Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In-depth content analysis of conservation agriculture training programs in Iran based on sustainability dimensions

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conservation agriculture (CA) is a tool of sustainable agriculture utilized in many countries. Sustainable agriculture has different dimensions among which the most important ones are environmental, social, economic, and institutional. Educational and extension programs of CA are in accordance with the principles of sustainable agriculture. Accordingly, educational and extension contents prepared for farmers should include the four dimensions of sustainability (environmental, social, economic, and institutional). The main objective of the present study was to examine the sustainability dimensions in the contents of CA training programs using an in-depth content analysis technique. Educational contents considered here included brochures, extension publications, regulations, and training slides. Based on the literature, themes and sub-themes for each of the four sustainability dimensions were extracted. Then, the frequency of each sub-theme in the CA training contents was counted. The findings showed differing emphasis on the sub-themes of sustainability dimensions in the contents of CA training programs so that the environmental and social dimensions had the highest and lowest frequencies, respectively. As the main principles of CA, no tillage/low tillage, crop rotation, and maintenance of crop residues constituted the sub-themes of the environmental dimension, and the emphasis was placed on this dimension reasonably and expectedly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anand, S. V. (2013). Global environmental issues. Open Access Scientific Reports, 2(2), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ataei, P., Aliabadi, V., Norouzi, A., & Sadighi, H. (2019). Measuring the employees’ environmental attitude of agricultural knowledge-based companies based on sociocultural components: A case study from Iran. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 21(5), 2341–2354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0136-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ataei, P., Khatir, A., Izadi, N., & Frost, K. J. (2018). Environmental Impact Assessment of artificial feeding plans: The Hammami Plain in Iran. International Journal of Environmental Quality, 27, 19–38. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2281-4485/7345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avila, M., Deve, F., & Mundy, P. (2005). Participatory policy development for sustainable agriculture and rural development. Roma: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachev, H. (2013). Management strategies for conservation of natural resources in agriculture. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 4(1), 4–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachev, H. (2016). A framework for assessing sustainability of farming enterprises. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 1(39), 24–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajpai, P. (2017). Chapter 11—Environmental issues and challenges. In P. Bajpai (Ed.), Pulp and paper industry (pp. 221–230). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayala, J., Sileshi, G. W., Coe, R., Kalinganire, A., Tchoundjeu, Z., Sinclair, F., et al. (2012). Cereal yield response to conservation agriculture practices in drylands of West Africa: A quantitative synthesis. Journal of Arid Environments, 78, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.10.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berglund, T., & Gericke, N. (2016). Separated and integrated perspectives on environmental, economic, and social dimensions—An investigation of student views on sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 22(8), 1115–1138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlan, A. (2013). Social sustainability in agriculture: An anthropological perspective on child labour in cocoa production in Ghana. Journal of Development Studies, 49(8), 1088–1100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2013.780041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birmingham, P., & Wilkinson, D. (2003). Using research instruments: A guide for researchers (1st ed.). Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonzanigo, L., Giupponi, C., & Moussadek, R. (2016). Conditions for the adoption of conservation agriculture in central Morocco: An approach based on Bayesian network modelling. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 11(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2016.665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosshaq, M. R., Afzalinia, F., & Moradi, H. (2012). Measuring indicators and determining factors affecting sustainable agricultural development in rural areas—A case study of Ravansar, Iran. International Journal of Agriscience, 2(6), 550–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouder, S. M., & Gomez-Macpherson, H. (2014). The impact of conservation agriculture on smallholder agricultural yields: A scoping review of the evidence. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 187, 11–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burmeister, M., von Döhlen, J., & Eilks, I. (2014). Learning about the different dimensions of sustainability by applying the product test method in science classes. In I. Management Association (Ed.), STEM education: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 594–610). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-7363-2.ch031.

