Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Factors affecting sustained adoption of irrigation water-saving technologies in groundwater over-exploited areas in the North China Plain

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over-exploitation of groundwater in China has severely affected irrigation agriculture, especially in the North China Plain, and it also threatens the environment. Although water-saving technologies (WSTs) have been introduced for decades, sustained commitment to WST is not being met. This paper investigates factors affecting adoption and sustained adoption of WST based on 261 households in the North China Plain. We employ Heckman’s two-stage sample selection process: (1) households decide whether to adopt WST or not and (2) households decide whether to sustainably adopt (adopt for a long time) WST or not. Particular attention is paid to the role of water scarcity in the initial adoption and sustained adoption stages. Several indicators relating to water scarcity are used to calculate a water scarcity index based on principal component analysis. The results showed that water scarcity exerts a significant and positive effect on both adoption and sustained adoption of WST. Non-adopters and non-sustained adopters face less severe water scarcity than adopters. Membership in cooperative organizations significantly improves the likelihood of sustained adoption; 63.6% of sustained adopters have a membership in cooperative organizations, compared with 18.2% of non-sustained adopters. The number of plots negatively affects the sustained adoption of WST; sustained adopters on average have 3.0 plots, and non-sustained adopters have 5.3 plots. Education, extension service, farm size, off-farm work, relatives working in the local government and irrigation costs are positively and significantly associated with adoption and sustained adoption decisions. Finally, we find that labor-saving capacity significantly influences both stages, whereas capital-saving capacity is only significant in the adoption stage. Only 10% of non-adopters consider adoption of WST as more labor- and capital-saving than conventional irrigation practices, in comparison with nearly 50% of adopters. These results imply that the extension of WST should consider focusing more on cooperative organizations and hold more demonstrations for farmers. Moreover, given that the degree of water shortage varies from region to region, the WST extension standards should vary accordingly. Governments should strengthen awareness by enhancing education and publicity concerning water scarcity and conservation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig.2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdulai, A., Glauben, T., Herzfeld, T., & Zhou, S. (2005). Water saving technology in Chinese rice production-evidence from survey data (No. 724-2016-49052).

  • Abdulai, A., Owusu, V., & Bakang, J.-E.A. (2011). Adoption of safer irrigation technologies and cropping patterns: Evidence from Southern Ghana. Ecological Economics, 70(7), 1415–1423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahammed, S. J., Chung, E.-S., & Shahid, S. (2018). Parametric assessment of pre-monsoon agricultural water scarcity in bangladesh. Sustainability, 10(3), 819.

    Google Scholar 

  • An, H., & Butler, L. J. (2012). A discrete-time duration analysis of technology disadoption: The case of rbST in California. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d’agroeconomie, 60(4), 495–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arslan, A., McCarthy, N., Lipper, L., Asfaw, S., & Cattaneo, A. (2014). Adoption and intensity of adoption of conservation farming practices in Zambia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 187, 72–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgart-Getz, A., Prokopy, L. S., & Floress, K. (2012). Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: A meta-analysis of the adoption literature. Journal of Environmental Management, 96(1), 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belder, P., Bouman, B., Cabangon, R., Lu, G., Quilang, E., LI, Y., , et al. (2004). Effect of water-saving irrigation on rice yield and water use in typical lowland conditions in Asia. Agricultural Water Management, 65(3), 193–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beltran, J. C., White, B., Burton, M., Doole, G. J., & Pannell, D. J. (2013). Determinants of herbicide use in rice production in the Philippines. Agricultural Economics, 44(1), 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birhanu, M. Y., Girma, A., & Puskur, R. (2017). Determinants of success and intensity of livestock feed technologies use in Ethiopia: Evidence from a positive deviance perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 115, 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanke, A., Rozelle, S., Lohmar, B., Wang, J., & Huang, J. (2007). Water saving technology and saving water in China. Agricultural Water Management, 87(2), 139–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravo-Ureta, B. E., & Pinheiro, A. E. (1997). Technical, economic, and allocative efficiency in peasant farming: Evidence from the Dominican Republic. The Developing Economies, 35(1), 48–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bro, A. S., Clay, D. C., Ortega, D. L., & Lopez, M. C. (2019). Determinants of adoption of sustainable production practices among smallholder coffee producers in Nicaragua. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 21(2), 895–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., Wang, J., & Huang, J. (2014). Policy support, social capital, and farmers’ adaptation to drought in China. Global Environmental Change, 24, 193–202.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chinseu, E., Dougill, A., & Stringer, L. (2019). Why do smallholder farmers dis-adopt conservation agriculture? Insights from Malawi. Land Degradation & Development, 30(5), 533–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, R., Leonhardt, J. M., & Liu, M. T. (2015). Chinese migrant workers’ adoption of urban consumer habits. Marketing Letters, 26(1), 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremades, R., Wang, J., & Morris, J. (2015). Policies, economic incentives and the adoption of modern irrigation technology in China. Earth System Dynamics, 6, 399–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Souza, A., & Mishra, A. K. (2018). Adoption and abandonment of partial conservation technologies in developing economies: The case of South Asia. Land Use Policy, 70, 212–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Fraiture, C., Molden, D., & Wichelns, D. (2010). Investing in water for food, ecosystems, and livelihoods: An overview of the comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture. Agricultural Water Management, 97(4), 495–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimara, E., & Skuras, D. (2003). Adoption of agricultural innovations as a two-stage partial observability process. Agricultural Economics, 28(3), 187–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebremedhin, B., & Swinton, S. M. (2003). Investment in soil conservation in northern Ethiopia: The role of land tenure security and public programs. Agricultural Economics, 29(1), 69–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghimire, R., & Huang, W. (2015). Household wealth and adoption of improved maize varieties in Nepal: A double-hurdle approach. Food Security, 7(6), 1321–1335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, T. W., & Yeager, E. A. (2018). Adoption of precision agriculture technology: A duration analysis. In In Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Precision Agriculture. Monticello, IL: International Society of Precision Agriculture.

