Abstract
Breeding for higher levels of health-promoting components are among the priorities for many fruit crops. Such an approach requires breeding material displaying great variations in the trait to be improved. Commercial sweet cherry cultivars demonstrate only limited variability in fruit antioxidant parameters and hence this study was carried out to characterize some Ukrainian sweet cherry cultivars for their antioxidant and antiradical capacity and total phenolic and anthocyanin contents. Ukrainian cultivars had significantly higher ferric reducing antioxidant power and total phenolic contents compared with commercial cultivars. Levels of all four parameters varied considerably in the Ukrainian germplasm, with some cultivars having outstanding values. A total of eight different self-incompatibility genotypes were assigned to the 14 accessions tested. Assigning cultivars to the appropriate incompatibility groups allowed the design of parental combinations which may result in new genotypes with enhanced functional properties and other valuable fruit traits. Based on the S-genotypes, parental combinations were proposed to ensure 50 or 100 % self-compatible seedlings in the offspring population. The most perspective Ukrainian cultivars like ‘Dagestanka’ and ‘Kodrinskaya’ also had reasonable fruit weight (over 8 g), high flesh to pit ratio (approx. 18) and soluble solid contents (over 16 %). Our results demonstrated that adequate variation is available in Ukrainian germplasm for improving fruit health benefits in sweet cherry through directed hybridizations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benzie IFF, Strain JJ (1996) The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: the FRAP assay. Anal Biochem 239:70–76
Boeing H, Bechthold A, Bub A, Ellinger S, Haller D, Kroke A, Leschik-Bonnet E, Muller MJ, Oberritter H, Schulze M, Stehle P, Watzl B (2012) Critical review: vegetables and fruit in the prevention of chronic diseases. Eur J Nutr 51:637–663
Byrne D (2002) Peach breeding trends: a world wide perspective. Acta Hort 592:49–59
Cantín CM, Moreno MA, Gogorcena Y (2009) Evaluation of the antioxidant capacity, phenolic compounds, and vitamin C content of different peach and nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] breeding progenies. J Agric Food Chem 57:4586–4592
Capocasa F, Diamanti J, Mezzetti B, Tulipani S, Battino M (2008) Breeding strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch) to increase fruit nutritional quality. BioFactors 34:67–72
Cevallos-Casals BA, Byrne D, Okie WR, Cisneros-Zevallos L (2006) Selecting new peach and plum genotypes rich in phenolic compounds and enhanced functional properties. Food Chem 96:273–280
Connor AM, Luby JJ, Tong CBS (2002) Variation and heritability estimates for antioxidant activity, total phenolic content, and anthocyanin content in blueberry progenies. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 127:82–88
Connor AM, Stephens MJ, Hall HK, Alspach PA (2005) Variation and heritabilities of antioxidant activity and total phenolic content estimated from a red raspberry factorial experiment. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 130:403–411
Crisosto CH, Crisosto GM, Metheney P (2003) Consumer acceptance of ‘brooks’ and ‘bing’ cherries is mainly dependent on fruit SSC and visual skin color. Postharvest Biol Technol 28:159–167
Crowe FL, Roddam AW, Key TJ et al (2013) Fruit and vegetable intake and mortality from ischaemic heart disease: results from the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC)-heart study. Eur Heart J. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehq465
Davey MW, Keulemans J (2004) Determining the potential to breed for enhanced antioxidant status in Malus: mean inter- and intravarietal fruit vitamin C and glutathione contents at harvest and their evolution during storage. J Agric Food Chem 52:8031–8038
Díaz-Mula H, Valero D, Zapata P, Guillén F, Castillo S, Martínez-Romero D, Serrano M (2009) The functional properties of sweet cherry as a new criterion in a breeding program. Acta Hort 839:275–280
Dirlewanger E, Claverie J, Iezzoni AF, Wünsch A (2009) Sweet and sour cherries: linkage maps, QTL detection and marker assisted selection. In: Folta KM, Gardiner SE (eds) Genetics and genomics of Rosaceae. Springer, New York
Goncalves B, Landbo A-K, Knudsen D, Silva AP, Moutinho-Pereira J, Rosa E, Meyer AS (2004) Effect of ripeness and postharvest storage on the phenolic profiles of cherries (Prunus avium L.). J Agric Food Chem 52:523–530
Hegedűs A, Balogh E, Engel R, Sipos BZ, Papp J, Blazovics A, Stefanovits-Banyai E (2008) Comparative nutrient element and antioxidant characterization of berry fruit species and cultivars grown in Hungary. HortScience 43:1711–1715
Hegedűs A, Engel R, Abrankó L, Balogh Ek, Blázovics A, Hermán R, Halász J, Ercisli S, Pedryc A, Stefanovits-Bányai É (2010) Antioxidant and antiradical capacities in apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) fruits: variations from genotypes, years, and analytical methods. J Food Sci 75:C722–C730
Horvitz S, Godoy C, López Camelo AF, Yommi A (2003) Application of gibberellic acid to ‘sweetheart’ sweet cherries: effect on fruit quality at harvest and during cold storage. Acta Hort 628:311–316
Kader A (1999) Fruit maturity, ripening, and quality relationships. Acta Hort 485:203–208
Kelebek H, Selli S (2011) Evaluation of chemical constituents and antioxidant activity of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars. Int J Food Sci Technol 46:2530–2537
Lee J, Durst WR, Wrolstad ER (2005) Determination of total monomeric anthocyanin pigment content of fruit juices, beverages, natural colorants, and wines by the pH differential method: collaborative study. J AOAC Int 88:1269–1278
Liu RH (2003) Health benefits of fruit and vegetables are from additive and synergistic combinations of phytochemicals. Am J Clin Nutr 78:S517–S520
Lock K, Pomerleau J, Causer L, Altmann DR, McKee M (2005) The global burden of disease attributable to low consumption of fruit and vegetables: implications for the global strategy on diet. Bull World Health Organ 83:100–108
Lukicheva LA (2010) Cherry germplasm collection in the Nikitsky Botanical Garden. Trud Nikit Bot Sad 132:115–129 (in Russian)
Miller NJ, Rice-Evans C, Davies MJ, Gopinathan V, Milner A (1993) A novel method for measuring antioxidant capacity and its application to monitoring the antioxidant status in premature neonates. Clin Sci 84:407–412
Olsson ME, Gustavsson K-E, Andersson S, Nilsson A, Duan R-D (2004) Inhibition of cancer cell proliferation in vitro by fruit and berry extracts and correlations with antioxidant levels. J Agric Food Chem 52:7264–7271
Papp N, Szilvássy B, Abrankó L, Szabó T, Pfeiffer P, Szabó Z, Nyéki J, Ercisli S, Stefanovits-Bányai É, Hegedűs A (2010) Main quality attributes and antioxidants in Hungarian sour cherries: identification of genotypes with enhanced functional properties. Int J Food Sci Technol 45:395–402
Piccolella S, Fiorentino A, Pacifico S, D’Abrosca B, Uzzo P, Monaco P (2008) Antioxidant properties of sour cherries (Prunus cerasus L.): role of colorless phytochemicals from the methanolic extract of ripe fruits. J Agric Food Chem 56:1928–1935
Radicevic S, Cerovic R, Mitrovic O, Glisic I (2008) Pomological characteristics and biochemical fruit composition of some Canadian sweet cherry cultivars. Acta Hort 795:283–286
Root MM, McGinn MC, Nieman DC, Henson DA, Heinz SA, Shanely RA, Knab AM, Jin F (2012) Combined fruit and vegetable intake is correlated with improved inflammatory and oxidant status from a cross-sectional study in a community setting. Nutrients 4:29–41
Scalzo J, Politi A, Pellegrini N, Mezzetti B, Battino M (2005) Plant genotype affects total antioxidant capacity and phenolic contents in fruit. Nutrition 21:207–213
Schuster M (2012) Incompatible (S-) genotypes of sweet cherry cultivars (Prunus avium L.). Sci Hortic-Amsterdam 148:59–73
Serdula MK, Gillespie C, Kettel-Khan L, Farris R, Seymour J, Denny C (2004) Trends in fruit and vegetable consumption among adults in the United States: behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 1994–2000. Am J Public Health 94:1014–1018
Singleton VL, Rossi JA Jr (1965) Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am J Enol Viticult 16:144–158
Sonneveld T, Robbins TP, Boskovic R, Tobutt KR (2001) Cloning of six cherry self-incompatibility alleles and development of allele-specific PCR detection. Theor Appl Genet 102:1046–1055
Sonneveld T, Tobutt KR, Robbins TP (2003) Allele-specific PCR detection of sweet cherry self-incompatibility (S) alleles S1 to S16 using consensus and allele-specific primers. Theor Appl Genet 107:1059–1070
Sonneveld T, Tobutt KR, Vaughan SP, Robbins TP (2005) Loss of pollen-S function in two self-compatible selections of Prunus avium is associated with deletion/mutation of an S haplotype-specific F-box gene. Plant Cell 17:37–51
Stables G, Subar A, Patterson B, Dodd K, Heimendinger J, Van Duyn M, Nebeling L (2002) Changes in vegetable and fruit consumption and awareness among US adults: results of the 1991 and 1997 5 A day for better health program surveys. J Am Diet Assoc 102:809–817
Szikriszt B, Dogan A, Ercisli S, Akcay ME, Hegedus A, Halasz J (2013) Molecular typing of the self-incompatibility locus of Turkish sweet cherry genotypes reflects phylogenetic relationships among cherries and other Prunus species. Tree Genet Genomes 9:155–165
Turovtsev NI (1970) New sweet cherry varieties recommended for Ukraine. Sadov Vinogr Vinod Mold 2:14–16 (in Russian)
Usenik V, Fabcic J, Stampar F (2008) Sugars, organic acids, phenolic composition and antioxidant activity of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.). Food Chem 107:185–192
Vursavus K, Kelebek H, Selli S (2006) A study on some chemical and physico-mechanic properties of three sweet cherry varieties (Prunus avium L.) in Turkey. J Food Eng 74:568–575
WCRF/AICR (2007) Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. American Institute for Cancer Research, Washington, DC
Wünsch A, Hormaz JI (2004) S-allele identification by PCR analysis in sweet cherry cultivars. Plant Breed 123:327–331
Zhu M, Zhang X, Zhang K, Jiang L, Zhang L (2004) Development of a simple molecular marker specific for detecting the self-compatible S4′ haplotype in sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.). Plant Mol Biol Rep 22:387–398
Acknowledgments
This study was financed by the OTKA K84290, OTKA PD 78124 grants and COST FA1104 “Sustainable production of high-quality cherries for the European market”. J. Halász and A. Hegedűs are grateful for receiving a János Bolyai Scholarship, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungary. We thank Olga Grygorieva for providing information on Ukrainian sweet cherry cultivars and Craig A. Ledbetter for his useful comments and English revision.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Hegedűs A and Taller D contributed equally to this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hegedűs, A., Taller, D., Papp, N. et al. Fruit antioxidant capacity and self-incompatibility genotype of Ukrainian sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars highlight their breeding prospects. Euphytica 191, 153–164 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-013-0919-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-013-0919-x