Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Improved Rating System for Assessing Surface Water Contamination Potential from MSW Landfills

  • Published:
Environmental Modeling & Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Leachate emission from uncontrolled municipal solid waste landfills (referred to as waste sites in the present study) is a major threat to the environment and living beings in its vicinity. Surface water contamination potential resulting from leachate may be used as one of the criteria for prioritization of sites for remediation purposes. The existing hazard rating systems that prioritize waste sites considering surface water contamination potential as one of the criteria are mainly suited for the developed countries where these were developed initially. In developing countries like India, the set of conditions differ from those in developed countries, and therefore the existing systems may not be suitable for developing countries. Thus in the present study, an improved system is proposed to assess surface water contamination potential from MSW sites. The system is based on the concept of Source, Pathway and Receptor. The proposed system employs parameters derived from the review of existing rating systems and selects their best and worst values based on literature review, design standards and field conditions. The importance weights of the system parameters have been decided based on expert judgment using Delphi technique. Sensitivity analysis of the system shows that the improved system is more sensitive than the existing systems for the site conditions encountered in developing countries. Monte Carlo analysis of the proposed system confirms the spread of the scores obtained from the system over the full scale of 0–1000. The improved system is compared with existing systems by applying it to waste sites from metropolitan cities of India and performing clustering analysis on the rating scores. The clustering analysis shows that the rating scores from the improved system are less clustered as compared to the scores from the existing systems. This demonstrates that the improved system makes a better tool to distinctly prioritize the waste sites for remediation purpose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jhamnani, B., Singh, S. (2009). Groundwater contamination due to Bhalaswa landfill site in New Delhi. International Journal of Environmental Science Engineering, 121–125.

  2. Papadopoulou, M. P., Karatzas, G. P., & Bougioukou, G. G. (2007). Numerical modelling of the environmental impact of landfill leachate leakage on groundwater quality—a field application. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 12, 43–54. doi:10.1007/s10666-006-9050-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Page, G. W. (1981). Comparison of groundwater and surface water for patterns and levels of contamination by toxic substances. Environmental Science and Technology, 15, 1475–1481.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pastor, J., & Hernández, A. J. (2012). Heavy metals, salts and organic residues in old solid urban waste landfills and surface waters in their discharge areas: determinants for restoring their impact. Journal of Environmental Management, 95, S42–S49. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.048.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rowe, R. K. (2012). Third Indian geotechnical society: Ferroco Terzaghi oration design and construction of barrier systems to minimize environmental impacts due to municipal solid waste leachate and gas. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 42, 223–256. doi:10.1007/s40098-012-0024-4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sharma, A., Meesa, S., Pant, S., Alappat, B. J., & Kumar, D. (2008). Formulation of a landfill pollution potential index to compare pollution potential of uncontrolled landfills. Waste Management & Research, 26, 474–483. doi:10.1177/0734242X07086515.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Thomsen, N. I., Milosevic, N., & Bjerg, P. L. (2012). Application of a contaminant mass balance method at an old landfill to assess the impact on water resources. Waste Management, 32, 2406–2417. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.06.014.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yusof, N., Haraguchi, A., Hassan, M. A., Othman, M. R., Wakisaka, M., & Shirai, Y. (2009). Measuring organic carbon, nutrients and heavy metals in rivers receiving leachate from controlled and uncontrolled municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills. Waste Management, 29, 2666–2680. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2009.05.022.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nixon, W. B., & Murphy, R. J. (1998). Waste site hazard assessment: a taxonomy of current methods and criteria. Environmental Engineering and Policy, 1, 59–74. doi:10.1007/s100220050006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Singh, R. K., Datta, M., & Nema, A. K. (2009). A new system for groundwater contamination hazard rating of landfills. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 344–357. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.09.003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. MHA (2011). Census of India 2011, urban agglomerations and cities definitions. New Delhi, India

  12. USEPA (1982). Uncontrolled hazardous waste site ranking system. A Users Manual. OSWER Directive 9355.0-03.

  13. Wu, J., & Hilger, H. (1984). Evaluation of EPA’s hazard ranking system. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 110, 797–807.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. USEPA (1990). Hazard ranking system, final rule December 14, 1990.

  15. Department of Natural Resources (2001).Wisconsin Administrative Code, Chapter NR 710, Site discovery, screening and ranking , Register September 2007 No. 621.

  16. Ministry for the Environment (NZ). (2004). Risk screening system, contaminated land management guidelines no. 3. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ministry for the Environment (NZ) (2002). Risk assessment for small closed landfill. Prepared for Ministry of the Environment (New Zealand).

  18. National Research Council (1994). Ranking hazardous-waste sites for remedial action. National Academic Press.

  19. Science Applications International Corporation (1990). Washington ranking method scoring manual. Olympia, Washington.

  20. CCME (2008). CCME National Classification System for Contaminated Sites. Winnipeg, Canada.

  21. DOE (1996). National Corrective Action Prioritization System (NCAPS): RCRA information brief EH-413-070/1296 [December 1996 (updated 3/97)].

  22. National Productivity Council (2003). Hazard potential rating of existing municipal solid waste dump sites. A report prepared for Central Pollution Control Board, New Delhi, India.

  23. Joseph, K., Esakku, S., Nagendran, R., Visvanathan, C. (2005). A decision making tool for dumpsite rehabilitation in developing countries. Proc. Tenth Int. Waste Manag. Landfill Symp. Sardinia

  24. Hagemeister, B. M. E., Jones, D. D., Woldt, W. E., & Member, A. (1996). Hazard ranking of landfills using fuzzy composite programming. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 122, 248–258.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kumar, A., Datta, M., Nema, A.K., Singh, R.K. (2015). Contaminated sites in India : challenges and recent initiatives for MSW disposal sites. Contam. Sites Bratislava 2015. (pp. 151–156).

  26. Castañeda, S. S., Sucgang, R. J., Almoneda, R. V., Mendoza, N. D. S., & David, C. P. C. (2012). Environmental isotopes and major ions for tracing leachate contamination from a municipal landfill in Metro Manila, Philippines. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 110, 30–37. doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2012.01.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Karak, T., Bhattacharyya, P., Das, T., Paul, R. K., & Bezbaruah, R. (2013). Non-segregated municipal solid waste in an open dumping ground: a potential contaminant in relation to environmental health. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 10, 503–518. doi:10.1007/s13762-013-0184-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mangimbulude, J. C., Van Breukelen, B. M., Krave, A. S., Van Straalen, N. M., & Röling, W. F. M. (2009). Seasonal dynamics in leachate hydrochemistry and natural attenuation in surface run-off water from a tropical landfill. Waste Management, 29, 829–838. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2008.06.020.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Komilis, D., & Athiniotou, A. (2014). A water budget model for operating landfills: an application in Greece. Waste Management & Research. doi:10.1177/0734242X14545505.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Montgomery, R.J., Parsons, L.J. (1989). The Omega hills final cover test plot study: three-year data summary. Annu. Meet. Natl. Solid Waste Manag. Assoc.

  31. Corser, P., & Cranston, P. (1991). Observations on long-term performance of composite clay liners and covers. Vancouver: Geosynth. Des, Performance.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Corser, P., Pellicer, J., Cranston, M. (1992). Observation on long-term performance of composite clay liners and covers. Geotechnical Fabric Report, 6–16.

  33. Melchior, S., Berger, K., Vielhaver, B., Miehlich, G. (1994). Multilayered landfill covers: Field data on the water balance and liner performance. In G.W.G. Wing & N.R. (ed.), In-situ remediat. Sci. Basis Curr. Futur (pp. 4111–4425). Columbus, Ohio: Technol. Battelle Press.

  34. Soh, I. E., & Hettiaratchi, J. P. (2009). Potential lateral migration of leachate in flushing bioreactor landfills during aggressive leachate recirculation. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, Radioactive Waste Management, 13, 174–178. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-025X(2009)13:3(174).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rowe, R.K., Yu, Y. (2010). Factors affecting the clogging of leachate collection systems in MSW landfills. Proc. 6th Int. Congr. Environ. Geotech. 2010, New Delhi, India.

  36. Franzini, J.B., Finnemore, E.J. (1997). Fluid mechanics with engineering applications. McGraw-Hill.

  37. Aivalioti, M. V., & Karatzas, G. P. (2005). Modeling the flow and leachate transport in the vadose and saturated zones of a municipal landfill. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 11, 81–87. doi:10.1007/s10666-005-9012-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fleming, I.R., Barone, F.S., Dewaele, P.J. (2010). Case study—clogging of a geotextile/geopipe system in a landfill drainage application. Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Geosynth (pp. 1127–1130).

  39. Singh, R. K., Datta, M., Nema, A. K., & Pérez, I. V. (2013). Evaluating groundwater contamination hazard rating of municipal solid waste landfills in India and Europe using a new system. Journal of Hazardous, Toxic and Radioactive Waste, 17, 62–73. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Housing and Urban Development Corporation (HUDCO) for extending the financial support to this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India

    Amit Kumar, Manoj Datta & Arvind K. Nema

  2. Housing and Urban Development Corporation Ltd., India Habitat Center, Lodhi Rd., New Delhi, 110003, India

    R. K. Singh

Authors
  1. Amit Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Manoj Datta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Arvind K. Nema
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. K. Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amit Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, A., Datta, M., Nema, A.K. et al. An Improved Rating System for Assessing Surface Water Contamination Potential from MSW Landfills. Environ Model Assess 21, 489–505 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-015-9493-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-015-9493-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation