Abstract
An important component of wildlife management and conservation is monitoring the health and population size of wildlife species. Monitoring the population size of an animal group can inform researchers of habitat use, potential changes in habitat and resulting behavioral adaptations, individual health, and the effectiveness of conservation efforts. Arboreal monkeys are difficult to monitor as their habitat is often poorly accessible and most monkey species have some degree of camouflage, making them hard to observe in and below the tree canopy. Surveys conducted using uninhabited aerial vehicles (UAVs) equipped with thermal infrared (TIR) cameras can help overcome these limitations by flying above the canopy and using the contrast between the warm body temperature of the monkeys and the cooler background vegetation, reducing issues with impassable terrain and animal camouflage. We evaluated the technical and procedural elements associated with conducting UAV-TIR surveys for arboreal and terrestrial macaque species. Primary imaging missions and analyses were conducted over a monkey park housing approximately 160 semi-free-ranging Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata). We demonstrate Repeat Station Imaging (RSI) procedures using co-registered TIR image pairs facilitate the use of image differencing to detect targets that were moving during rapid sequence imaging passes. We also show that 3D point clouds may be generated from highly overlapping UAV-TIR image sets in a forested setting using structure from motion (SfM) image processing techniques. A point cloud showing area-wide elevation values was generated from TIR imagery, but it lacked sufficient point density to reliably determine the 3D locations of monkeys.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Burke, C., Rashman, M. F., Longmore, S. N., McAree, O., Glover-Kapfer, P., Ancrenaz, M., & Wich, S. A. (2019). Successful observation of orangutans in the wild with thermal-equipped drones. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems, 7(3), 235–257. https://doi.org/10.1139/juvs-2018-0035
Campbell, G., Head, J., Junker, J., Nekaris, K. A. I., Wich, S., & Marshall, A. (2016). Primate abundance and distribution: Background concepts and methods. An introduction to primate conservation, pp.79–110.
Coulter, L. L., Stow, D. A., Lippitt, C. D., & Fraley, G. W. (2015). Repeat station imaging for rapid airborne change detection. In C. D. Lippitt, D. A. Stow, & L. L. Coulter (Eds.), Time-sensitive remote sensing (pp. 29–43). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2602-2_3
Ditmer, M. A., Vincent, J. B., Werden, L. K., Tanner, J. C., Laske, T. G., Iaizzo, P. A., Garshelis, D. L., & Fieberg, J. R. (2015). Bears show a physiological but limited behavioral response to unmanned aerial vehicles. Current Biology, 25(17), 2278–2283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.024
Gonzalez, L. F., Montes, G. A., Puig, E., Johnson, S., Mengersen, K., & Gaston, K. J. (2016). Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and artificial intelligence revolutionizing wildlife monitoring and conservation. Sensors, 16(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16010097
He, G., Yang, H., Pan, R., Sun, Y., Zheng, P., Wang, J., Jin, X., Zhang, J., Li, B., & Guo, S. (2020). Using unmanned aerial vehicles with thermal-image acquisition cameras for animal surveys: A case study on the Sichuan snub-nosed monkey in the Qinling Mountains. Integrative Zoology, 15(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/1749-4877.12410
Kays, R., Sheppard, J., Mclean, K., Welch, C., Paunescu, C., Wang, V., Kravit, G., & Crofoot, M. (2019). Hot monkey, cold reality: Surveying rainforest canopy mammals using drone-mounted thermal infrared sensors. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 40(2), 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1523580
Kutsukake, N., & Castles, D. L. (2001). Reconciliation and variation in post-conflict stress in Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata fuscata): Testing the integrated hypothesis. Animal Cognition, 4(3–4), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-001-0119-2
Loerch, A., Paulus, G., & Lippitt, C. (2018). Volumetric change detection with using structure from motion – The impact of repeat station imaging. Gi_forum. https://doi.org/10.1553/giscience2018_01_s135
Mulero-Pázmány, M., Jenni-Eiermann, S., Strebel, N., Sattler, T., Negro, J. J., & Tablado, Z. (2017). Unmanned aircraft systems as a new source of disturbance for wildlife: A systematic review. PLoS ONE, 12(6), e0178448. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178448
Oishi, Y., Oguma, H., Tamura, A., Nakamura, R., & Matsunaga, T. (2018). Animal detection using thermal images and its required observation conditions. Remote Sensing, 10(7), 1050. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10071050
Pflüger, L. S., Pink, K. E., Wallner, B., Radler, C., Dorner, M., & Huffman, M. A. (2021). Twenty-three-year demographic history of the Affenberg Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata), a translocated semi-free-ranging group in southern Austria. Primates; Journal of Primatology, 62(5), 761–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-021-00928-4
Plumptre, A. J., Sterling, E. J., & Buckland, S. T. (2013). Primate census and survey techniques (pp. 10–26). A handbook of techniques. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Pomeroy, P., O’Connor, L., & Davies, P. (2015). Assessing use of and reaction to unmanned aerial systems in gray and harbor seals during breeding and molt in the UK. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems, 3(3), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1139/juvs-2015-0013
Ritika, R., & Kaur, S. (2013). Contrast enhancement techniques for images—A visual analysis. International Journal of Computer Applications, 64(17), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.5120/10727-5679
Rublee, E., Rabaud, V., Konolige, K., & Bradski, G. (2011). ORB: An efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126544
Schino, G., Scucchi, S., Maestripieri, D., & Turillazzi, P. (1988). Allogrooming as tension-reduction mechanism: A behavioural approach. American Journal of Primatology, 16, 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.1350160106
Spaan, D., Burke, C., McAree, O., Aureli, F., Rangel-Rivera, C. E., Hutschenreiter, A., Longmore, S. N., McWhirter, P. R., & Wich, S. A. (2019). Thermal infrared imaging from drones offers a major advance for spider monkey surveys. Drones, 3(2), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones3020034
Stow, D. A., Coulter, L. C., MacDonald, G., Lippitt, C. D., McCreight, R., & Zamora, N. (2016). Evaluation of geometric elements of repeat station imaging and registration. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 82(10), 775–788. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.82.10.775
Stow, D. A., Tsai, Y. -H., Coulter, L. L., & Lippitt, C. D. (2014). Detecting and measuring moving objects with airborne repeat station imaging in rapid succession mode. Remote Sensing Letters, 5(3), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/2150704X.2014.894654
Thiele, S. T., Varley, N., & James, M. R. (2017). Thermal photogrammetric imaging: A new technique for monitoring dome eruptions. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 337, 140–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2017.03.022
USGS. (2017). Agisoft PhotoScan workflow. Retrieved May 2020 https://uas.usgs.gov/nupo/pdf/USGSAgisoftPhotoScanWorkflow.pdf
Vas, E., Lescroël, A., Duriez, O., Boguszewski, G., & Grémillet, D. (2015). Approaching birds with drones: First experiments and ethical guidelines. Biology Letters, 11(2), 20140754. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2014.0754
Webster, C., Westoby, M., Rutter, N., & Jonas, T. (2018). Three-dimensional thermal characterization of forest canopies using UAV photogrammetry. Remote Sensing of Environment, 209, 835–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.09.033
Westoby, M. J., Brasington, J., Glasser, N. F., Hambrey, M. J., & Reynolds, J. M. (2012). Structure-from-motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications. Geomorphology, 179, 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.08.021
Witczuk, J., Pagacz, S., Zmarz, A., & Cypel, M. (2018). Exploring the feasibility of unmanned aerial vehicles and thermal imaging for ungulate surveys in forests—Preliminary results. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39(15–16), 5504–5521. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2017.1390621
Zhang, H., Wang, C., Turvey, S. T., Sun, Z., Tan, Z., Yang, Q., Long, W., Wu, X., & Yang, D. (2020). Thermal infrared imaging from drones can detect individuals and nocturnal behavior of the world’s rarest primate. Global Ecology and Conservation, 23, e01101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01101
Zheng, H., Zhong, X., Yan, J., Zhao, L., & Wang, X. (2020). A thermal performance detection method for building envelope based on 3D model generated by UAV thermal imagery. Energies, 13(24), 6677. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13246677
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under the Dynamics of Coupled Natural and Human Systems program (BCS-1826839). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Support was also provided from the San Diego State University for a research stipend and the Austrian Marshall Plan Foundation for supporting travel and data collection. Ulf Scherling from CUAS for performing the UAV mission at Affenberg. Affenberg Landskron and the manager of the park, Svenja and Peter Gaubatz, and the animal care staff who provided access and support for our surveys over the monkey park.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mirka, B., Stow, D.A., Paulus, G. et al. Evaluation of thermal infrared imaging from uninhabited aerial vehicles for arboreal wildlife surveillance. Environ Monit Assess 194, 512 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10152-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10152-2