Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Consumer knowledge about food production systems and their purchasing behavior

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Food purchasing behaviors are influenced by a range of factors, including health and the environmental impact of unique food production systems. There is ambiguity about the exact long-term large-scale impact of systems utilizing organic methods, genetically modified organisms (GMOs), and conventional farming methods. There is a great deal of variance in consumer knowledge because of this ambiguity. This study aimed to assess consumers’ familiarity with these food production systems, to understand the perceived environmental impact of each, and to assess how different perceptions impact food purchasing. A survey administered to 123 New Jersey residents revealed large levels of uncertainty about perceived environmental impact of conventional foods (26.0%) and GMOs (26.8%), with a smaller number of people expressing uncertainty about organic food impact (14.6%). Consumers who believed organic food was beneficial allowed these beliefs to impact purchasing more often than those who were unsure (H(3) = 21.417, p < 0.01). Similarly, those who believed GMOs were harmful to the environment allowed this belief to impact purchasing more than those who believed they have a beneficial effect (p < 0.05), believe they have no effect (p < 0.01), or are unsure of the effect (H(3) = 37.476, p < 0.01). Overall, beliefs about organic food production impacted purchasing more frequently than beliefs about GMO food production (p < 0.01). These findings indicate a need for greater consumer education to eliminate uncertainty, as strong beliefs about environmental impact may have the ability to influence consumer purchasing decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blake, P. (2016). Obama signs bill mandating GMO labeling. Retrieved 15 Sept 2016, from ABC News. http://abcnews.go.com/US/obama-signs-bill-mandating-gmo-labeling/story?id=41004057.

  • Bravo, P. B., Cordts, A., Schulze, B., & Spiller, A. (2013). Assessing determinants of organic food consumption using data from the German National Nutrition Survey II. Food Quality and Preference, 28, 60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanigro, M., Kroll, S., Thilmany, D., & Bunning, M. (2014). Is it love for local/organic or hate for conventional? Asymmetric effects of information and taste on label preferences in an experimental auction. Food Quality and Preference, 31, 94–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, K., & Burke, K. J. (2013). The influence of ethical values and food choice motivations on intentions to purchase sustainably sourced foods. Appetite, 69, 37–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glanz, K. (2015). Theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, and the integrated behavioral model. In K. Viswanath (Ed.), Health Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practice. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=9BQWCgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA95&dq=theory+of+planned+behavior&ots=ecQ31jvQ6Z&sig=_nH8Beu2K06J8YbOzaE5dftQYak#v=onepage&q=theory%20of%20planned%20behavior&f=false

  • Gold, M. V. (2007). Sustainable agriculture: Definitions and terms. In: Special Reference Briefs Series No. SRB 99-02. [WWW document]. https://www.nal.usda.gov/afsic/sustainable-agriculture-definitions-and-terms-related-terms#term4. Accessed 15 June 2016.

  • Hwang, J. (2016). Organic food as self-presentation: The role of psychological motivation in older consumers’ purchase intention of organic food. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 28, 281–287.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kareklas, I., Carlson, J. R., & Muehling, D. D. (2014). “I eat organic for my benefit and yours”: Egoistic and altruistic considerations for purchasing organic food and their implications for advertising strategists. Journal of Advertising, 43, 18–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. G., & Jang, S. Y. (2014). Application of the theory of planned behavior to genetically modified foods: Moderating effects of food technology neophobia. Food Research International, 62, 947–954. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2014.03.057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. S., Choe, Y. C., & Park, S. H. (2015). Measuring the environmental effects of organic farming: A meta-analysis of structural variables in empirical research. Journal of Environmental Management, 162, 263–274.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lockie, S., Lyons, K., Lawrence, G., & Grice, J. (2014). Choosing organics: A path analysis of factors underlying the selection of organic food among Australian consumers. Appetite, 43, 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, M. S., Stoessel, F., Jungbluth, N., Juraske, R., Schader, C., & Stolze, M. (2015). Environmental impacts of organic and conventional agricultural products: Are the differences captured by life cycle assessment? Journal of Environmental Management, 149, 193–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Genetically engineered crops: Experiences and prospects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/23395.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, P. P., Kumar, B. B., & Tiwari, D. K. (2010). Environmental considerations concerning the release of genetically modified organisms. Proenvironment Promediu, 3, 381–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prati, G. (2012). The prediction of intention to consume genetically modified food: Test of an integrated psychosocial model. Food Quality Preference, 25, 163–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranganathan, J., Vennard, D., Waite, R., Dumas, P., Lipinski, B., Searchinger, T., & Globagri-WRR Model Authors. (2016). Shifting diets for a sustainable food future. World Resources Institute. [WWW document]. http://www.wri.org/sites/default/files/Shifting_Diets_for_a_Sustainable_Food_Future_0.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2016.

  • Tobler, C., Vischers, V. H. M., & Siegrist, M. (2011). Eating green. Consumers’ willingness to adopt ecological food consumption behaviors. Appetite, 57, 674–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomisto, H. L., Hodge, I. D., Riordan, P., & Macdonald, D. W. (2012). Does organic farming reduce environmental impacts? A meta-analysis of European research. Journal of Environmental Management, 112, 309–320.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van den Bergh, J. C., & Holley, J. M. (2002). An environmental–economic assessment of genetic modification of agricultural crops. Futures, 34, 807–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vecchione, M., Feldman, C., & Wunderlich, S. (2015). Consumer knowledge and attitudes about genetically modified food products and labeling policy. International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition, 66, 329–335.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wee, C. S., Ariff, M. S. B., Zakuan, N., Tajudin, M. N. M., Ismail, K., et al. (2014). Consumers perception, purchase intention and actual purchase behavior of organic food products. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 3, 378–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worsley, A., Wang, W. C., & Burton, M. (2015). Food concerns and support for environmental food policies and purchasing. Appetite, 91, 48–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich, S., & Gatto, K. A. (2015). Consumer perception of genetically modified organisms and sources of information. Advanced Nutrition, 13, 842–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich, S. M., & Gatto, K. A. (2016). Consumers’ food choices and the role of perceived environmental impact. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 11(6), 989–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. S. (2016). Intention to purchase organic food among young consumers: Evidences from a developing nation. Appetite, 96, 122–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zagata, L. (2014). Towards conscientious food consumption: Exploring the values of Czech organic food consumers. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38, 243–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shahla Wunderlich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wunderlich, S., Gatto, K. & Smoller, M. Consumer knowledge about food production systems and their purchasing behavior. Environ Dev Sustain 20, 2871–2881 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-0021-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-0021-y

Keywords

Navigation