Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Farm-scale adaptation under extreme climate and rapid economic transition

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims to analyse what shapes farmers’ vulnerability and adaptation strategies in the context of rapid change. Xinjiang is semi-arid, with extremes of temperature, growing seasons and winds. Favourable socioeconomic conditions have boosted the wellbeing of farmers in the past decades. Interviews with forty-seven farmers led to the categorization of five groups according to the predominant type of farming activity: animal farmers, government farmers (leasing land from the Xinjiang Production and Construction Group), crop farmers, agri-tourism operators and entrepreneurs. High government support has aided farmers to deal with climate challenges, through advanced technology, subsidies and loans. Farmers, however, greatly contribute to their own high adaptive capacity through inventiveness, flexibility and a high knowledge base. Although the future climate will entail hotter temperatures, farmers can be seen as generally well equipped to deal with these challenges because of the high adaptive capacity they currently have and utilize. Those that are most vulnerable are those that have difficulty to access credit e.g. animal farmers and those that do not want to change their agricultural systems e.g. from pastoral lifestyles to include tourism-based operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger, W. N. (1999). Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in coastal Vietnam. World Development, 27(2), 242–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 268–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger, W. N., Eakin, H., & Winkels, A. (2009). Nested and teleconnected vulnerabilities to environmental change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(3), 150–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger, W. N., & Kelly, P. (1999). Social vulnerability to climate change and the architecture of entitlements. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 4, 253–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger, N., & Vincent, K. (2005). Uncertainty in adaptive capacity. Compus Rendus Geoscience, 337, 399–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belliveau, S., Smit, B., & Bradshaw, B. (2006). Multiple exposures and dynamic vulnerability: Evidence from the grape industry in the Okanagan Valley, Canada. Global Environmental Change, 16, 364–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Below, T. B., Mutabazi, K. D., Kirschke, D., Franke, C., Sieber, S., Siebert, R., et al. (2012). Can farmers’ adaptation to climate change be explained by socioeconomic household-level variables? Global Environmental Change, 22, 223–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X. (2009). Review of China’s agricultural and rural development: Policy changes and current issue. China Agricultural Economic Review, 1(2), 121–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., & Sun, J. (2009). How the “Best” models project the future precipitation change in China. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 26(4), 773–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deressa, T. T., Hassan, R. M., Ringler, E., Alemu, T., & Yesuf, M. (2009). Determinants of farmers´ choice of adaptation methods to climate change in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia. Global Environmental Change, 19, 248–255.

  • Eakin, H. (2005). Institutional change, climate risk, and rural vulnerability: Cases from Central Mexico. World Development, 33(11), 1923–1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, S., Aldunce, P., Bahinipati, C. S., D’Almeida Martins, R., Molefe, J. I., Nhemachena, C., et al. (2011). When not every response to climate change is a good one: Identifying principles for sustainable adaptation. Climate and Development, 2, 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, L., Wu Zhou, B., Li, T., & Luo, J. (2011). Projection of future precipitation change over China with a high-resolution global atmospheric model. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 28(2), 464–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gale, F., Lohmar, B., & Tuan, F. (2005). China’s new farm subsidies. USDA Outlook WRS-05-01. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C.

  • Gallopin, G. C. (2006). Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 16, 293–303.

  • Guo, H., & Jolly, R. W. (2008). Contractual arrangements and enforcement in transition agriculture: Theory and evidence from China. Food Policy, 33, 570–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hageback, J., Sundberg, J., Ostwald, M., Chen, D., Yun, X., & Knutson, P. (2005). Climate variability and land-use change in Danangou watershed, China-examples of small-scale farmers adaptation. Climatic Change, 72, 189–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hisali, E., Birungi, P., & Buyinza, F. (2011). Adaptation to climate change in Uganda: Evidence from micro level data. Global Environmental Change, 21, 1245–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjerpe, M., & Glaas, E. (2012). Evolving local climate adaptation strategies: Incorporating influences of socio-economic stress. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 17(5), 471–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., Wang, X., Zhi, H., Huang, Z., & Rozelle, S. (2011). Subsidies and distortions in China’s agriculture: Evidence from producer-level data. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 55, 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. (1997). Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leichenko, R., & O’Brien, K. (2002). The dynamics of rural vulnerability to global change: The case of southern Africa. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 7, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leichenko, R., & O’Brien, K. L. (2008). Environmental change and glob alization: Double exposures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, L., Bai, L., Yao, Y., Yang, Q., & Zhao, X. (2013). Patterns of climate Change in Xinjiang projected by IPCC SRES. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 4(1), 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Qi, G., Xu, X., & Mao, M. (2008). Pro-smallholders’ agricultural science and technology policies in China. China Soft Science, 10, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Li, X., Zhang, Q., Guo, Y., Gao, G., & Wang, J. (2010). Simulation of regional temperature and precipitation in the past 50 years and the next 30 years over China. Quaternary International, 212, 57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, N. (2010). Understanding social resilience to climate variability in primary enterprises and industries. Global Environmental Change, 20, 36–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, K., & Durham, W. (2012). Farm-scale adaptation and vulnerability to environmental stresses: Insights from winegrowing in Northern California. Global Environmental Change, 22, 483–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niu, R. F. (2006). Industrialized management of Agriculture in China: Observations and comments. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 3, 8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, K., & Leichenko, R. (2000). Double exposure: Assessing the impacts of climate change within the context of economic globalization. Global Environmental Change, 10, 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, K., Leichenko, R., Kelkar, U., Venerna, H., Aandahl, G., Tompkins, H., et al. (2004). Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: Climate change and globalization in India. Global Environmental Change, 14, 303–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostwald, M., Simelton, E., Chen, D., & Liu, A. (2007). Relation between vegetation changes, climate variables and land use policy in Shaanxi Province. China, Geographical Annals, 89(A4), 223–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, C. M., & Robinson, G. M. (2013). Factors affecting rural landholders’ adaptation to climate change: Insights from formal institutions and communities of practice. Global Environmental Change, 23, 103–114.

  • Rozelle, S., & Swinnen, J. (2004). Success and failure of reform: Insights from the transition of agriculture. Journal of Economic Literature, 42, 404–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Y. (2009). The social and environmental costs associated with water management in state environmental protection projects in Xinjiang. Environmental Science & Policy, 12, 970–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Y., Shen, Y., Kang, E., Li, D., Ding, Y., Zhang, G., et al. (2007). Recent and future climate change in northwest China. Climatic Change, 80, 379–393.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smit, B., & Skinner, M. (2002). Adaptation options in agriculture to climate change: A typology. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 7, 85–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urwin, K., & Jordan, A. (2008). Does public policy support or undermine climate change adaptation? Exploring policy interplay across different scales of governance. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 180–191.

  • Wandel, J., & Smit, B. (2000). Agricultural risk management in light of climate variability. In H. Millward, K. Beesly, B. Ilbery, & L. Harrington (Eds.), Agricultural and Environmental Sustainability in the New Countryside (pp. 30–39). Winnipeg: Hignell Printing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, S., Zuo, A., & Björnlund, H. (2013). Farmers’ climate change beliefs and adaptation strategies for a water scarce future in Australia. Global Environmental Change, 23, 537–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Z., Zhang, H., Krause, C. M., & Cobb, N. S. (2010). Climate change and human activities: A case study in Xinjiang, China. Climatic Change, 99, 457–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, C., Chen, Y., Yang, Y., Hao, X., & Shen, Y. (2010). Hydrology and water resources variation and its response to regional climate change in Xinjiang. Journal of Geographic Sciences, 20(4), 599–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yegbemey, R. N., Yabi, J. A., Tovignan, S. D., Gantoli, G., Sènakpon, E., & Kokoye, H. (2013). Farmers’ decisions to adapt to climate change under various property rights: A case study of maize farming in northern Benin (West Africa). Land Use Policy, 34, 168–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H., Wu, J. W., Zheng, Q. H., & Yu, Y. J. (2003). A preliminary study of oasis evolution in the Tarim Basin, Xinjiang, China. Journal of Arid Environments, 55, 545–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the support of the Swedish International Development Agency and Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2010DFA32520) for funding this project and the staff at the Institute of Desert Meteorology, the Chinese Meteorological Authority, Urumqi and the Key Oasis Eco-agriculture Laboratory, Xinjiang Production and Construction Group, Shihezi University, Shihezi, as well as the farmers and managers who gave their time to aid us in this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie Wilk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wilk, J., Hjerpe, M., Yang, W. et al. Farm-scale adaptation under extreme climate and rapid economic transition. Environ Dev Sustain 17, 393–407 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9549-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9549-2

Keywords

Navigation