Skip to main content
Log in

Performance Evaluation of Multi-Object Auctions

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper evaluates the performance of two multi-object auction models: sequential and simultaneous, using different performance measures. The objects put up for auction have different synergies for different bidders. We define different types of bidders who can exist in these multi-object auction models. The classification of bidders is based on the bidding strategies they use. We then study the effects of different parameters in auction and bidding strategies, on the performance of these auction models by simulating them using a JAVA based framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boutilier, C., M. Goldszmidt, and B. Sabata. (1999). “Sequential Auctions for the Allocation of Resources with complementarities.” International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence.

  2. Cramton, C.P. (1995). “Money Out of Thin Air: The Nationwide Narrowband PCS Auction.” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 4, 267–343.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hausch, D.B. (1986). “Multi-Object Auctions: Sequential vs. Simultaneous Sales.” Management Science 32, 1599–1610.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kephart, J.O., J.E. Hanson, and A. R. Greenwald. (2000). “Dynamic Pricing by Software Agents.” Computer Networks 32(6), 731–752.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Krishna, V. and R.W. Rosenthal. (1996). “Simultaneous Auctions with Synergies.” Games and Economic Behavior 17, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Krishna, V. and J. Benoit. (2001). “Multiple Object Auctions with Budget Constrained Bidders.” Review of Economic Studies 68(1), 155–179.

    Google Scholar 

  7. McAfee, R.P. and J. McMillan. (1987). “Auctions and Bidding.” Journal of Economic Literature 25, 699–738.

    Google Scholar 

  8. McMillan, J. (1994). “Selling Spectrum Rights.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 8, 145–162.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Milgrom, P.R. and R.J. Weber. (1982). “A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding.” Econometrica 50(5), 1089–1122.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rassenti, S.J., V.L. Smith, and R.L. Bulfin. (1982). “A Combinatorial Auction Mechanism for Airport Time Slot Allocation.” The Rand Journal of Economics 13, 402–417.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rothkopf, H.M., A. Pekec, and M.R. Harstad. (1998). “Computationally Manageable Combinatorial Auctions.” Management Science 44(8), 1131–1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rothkopf, M.H. and R.M. Harstad. (1994). “On the Role of Discrete Bid Levels in Oral Auctions.” European Journal of Operations Research 74, 572–581.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sandholm, T. (1999). “An Algorithm for Optimal Winner Determination in Combinatorial Auctions.” International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 542–547.

  14. Sawhney, M. and S. Kaplan. (2000). “E-Hubs: The New B-to-B Marketplaces.” Harvard Business Review, May–June 2000.

  15. Vickery, W. (1961). “Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders.” Journal of Finance, March 16(1), 8–37.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wurman, P.R., M.P. Wellman, and W.E. Walsh. (2001). “A Parametrization of the Auction Design Space.” Games and Economic Behavior 35(1/2), 304–338.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dharmaraj Veeramani.

Additional information

This material is based upon work supported by a National Science Foundation grant (DMI 9800449) to the Dharmaraj Veeramani last author. The authors also thank the referees of the paper and the area editors for their valuable comments on the work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mishra, D., Reddy, S.S. & Veeramani, D. Performance Evaluation of Multi-Object Auctions. Electron Commerce Res 5, 293–307 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-005-6160-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-005-6160-5

Keywords

Navigation