  • Heckman, J. J. (1977). Sample selection bias as a specification error (with an application to the estimation of labor supply functions). National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Huang, Q., Wang, J., & Li, Y. (2017). Do water saving technologies save water? Empirical evidence from North China. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 82, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jara-Rojas, R., Bravo-Ureta, B. E., Engler, A., & Díaz, J. (2013). An analysis of the joint adoption of water conservation and soil conservation in Central Chile. Land Use Policy, 32, 292–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagoya, S., Paudel, K. P., & Daniel, N. L. (2018). Awareness and adoption of soil and water conservation technologies in a developing country: A case of Nabajuzi Watershed in Central Uganda. Environmental Management, 61(2), 188–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, M. D. (2005). Impact of electricity prices and volumetric water allocation on energy and groundwater demand management: Analysis from Western India. Energy Policy, 33(1), 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Läpple, D. (2010). Adoption and abandonment of organic farming: An empirical investigation of the Irish drystock sector. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(3), 697–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., & Wang, J. (2018). Village-level supply reliability of surface water irrigation in rural China: Effects of climate change. Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences, 379, 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, E., & Ding, C. (2008). Assessing farmland protection policy in China. Land Use Policy, 25(1), 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J. Y., Wang, G., & Zhao, Y. (2004). Regional inequality and labor transfers in China. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 52(3), 587–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M., Yang, L., & Min, Q. (2019). Water-saving irrigation subsidy could increase regional water consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 283–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Huang, J., Wang, J., & Rozelle, S. (2008). Determinants of agricultural water saving technology adoption: An empirical study of 10 provinces of China. Ecological Economics, 4, 462–472.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmar, B., Wang, J., Rozelle, S., Huang, J., & Dawe, D. (2003). China’s agricultural water policy reforms: Increasing investment, resolving conflicts, and revising incentives. Market and trade economics division. Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture. Agriculture Information Bulletin (782).

  • Luo, L., Qin, L., Wang, Y., & Wang, Q. (2016). Environmentally-friendly agricultural practices and their acceptance by smallholder farmers in China—A case study in Xinxiang County, Henan Province. Science of the Total Environment, 571, 737–743.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malik, R. P. S., Giordano, M., & Rathore, M. (2018). The negative impact of subsidies on the adoption of drip irrigation in India: Evidence from Madhya Pradesh. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 34(1), 66–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mango, N., Makate, C., Tamene, L., Mponela, P., & Ndengu, G. (2017). Awareness and adoption of land, soil and water conservation practices in the Chinyanja Triangle, Southern Africa. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 5(2), 122–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marenya, P. P., & Barrett, C. B. (2007). Household-level determinants of adoption of improved natural resources management practices among smallholder farmers in western Kenya. Food Policy, 32(4), 515–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazvimavi, K., & Twomlow, S. (2009). Socioeconomic and institutional factors influencing adoption of conservation farming by vulnerable households in Zimbabwe. Agricultural Systems, 101(1–2), 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molden, D., Oweis, T., Steduto, P., Bindraban, P., Hanjra, M. A., & Kijne, J. (2010). Improving agricultural water productivity: Between optimism and caution. Agricultural Water Management, 97(4), 528–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigussie, Z., Tsunekawa, A., Haregeweyn, N., Adgo, E., Nohmi, M., Tsubo, M., et al. (2017). Factors influencing small-scale farmers’ adoption of sustainable land management technologies in north-western Ethiopia. Land Use Policy, 67, 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niroula, G. S., & Thapa, G. B. (2005). Impacts and causes of land fragmentation, and lessons learned from land consolidation in South Asia. Land Use Policy, 22(4), 358–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norwood, C. A., & Dumler, T. J. (2002). Transition to dryland agriculture. Agronomy Journal, 94(2), 310–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. H., & Luo, Y. (2001). Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational networking in Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), 455–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, K. A., Millar, G. M., Norton, G. J., & Price, A. H. (2018). Alternate wetting and drying in Bangladesh: Water-saving farming practice and the socioeconomic barriers to its adoption. Food and Energy Security, 7(4), e00149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedzisa, T., Rugube, L., Winter-Nelson, A., Baylis, K., & Mazvimavi, K. (2015). Abandonment of conservation agriculture by smallholder farmers in Zimbabwe. Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1), 69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberto, M.-E., María, Á., & G.-V. . (2013). Adopting versus adapting: adoption of water-saving technology versus water conservation habits in Spain. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 29(3), 400–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinyolo, S., Mudhara, M., & Wale, E. (2014). Water security and rural household food security: Empirical evidence from the Mzinyathi district in South Africa. Food Security, 6(4), 483–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J., Folmer, H., & Xue, J. (2016). Adoption of farm-based irrigation water-saving techniques in the Guanzhong plain China. Agricultural Economics, 47(4), 445–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twomlow, S., & Delve, R. (2016). Lessons learnt: Designing and implementing conservation agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa. Rome: IFAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, W. P., & Van Praag, B. M. (1981). The demand for deductibles in private health insurance: A probit model with sample selection. Journal of Econometrics, 17(2), 229–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varghese, S. K., Veettil, P. C., Speelman, S., Buysse, J., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2013). Estimating the causal effect of water scarcity on the groundwater use efficiency of rice farming in South India. Ecological Economics, 86, 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatta, K., Sidhu, R., Lall, U., Birthal, P., Taneja, G., Kaur, B., et al. (2018). Assessing the economic impact of a low-cost water-saving irrigation technology in Indian Punjab: The tensiometer. Water International, 43(2), 305–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Klein, K., Bjornlund, H., Zhang, L., & Zhang, W. (2015). Adoption of improved irrigation scheduling methods in Alberta: An empirical analysis. Canadian Water Resources Journal/Revue canadienne Des ressources Hydriques, 40(1), 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Li, Y., Huang, J., Yan, T., & Sun, T. (2017). Growing water scarcity, food security and government responses in China. Global Food Security, 14, 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watto, M. A., & Mugera, A. W. (2014). Measuring production and irrigation efficiencies of rice farms: evidence from the Punjab Province Pakistan. Asian Economic Journal, 28(3), 301–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Z., Mugera, A. W., Yin, N., & Wang, Y. (2018). Soil conservation practices and production efficiency of smallholder farms in Central China. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 20(4), 1517–1533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, N., Huang, Q., & Wang, Y. (2018). Impacts of off-farm employment on groundwater irrigation in North China. Environment and Development Economics, 23(2), 161–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, N., Huang, Q., Yang, Z., & Wang, Y. (2016). Impacts of off-farm employment on irrigation water efficiency in North China. Water, 8(10), 452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Y., Zhang, J., He, K., & Cheng, L. (2019). Who cares what parents think or do? Observational learning and experience-based learning through communication in rice farmers’ willingness to adopt sustainable agricultural technologies in Hubei Province China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(12), 12522–12536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, B., Fu, Z., Wang, J., & Zhang, L. (2019). Farmers’ adoption of water-saving irrigation technology alleviates water scarcity in metropolis suburbs: A case study of Beijing, China. Agricultural Water Management, 212, 349–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, S., Herzfeld, T., Glauben, T., Zhang, Y., & Hu, B. (2008). Factors affecting Chinese farmers’ decisions to adopt a water-saving technology. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne D’agroeconomie, 56(1), 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the National Social Science Foundation of China (No.16CGL038) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2662020JGPY006).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, Hubei, China

    Shuhong Wang & Zhihai Yang

  2. School of Environment and Natural Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China

    Shuhong Wang

  3. Economic College, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, China

    Ning Yin

Authors
  1. Shuhong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ning Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhihai Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhihai Yang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Shuhong Wang and Zhihai Yang contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, S., Yin, N. & Yang, Z. Factors affecting sustained adoption of irrigation water-saving technologies in groundwater over-exploited areas in the North China Plain. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 10528–10546 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01071-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01071-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation