Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic improvement trends in agronomic performances and end-use quality characteristics among hard red winter wheat cultivars in Nebraska

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evaluation of wheat cultivars from different eras allows breeders to determine changes in agronomic and end-use quality characteristics associated with grain yield and end-use quality improvement over time. The objective of this research was to examine the trends in agronomic and end-use quality characteristics of hard red winter wheat cultivars grown in Nebraska. Thirty historically important and popular hard red winter wheat cultivars introduced or released between 1874 and 2000 were evaluated at Lincoln, Mead and North Platte, Nebraska in 2002 and 2003. An alpha lattice design with 15 incomplete blocks of two plots and three replications was used at all locations. Agronomic (days to flowering, plant height, spike length, culm length, grain yield and yield components, and grain volume weight) and end-use quality (flour yield, SDS-sedimentation value, flour protein content, and mixograph time and tolerance) traits were measured in each environment. Highly significant differences were observed among environments, genotypes and their interactions for most agronomic and end-use quality characteristics. Unlike modern cultivars, older cultivars were low yielding, and less responsive to favorable environments for grain yield and yield components. Semidwarf cultivars were more stable for plant height than traditional medium to tall cultivars. All cultivars had high grain volume weight since it is part of the grading system and highly selected for in cultivar release. Modern cultivars were less stable than older cultivars for SDS-sedimentation and mixing tolerance. However, the stability of older cultivars was attributed to their having weak mixing tolerance and reduced SDS-sedimentation values. The reduced protein content of modern cultivars was offset by increased functionality, as measured by mixograph and SDS sedimentation. In conclusion, breeders have tailored agronomic and end-use quality traits essential for hard red winter wheat production and marketing in Nebraska.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AACC. 1995. Approved methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists. Methods 39–70, 46-14A, 46–30 and 54–40. AACC, St. Paul, MN.

  • Allen, F.L., R.E. Comstock & D.C. Rasmusson, 1978. Optimal environments for yield testing. Crop Sci. 18: 747–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, I.M., K.B. Porter & O.G. Merkle, 1967. Registration of ‘Sturdy’ wheat. Crop Sci. 7: 406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, R.B., M.A. Ford & C.L. Morgan, 1989. Genetic improvement in the yield of winter wheat: A further evaluation. J. Agri. Sci. 112: 295–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baenziger, P.S., B. Moreno-Sevilla, C.J. Peterson, J.W. Schmidt, D.R. Shelton, D.D. Baltensperger, L.A. Nelson, C.J. Peterson, D.V. McVey, J.E. Watkins & J.H. Hatchett, 1995. Registration of ‘Alliance’ wheat. Crop Sci. 35: 938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baenziger, P.S., B. Moreno-Sevilla, C.J. Peterson, D.R. Shelton, J. Krall, D.D. Baltensperger, S.D. Haley, L.A. Nelson, D.V. McVey, J.E. Watkins, J.H. Hatchett & J.W. Schmidt, 1997. Registration of ‘Pronghorn’ wheat. Crop Sci 37: 1006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baenziger, P.S., J.W. Schmidt, C.J. Peterson, V.A. Johnson, P.J. Mattern, A.F. Dreier, D.V. McVey & J.H. Hatchett, 1989. Registration of ‘Arapahoe’ wheat. Crop Sci. 29: 832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baenziger, P.S., D.R. Shelton, M.J. Shipman & R.A. Graybosch, 2001. Breeding for end-use quality: Reflections on the Nebraska experience. Euphytica 119: 95–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M.A., R.A. Fischer, D. Bayerlee & K. Sayre, 1995. Genetic and agronomic contributions to yield gains. A case study for wheat. Field Crops Res. 44: 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borell, A.K., L.D. Incoll & M.J. Dalling, 1991. The influence of the Rht1 and Rht2 alleles on the growth of winter wheat stems and ears. Ann. Bot. 67: 103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budak, N., P.S. Baenziger, K.M. Eskridge, D. Baltensperger & B. Moreno-Sevilla, 1995. Plant height responses of semidwarf and nonsemidwarf wheats to the environment. Crop Sci. 35: 445–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budak, H., P.S. Baenziger, R.A. Graybosch, B.S. Beecher, K.M. Eskridge & M.J. Shipman, 2003. Genetic and environmental effects on dough mixing characteristics and agronomic performance of diverse hard red winter wheat genotypes. Cereal Chem. 80: 518–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderini, D.F., M.F. Dreccer & G.A. Slafer, 1995. Genetic improvement in wheat yield and associated traits. A re-examination of previous results and the last trends. Plant Breed. 114: 108–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, B.T., P.S. Baenziger, K.S. Gill, K.M. Eskridge, H. Budak, M. Erayman, I. Dweikat & Y. Yen, 2003. Identification of QTLs and environmental interactions associated with agronomic traits on chromosome 3A of wheat. Crop Sci. 43: 1493–1503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J.A., 1931. Registration of improved wheat varieties, VI. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 23: 1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T.S., J.P. Murphy & D.M. Rodgers, 1986. Changes in genetic diversity in the red winter wheat regions of the United States. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83: 5583–5586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T.S., M.D. Shogren, R.G. Sears, T.J. Martin & L.C. Bolte, 1989. Genetic improvement in milling and baking quality of hard red winter wheat cultivars from 1919 to 1987. Crop Sci. 29: 626–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T.S., J.P. Shroyer, L. Ben-Hui, R.G. Sears & T.J. Martin, 1988. Genetic improvement in agronomic traits of hard red winter wheat cultivars from 1919 to 1987. Crop Sci. 28: 756–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donmez, E., R.G. Sears, J.P. Shroyer & G.M. Paulsen, 2001. Genetic gain in yield attributes of winter wheat in the Great Plains. Crop Sci. 41: 1412–1419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhart, S.A. & W.A. Russell, 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6: 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espitia-Rangel, E., P.S. Baenziger, R.A. Graybosch, D.R. Shelton, B. Moreno-Sevilla & C.J. Peterson, 1999a. Agronomic performance and stability of 1A vs. 1AL.1RS genotypes derived from winter wheat ‘Nekota’. Crop Sci. 39: 643–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espitia-Rangel, E., P.S. Baenziger, D.R. Shelton, R.A. Graybosch, B. Moreno-Sevilla & C.J. Peterson, 1999b. End-use quality performance and stability of 1A vs. 1AL.1RS genotypes derived from winter wheat ‘Nekota’. Crop Sci. 39: 649–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerherm, A., G.M. Paulsen, & J.L. Sebaugh, 1984. Contribution of genetic improvement to recent wheat yield increases in the U.S.A. Agron J. 76: 985–990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finney, K.F., W.T. Yamazaki, V.L. Young & G.L. Rubenthaler, 1987. Quality of hard, soft and durum wheats. In: E.G. Heyne (Ed.), Wheat and Wheat Improvements, pp. 677–741, 2nd edn. ASA, Madison, WI, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geleta, B., M. Atak, P.S. Baenziger, L.A. Nelson, D.D. Baltensperger, K.M. Eskridge, M.J. Shipman & D.R. Shelton, 2002. Seeding and genotypic effect on agronomic performance and end-use quality of winter wheat. Crop Sci. 42: 827–837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, A.K. & A.A. Gomez, 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, p. 332. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graybosch, R.A., C.J. Peterson, P.S. Baenziger & D.R. Shelton, 1995. Environmental modification of hard red winter wheat flour protein composition. J. Cereal Sci. 22: 45–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graybosch, R.A., C.J. Peterson, D.R. Shelton & P.S. Baenziger, 1996. Genotypic and environmental modification of wheat flour protein composition in relation to end-use quality. Crop Sci. 36: 296–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, M.S., 1998. Using genotype by environment interaction for cultivar development. Adv. Agron. 62: 199–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, I.H., B.F. Carver, E.G. Krenzer, C.T. Mackown & G.W. Horn, 2002a. Genetic trends in winter wheat yield and test weight under dual-purpose and grain-only management systems. Crop Sci. 42: 710–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, I.H., B.F. Carver, E.G. Krenzer, C.T. Mackown, G.W. Horn & P. Rayas-Durate, 2002b. Genetic trends in winter wheat grain quality with dual dual-purpose and grain-only management systems. Crop Sci. 42: 1112–1116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, I.H., B.F. Carver & E.L. Smith, 1995. Genetic gains in two selection phases of wheat-breeding program. Plant Breed. 114: 117–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kibite, S. & L.E. Evans, 1984. Causes of negative correlations between grain yield and grain protein concentration in common wheat. Euphytica 33: 801–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, M.J., H.D. Voldeng & E.R. Cober, 2000. Agronomic changes from 58 years of genetic improvement of short-season soybean cultivars in Canada. Agron. J. 92: 780–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • NASS, 2003. Nebraska Agricultural Statistics Service, Nebraska, Lincoln. http://www.usda.gov/nass., February 26, 2004.

  • Peterson, C.J., 1992. Similarities among test sites based on cultivar performance in the hard red winter wheat region. Crop Sci. 32: 907–912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C.J., R.A. Graybosch, P.S. Baenziger & A.W. Grombacher, 1992. Genotype and environment effects on quality characteristics of hard red winter wheat. Crop Sci. 32: 98–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosielle, A.A. & J. Hamblin, 1981. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environments. Crop Sci. 21: 943–946.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc., 1996. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, 4th edn. Vol.1 and 2. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.

  • Sayre, K.D., S. Rajaram & R.A. Fischer, 1997. Yield potential progress in short bread wheats in northern Mexico. Crop Sci. 37: 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J.W., V.A. Johnson, A.F. Dreier & P.J. Mattern, 1971. Registration of ‘Scout 66’ wheat. Crop Sci. 11: 138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J.W. & W.D. Worrall, 1984. Trends in yield improvement through genetic gains. In: S. Sakamoto (Ed.), Proceedings of 6th International Wheat Genetics Symposium, pp. 691–700. Plant Germ-plasm Institute, Kyoto, Japan.

  • Slafer, G.A. & F.H. Andrade, 1989. Genetic improvement in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) yield in Argentina. Field Crops Res. 21: 289–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C.W., 1995. Crop Production: Evolution, History and Technology, p. 469. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Fufa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fufa, H., Baenziger, P.S., Beecher, B.S. et al. Genetic improvement trends in agronomic performances and end-use quality characteristics among hard red winter wheat cultivars in Nebraska. Euphytica 144, 187–198 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-5811-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-5811-x

Key Words

Navigation