Abstract
Current evolutionary models for amphibian life cycles reflect tradeoffs in size-specific growth and mortality rates between the aquatic and terrestrial stages. A limitation of these models is that they do not incorporate evolutionary phenomena that are associated with metapopulation structure. In this work I address components of the evolution of complex life cycles (CLCs) that are tied to the metapopulation dynamics of amphibians that use seasonal wetlands that vary in hydroperiod. In particular, I describe how selection for the minimum length of the larval period affects metapopulation viability and the selection/migration equilibrium. Selection to increase the minimum length of the larval period functionally reduces the number of viable breeding sites on the landscape, increases the average distance between neighboring sites, and increases the risk of metapopulation extinction. Within a metapopulation, asymmetric gene flow between populations that are adapted to different hydroperiods tends to swamp local selection for long larval periods at sites with long hydroperiods. The evolutionary stability of CLCs of many species with metapopulation structure may reflect the fact that extremely small metamorphs cannot survive on land, while lineages with long larval periods incur a high risk of metapopulation extinction. I encourage theorists to more carefully consider how life history traits and metapopulation viability are related for these and other taxa.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akcakaya HR (2005) RAMAS metapop: viability analysis for stage-structured metapopulations (version 5). Applied Biomathematics, Setauket, New York
Alford RA (1999) Ecology: resource use, competition, and predation. In: McDiarmid RW, Altig R (eds) Tadpoles: the biology of anuran larvae. Univ Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
Babbitt KJ, Baber MJ, Tarr TL (2003) Patterns of larval amphibian distribution along a wetland hydroperiod gradient. Can J Zool 81:1539–1552
Berven KA, Grudzien TA (1990) Dispersal in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica): implications for genetic population structure. Evolution 44:2047–2056
Brooks RT (2004) Weather-related effects on woodland vernal pool hydrology and hydroperiod. Wetlands 24:104–114
Bruce RC (2005) Theory of complex life cycles: application in plethodontid salamanders. Herpetol Monogr 19:180–207
Denver RJ, Mirhadi N, Phillips M (1998) Adaptive plasticity in amphibian metamorphosis: response of Scaphiopus hammondii tadpoles to habitat desiccation. Ecology 79:1859–1872
Duellman WE, Trueb L (1986) Biology of amphibians. McGraw-Hill, New York
Egan RS, Paton PWC (2004) Within-pond parameters affecting oviposition by wood frog and spotted salamanders. Wetlands 24:1–13
Garcia-Ramos G, Kirkpatrick M (1997) Genetic models of adaptation and gene flow in peripheral populations. Evolution 51:21–28
Gibbs JP (1993) Importance of small wetlands for the persistence of local populations of wetland-associated animals. Wetlands 13:25–31
Gibbs JP (2000) Wetland loss and biodiversity conservation. Cons Biol 14:314–317
Hanski IA, Gaggiotti OE (2004) Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier, Burlington, MA
Gill DE (1978) Effective population size and interdemic migration rates in a metapopulation of the red-spotted newt, Notophthalmus viridescens (Rafinesque). Evolution 32:839–849
Harris RN (1999) The anuran tadpole: evolution and maintenance. In: McDiarmid RW, Altig R (eds) Tadpoles: the biology of anuran larvae. Univ Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
Hecnar SJ, M’Closkey RT (1996) Regional dynamics and the status of amphibians. Ecology 77:2091–2097
Heino M, Hanski I (2001) Evolution of migration rate in a spatially realistic metapopulation model. Am Nat 157:495–511
Hentschel BT (1999) Complex life cycles in a variable environment: predicting when the timing of metamorphosis shifts from resource dependent to developmentally fixed. Am Nat 154:549–558
Istock CA (1967) The evolution of complex life cycle phenomena: an ecological perspective. Evolution 21:592–605
Lannoo MJ (2005) Amphibian declines: the conservation status of United States species. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA
Marsh DM, Trenham PC (2001) Metapopulation dynamics and amphibian conservation. Cons Biol 15:40–49
Paton PWC, Crouch III WB (2002) Using phenology of pond-breeding amphibians to develop conservation strategies. Cons Biol 18:194–204
Petranka JW, Sih A (1987) Habitat duration, length of larval period, and the evolution of a complex life cycle of a salamander, Ambystoma texanum. Evolution 41:1347–1356
Petranka JW (1998) Salamanders of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC
Ronce O, Olivieri I (2004) Life history evolution in metapopulations. In: Hanski IA, Gaggiotti OE (eds) Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier, Burlington, MA
Semlitsch RD (1998) Biological delineation of terrestrial buffer zones for pond-breeding salamanders. Cons Biol 12:1113–1119
Semlitsch RD (2002) Critical elements for biologically based recovery plans of aquatic breeding amphibians. Cons Biol 16:619–629
Semlitsch RD (2003) Conservation of pond-breeding amphibians. In: Semlitsch RD (ed) Amphibian conservation. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC
Semlitsch RD, Bodie JR (1998) Are small, isolated wetlands expendable? Cons Biol 12:1129–1133
Skelly DK, Werner EE, Cortwright SA (1999) Long-term distributional dynamics of a Michigan amphibian assemblage. Ecology 80:2326–2327
Skidds E, Golet FC (2005) Estimating hydroperiod suitability for breeding amphibians in southern Rhode Island seasonal forest ponds. Wet Ecol Manage 13:349–366
Sjögren P (1991) Extinction and isolation gradients in metapopulations: the case of the pool frog (Rana lessonae). Biol J Linn Soc 42:135–147
Smith MA, Green DM (2005) Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecogeography 28:110–128
Smith-Gill SJ, Berven KA (1979) Predicting amphibian metamorphosis. Am Nat 113:563–585
Stebbins RC, Cohen NW (1995) A natural history of amphibians. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
Travis J (1980) Phenotypic variation and the outcome of interspecific competition in hylid tadpoles. Evolution 34:40–50
Travis J (1983) Variation in development patterns of larval anurans in temporary ponds. I. Persistent variation within a Hyla gratiosa population. Evolution 37:496–512
Travis J (1984) Anuran size at metamorphosis: experimental test of a model based on intraspecific competition. Ecology 65:1155–1160
Wassersug RJ (1975) The adaptive significance of the tadpole stage with comments on the maintenance of complex life cycles in Anurans. Am Zool 15:405–417
Wassersug RJ (1976) Oral morphology of anuran larvae: terminology and general description. Occas Papers Mus Nat Hist Univ Kansas 48:1–23
Wellborn GA, Skelly DK, Werner EE (1996) Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 27:337–363
Werner EE (1986) Amphibian metamorphosis: growth rate, predation risk, and the optimal size at transformation. Am Nat 128:319–341
Whitlock MC (2004) Selection and drift in metapopulations. In: Hanski IA, Gaggiotti OE (eds) Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier, Burlington, MA
Wilbur HM, Collins JP (1973) Ecological aspects of amphibian metamorphosis. Science 182:1305–1314
Acknowledgments
I thank C. Smith and M. Takahashi for their helpful criticisms and comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Petranka, J.W. Evolution of complex life cycles of amphibians: bridging the gap between metapopulation dynamics and life history evolution. Evol Ecol 21, 751–764 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-006-9149-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-006-9149-1