Skip to main content
Log in

Study of genetic diversity in safflower genotypes using agro-morphological traits and RAPD markers

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research was conducted to study the genetic diversity in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) using agro-morphological traits and RAPD markers. Sixteen selected lines derived from landraces growing in various agro-climatic regions of Iran along with four exotic genotypes were evaluated in a randomized complete block design with three replications under field conditions. Days to emergence, days to initial flowering, days to flowering, days to maturity, plant height, branches per plant, capitula per plant, seeds per capitulum, 1,000-seed weight, seed yield per plant, seed yield, and reaction to powdery mildew (Leveillula taurica Arnaud) were evaluated in this study. Genetic diversity of the genotypes was assessed by RAPD markers. The results indicated significant differences among genotypes for the agro-morphological traits and clustering based on these traits classified the genotypes into five groups. Analysis of the RAPD markers revealed 15 polymorphic primers out of 50 used primers. Based on RAPD data, the highest genetic similarity was observed between the cultivars of “AC Sunset,” “AC Sterling” from Canada and the lowest relatedness observed between a local breeding line “E2428” and genotype “GE62923” from Germany. Cluster analysis based on RAPD markers and 54% coefficient of similarity divided the genotypes into five distinct groups. Comparing the clusters based on agro-morphological traits with those from molecular markers showed slight similarities. The finding of high genetic variation for agro-morphological traits and polymorphism at DNA level reveal that agronomic traits can be improved by selection programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Able GH, Driscoll MF (1976) Sequential trait development and breeding for high yield in safflower. Crop Sci 16:213–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JA, Churchill GA, Autroque JE, Tanksley SD, Swells ME (1993) Optimising selection for plant linkage map. Genome 36:181–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ash GJ, Raman R, Crump NS (2003) An investigation of genetic variation in Carthamus lanatus in New South Wales, Australia, using intersimple sequence repeats (ISSR) analysis. Weed Res 43:208–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ashri A (1975) Evaluation of the germplasm collection of safflower Carthamus tinctorius L. V: Distribution and regional divergence for morphological characters. Euphytica 24:651–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashri A, Zimmer DE, Urie AL, Cahaner A, Marani A (1974) Evaluation of the world collection of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L). IV. Yield and yield components and their relationship. Crop Sci 14:799–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun U (1987) A monograph of the Erysiphales (Powdery mildews). Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia 89. J. Cramer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Caetano-Anolles G, Bassam BJ, Gresshoff PM (1991) DNA amplification fingerprinting using very short arbitrary oligonucleotide primers. Biotech 9:553–556

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction sites. Genetics 131:479–491

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, Harlow, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Martinez J, Rio M, Haro A (1993) Survey of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L) germplasm for variants in fatty acid composition and other seed characters. Euphytica 19:115–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han Y, Li D (1992) Evaluation of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) germplasm-analysis in fatty acid composition of seeds of domestic and exotic safflower varieties. Bot Res 6:28–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlan J (1992) Crops and man, 2nd edn. ASA, CSSA, Inc., Madison, WI, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Holiday P (1980) Fungus diseases of tropical crops. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Jan CC (1988) Registration of a powdery mildew resistant sunflower germ plasm pool, PM1. Crop Sci 28:1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaradat AA, Shahid M (2006) Patterns of phenotypic variation in a germplasm collection of Carthamus tinctorius L. from the Middle East. Euphytica 53:225–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavani RH, Shukla PT, Madariya RB (2000) Analysis of variability for seed yield and related characters in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Madras Agric J 87:449–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearsey MJ, Pooni HS (1996) The genetical analysis of quantitative traits. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles PF (1989) Centers of plant diversity and conservation of crop germplasm: safflower. Econ Bot 23:324–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles PF, Ashri A (1995) Safflower Carthamus tinctorius (Compositae). In: Smartt J, Simmonds NW (eds) Evolution of crop plants, 2nd edn. Longman Scientific and Technical, London, pp 47–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahane PS, Mukewar AM, Zope JS, Kalpande HV, Kalpande VV (1999) Genetic variability for different traits in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). J Soil Crops 9:130–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Maali Amiri RM, Yazdi-Samadi B, Ghannadha MR, Abd-Mishani C (2001) Detection of DNA polymorphism in landrace populations of safflower in Iran using RAPD-PCR technique. Iran J Agri Sci 32:737–745

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murray MG, Thampson WF (1998) Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acid Res 8:4321–4325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Li WH (1979) Mathematical model for studying in genetic variation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:5269–5273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf FJ (1972) An empirical comparison of three ordination techniques in numerical taxonomy. Syst Zool 21:271–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf FJ (1992) NTSYS-PC: numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system version 2.02 k. State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1997) SAS/STAT Software: changes and enhancements through Release 6.12. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sehgal D, Raina SN (2005) Genotyping safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) cultivars by DNA fingerprints. Euphytica 146:67–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vilatersana R, Garnatje T, Susanna A, Garcia-Jacas N (2005) Taxanomic problems in Carthamus (Asteraceae): RAPD markers and sectional classification. J Bot Linn Soc 147:375–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss EA (2000) Oil Seed Crops. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafaleski JA, Tingey SV (1990) DNA Polymorphism amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res 18:6531–6535

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu-Xia Y, Wei W, You-Liang Z, Li C, Ren-Jian L, Chun-Yan H (2007) Genetic diversity and relationships among safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) analyzed by inter-simple sequence repeats (ISSRs). Genet Res Crop Evol 54:1043–1051

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ghodratollah Saeidi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amini, F., Saeidi, G. & Arzani, A. Study of genetic diversity in safflower genotypes using agro-morphological traits and RAPD markers. Euphytica 163, 21–30 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9556-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9556-6

Keywords

Navigation