long larval periods at sites with long hydroperiods. The evolutionary stability of CLCs of many species with metapopulation structure may reflect the fact that extremely small metamorphs cannot survive on land, while lineages with long larval periods incur a high risk of metapopulation extinction. I encourage theorists to more carefully consider how life history traits and metapopulation viability are related for these and other taxa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akcakaya HR (2005) RAMAS metapop: viability analysis for stage-structured metapopulations (version 5). Applied Biomathematics, Setauket, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Alford RA (1999) Ecology: resource use, competition, and predation. In: McDiarmid RW, Altig R (eds) Tadpoles: the biology of anuran larvae. Univ Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbitt KJ, Baber MJ, Tarr TL (2003) Patterns of larval amphibian distribution along a wetland hydroperiod gradient. Can J Zool 81:1539–1552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berven KA, Grudzien TA (1990) Dispersal in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica): implications for genetic population structure. Evolution 44:2047–2056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks RT (2004) Weather-related effects on woodland vernal pool hydrology and hydroperiod. Wetlands 24:104–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce RC (2005) Theory of complex life cycles: application in plethodontid salamanders. Herpetol Monogr 19:180–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denver RJ, Mirhadi N, Phillips M (1998) Adaptive plasticity in amphibian metamorphosis: response of Scaphiopus hammondii tadpoles to habitat desiccation. Ecology 79:1859–1872

    Google Scholar 

  • Duellman WE, Trueb L (1986) Biology of amphibians. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan RS, Paton PWC (2004) Within-pond parameters affecting oviposition by wood frog and spotted salamanders. Wetlands 24:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Ramos G, Kirkpatrick M (1997) Genetic models of adaptation and gene flow in peripheral populations. Evolution 51:21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs JP (1993) Importance of small wetlands for the persistence of local populations of wetland-associated animals. Wetlands 13:25–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs JP (2000) Wetland loss and biodiversity conservation. Cons Biol 14:314–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski IA, Gaggiotti OE (2004) Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier, Burlington, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill DE (1978) Effective population size and interdemic migration rates in a metapopulation of the red-spotted newt, Notophthalmus viridescens (Rafinesque). Evolution 32:839–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris RN (1999) The anuran tadpole: evolution and maintenance. In: McDiarmid RW, Altig R (eds) Tadpoles: the biology of anuran larvae. Univ Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecnar SJ, M’Closkey RT (1996) Regional dynamics and the status of amphibians. Ecology 77:2091–2097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heino M, Hanski I (2001) Evolution of migration rate in a spatially realistic metapopulation model. Am Nat 157:495–511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hentschel BT (1999) Complex life cycles in a variable environment: predicting when the timing of metamorphosis shifts from resource dependent to developmentally fixed. Am Nat 154:549–558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Istock CA (1967) The evolution of complex life cycle phenomena: an ecological perspective. Evolution 21:592–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lannoo MJ (2005) Amphibian declines: the conservation status of United States species. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh DM, Trenham PC (2001) Metapopulation dynamics and amphibian conservation. Cons Biol 15:40–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paton PWC, Crouch III WB (2002) Using phenology of pond-breeding amphibians to develop conservation strategies. Cons Biol 18:194–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petranka JW, Sih A (1987) Habitat duration, length of larval period, and the evolution of a complex life cycle of a salamander, Ambystoma texanum. Evolution 41:1347–1356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petranka JW (1998) Salamanders of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronce O, Olivieri I (2004) Life history evolution in metapopulations. In: Hanski IA, Gaggiotti OE (eds) Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier, Burlington, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD (1998) Biological delineation of terrestrial buffer zones for pond-breeding salamanders. Cons Biol 12:1113–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD (2002) Critical elements for biologically based recovery plans of aquatic breeding amphibians. Cons Biol 16:619–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD (2003) Conservation of pond-breeding amphibians. In: Semlitsch RD (ed) Amphibian conservation. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD, Bodie JR (1998) Are small, isolated wetlands expendable? Cons Biol 12:1129–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skelly DK, Werner EE, Cortwright SA (1999) Long-term distributional dynamics of a Michigan amphibian assemblage. Ecology 80:2326–2327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skidds E, Golet FC (2005) Estimating hydroperiod suitability for breeding amphibians in southern Rhode Island seasonal forest ponds. Wet Ecol Manage 13:349–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjögren P (1991) Extinction and isolation gradients in metapopulations: the case of the pool frog (Rana lessonae). Biol J Linn Soc 42:135–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith MA, Green DM (2005) Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecogeography 28:110–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Gill SJ, Berven KA (1979) Predicting amphibian metamorphosis. Am Nat 113:563–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins RC, Cohen NW (1995) A natural history of amphibians. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis J (1980) Phenotypic variation and the outcome of interspecific competition in hylid tadpoles. Evolution 34:40–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travis J (1983) Variation in development patterns of larval anurans in temporary ponds. I. Persistent variation within a Hyla gratiosa population. Evolution 37:496–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travis J (1984) Anuran size at metamorphosis: experimental test of a model based on intraspecific competition. Ecology 65:1155–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wassersug RJ (1975) The adaptive significance of the tadpole stage with comments on the maintenance of complex life cycles in Anurans. Am Zool 15:405–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassersug RJ (1976) Oral morphology of anuran larvae: terminology and general description. Occas Papers Mus Nat Hist Univ Kansas 48:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellborn GA, Skelly DK, Werner EE (1996) Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 27:337–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE (1986) Amphibian metamorphosis: growth rate, predation risk, and the optimal size at transformation. Am Nat 128:319–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitlock MC (2004) Selection and drift in metapopulations. In: Hanski IA, Gaggiotti OE (eds) Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier, Burlington, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur HM, Collins JP (1973) Ecological aspects of amphibian metamorphosis. Science 182:1305–1314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank C. Smith and M. Takahashi for their helpful criticisms and comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James W. Petranka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petranka, J.W. Evolution of complex life cycles of amphibians: bridging the gap between metapopulation dynamics and life history evolution. Evol Ecol 21, 751–764 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-006-9149-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-006-9149-1

Keywords

Navigation