Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of land use land cover change on soil erosion potential in an agricultural watershed

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Universal soil loss equation (USLE) was used in conjunction with a geographic information system to determine the influence of land use and land cover change (LUCC) on soil erosion potential of a reservoir catchment during the period 1989 to 2004. Results showed that the mean soil erosion potential of the watershed was increased slightly from 12.11 t ha − 1 year − 1 in the year 1989 to 13.21 t ha − 1 year − 1 in the year 2004. Spatial analysis revealed that the disappearance of forest patches from relatively flat areas, increased in wasteland in steep slope, and intensification of cultivation practice in relatively more erosion-prone soil were the main factors contributing toward the increased soil erosion potential of the watershed during the study period. Results indicated that transition of other land use land cover (LUC) categories to cropland was the most detrimental to watershed in terms of soil loss while forest acted as the most effective barrier to soil loss. A p value of 0.5503 obtained for two-tailed paired t test between the mean erosion potential of microwatersheds in 1989 and 2004 also indicated towards a moderate change in soil erosion potential of the watershed over the studied period. This study revealed that the spatial location of LUC parcels with respect to terrain and associated soil properties should be an important consideration in soil erosion assessment process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asselman, N. E. M., & Middelkoop, H. (1995). Floodplain sedimentation: Quantities, patterns, and processes. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 20, 481–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boers, P. C. M. (1996). Nutrient emissions from agriculture in the Netherlands: Causes and remedies. Water Science and Technology, 33, 183–189.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cebecauer, T., & Hofierka, J. (2008). The consequences of land-cover changes on soil erosion distribution in Slovakia. Geomorphology, 98, 187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Moor, J. J. W., & Verstraeten, G. (2008). Alluvial and colluvial sediment storage in the Geul River catchment (The Netherlands)—combining field and modelling data to construct a Late Holocene sediment budget. Geomorphology, 95, 487–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wit, M. J. M., & Behrendt, H. (1999). Nitrogen and phosphorus emissions from soil to surface water in the Rhine and Elbe basins. Water Science and Technology, 39, 109–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunjo, G., Pardini, G., & Gispert, M. (2004). The role of land use–land cover on runoff generation and sediment yield at a microplot scale, in a small Mediterranean catchment. Journal of Arid Environments, 57, 99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favis-Mortlock, D., & Boardman, J. (1995). Nonlinear responses of soil erosion to climate change: A modelling study on the UK South Downs. Catena, 25, 365–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, G. R., Mc Cool, D. K., Renard, K. G., & Moldenhauer, W. C. (1991). Conversion of the universal soil loss equation to SI metric units. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 36, 356–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobin, A., Kirkby, M., & Govers, G. (2004). Pan-European soil risk assessment. In R. Francaviglia (Ed.), Agricultural impacts on soil erosion and soil biodiversity: Developing indicators for policy analysis (pp. 1–15). Proceedings from an OECD Expert Meeting, Rome, Italy.

  • Houben, P., Hoffmann, T., Zimmermann, A., & Dikau, R. (2006). Land use and climatic impacts on the Rhine system (RheinLUCIFS): Quantifying sediment fluxes and human impact with available data. Catena, 66, 42–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007). Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. In Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, A. (2007). Simulated impacts of climate and land-cover change on soil erosion and implication for the carbon cycle, 1901 to 2100. Geophysical Research Letters, 34, L09403. doi:10.1029/2007GL029342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, A., Reuter, H. I., Nelson, A., & Guevara, E. (2006). Hole-filled seamless SRTM data V3. International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia, U.S.A. Retrieved from http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org.

  • Jordan, G., van Rompaey, A., Szilassi, P., Csillag, G., Mannaerts, C., & Woldai, T. (2005). Historical land use changes and their impact on sediment fluxes in the Balaton basin (Hungary). Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 108, 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martha, M. B., Gerard, G., Anne van, D., Fabien, Q., Dimitris, C., & Mark, R. (2008). The response of soil erosion and sediment export to land-use change in four areas of Europe: The importance of landscape pattern. Geomorphology, 98, 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCool, D. K., Foster, G. R., Mutchler, C. K., & Meyer, L. D. (1987). Revised slope steepness factor for the universal soil loss equation. Transactions of the ASAE, 30, 1387–1396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nearing, M. A., Jetten, V., Baffaut, C., Cerdan, O., Couturier, A., Hernandez, M., et al. (2005). Modeling response of soil erosion and runoff to changes in precipitation and cover. Catena, 61, 131–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neil Munro, R., Deckers, J., Haile, M., Grove, A. T., Poesen, J., & Nyssen, J. (2008). Soil landscapes, land cover change and erosion features of the Central Plateau region of Tigrai, Ethiopia: Photo-monitoring with an interval of 30 years. Catena, 75, 55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piccarreta, M., Capolongo, D., Boenzi, F., & Bentivenga, M. (2006). Implications of decadal changes in precipitation and land use policy to soil erosion in Basilicata, Italy. Catena, 65, 138–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruski, F. F., & Nearing, M. A. (2002). Runoff and soil loss responses to changes in precipitation: A computer simulation study. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 57, 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renard, K. G., Foster, G. R., Weesies, G. A., McCool, D. K., & Yode, D. C. (1997). Predicting soil erosion by water: A guide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation. Agriculture handbook no. 703. Washington: US Department of Agriculture.

  • Richards, K., Brasington, J., & Hughes, F. (2002) Geomorphic dynamics of floodplains: Ecological implications and a potential modelling strategy. Freshwater Biology, 47, 559–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, G., Babu, R., Narayan, P., Bhushan, L. S., & Abrol, I. P. (1992). Soil erosion rates in India. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 47, 97–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siyuan, W., Jingshi, L., & Cunjian, Y. (2007). Temporal change in the landscape erosion pattern in the Yellow River Basin, China. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21, 1077–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szilassi, P., Jordan, G., Rompaey, A., & Csillag, G. (2008). Impacts of historical land use changes on erosion and agricultural soil properties in the Kali Basin at Lake Balaton, Hungary. Catena, 68, 96–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toy, J. T., Foster, G. R., & Renard, K. G. (2002). Soil erosion. Processes, prediction, measurement, and control. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rompaey, A., Bazzoffi, P., Jones, R. J. A., & Montanarella, L. (2005). Modeling sediment yields in Italian catchments. Geomorphology, 65, 157–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verstraeten, G., & Poesen, J. (1999). The nature of small-scale flooding, muddy floods and retention pond sedimentation in central Belgium. Geomorphology, 29, 275–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verstraeten, G., & Poesen, J. (2002). Regional scale variability in sediment and nutrient delivery from small agricultural watersheds. Journal of Environmental Quality, 31, 870–879.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verstraeten, G., Van Oost, K., Van Rompaey, A., Poesen, J., & Govers, G. (2002). Evaluating an integrated approach to catchment management to reduce soil loss and sediment pollution through modelling. Soil Use and Management, 19, 386–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D., Kanae, S., Oki, T., Koike, T., & Musiake, K. (2003). Global potential soil erosion with reference to land use and climate changes. Hydrological Processes, 17, 2913–2928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier, W. H. (1959). A rainfall erosivity index for a universal soil loss equation. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 23, 246–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Civil Engineering Department, MM University, Mullana, 133203, Haryana, India

    Arabinda Sharma

  2. Agricultural and Food Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, 721302, India

    Kamlesh N. Tiwari & P. B. S. Bhadoria

Authors
  1. Arabinda Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kamlesh N. Tiwari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. B. S. Bhadoria
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arabinda Sharma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharma, A., Tiwari, K.N. & Bhadoria, P.B.S. Effect of land use land cover change on soil erosion potential in an agricultural watershed. Environ Monit Assess 173, 789–801 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1423-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1423-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation