Abstract
In 1993, Norway became the second country in the world to introduce registered partnerships. As with same-sex marriages, registered partnerships give the same rights and duties as marriages for opposite sex couples, with a few exceptions. The present article describes this ‘new’ demographic event based on Norwegian experiences. Compared to the number of new cases each year of opposite-sex marriages, registered partnerships amount to less than 1%. Gay partnerships are more common than lesbian partnerships, but the proportion of female partnerships has increased since the law came into force. In one out of five partnerships, one or both partners have been previously married to a person of the opposite sex. At the time they entered into the partnership, 24% of the women and 13 of the men had at least one child. When examining the registered partnerships entered into in Norway between 1993 and 2001 we estimated the probability of divorce to be 16% after six years. We also carried out a multivariate analysis of the divorce risk and found that the divorce risk for female partnerships is double that of the risk for male partnerships. Another high risk group is partnerships between a Norwegian and a person from a non-Nordic country.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
G. Andersson T. Noack A. Seierstad H. Weedon-Fekjær (2004) The demographics of same-sex “marriages” in Norway and Sweden’ Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research Rostock
L Badgett (1995) ArticleTitle‘The wage effects on sexual orientation discrimination’ Industrial and Labor Relations Review 48 726–739
L. Badgett (2001) Money, myths, and change. The Economic Lives of Lesbian and Gay Men Chicago: University Press Chicago
D Black G Gates S Sanders L Taylor (2000) ArticleTitle‘Demographics of the gay and lesbian population in the United States: Evidence from available systematic data sources’ Demography 37 139–154 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvitVeksA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10836173
D Black G Gates S Sanders L Taylor (2002) ArticleTitle‘Why do gay men live in San Francisco?’ Journal of Urban Economics 51 54–76 Occurrence Handle10.1006/juec.2001.2237
U Beck E Beck-Gernsheim (1995) The Normal Chaos of Love Polity Press Cambridge
M Corijn E Klijzing (2001) Transition to Adulthood in Europe Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht
Digoix, M., Festy, P. and Waaldijk, K., 2004. Same-sex couples and heteronormativity. Paper presented at the PAA 2004 Annual Meeting, Boston, April 1–3, 2004.
P Festy (2001) ‘The “Civil Solidarity Pact” (PACS) in France: An impossible evaluation’ Population & Sociétés Institut national d’études démographiques Paris 1–4
A Giddens (1992) The Transformation of Intimacy Polity Press Oxford
R. Halvorsen (1998) ‘The ambiguity of lesbian and gay marriages: Change and continuity in the symbolic order’ J Löfström (Eds) Scandinavian Homosexualities: Essays on Gay and Lesbian Studies Harrington Park Press New York 207–231
R Halvorsen (1999) ArticleTitle‘Partnerskapslovens tvetydighet’ Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning 3 310–331
K Hegna H. W Kristiansen B. U Moseng (1999) Levekår og livskvalitet blant lesbiske kvinner og homofile menn. Rapport 1/99 Norsk institutt for forskning om oppvekst velferd og aldring Oslo
L Jepsen C Jepsen (2002) ArticleTitle‘An empirical analysis of the matching patterns of same-sex and opposite-sex couples’ Demography 39 435–453 Occurrence Handle12205751
A. C Kinsey W. B Pomeroy C. E Martin (1948) Sexual Behaviour in the Human Male W.B. Saunders Philadelphia/London
L. A Kurdek (2003) ArticleTitle‘Differences between gay and lesbian cohabiting couples’ Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 20 411–436 Occurrence Handle10.1177/02654075030204001
E Lauman J. M Gagnon R. T Michael S Michals (1994) The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practice in the United States University of Chicago Press Chicago
C Martin I Théry (2001) ArticleTitle‘The PACS and Marriage and Cohabitation in France’ International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 15 135–158
K Moxnes (1993) ArticleTitle‘Partnerskapsloven - et uttrykk for parforholdets endrede karakter’ Løvetann 3 30–31
Noack, T. and Østby, L., 1996. Fertility and Family Surveys in Countries of the ECE Region. Standard Country Report Norway. Economic Studies No 10a, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Geneva/New York: United Nations.
Noack, T. and Østby, L., 2002. ‘Free to choose – but unable to stick with it?’, in E. Klijzing and M. Corijn (eds), Fertility and partnership in Europe: Findings and Lessons from Comparative Research Vol. II. pp. 103–116 Geneva/New York: United Nations.
C Patterson (2000) ArticleTitle‘Family relationships of lesbian and gay men’ Journal of Marriage and the Family 62 1052–1069 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01052.x
W Pedersen H. W Kristiansen (2003) ArticleTitle‘Å gjøre det å føle det og å være det. Homoseksualitet i det seinmoderne’ Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning 44 3–37
Søland, B., 1998. ‘A queer nation? The passage of the gay and lesbian partnership legislation in Denmark, 1989’, Social Politics 5, Spring: 48–69.
A Spira H Leridon R Gray (1993) Biomedical and Demographic Determinants of Reproduction Clarendon Oxford
Størksen, I., 2000. Homofili og politikk. En komparativ analyse av verdiendringer og meningskoalisjoner bak vedtaket av partnerskapsloven i Danmark og Norge. Hovedoppgave ved Institutt for sammenlignende politikk. Universitetet i Bergen.
Turcotte P., Renaud V. and Cunningham, R., 2003. Same-sex relationships and sexual orientation in Canada: data, concepts, and methodological issues. Paper presented at the 2003 PAA annual meeting Minneapolis, May 2003
K Waaldijk (2001) Small change: How the road to same-sex marriage got paved in the Netherlands R Wintermute M Andenæs (Eds) Legal recognition of same-sex partnerships: A study of national, European and international law Hart publishing Oxford 437–446
Waaldijk, K., 2003. Major legal consequences and procedures of civil marriage, registered partnership and informal cohabitation for different and same-sex partners in nine European countries. Work in progress, version 17 September 2003. Leiden: E-M. Meijers Institute of Legal Studies, Universiteit Leiden.
J Weeks (2000) ‘The challenge of lesbian and gay studies’ T Sandfort J Schuyf J. W Duyvendak J Weeks (Eds) Lesbian and Gay Studies. An Introductory Interdisciplinary Approach Sage Publications London 1–13
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Noack T., Seierstad A. and Weedon-Fekjær H., 2005, A Demographic Analysis of Registered Partnerships (legal same-sex unions): The Case of Norway, European Journal of Population, 21: 89–109.
Noack T., Seierstad A. and Weedon-Fekjær H., 2005, A Demographic Analysis of Registered Partnerships (legal same-sex unions): The Case of Norway, European Journal of Population, 21: 89–109.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Noack, T., Seierstad, A. & Weedon-fekjær, H. A Demographic Analysis of Registered Partnerships (legal same-sex unions): The Case of Norway. Eur J Population 21, 89–109 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-005-3626-z
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-005-3626-z