  • Byg, A., & Herslund, L. (2016). Socio-economic changes, social capital and implications for climate change in a changing rural Nepal. GeoJournal, 81(2), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-014-9611-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantero-Martinez, C., Angas, P., & Lampurlanes, J. (2007). Long-term yield and water use efficiency under various tillage systems in Mediterranean rainfed conditions. Annals of Applied Biology, 150(3), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2007.00142.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carew, A. L., & Mitchell, C. A. (2008). Teaching sustainability as a contested concept: Capitalizing on variation in engineering educators’ conceptions of environmental, social and economic sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.11.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casagrande, M., Peigné, J., Payet, V., Mäder, P., Sans, F. X., Blanco-Moreno, J. M., et al. (2016). Organic farmers’ motivations and challenges for adopting conservation agriculture in Europe. Organic Agriculture, 6(4), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-015-0136-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, W. S., & Chen, Y. (2012). Corporate sustainable development: Testing a new scale based on the mainland Chinese context. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(4), 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0983-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, B. A., Miller, K. K., Cooke, R., & White, J. G. (2013). Environmental sustainability in higher education: How do academics teach? Environmental Education Research, 19(3), 385–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cid, P., Carmona, I., Murillo, J. M., & Gomez-Macpherson, H. (2014). No-tillage permanent bed planting and controlled traffic in a maize-cotton irrigated system under Mediterranean conditions: Effects on soil compaction, crop performance and carbon sequestration. European Journal of Agronomy, 61, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2014.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cirella, G. T., & Tao, L. (2010). The index of sustainable functionality: An application for measuring sustainability. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 5(5), 279–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colantonio, A., & Dixon, T. (2009). Measuring socially sustainable, urban regeneration in Europe (pp. 1–129). Oxford: Oxford Institute for Sustainable Development (OISD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawe, G., Jucker, R., & Martin, S. (2005). Sustainable development in higher education: Current practice and future developments, a report for the higher education academy. New York: Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doody, D. G., Kearney, P., Barry, J., Moles, R., & O’Regan, B. (2009). Evaluation of the Q-method as a method of public participation in the selection of sustainable development indicators. Ecological Indicators, 9(6), 1129–1137.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Silva, J. L., Samah, B. A., Uli, J., & Shaffril, H. A. M. (2011). Towards developing a framework on acceptance of sustainable agriculture among contract farming entrepreneurs. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 5(20), 8110–8116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. A. (2012). An introduction to sustainable development. Routledge Perspectives on Development. Published by Routledge, Fourth edition.

  • Esterhuyse, P. (2012). Social capital in a rainwater-harvesting project in rural South Africa. Irrigation and Drainage, 61(SUPPL.2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.1690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gafsi, M., Legagneux, B., Nguyen, G., & Robin, P. (2006). Towards sustainable farming systems: Effectiveness and deficiency of the French procedure of sustainable agriculture. Agricultural Systems, 90(1–3), 226–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2006.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallego-Alvarez, I., Galindo-Villardon, M. P., & Rodriguez-Rosa, M. (2015). Evolution of sustainability indicator worldwide: A study from the economic perspective based on the X-STATICO method. Ecological Indicators, 58, 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golusin, M., & Munitlak Ivanovic, O. (2009). Definition, characteristics and state of the indicators of sustainable development in countries of Southeastern Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 130(1–2), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2008.11.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gwenzi, W., Gotosa, J., Chakanetsa, S., & Mutema, Z. (2009). Effects of tillage systems on soil organic carbon dynamics, structural stability and crop yields in irrigated wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L) rotation in semi-arid Zimbabwe. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 83(3), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-008-9211-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayati, D., Ranjbar, Z., & Karami, E. (2010). Measuring agricultural sustainability. In E. Lichtfouse (Ed.), Biodiversity, biofuels, agroforestry and conservation agriculture, 73, Sustainable agriculture reviews 5 (pp. 73–100). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, K., Zhang, J., Feng, J., Hu, T., & Zhang, L. (2016). The impact of social capital on farmers’ willingness to reuse agricultural waste for sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 24(2), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, M. C., & Keoleian, G. A. (2003). Assessing the sustainability of the US food system: A life cycle perspective. Agricultural Systems, 76(3), 1007–1041. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0308-521x(02)00027-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horrigan, L., Robert, S. L., & Walker, P. (2002). How sustainable agriculture can address the environment and human health harms of industrial agriculture. Environmental Health Perspectives, 110(5), 445–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, F., Gan, Y., Cui, H., Zhao, C., Feng, F., Yin, W., et al. (2016). Intercropping maize and wheat with conservation agriculture principles improves water harvesting and reduces carbon emissions in dry areas. European Journal of Agronomy, 74, 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2015.11.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlimann, A. C. (2009). Responding to environmental challenges: An initial assessment of higher education curricula needs by Australian planning professionals. Environmental Education Research, 15(6), 643–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620903244159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, M. J., & Sutherland, J. W. (2008). An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1688–1698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.06.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IESUK (Institution of Environmental Sciences UK). (2006). Integrating sustainable development principles into professional practice: Initial training requirements for environmental scientist. Report of GEES/PP4SD/IES research project.

  • Izadi, N., Ataei, P., Karimi, H., & Norouzi, A. (2019). Environmental impact assessment of construction of water pumping station in Bacheh Bazar Plain: A case from Iran. International Journal of Environmental Quality, 35, 13–32. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2281-4485/8890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izadi, N., Norouzi, A., & Ataei, P. (2017). Socio-economic, cultural, physical and ecological impact assessment of Kavar irrigation and drainage network in Iran. International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management, 2(4), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijhcum.2017.02.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, L. (2003). The challenge of sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(3), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00073-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagawa, F. (2007). Dissonance in students’ perceptions of sustainable development and sustainability: Implications for curriculum change. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8(3), 317–338. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370710817174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaivo-Oja, J., Panula-Ontto, J., Vehmas, J., & Luukkanen, J. (2014). Relationships of the dimensions of sustainability as measured by the sustainable society index framework. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 21(1), 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khajehshahkoei, A. R., & Abdolzadeh, G. H. (2012). Analyzing determinants of agricultural sustainability of wheat cultivators under rural cooperative productions in Golestan Province. Geographical Planning of Space Quarterly Journal, 2(4), 95–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koocheki, A., Nassiri Mahallati, M., Moradei, R., & Mansoori, H. (2014). Assessing sustainable agriculture development status in Iran and offering of sustainability approaches. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 23(4), 179–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotzé, P. (2016). Water and agriculture: Conservation agriculture: Farming for the future. Water Wheel, 15(2), 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research., 30, 411–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labuschagne, C., Brent, A. C., & van Erck, R. P. G. (2005). Assessing the sustainability performances of industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(4), 373–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, K. M. Y. (2010). Factors affecting sustainability development: High-tech manufacturing firms in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Management Review, 15(4), 619–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, T. B., Blok, V., & Coninx, I. (2016). Barriers to the adoption and diffusion of technological innovations for climate-smart agriculture in Europe: Evidence from the Netherlands, France, Switzerland and Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(Part 1), 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lourdel, N., Gondran, N., Laforest, V., Debray, B., & Brodhag, C. (2007). Sustainable development cognitive map: A new method of evaluating student understanding. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8(2), 170–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madejon, E., Murillo, J. M., Moreno, F., Lopez, M. V., Arrue, J. L., Alvaro-Fuentes, J., et al. (2009). Effect of long-term conservation tillage on soil biochemical properties in Mediterranean Spanish areas. Soil and Tillage Research, 105(1), 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mafongoya, P., Rusinamhodzi, L., Siziba, S., Thierfelder, C., Mvumi, B. M., Nhau, B., et al. (2016). Maize productivity and profitability in Conservation Agriculture systems across agro-ecological regions in Zimbabwe: A review of knowledge and practice. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 220, 211–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazvimavi, K. (2011). Socio-economic analysis of conservation agriculture in South-ern Africa (2nd ed.). Johannesburg: FAO-REOSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melero, S., Lopez-Bellido, R. J., Lopez-Bellido, L., Muñoz-Romero, V., Moreno, F., & Murillo, J. M. (2011). Long-term effect of tillage, rotation and nitrogen fertiliser on soil quality in a Mediterranean Vertisol. Soil and Tillage Research, 114(2), 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mhlanga, B., Cheesman, S., Chauhan, B. S., & Thierfelder, C. (2016). Weed emergence as affected by maize (Zea mays L.)-cover crop rotations in contrasting arable soils of Zimbabwe under conservation agriculture. Crop Protection, 81, 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mhlanga, B., Cheesman, S., Maasdorp, B., Mupangwa, W., & Thierfelder, C. (2017). Relay intercropping and mineral fertilizer effects on biomass production, maize productivity and weed dynamics in contrasting soils under conservation agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Science, 155(6), 876–887.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadzadeh, L., Sadighi, H., & Abbasi, E. (2017). Assessment of farmer-oriented agricultural extension intervention in Iran. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 23(2), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2016.1242429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moradhaseli, S., Ataei, P., & Karimi, H. (2019). Determinants of students’ Pro-environmental attitude of Agricultural College, Tarbiat Modares University. Environmental Researches, 9(18), 285–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moradhaseli, S., Ataei, P., & Norouzi, A. (2017). Analysis of students’ environmental behavior in the Agriculture College of Tarbiat Modares University, Iran (application of Planned Behavior Theory). Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 27(7), 733–742. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2017.1334614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, M. M., Lacasta, C., Meco, R., & Moreno, C. (2011). Rainfed crop energy balance of different farming systems and crop rotations in a semi-arid environment: Results of a long-term trial. Soil and Tillage Research, 114(1), 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nambiar, K. K. M., Gupta, A. P., Fu, Q., & Li, S. (2001). Biophysical, chemical and socio-economic indicators for assessing agricultural sustainability in the Chinese coastal zone. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 87(2), 209–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuendorf, K. A. (2016). The content analysis guidebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nkonya, E., Kaizzi, C., & Pender, J. (2005). Determinants of nutrient balances in a maize farming system in eastern Uganda. Agricultural Systems, 85(2), 155–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1991). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyagumbo, I., Mkuhlani, S., Mupangwa, W., & Rodriguez, D. (2017). Planting date and yield benefits from conservation agriculture practices across Southern Africa. Agricultural Systems, 150, 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olafsson, S., Cook, D., Davidsdottir, B., & Johannsdottir, L. (2014). Measuring countries’ environmental sustainability performance—A review and case study of Iceland. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 934–948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omann, I., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2002). Assessing social sustainability, the social dimension of sustainability in a socio-economic scenario. Presented at the 7th Biennial Conference of the International Society for Ecological Economics, Sousse, Tunisia.

  • Pannell, D. J., & Glenn, N. A. (2000). A framework for the economic evaluation and selection of sustainability indicators in agriculture. Ecological Economics, 33(1), 135–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfahl, S. (2005). Institutional sustainability. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1/2), 80–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccoli, I., Chiarini, F., Carletti, P., Furlan, L., Lazzaro, B., Nardi, S., et al. (2016). Disentangling the effects of conservation agriculture practices on the vertical distribution of soil organic carbon. Evidence of poor carbon sequestration in North- Eastern Italy. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 230, 68–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourtaheri, M., Eftekhari, A. R., & Fatahi, A. (2011). Assessment quality of life (QLA) in rural areas (case study: Northern Khâvé Village, Lorestan Province). Human Geography Research Quarterly, 43(2), 13–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powlson, D. S., Stirling, C. M., Thierfelder, C., White, R. P., & Jat, M. L. (2016). Does conservation agriculture deliver climate change mitigation through soil carbon sequestration in tropical agro-ecosystems? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 220, 164–174.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prevost, P. (1996). Environment, complexity and professional training in agriculture “turning local learning into global knowledge”. European Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 2(4), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/13892249685300051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, H. J., Zhu, W. B., Wang, H. B., & Cheng, X. (2007). Analysis and design of agricultural sustainability indicators system. Agricultural Sciences in China, 6(4), 475–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qu, Y., Liu, Y., Nayak, R. R., & Li, M. (2015). Sustainable development of eco-industrial parks in China: Effects of managers’ environmental awareness on the relationships between practice and performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 87(1), 328–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, F., Littledyke, M., & Taylor, N. (2015). Issues and dimensions of sustainability. In N. Taylor, F. Quinn, & C. Eames (Eds.), Educating for sustainability in primary schools: Teaching for the future (pp. 15–31). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raeisi, A. A., Bijani, M., & Chizari, M. (2018). The mediating role of environmental emotions in transition from knowledge to sustainable behavior toward exploit groundwater resources in Iran’s agriculture. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 6(2), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2018.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasul, G., & Thapa, G. B. (2003). Sustainability analysis of ecological and conventional agricultural systems in Bangladesh. World Development, 31(10), 1721–1741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasul, G., & Thapa, G. B. (2004). Sustainability of ecological and conventional agricultural systems in Bangladesh: An assessment based on environmental, economic and social perspectives. Agricultural Systems, 79(3), 327–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0308-521x(03)00090-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravanbakhsh, M. (2013). Iran situation in environmental sustainable development. Environment and Development Journal, 4(7), 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, P. R., Jalal, K. F., & Boyd, J. A. (2008). An introduction to sustainable development. London: Glen Educational Foundation Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Girón, V., Serrano, A., Suarez, M., Hernanz, J. L., & Navarrete, L. (2007). Economics of reduced tillage for cereal and legume production on rainfed farm enterprises of different sizes in semiarid conditions. Soil and Tillage Research, 95(1–2), 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segalas, J. (2009). Engineering education for a sustainable future. Ph.D. dissertation, Technical University of Catalonia, Spain.

  • Seufert, V. (2019). Comparing yields: Organic versus conventional agriculture. In P. Ferranti, E. M. Berry, & J. R. Anderson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of food security and sustainability (pp. 196–208). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A. R., Jat, M. L., Saharawat, Y. S., Singh, V. P., & Singh, R. (2012). Conservation agriculture for improving productivity and resource-use efficiency: Prospects and research needs in Indian context. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 57(IAC Special Issue), 131–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shetto, R., & Owenya, M. (2007). Conservation agriculture as practised in Tanzania: Three case studies. Nairobi. African Conservation Tillage Network, Centre de Coopération Internationale de Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (p. 11).

  • Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2012). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 15(1), 281–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg, J. H. (2002). Institutional sustainability indicators: An analysis of the institutions in Agenda 21 and a draft set of indicators for monitoring their effectivity. Sustainable Development, 10(2), 103–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparovek, G., Barretto, A. G. D. O. P., Matsumoto, M., & Berndes, G. (2015). Effects of governance on availability of land for agriculture and conservation in Brazil. Environmental Science and Technology, 49(17), 10285–10293.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stal, H. I. (2015). Inertia and change related to sustainability—An institutional approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 99, 354–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirol-Padre, A., Rai, M., Kumar, V., Gathala, M., Sharma, P. C., Sharma, S., et al. (2016). Water and agriculture: Conservation agriculture: Farming for the future. Water Wheel, 15(2), 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres, J., Valera, D. L., Belmonte, L. J., & Herrero-Sánchez, C. (2016). Economic and social sustainability through organic agriculture: Study of the restructuring of the citrus sector in the “Bajo Andarax” District (Spain). Sustainability (Switzerland), 8(9), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDESA (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs). (2000). Testing the CSD indicators of sustainable development: Interim analysis: Testing process, indicators and methodology sheets. Technical Paper prepared by the Division for Sustainable Development, 25 January 1999, and United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2000. UN CSD Theme Framework and Indicators of Sustainability, Final Draft, Price Waterhouse Coopers for Division for Sustainable Development, November 2000 (p. 18).

  • UNDESA. (2001). Indicators of sustainable development: framework and methodologies. Commission on Sustainable Development. Ninth session.16–27 April 2001, New York. UNDESA, New York.

  • Valizadeh, N., Bijani, M., Hayati, D., & Fallah Haghighi, N. (2019). Social-cognitive conceptualization of Iranian farmers’ water conservation behavior. Hydrogeology Journal, 27(4), 1131–1142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-018-01915-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Cauwenbergh, N., Biala, K., Bielders, C., Brouckaert, V., Franchois, L., Garcia Cidad, V., et al. (2007). SAFE—A hierarchical framework for assessing the sustainability of agricultural systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 120(2–4), 229–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Pelt, R. S., Hushmurodov, S. X., Baumhardt, R. L., Chappell, A., Nearing, M. A., Polyakov, V. O., et al. (2017). The reduction of partitioned wind and water erosion by conservation agriculture. CATENA, 148, 160–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanlauwe, B., Wendt, J., Giller, K. E., Corbeels, M., Gerard, B., & Nolte, C. (2014). A fourth principle is required to define Conservation Agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa: The appropriate use of fertilizer to enhance crop productivity. Field Crops Research, 155, 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whateley, S., Palmer, R. N., & Brown, C. (2015). Seasonal hydroclimatic forecasts as innovations and the challenges of adoption by water managers. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 141(5), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhen, L., & Routray, J. K. (2003). Operational indicators for measuring agricultural sustainability in developing countries. Environmental Management, 32(1), 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pouria Ataei.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ataei, P., Sadighi, H., Chizari, M. et al. In-depth content analysis of conservation agriculture training programs in Iran based on sustainability dimensions. Environ Dev Sustain 22, 7215–7237 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00484-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00484-4

Keywords

Navigation