Abstract
The common bean is the most important legume for human consumption and is grown in areas under conditions of varied rainfall and temperature that limit its yield. The objective of the present study was to identify genotypic differences in adaptation of 91 bean genotypes to high temperature under environmental conditions of a tropical dry forest ecosystem. We quantified differences among genotypes in terms of phenology, dry matter partitioning indices and grain yield. Common bean lines were derived from interspecific and intraspecific crosses among Phaseolus species of P. vulgaris, P. acutifolius, P. coccineus and P. dumosus. We identified three germplasm accessions of P. acutifolius (G 40001, G 40027, G 40141); two lines from the cross of P. vulgaris × P. acutifolius (INB 837, SIN 524); two lines from the cross of P. vulgaris × P. acutifolius × P. coccineus (SEF 14, SEF 42) and eight lines of P. vulgaris (BFS 10, SEN 46, SEN 48, SEN 70, SMN 99, SMC 140, SMR 139-1G, AMADEUS-EAP-9510-77) that are better adapted to higher temperature stress conditions, evidencing the significant contribution of P. acutifolius to heat tolerance derived from interspecific crosses in common beans. We also found a few Andean lines of growth habit I (SAP 1, SAP 1-15, SAP 1-16, G 122, SAB 618, DAB 525) with superior level of adaptation to heat stress. The superior performance of all these above identified genotypes under higher temperature conditions was attributed to early maturity, high pollen viability and greater ability to partition dry matter to reproductive growth together with greater grain filling.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amongi W, Nkalubo S, Ochwo-Ssemakula M, Gibson P, Edema R (2014) Development of intermittent drought stress tolerant common bean genotypes in Uganda. Afr Crop Sci J 22:303–315
Andrade E, Ribeiro V, Azevedo C, Chiorato A, Williams T, Carbonell E (2016) Biochemical indicators of drought tolerance in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Euphytica 210:277–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1720-4
Assefa T, Beebe S, Rao I, Cuasquer J, Duque M, Rivera M, Battisti A, Lucchin M (2013) Pod harvest index as a selection criterion to improve drought resistance in white pea bean. Field Crops Res 148:24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.04.008
Assefa T, Wu J, Beebe S, Rao I, Marcomin D, Claude R (2014) Improving adaptation to drought stress in small red common bean: phenotypic differences and predicted genotypic effects on grain yield, yield components and harvest index. Euphytica 203:477–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-014-1242-x
Assefa T, Rao I, Cannon S, Wu J, Guatema Z, Blair M, Otyama P, Alemayehu F, Dagne B (2017) Improving adaptation to drought stress in white pea bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): genotypic effects on grain yield, yield components and pod harvest index. Plant Breed. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12496
Beebe S (2012) Common bean breeding in the tropics. Plant Breed Rev 36:357–456. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358566.ch5
Beebe S, Rao I, Cajio C, Grajales M (2008) Selection for drought resistance in common bean also improves yield in phosphorus limited and favorable environments. Crop Sci 48:582–592. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.07.0404
Beebe S, Ramírez J, Jarvis A, Rao I, Mosquera J, Bueno J, Blair M (2011) Genetic improvement of common beans and the challenges of climate change. In: Yadav SS et al (eds) Crop adaptation to climate change. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 356–369
Beebe S, Rao I, Blair M, Acosta A (2013) Phenotyping common beans for adaptation to drought. Front Physiol 4:35. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00035
Beebe S, Rao I, Devi M, Polania J (2014) Common beans, biodiversity, and multiple stresses: challenges of drought resistance in tropical soils. Crop Pasture Sci 65:667–675
Bitocchi E, Rau D, Bellucci E, Rodriguez M, Murgia ML, Gioia T, Santo D, Nanni L, Attene G, Papa R (2017) Beans (Phaseolus spp.) as a model for understanding crop evolution. Front Plant Sci 8:722. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00722
Blair MW, Muñoz LC, Debouck DG (2002) Tepary beans (P. acutifolius): molecular analysis of a forgotten genetic resource for dry land agriculture. Grain Legum 36:25–26
Bringham J (2001) Soil root canopy interactions. Ann Appl Biol 138:243–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2001.tb00108.x
Busch FA, Sage RF (2017) The sensitivity of photosynthesis to O2 and CO2 concentration identifies strong rubisco control above the thermal optimum. New Phytol 213:1036–1051. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14258
Butare L, Rao IM, Lepoivre P, Polania J, Cajiao C, Cuasquer J, Beebe S (2011) New genetic sources of resistance in the genus Phaseolus to individual and combined aluminium toxicity and progressive soil drying stresses. Euphytica 181:385–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0564-1
Chaves N.P (2015). Uso de recombinantes de Phaseolus vulgaris L., P. coccineus L. y P. acutifolius A. Gray para mejorar la tolerancia del frijol común a diferentes tipos de estrés abiótico. Thesis (Ph.D.). Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Palmira, Valle del Cauca, CO. xxi, 123 p
Da Silva D, Ferreira C, Oliveira E, Moura dos Reis R, Morais A, Chiorato A (2020) Influence of high temperature on the reproductive biology of dry edible bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Sci Agricola 77:e20180233. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992x-2018-0233
Devasirvatham V, Gaur PM, Mallikarjuna N, Tokachichu RN, Trethowan RM, Tan Y (2012) Effect of high temperature on the reproductive development of chickpea genotypes under controlled environments. Funct Plant Biol 39:1009–1018. https://doi.org/10.1071/fp12033
Di Rienzo J, Balzarini M, Gonzalez L, Casanoves F, Tablada M, Robledo CW (2019) InfoStat versión (2018). Grupo infostat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. http://www.infostat.com.ar. Accessed 30 Oct 2019
Diaz L, Ricaurte J, Cajiao C, Galeano G, Rao I, Beebe S, Raatz B (2017) Phenotypic evaluation and QTL analysis of yield and symbiotic nitrogen fixation in common bean population grown with two levels of phosphorus supply. Mol Breed 37:2–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-017-0673-1
Diaz L, Ricaute J, Tovar E, Cajiao C, Terán H, Grajales M, Polania J, Rao I, Beebe S, Raatz B (2018) QTL analyses for tolerance to abiotic stresses in a common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) population. PLoS ONE 13:e0202342. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202342
Farooq M, Gogoi N, Barthakur S, Baroowa B, Bharadwi N, Alghamdi S, Siddique K (2016) Drought stress in grain legumes during reproduction and grain filling. J Exp Bot 55:2447–2460. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12169
Gross Y, Kigel J (1994) Differential sensitivity to high temperature of stages in the reproductive development of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). F Crop Res 36:201–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(94)90112-0
Gu Z, Gu L, Eils R, Schlesner M, Brors B (2014) Circlize implements and enhances circular visualization in R. Bioinformatics 30:2811–2812
Hall E (2004) Comparative Ecophysiology of cowpea, common bean, and peanut. In: Nguyen HT, Blum A (eds) Physiology and biotechnology integration for plant breeding. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, pp 271–325
Jiang Y, Lahlali R, Karunakaran C, Kumar S, Davis AR, Bueckert R (2015) Seed set, pollen morphology and pollen surface composition response to heat stress in field pea. Plant Cell Environ 38:2387–2397. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12589
Kamfwa K, Cichy K, Kelly JD (2015) Genome-wide association analysis of symbiotic nitrogen fixation in common bean. Theor Appl Genet 128:1999–2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-015-2562-5
Klaedtke S, Cajiao C, Grajales M, Polania J, Borrero G, Guerrero A, Rivera M, Rao I, Beebe S, Léon J (2012) Photosynthate remobilization capacity from drought-adapted common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) lines an improve yield potential of interspecific populations within the secondary gene pool. J Plant Breed Crop Sci 4:49–61. https://doi.org/10.5897/JPBCS11.087
Markhart AH (1985) Comparative water relation of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and Phaseolus acutifolius Gray. Plant Physiol 77:113–117. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.77.1.113
Mejía-Jiménez A, Muñoz C, Jacobsen H, Roca W, Singh S (1994) Interspecific hybridization between common and tepary beans: increased hybrid embryo growth, fertility, and efficiency of hybridization through recurrent and congruity backcrossing. Theor Appl Genet 88:324–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223640
Micheletto S, Rodriguez-Uribe L, Hernandez R, Richins R, Curry J, Connell O (2007) Comparative transcript profiling in roots of Phaseolus acutifolius and P. vulgaris under water deficit stress. Plant Sci 173:510–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2007.08.003
Miklas PN, Rosas JC, Beaver JS, Telek L, Freytag GF (1994) Field performance of select tepary bean germplasm in the tropics. Crop Sci 34(6):1639–1644
Mohamed MF, Keutgen N, Tawfik AA, Noga G (2002) Dehydration-avoidance response of tepary bean lines differing in drought resistance. J Plant Physiol 159:31–38. https://doi.org/10.1078/0176-1617-00530
Mohamed MF, Schmitz-Eiberger N, Keutgen N, Noga G (2005) Comparative drought postponing and tolerance potentials of two tepary bean lines in relation to seed yield. Afr Crop Sci J 13:49–60
Muñoz LC, Duque MC, Debouck DG, Blair MW (2006) Taxonomy of tepary bean and wild relatives as determined by amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers. Crop Sci 46:1744–1754. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropci2005-12-0475
Omae H, Kumar A, Kashiwaba K, Sbono M (2006) Influence of high temperature on morphological characters, biomass allocation, and yield components in snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Plant Prod Sci 9:200–205. https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.9.200
Omae H, Kumar A, Kashiwaba K, Shono M (2012) Adaptation to high temperature and water deficit in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) during the reproductive period. J Bot. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/803413
Pinheiro J, Bates D, Debroy S, Sarkar D (2012) Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R Packag Version 3:31–74
Polania J, Poschenrieder C, Beebe S, Rao I (2016a) Effective use of water and increased dry matter partitioned to grain contribute to yield of common bean improved for drought resistance. Front Plant Sci 7:660. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00660
Polania J, Poschenrieder C, Rao I, Beebe S (2016b) Estimation of phenotypic variability in symbiotic nitrogen fixation ability of common bean under drought stress using 15 N natural abundance in grain. Eur J Agron 79:66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2016.05.014
Polania J, Rao IM, Cajiao C, Rivera M, Raatz B, Beebe S (2016c) Physiological traits associated with drought resistance in Andean and Mesoamerican genotypes of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Euphytica 210:17–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1691-5
Polania J, Rao I, Cajiao C, Grajales M, Rivera M, Velasquez F, Raatz B, Beebe S (2017) Shoot and root traits contribute to drought resistance in recombinant inbred lines of MD 23-24 x SEA 5 of common bean. Front Plant Sci 8:296. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00296
Porch TG (2006) Application of stress indices for heat tolerance screening of common bean. J Agron Crop Sci 192:390–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2006.00229.x
Porch G, Jahn M (2001) Effects of high-temperature stress on microsporogenesis in heat-sensitive and heat-tolerant genotypes of Phaseolus vulgaris. Plant Cell Environ 24:723–731. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00716.x
Porch T, Ramirez V, Santana D, Harmsen E (2009) Evaluation of common bean for drought tolerance in Juana Diaz, Puerto Rico. J Agron Crop Sci 195:328–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037x.2009.00375.x
Porch T, Beaver D, Debouck S, Jackson J, Kelly D, Dempewolf H (2013) Use of wild relatives and closely related species to adapt common bean to climate change. Agronomy 3:433–461. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy3020433
Prasad P, Boote K, Allen H, Thomas J (2002) Effects of elevated temperature and carbon dioxide on seed-set and yield of kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Glob Change Biol 8:710–721. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00508.x
Pressman E, Harel D, Zamski E, Shaked R, Althan L, Rosenfeld K, Firon N (2006) The effect of high temperatures on the expression and activity of sucrose cleaving enzymes during tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) anther development. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 81:341–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2006.11512071
R Development Core Team (2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R. Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0
Rainey M, Griffiths D (2005a) Identification of heat tolerant Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray plant introductions following exposure to high temperatures in a controlled environment. Genet Resour Crop Evol 52:117–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-004-1811-2
Rainey KM, Griffiths PD (2005b) Inheritance of heat tolerance during reproductive development in snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 130:700–706. https://doi.org/10.21273/jashs.130.5.700
Rao I (2014) Advances in improving adaptation of common bean and Brachiaria forage to abiotic stresses in the tropics. In: Pessarakli M (ed) Handbook of plant and crop physiology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 847–889. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16675-49
Rao I, Beebe S, Polania J, Grajales M, Cajiao C, Garcia R, Rivera M (2009) Physiological basis of improved drought resistance in common bean: The contribution of photosynthate mobilization to grain. In: Paper presented at interdrought III: 3rd international conference on integrated approaches to improve crop production under drought-prone, 11–16 Oct 2009, Shanghai Environments
Rao I, Beebe S, Polania J, Ricaute J, Cajiao C, Garcia R, Rivera M (2013) Can tepary bean be a model for improvement of drought resistance in common bean? Afr Crop Sci J 21:265–281
Rao I, Beebe S, Polania J, Grajales M, Cajiao C, Ricaurte J et al (2017) Evidence for genotypic differences among elite lines of common bean in the ability to remobilize photosynthate to increase yield under drought. J Agric Sci 155:857–875. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859616000915
Rippke U, Ramirez-Villegas J, Jarvis A et al (2016) Timescales of transformational climate change adaptation in sub-Saharan African agriculture. Nat Clim Chang 6:605–609. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2947
Rosales R, Kohashi-Shibata J, Acosta-Gallegos J, Trejo-Lopez C, Ortiz-Cereceres J, Kelly J (2004) Biomass distribution, maturity acceleration and yield in drought-stressed common bean cultivars. Field Crops Res 85:203–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00161-8
Rosales MA, Ocampo E, Rodríguez-Valentín R, Olvera-Carrillo Y, Acosta-Gallegos J, Covarrubias AA (2012) Physiological analysis of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars uncovers characteristics related to terminal drought resistance. Plant Physiol Biochem 56:24–34
Shonnard GC, Gepts P (1994) Genetics of heat tolerance during reproductive development in common bean. Crop Sci 34:1168. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400050005x
Soltani A, Weraduwage S, Sharkey T, Lowry D (2019) Elevated temperatures cause loss of set in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) potentially through the disruption of source-sink relationships. BMC Genom 20:2–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5669-2
Suárez J, Polania J, Contreras A, Rodriguez L, Beebe S, Rao I (2018) Agronomical, phenological and physiological performance of common bean lines in the Amazon region of Colombia. Theor Exp Plant Physiol 30:303–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40626-018-0125-2
Suzuki K, Takeda H, Tsukaguchi T, Egawa Y (2000) Ultrastructural study on degeneration of tapetum in anther of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under heat stress”. Sex Plant Reprod 13:293–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004970100071
Suzuki K, Tsukaguchi T, Takeda H, Egawa Y (2001) Decrease of pollen stainability of green bean at high temperatures and relationship to heat tolerance. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 126:571–574. https://doi.org/10.21273/jashs.126.5.571
Traub J, Kelly J, Loescher W (2017) Early metabolic and photosynthetic responses to drought stress in common and tepary bean. Crop Sci 57:1670–1686. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2016.09.0746
Traub J, Porch T, Naeem M, Urrea CA, Austic G, Kelly JD, Loescher W (2018) Screening for heat tolerance in Phaseolus spp. Using multiple methods. Crop Sci 58:2459–2469. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropci2018.04.0275
Wahid A, Gelani S, Ashraf M, Foolad M (2007) Heat tolerance in plants: an overview. Environ Exp Bot 61:199–223. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropci2018.04.0275
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Suárez, J.C., Polanía, J.A., Contreras, A.T. et al. Adaptation of common bean lines to high temperature conditions: genotypic differences in phenological and agronomic performance. Euphytica 216, 28 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-020-2565-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-020-2565-4