Abstract
Meiotic nondisjunction during microsporegenesis can lead to aneuploid gametes formation and reduced pollen fertility in plants. This paper reports the prevalence of meiosis I nondisjunction in a resynthesized Brassica napus (AACC, 2n = 38) and its use for aneuploid production. Meiosis in the amphidiploids was characterized by high frequencies of univalents and multivalents per PMC at diakinesis/metaphase I and notably unbalanced chromosome segregations at anaphase I (AI). In all the plants observed, 18.95–44.3% of PMCs exhibited a segregation of 18:20 (n − 1:n + 1) at AI which was caused by nondisjunction of one bivalent or the distribution of two homologous univalents to the same pole. Meiosis proceeded normally after AI then, thus led to the formation of viable n − 1 and n + 1 gametes and high pollen fertility of these plants. Microspore culture was subsequently carried out using these plants in an attempt to isolate Brassica nullisomics. Four nullisomics (2n = 36), two nullihaploids (2n = 18) and one tetrasomic haploid (2n = 20) were identified cytologically and characterized morphologicaly and physiologically. Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) survey suggested that of the six nullisomics/nullihaploids, one nullihaploids lost one A-genome chromosome and the other five lost C genome chromosome(s). Altogether, different C-genome chromosomes were thought to have been lost in the nullisomics/nullihaploids. The mechanisms underlying the meiotic abnormalities and the implications of these B. napus nullisomics are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albertin W, Balliau T, Brabant P, Chèvre AM, Eber F, Malosse C, Thiellement H (2006) Numerous and rapid nonstochastic modifications of gene products in newly synthesized Brassica napus allotetraploids. Genetics 173:1101–1113
Beasley JO (1942) Meiotic chromosome behavior in species, species hybrids, haploids, and induced polyploids of Gossypium. Genetics 27:25–54
Buzza GC (1983) The Inheritance of an apetalous character in canola (Brassica napus L.). Cruciferae Newsl 8:11–12
Carter CR (1978) The cytology of Brachycome 8. The inheritance, frequency and distribution of B chromosomes in B. dichromosomatica (n = 2), formerly included in B. lineariloba. Chromosoma 67:109–121
Chen HF, Wang H, Li ZY (2007) Production and genetic analysis of partial hybrids in intertribal crosses between Brassica species (B. rapa, B. napus) and Capsella bursa-pastoris. Plant Cell Rep 26:1791–1800
Cheng BF, Séguin-Swartz G, Somers DJ, Rakow G (2001) Low glucosinolate Brassica juncea breeding line revealed to be nullisomic. Genome 44:738–741
Choudhary BR, Joshi P, Singh K (2000) Synthesis, morphology and cytogenetics of Raphanofortii (TTRR, 2n = 38): a new amphidiploid of hybrid Brassica tournefortii (TT, 2n = 20) × Raphanus caudatus (RR, 2n = 18). Theor Appl Genet 101:990–999
Gaeta RT, Pires JC, Iniguez-Luy F, Leon E, Osborn TC (2007) Genomic changes in resynthesized Brassica napus and their effect on gene expression and phenotype. Plant Cell 19:3403–3417
Gaeta RT, Yoo S-Y, Pires JC, Doerge RW, Jeffrey Z, Chen SZ, Osborn TC (2009) Analysis of gene expression in resynthesized Brassica napus allopolyploids using Arabidopsis 70mer Oligo Microarrays. PLoS ONE 4(3):e4760. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004760
Guo M, Davis D, Birchler JA (1996) Dosage effects on gene expression in a maize ploidy series. Genetics 142:1349–1355
Gupta PK, Kulwal PL, Rustgi S (2005) Wheat cytogenetics in the genomics era and its relevance to breeding. Cytogenet Genome Res 109:315–327
Hasterok R, Jenkins G, Langdon T, Jones RN (2001) Ribosomal DNA is an effective marker of Brassica chromosomes. Theor Appl Genet 103:486–490
Hasterok R, Dulawa J, Jenkins G, Leggett M, Langdon T (2006) Multi-substrate chromosome preparations for high throughput comparative FISH. BMC Biotechnol 6:20
Heneen WK, Chen BY, Cheng BF, Jonsson A, Simonsen V, Jørgensen RB, Davik J (1995) Characterization of the A and C genomes of Brassica campestris and B. alboglabra. Hereditas 123:251–261
Higgins JD, Armstrong SJ, Franklin FCH, Jones GH (2004) The Arabidopsis MutS homolog AtMSH4 functions at an early step in recombination: evidence for two classes of recombination in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev 18:2557–2570
Howell EC, Kearsey MJ, Jones GH, King GJ, Armstrong SJ (2008) A and C genome distinction and chromosome identification in Brassica napus by sequential fluorescence in situ hybridization and genomic in situ hybridization. Genetics 180:1849–1857
Huang Z, Chen YF, Yi B, Xiao L, Ma CZ, Tu JX, Fu TD (2007) Fine mapping of the recessive genic male sterility gene (Bnms3) in Brassica napus L. Theor Appl Genet 115:113–118
Inomata N (1980) Hybrid progenies of the cross, Brassica campestris × B. oleracea. I. Cytogenetical studies on F1 hybrids. Jpn J Genet 55:189–202
Jenczewski E, Eber F, Grimaud A, Huet S, Lucas MO, Monod H, Chèvre AM (2003) PrBn, a major gene controlling homeologous pairing in oilseed rape (Brassica napus) haploids. Genetics 164:645–653
Kaeppler SM, Phillps RL (1993) DNA methylation and tissue culture-induced variation in plants. In Vitro Cell Dev-Pl 29:125–130
Kramer MG, Reed SM (1988a) An evaluation of maternal nullihaploidy for Nicotiana tabacum L. nullisomic production. I. An interspecific hybridization approach. J Hered 79:24–27
Kramer MG, Reed SM (1988b) An evaluation of maternal nullihaploidy for Nicotiana tabacum L. nullisomic production. II. A pollen irradiation and ovule culture approach. J Hered 79:469–472
Lamkerts WE (1932) Inheritance of monosomics in Nicotiana rustica. Genetics 17:689–696
Li Z, Liu HL, Luo P (1995) Production and cytogenetics of intergeneric hybrids between Brassica napus and Orychophragmus violaceus. Theor Appl Genet 91:131–136
Litcher R (1982) Induction of haploid plants from isolated pollen of Brassica napus. Z Pflanzenphysiol 105:427–434
Lu GY, Yang GS, Fu TD (2001) Silver stained AFLP—a novel assay for DNA fingerprinting in Brassica napus. J Huazhong Agric Univ 20:413–415 (in Chinese with English summary)
Lukens LN, Chris PJ, Leon E, Vogelzang R, Oslach L, Osborn T (2006) Patterns of sequence loss and cytosine methylation within a population of newly resynthesized Brassica napus allopolyploids. Plant Physiol 140:336–348
Madlung A, Tyagi AP, Watson B, Jiang H, Kagochi T, Doerge RW, Martienssen R, Comai L (2005) Genomic changes in synthetic Arabidopsis polyploids. Plant J 41:221–230
Martin R, Ernst S, Rademaker A, Barclay L, Ko E, Summers N (1997) Chromosomal abnormalities in sperm from testicular cancer patients before and after chemotherapy. Hum Genet 99:214–218
Moore GA, Collins GB (1982) Isolation of nullihaploids from diverse genotypes of Nicotiana tabacum. J Hered 73:192–196
Nicolas SD, Leflon M, Liu Z, Eber F, Chelysheva L, Coriton O, Chèvre AM, Jenczewski E (2008) Chromosome ‘speed dating’ during meiosis of polyploid Brassica hybrids and haploids. Cytogenet Genome Res 120:331–338
Nicolas SD, Leflon M, Monod H, Eber F, Coriton O, Huteau V, Chèvre AM, Jenczewski E (2009) Genetic regulation of meiotic cross-overs between related genomes in Brassica napus haploids and hybrids. Plant Cell 21:373–385
Nonomura K, Nakano M, Fukuda T, Eiguchi M, Miyao A, Hirochika H, Kurata N (2004) The novel gene homologous pairing aberration in rice meiosis I of rice encodes a putative coiled-coil protein required for homologous chromosome pairing in meiosis. Plant Cell 16:1008–1020
Olsson G (1960) Species crosses within the genus Brassica. II. Artificial Brassica napus L. Hereditas 46:351–396
Pires JC, Zhao JW, Schranz ME, Leon EJ, Quijada PA, Lukens LN, Osborn TC (2004) Flowering time divergence and genomic rearrangements in resynthesized Brassica polyploids (Brassicaceae). Biol J Linn Soc Lond 82:675–688
Pradillo M, Lopez E, Romero C, Sanchez-Moran E, Cunado N, Santos JL (2007) An analysis of univalent segregation in meiotic mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana: a possible role for synaptonemal complex. Genetics 175:505–511
Prakash S, Hinata K (1980) Taxonomy, cytogenetics and origin of crop Brassicas, a review. Opera Bot 55:1–57
Prakash S, Raut RN (1983) Artificial synthesis of Brassica napus and its prospect as an oilseed crop in India. Indian J Genet 43:191–283
Ramanna MS, Hermsen JGT (1979) Unique meiotic behaviour in F1 plants from a cross between a non-tuberous and a tuberous Solanum species in section Petota. Euphytica 28:9–15
Sapre AB, Barve SS (1985) Typical meiotic nondisjunction and its consequences in Colx glgantea. J Hered 76:387–389
Sarashima M (1973) Studies on the breeding of artificially synthesized forage rape (Brassica napus ssp. oleifera) by means of interspecific crosses between B. campestris and B. oleracea. Spe Bull Coll Agr Utsunomiya Univ 29:1–117
Schranz ME, Osborn TC (2000) Novel flowering time variation in the resynthesized polyploid Brassica napus. J Hered 91:242–246
Schranz ME, Osborn TC (2004) De novo variation in lifehistory traits and responses to growth conditions of resynthesized polyploid Brassica napus (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 91:174–183
Sears ER (1939) Cytogenetic studies with polyploid species of wheat I. Chromosomal aberrations in the progeny of a haploid of Triticum vulgare. Genetics 24:509–523
Sears ER (1953) Nullisomic analysis in common wheat. Am Nat 87:245–252
Sears ER (1954) The aneuploids of common wheat. Mo Agric Exp Stn Res Bull 572:1–58
Shaked H, Kashkush K, Ozkan H, Feldman M, Levy AA (2001) Sequence elimination and cytosine methylation are rapid and reproducible responses of the genome to wide hybridization and allopolyploidy in wheat. Plant Cell 13:1749–1759
Snowdon RJ, Köhler W, Friedt W, Köhler A (1997) Genomic in situ hybridization in Brassica amphidiploids and intergeneric hybrids. Theor Appl Genet 95:1320–1324
Snowdon RJ, Friedrich T, Friedt T, Köhler W (2002) Identifying the chromosomes of the A- and C-genome diploid Brassica species B. rapa (syn. campestris) and B. oleracea in their amphidiploid B. napus. Theor Appl Genet 104:533–538
Song K, Tang K, Osborn TC (1993) Development of synthetic Brassica amphidiploids by reciprocal hybridization and comparison to natural amphidiploids. Theor Appl Genet 86:811–821
Song K, Lu P, Tang K, Osborn TC (1995) Rapid genome change in synthetic polyploids of Brassica and its implication for polyploid evolution. Proc Nat Acad Sci 92:7719–7723
Takahata Y (1997) Microspore culture. In: Kalia HR, Gupta SK (eds) Recent advances in oilseed Brassicas. Kalyani, Ludhiana, pp 162–181
Takahata Y, Fukuoka H, Wakui K (2005) Utilization of microspore-derived embryos. In: Palmer CED, Keller WA, Kasha KJ (eds) Haploids in crop improvement II. Springer, New York, pp 153–165
Tepperberg JH, Moses MJ, Nath J (1999) Colchicine effects on meiosis in the male mouse II. Inhibition of synapsis induction of nondisjunction. Mutat Res 429:93–105
Tokumasu S (1976) The increase of seed fertility of Brassicoraphamus through cytological irregularity. Euphytica 25:463–470
Tokumasu S, Kato M (1988) Chromosomal and genetic structure of Brassicoraphanus related to seed fertility and the presentation of an instance of improvement of its fertility. Euphytica 39:145–151
U N (1935) Genome analysis on Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation and peculiar mode of fertilization. Jpn J Bot 7:389–452
Wen J, Tu JX, Li ZY, Fu TD, Ma CZ, Shen JX (2008) Improving ovary and embryo culture techniques for efficient resynthesis of Brassica napus from reciprocal crosses between yellow-seeded diploids B. rapa and B. oleracea. Euphytica 162:81–89
Yang SJ (1964) Numerical chromosome instability in Nicotiana hybrids I. Interplant variation among offspring of amphiploids. Genetics 50:745–756
Yang GS, Chen CB, Zhou GL, Geng CN, Ma CZ, Tu JX, Fu TD (2001) Genetic analysis of four self-incompatible lines in Brassica napus. Plant Breed 120:57–61
Acknowledgments
This research was financed by funds from the High-tech program “863” (2009AA101105), the Program for “973” (2007CB109006), and the Program for Modern Agricultural Industrial Technology System (nycytx-00501).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wen, J., Zeng, Xh., Pu, Yy. et al. Meiotic nondisjunction in resynthesized Brassica napus and generation of aneuploids through microspore culture and their characterization. Euphytica 173, 99–111 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-010-0129-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-010-0129-8